Westwood Premkumar Aff
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contact Info | Finals | You | IDK |
|
| ||
| Glenbrooks | 1 | Lexington AA | Abishek Stanley |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Glenbrooks | 1 | Opponent: Lexington AA | Judge: Abishek Stanley 1AC UK |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
Contact InfoTournament: Contact Info | Round: Finals | Opponent: You | Judge: IDK | 11/19/21 |
ND - 1AC UKTournament: Glenbrooks | Round: 3 | Opponent: Peninsula CS | Judge: Lauren Woodall | 11/21/21 |
ND - 1AC UK v1Tournament: Glenbrooks | Round: 1 | Opponent: Lexington AA | Judge: Abishek Stanley 1AC1AC – FrameworkThe standard is minimizing material violence.Prefer: ~1~ Pleasure and pain are intrinsic value and disvalueBlum et al. 18Kenneth Blum, 1Department of Psychiatry, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton VA Medical Center, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, USA 2Department of Psychiatry, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA 3Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Keck Medicine University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA 4Division of Applied Clinical Research and Education, Dominion Diagnostics, LLC, North Kingstown, RI, USA 5Department of Precision Medicine, Geneus Health LLC, San Antonio, TX, USA 6Department of Addiction Research and Therapy, Nupathways Inc., Innsbrook, MO, USA 7Department of Clinical Neurology, Path Foundation, New York, NY, USA 8Division of Neuroscience-Based Addiction Therapy, The Shores Treatment and Recovery Center, Port Saint Lucie, FL, USA 9Institute of Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary 10Division of Addiction Research, Dominion Diagnostics, LLC. North Kingston, RI, USA 11Victory Nutrition International, Lederach, PA., USA 12National Human Genome Center at Howard University, Washington, DC., USA, Marjorie Gondré-Lewis, 12National Human Genome Center at Howard University, Washington, DC., USA 13Departments of Anatomy and Psychiatry, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC US, Bruce Steinberg, 4Division of Applied Clinical Research and Education, Dominion Diagnostics, LLC, North Kingstown, RI, USA, Igor Elman, 15Department Psychiatry, Cooper University School of Medicine, Camden, NJ, USA, David Baron, 3Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Keck Medicine University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA, Edward J Modestino, 14Department of Psychology, Curry College, Milton, MA, USA, Rajendra D Badgaiyan, 15Department Psychiatry, Cooper University School of Medicine, Camden, NJ, USA, Mark S Gold 16Department of Psychiatry, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA, "Our evolved unique pleasure circuit makes humans different from apes: Reconsideration of data derived from animal studies", U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 28 February 2018, accessed: 19 August 2020, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6446569/, R.S. ~2~ Actor Spec— States must use util. Any other standard dooms the moral theoryGoodin 90.Robert Goodin 90, ~professor of philosophy at the Australian National University college of arts and social sciences~, "The Utilitarian Response," pgs 141-142 RS My larger argument turns on the proposition that there is something special about the situation of public officials that makes utilitarianism more probable for them than private individuals. Before proceeding with the large argument, I must therefore say what it is that makes it so special about public officials and their situations that make it both more necessary and more desirable for them to adopt a more credible form of utilitarianism. Consider, first, the argument from necessity. Public officials are obliged to make their choices under uncertainty, and uncertainty of a very special sort at that. All choices – public and private alike – are made under some degree of uncertainty, of course. But in the nature of things, private individuals will usually have more complete information on the peculiarities of their own circumstances and on the ramifications that alternative possible choices might have for them. Public officials, in contrast, are relatively poorly informed as to the effects that their choices will have on individuals, one by one. What they typically do know are generalities: averages and aggregates. They know what will happen most often to most people as a result of their various possible choices, but that is all. That is enough to allow public policy-makers to use the utilitarian calculus – assuming they want to use it at all – to choose general rules or conduct.3~ No act-omission distinction—governments are responsible for everything in the public sphere so inaction is implicit authorization of action: they have to yes/no bills, which means everything collapse to aggregation.4~ Extinction comes first!Pummer 15 ~Theron, Junior Research Fellow in Philosophy at St. Anne's College, University of Oxford. "Moral Agreement on Saving the World" Practical Ethics, University of Oxford. May 18, 2015~ AT 1AC – Advantage – Climate ChangeLack of a "right to strike" means the UK makes it near impossible for workers to climate strike.====Aspinall '19====
Collective action incentivizes policy change, but status quo sustains science as usual which embraces climate skep.Green '19~Matthew, Reuters Journalist, "Scientists endorse mass civil disobedience to force climate action", 10-12-2019, Reuters, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-climate-change-scientists/scientists-endorse-mass-civil-disobedience-to-force-climate-action-idUSKBN1WS01K~~//pranav Climate strikes spill over and cause corporate policy change – empirically proven in tech – that bypasses politicians and avoids legal disputes.Ghaffary '19 ~Shirin Ghaffary, 9-20-2019, "Here's why the Amazon climate walkout is a big deal," Vox, https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/9/20/20874497/amazon-climate-change-walkout-google-microsoft-strike-tech-activism~~//pranav Warming causes extinction and turns every impact – no adaptation and each degree is worseKrosofsky '21 ~Andrew, Green Matters Journalist, "How Global Warming May Eventually Lead to Global Extinction", Green Matters, 03-11-2021, https://www.greenmatters.com/p/will-global-warming-cause-extinction~~//pranav 1AC – Advantage - DemocracyUK democracy is declining right now – Johnson's levelling up agenda is a disguise for masking dissent====Macfarlane 5/12 ==== Strikes are the internal link to uphold democracy – empirics prove====Pope 18==== Climate strikes are a form of environmental, civil mobilization that creates the emergence of a democratic impetus legitimizing democracy and reform====Szolucha 20==== Democracy solves climate change but we need an increase in pace of action====Casas-Zamora 21==== The alternative to democracy is violent civil wars, ethnic cleansing, and genocide—-the best research confirms====Cortright 13==== 1AC – Solvency – PlanThus the plan – The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland should recognize an unconditional right for workers to strike.====Clarion 19==== Coordinated civic engagement and strikes is key to comprehensive climate action globally.====Fisher and Nasrin 20==== UK seeking climate leadership now, and climate reform gets modeled by other T15 fossel fuel financiers====LaFortune 10/29====
Climate strikes spur business and government climate reform – ambitions are high, but sustained strikes are key====Diggle '19====
1AC – MethodEngagement with climate debates develops understanding of continuous climate evolution – current climate curriculum bad- we epistemologically straight turn ground level clean tech movements pragmatically necessary to solve climate.Mehling et al. '20 ~Michael, Deputy Director, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEPR), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, USA; Professor of Practice, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK. (mmehling@mit.edu) Harro van Asselt, Professor of Climate Law and Policy, Centre for Climate Change, Energy and Environmental Law (CCEEL), University of Eastern Finland Law School, Joensuu, Finland. Kati Kulovesi, Professor of International Law, Centre for Climate Change, Energy and Environmental Law (CCEEL), University of Eastern Finland Law School, Joensuu, Finland. Elisa Morgera, Professor of Global Environmental Law, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK, "Teaching Climate Law: Trends, Methods and Outlook", Journal of Environmental Law, https://advance.lexis.com/api/document?collection=analytical-materialsandid=urn:contentItem:62H0-BSY1-JFSV-G3J9-00000-00andcontext=1516831, 11/1/2020, LexisNexis, NDawson~ 1AC – Underview~1~ 1AR theory –A. AFF gets it because otherwise the neg can engage in infinite abuse, making debate impossible.B. Drop the debater – the short 1AR irreparably skewed from abuse on substance and time investment on theory.C. No RVIs – the 6-minute 2nr can collapse to a short shell and get away with infinite 1nc abuse via sheer brute force and time spent on theory.D. No new 2NR theory, paradigm issues, or recontextualizations – allows them to spam frivolous shells in the 2NR and prove why theirs outweighs which gives them a 6-3 structural skew where they can always win on uplayering or outspreading | 11/20/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
11/20/21 | prithiv2047@gmailcom |
|