Village Blenda Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple Valley | 2 | Monta Vista AK | Meza, Jonathan |
|
|
| |
| Apple Valley | 3 | San Mateo YR | Smith, Collin |
|
|
| |
| Apple Valley | 5 | Scarsdale KS | Melin, Eric |
|
|
| |
| Apple Valley | Doubles | Evergreen Valley Independent SS | Panel |
|
|
| |
| Barkley Forum for High Schools | 2 | American Heritage Broward SS | McGinnis, David |
|
|
| |
| Holy Cross | 2 | Russellville HS ForensicsDebate BC | Etienne, Fabrice |
|
|
| |
| Holy Cross | 4 | Kenston EJ | Navarrete, Javier |
|
|
| |
| Holy Cross | 5 | Strake Jesuit JK |
|
|
| ||
| Laputa Castle in the Sky | Finals | Muska | Dola |
|
|
| |
| Newark Invitational | 3 | Lexington AM | Siegal, Zach |
|
|
| |
| Newark Invitational | 5 | Harrison TB | Vennelakanti, Vishnu |
|
|
| |
| Newark Invitational | Quarters | Peninsula CS | Panel |
|
|
| |
| Newark Invitational | 1 | Lexington AR | Jeong, Jonathan |
|
|
| |
| Peninsula Invitational | 4 | McNeil AG | Alvarez, Diana |
|
|
| |
| Peninsula Invitational | 1 | Mountain View EN | Krause, Lukas |
|
|
| |
| Yale | 3 | Charlotte Country Day AC | Kivimaki, Mark |
|
|
| |
| Yale | 5 | Olympia BO | Fees, Bennett |
|
|
| |
| Yale | Octas | Strake Jesuit JW | Panel |
|
|
| |
| Yale | 2 | Colonial Forge SR | Smith, Aeryn |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Valley | 2 | Opponent: Monta Vista AK | Judge: Meza, Jonathan Stock AC |
| Apple Valley | 3 | Opponent: San Mateo YR | Judge: Smith, Collin China AC |
| Apple Valley | 5 | Opponent: Scarsdale KS | Judge: Melin, Eric Jaeggi AC |
| Apple Valley | Doubles | Opponent: Evergreen Valley Independent SS | Judge: Panel Impossible Demands AC |
| Barkley Forum for High Schools | 2 | Opponent: American Heritage Broward SS | Judge: McGinnis, David 1ac kant |
| Holy Cross | 2 | Opponent: Russellville HS ForensicsDebate BC | Judge: Etienne, Fabrice trad 1ac |
| Holy Cross | 4 | Opponent: Kenston EJ | Judge: Navarrete, Javier Trad 1ac |
| Holy Cross | 5 | Opponent: Strake Jesuit JK | Judge: Kant 1ac |
| Laputa Castle in the Sky | Finals | Opponent: Muska | Judge: Dola Go watch it its my favorite movie |
| Newark Invitational | 3 | Opponent: Lexington AM | Judge: Siegal, Zach Cap K Aff |
| Newark Invitational | 5 | Opponent: Harrison TB | Judge: Vennelakanti, Vishnu very lay |
| Newark Invitational | Quarters | Opponent: Peninsula CS | Judge: Panel Cosmo Colonialism AC |
| Newark Invitational | 1 | Opponent: Lexington AR | Judge: Jeong, Jonathan 1AC Disability Pess |
| Peninsula Invitational | 4 | Opponent: McNeil AG | Judge: Alvarez, Diana 1ac militarism |
| Peninsula Invitational | 1 | Opponent: Mountain View EN | Judge: Krause, Lukas 1ac Cap Aff |
| Yale | 3 | Opponent: Charlotte Country Day AC | Judge: Kivimaki, Mark Trad Aff |
| Yale | 5 | Opponent: Olympia BO | Judge: Fees, Bennett Evergreening AC |
| Yale | Octas | Opponent: Strake Jesuit JW | Judge: Panel Pandemic AC |
| Yale | 2 | Opponent: Colonial Forge SR | Judge: Smith, Aeryn Trad larpy aff |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - Important InformationTournament: Laputa Castle in the Sky | Round: Finals | Opponent: Muska | Judge: Dola You can reach me via (order from most to least likely to see) Please message me if you are going to read something concerning suicide or sexual assault SeptOct Set Col K v1 AND V2 - cites wont disclose for some reason but its open-sourced, dm if you want the cites, the wiki is being a settler rn | 9/19/21 |
Generics - Kant AbleistTournament: Holy Cross | Round: 5 | Opponent: Strake Jesuit JK | Judge: Kantianism is actively ableist – excludes those who are cognitively impaired.Ryan 11 – (Philosophy Student on "Cognitive Disability, Misfortunate, and Justice"; http://parenethical.com/phil140win11/2011/01/17/group-3-cognitive-disability-misfortune-and-justice-deontology-ryan/) AND this space unsafe – accessibility is a pre-requisite to any benefit. That’s a voting issue and outweighs all other offense – A) Perpetuates discursive violence, B) Justifies out-of-round violence, C) Makes this space unsafe – accessibility is a pre-requisite to any benefit. | 9/25/21 |
Generics - MisdisclosureTournament: Newark Invitational | Round: 3 | Opponent: Lexington AM | Judge: Siegal, Zach interp: debaters when asked must disclose the affirmative open source 30 minutes before the debate AND when the debaters have disclosed the aff, must not change itVio: (screenshot)1~ shiftiness - this practice allows debaters to shift from advocacies and KILLS pre-round prep - THEY LITERALLY WENT CAP K LARP AFF CAP K - I had to redo my NC 3 separate times its ridiculous - tech issues don’t matter because you ALWAYS had access to the UTIL aff which means you couldv’e read it and fixed tech issues outside of round2~ clash - giving me the aff 10 MINUTES BEFORE ROUND kills any in-round clash, pre round prep is key to engage in substantive issues in the debate which means you don’t get to weigh the aff vs this shell - its a proceduralFairness – debate is a competitive activity that requires fairness for objective evaluation. Education’s a voter – terminal impact of debateDrop the debater – a~ deter future abuse and b~ set better norms for debate.Competing interps – ~a~ reasonability is arbitrary and encourages judge intervention since there’s no clear norm, ~b~ it creates a race to the top where we create the best possible norms for debate.No RVIs – a~ illogical, you don’t win for proving that you meet the burden of being fair, logic outweighs since it’s a prerequisite for evaluating any other argument, b~ RVIs incentivize baiting theory and prepping it out which leads to maximally abusive practices | 1/8/22 |
Generics - New Affs BadTournament: Barkley Forum for High Schools | Round: 2 | Opponent: American Heritage Broward SS | Judge: McGinnis, David 1Interpretation: The aff must disclose the plan text and framing before the round. To clarify, disclosure can occur on the wiki or over message.
| 1/28/22 |
Generics - UtilTournament: Newark Invitational | Round: 3 | Opponent: Lexington AM | Judge: Siegal, Zach The standard is maximizing expected well-being – to clarify, saving lives. Calc indicts don’t link—my framework evaluates offense—pandemics is bad because as far as we know, it would cause suffering.1~ Death outweighs— A~ Agents can’t act if they fear for their bodily security—my framework constrains every NC and K and B~ It’s the worst form of evil:Paterson 3 – Department of Philosophy, Providence College, Rhode Island (Craig, "A Life Not Worth Living?", Studies in Christian Ethics. AND the person, the very source and condition of all human possibility.82 2~ Actor spec—governments must use util because they don’t have intentions and are constantly dealing with tradeoffs—outweighs since different agents have different obligations—takes out calc indicts since they are empirically denied.3~ No intent-foresight distinction for states.Enoch 07 Enoch, D ~The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew Unviersity, Mount Scopus Campus, Jersusalem~. (2007). INTENDING, FORESEEING, AND THE STATE. Legal Theory, 13(02). doi:10.1017/s1352325207070048 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/legal-theory/article/intending-foreseeing-and-the-state/76B18896B94D5490ED0512D8E8DC54B2 AND against the intending-foreseeing distinction when applied to state action than elsewhere. 4~ Only consequentialism explains degrees of wrongness—if I break a promise to meet up for lunch, that is not as bad as breaking a promise to take a dying person to the hospital. Only the consequences of breaking the promise explain why the second one is much worse than the first which is the most intuitive.Outweighs- A~ Parsimony- metaphysics relies on long chains of questionable claims that make conclusions less likely. B~ Hijacks- intuitions are inevitable since even every framework must take some unjustified assumption as a starting point.Impact calc –1~ Extinction outweighs: A~ Reversibility- it forecloses the alternative because we can’t improve society if we are all dead B~ Structural violence- death causes suffering because people can’t get access to resources and basic necessities C~ Objectivity- body count is the most objective way to calculate impacts because comparing suffering is unethical D~ Uncertainty- if we’re unsure about which interpretation of the world is true, we should preserve the world to keep debating about it2~ Calc indicts fail: A~ Ethics- it would indict everything since they use events to understand how their ethics have worked B~ Reciprocity- they are NIBs that create a 2:1 skew where I have to answer them to access offense while they only have to win one C~ Internalism- asking why we value pain and pleasure is nonsensical cuz the answer is intrinsic since we just do, which means we still prefer hedonism despite shortcomings. | 1/8/22 |
Generics - UtilTournament: Barkley Forum for High Schools | Round: 2 | Opponent: American Heritage Broward SS | Judge: McGinnis, David The standard is maximizing expected wellbeing.1~ No intent foresight distinction for states – governments must use util because they don’t have intentions and are constantly dealing with tradeoffs—outweighs since different agents have different obligations—takes out calc indicts since they are empirically denied.Enoch 07 Enoch, D ~The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew Unviersity, Mount Scopus Campus, Jersusalem~. (2007). INTENDING, FORESEEING, AND THE STATE. Legal Theory, 13(02). doi:10.1017/s1352325207070048 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/legal-theory/article/intending-foreseeing-and-the-state/76B18896B94D5490ED0512D8E8DC54B2 AND against the intending-foreseeing distinction when applied to state action than elsewhere. 2~ Only pleasure and pain are intrinsically valuable – all other frameworks collapse.Moen 16 ~Ole Martin Moen, Research Fellow in Philosophy at University of Oslo "An Argument for Hedonism" Journal of Value Inquiry (Springer), 50 (2) 2016: 267–281~ TDI AND places where we reach the end of the line in matters of value. 3~ Death is bad and outweighs – a~ agents can’t act if they fear for their bodily security which constrains every ethical theory, b~ it destroys the subject itself – kills any ability to achieve value in ethics since life is a prerequisite which means it’s a side constraint since we can’t reach the end goal of ethics without life4~ Extinction outweighsMacAskill 14 ~William, Oxford Philosopher and youngest tenured philosopher in the world, Normative Uncertainty, 2014~ AND with the benefit of keeping one’s options open while one gains new information. 5~ Reject calc indicts:A~ Empirically denied—both individuals and policymakers carry out effective cost-benefit analysis which means even if decisions aren’t always perfect it’s still better than not acting at allB~ Theory—they’re functionally NIBs that everyone knows are silly but skew the aff and move the debate away from the topic and actual philosophical debate, killing valuable education | 1/28/22 |
JanFeb - Cap K V1Tournament: Newark Invitational | Round: 1 | Opponent: Lexington AR | Judge: Jeong, Jonathan Capitalism is approaching its limits – global warming, rampant inequality, populism, and social control ensure that this crisis will be our last, and so we come to a crossroads – fascism or communism. Absent mass movement building, neofascist leaders and the transnational capitalist elite will lead us to our doom, overproducing and overconsuming until the very end. There is no time to wait – our future depends on taking advantage of this crisis to seize the means of production and win the world back.Robinson 16 – William I. Robinson is distinguished professor of sociology, global studies and Latin American studies at the University of California at Santa Barbara. AND just distribution of wealth and power. Our survival may depend on it. The aff’s politics cede the universal in favor of local, fragmented knowledge – this surrenders the ability to define the future to neoliberal hegemony – the universal is not inherently oppressive, but it will be under unfettered capitalism.Hester 17 ~Helen Hester, Associate Professor of Media and Communication at the University of West London, "Promethean Labors and Domestic Realism," 09/25/17, Artifical Labor, http://www.e-flux.com/architecture/artificial-labor/140680/promethean-labors-and-domestic-realism/ rvs, RC EA~ AND left—and indeed, to gather momentum and popular support more broadly. Fantasies of disabled bodies as inherently resistant to capitalism mystifies how disability becomes a site of value extraction and papers over Western privilege.Puar ‘17 AND /developed nations and the disarray of the rest/developing nations. / This debate is about revolutionary political strategy ¬– we must recognize that left organizing is failing and commit to base building via dual power. By showing the masses that another world is possible, the alternative builds a mass movement capable of challenging capital – but base building is not enough. You should affirm the form of the party – only organizational structure can ensure accountability, correct chauvinism, and generate revolutionary militancy to struggle for communism. Dare to dream for a better world – join the party.Escalante 18 – Alyson Escalante is a Marxist, Material Feminist, and has a Masters in Philosophy from the University of Oregon AND debates will be crucial to ensuring that this rapidly growing movement can succeed. ====Extinction is a unique ontological phenomenon that outweighs under every ethical theory.==== AND which undermines the conditions of plurality that enables life on Earth to thrive. | 1/22/22 |
JanFeb - Set Col K V1Tournament: Newark Invitational | Round: Quarters | Opponent: Peninsula CS | Judge: Panel | 1/10/22 |
JanFeb - Set Col K V3Tournament: Peninsula Invitational | Round: 1 | Opponent: Mountain View EN | Judge: Krause, Lukas | 1/28/22 |
JanFeb - T-FWTournament: Newark Invitational | Round: 1 | Opponent: Lexington AR | Judge: Jeong, Jonathan Our interpretation is that the negative should not be burdened with rejoinder against AFFs that defend anything other than the desirability of a topical action.Resolved means to enact a policy by law.Words and Phrases ’64 (Words and Phrases; 1964; Permanent Edition) AND ," which is defined by Bouvier as meaning "to establish by law". At best they are extra-topical – that’s still a voting issue because it allows the affirmative to say anything remotely connected to spaceVote negative for predictable limits—-allowing the affirmative to pick any grounds for the debate makes negative engagement impossible by skirting a predictable starting point, which makes all our preparation and research useless.Two impacts—-1—-Fairness—-a predictable limit is the only way to give the neg a chance—-radical aff choice shifts the grounds for the debate and puts the aff far ahead. Pre-tournament negative preparation is structured around topical plans as points of offense, which means anything else structurally favors the aff.That’s an intrinsic good—-debate is a game and requires effective competition between the aff and the neg—-the only way for any benefit to be produced from debate is if the judge can make a decision between two sides who have had a relatively equal chance to prepare for a common point of debate.2—- Clash—-debates over a stasis point incentivize argumentative refinement and self-questioning. Defending our position against a well-prepared opponent is key—-it makes us more persuasive, informed, and forces us to adjust our position to become more effective advocates.Topical version of the aff – literally just the aff minus all the stuff that isn’t covered by the resolutionCompeting interps – anything else invites judge intervention absent a clear brightline and this will be a debate about models of debate – if you have no idea what debates would look like in the world of the aff you should vote negative.Drop the debater – the entirety of the aff is being criticized which means drop the argument is incoherent. | 1/22/22 |
Janfeb - Innovation DATournament: Barkley Forum for High Schools | Round: 2 | Opponent: American Heritage Broward SS | Judge: McGinnis, David Space Commercialization drives Tech Innovation in the Status Quo – it provides a unique impetus.Hampson 17 Joshua Hampson 1-25-2017 "The Future of Space Commercialization" https://republicans-science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/documents/TheFutureofSpaceCommercializationFinal.pdf (Security Studies Fellow at the Niskanen Center)Elmer AND to global networks, and new opportunities could lead to wider economic growth. Strong Innovation solves Extinction.Matthews 18 Dylan Matthews 10-26-2018 "How to help people millions of years from now" https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2018/10/26/18023366/far-future-effective-altruism-existential-risk-doing-good (Co-founder of Vox, citing Nick Beckstead @ Rutgers University)Re-cut by Elmer AND far future, then effective altruism just becomes plain ol’ do-goodery. | 1/28/22 |
Janfeb - Set Col K V2Tournament: Newark Invitational | Round: Semis | Opponent: Peninsula RM | Judge: Panel | 1/10/22 |
Janfeb - Set Col K V4Tournament: Barkley Forum for High Schools | Round: 2 | Opponent: American Heritage Broward SS | Judge: McGinnis, David The coherence of the Western subject is formulated in opposition to the native – this death drive towards elimination structures settler futurity via the libidinal economy and its investments in native suffering because the native is the quilting point of settler subject formation.Young 17 – BH Young is a doctoral student at the University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill, studying Philosophy AND imagine colonial forms, not only of life, but also of death. The ethical dilemmas of settler civil society can only cohere themselves through the genocide of the Native – the grammars of suffering that shape Settler ontology are fundamentally incompatible with Native grammars because the grammars of the Settler are only possible via genocide.Wilderson 10 – Frank B Wilderson III is an American writer, dramatist, filmmaker and critic. He is a full professor of drama and African American studies at the University of California, Irvine AND run out of people long before it ran out of compensatory obligation."21 Their philosophy is built on genocide and exploitation of native bodies – metaphysical dualisms justify and inform settler colonialism by creating distinctions between the rational and irrational subject – this justifies colonialism because we will win indigenous people are never seen as rational subjects – they will be unable to answer how their framework binds settlers to treat indigenous people as agents which means you vote negative.Sartwell 19 - Crispin Sartwell is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Dickinson College in Carlisle, PA. His books include Act Like You Know: African American Autobiography and White Identity (Chicago, 1998) and Entanglements: A System of Philosophy (SUNY, 2017). His essays and reviews have appeared in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Times Literary Supplement, and the Atlantic, among other venues. AND . And its social applications have been self-serving and profoundly oppressive. Settler subjectivity is inevitably concerned with the construction of a smooth wholeness – a coherent imago, which the settler constructs through disidentification with the violence of their origins. The alternative is reidentification – this is an iterative process that requires the refusal and disruption of settler spaces of coherence – you should refuse the research project of the affirmative as a method of subject formation.Henderson 15 – Phil Henderson is a professor of political science at the University of Victoria AND , Idle No More put the settler subject into serious flux once more. | 1/28/22 |
NovDec - Baedan K V1Tournament: Apple Valley | Round: 2 | Opponent: Monta Vista AK | Judge: Meza, Jonathan | 11/17/21 |
NovDec - Baedan K V2Tournament: Apple Valley | Round: 5 | Opponent: Scarsdale KS | Judge: Melin, Eric | 11/17/21 |
NovDec - Hong Kong DATournament: Apple Valley | Round: 3 | Opponent: San Mateo YR | Judge: Smith, Collin | 11/17/21 |
NovDec - South Africa DATournament: Apple Valley | Round: 2 | Opponent: Monta Vista AK | Judge: Meza, Jonathan | 11/17/21 |
NovDec - T-Aff Gov Spec BadTournament: Apple Valley | Round: 3 | Opponent: San Mateo YR | Judge: Smith, Collin
| 11/17/21 |
NovDec - T-Just GovTournament: Apple Valley | Round: 3 | Opponent: San Mateo YR | Judge: Smith, Collin | 11/17/21 |
NovDec - T-Spec A GovTournament: Apple Valley | Round: 5 | Opponent: Scarsdale KS | Judge: Melin, Eric
| 11/17/21 |
SeptOct - Baedan KTournament: Yale | Round: Octas | Opponent: Strake Jesuit JW | Judge: Panel 1Industrialized medicine acts as a vector of domestication in order to inscribe gender onto flesh – creating an infinite violence that emerges from the privatization of careBaedan 14 AND for enforcing private property, enforcement of discipline, and policing of sexuality. The aff’s push for limited IP waivers envisions a world for the child that always leaves the kweer behind. Saving the child, saving the future inherently reproduce antikweer violence by attempting to eliminate or assimilate that which is a threat to society itself. They make the same mistake as all political organizations - they build the social order in order to solve a lack present inherently within it, unknowingly reproducing the harms they aim to solve. No future exists for the kweerbaedan 12 (baedan. "Journal of Queer ~kweer~ Nihilism." The Anarchist Library, 2012, theanarchistlibrary.org/library/baedan-baedan.)VHSRBA bracketed for inclusive language No page numbers its an article AND of resisting enslavement to the future in the name of having a life. The Role of the Judge is to embrace individual resistance to futurism – our bodies have become the playing field upon which reason and ethic is staged in opposition to the desire of our flesh.baedan 12 (baedan. "Journal of Queer Nihilism." The Anarchist Library, 2012, theanarchistlibrary.org/library/baedan-baedan.)LK AND must include the managerial and policing apparatuses which operate in our very being. ====The alternative is to embrace unintelligibility – any dialogue, concession, or identification with or for the state just reproduces the social order and its violence ==== AND offers two options: legitimization and democratic inclusion, or delegitimization and repression. Agential Fantasy DANothing about voting aff actually does anything in the real world, fiat disconnects you from your agency because you’re pretending to be something elsePolson 2012 (Dana Roe Polson, Co-Director, teacher, founder of ConneXions Community Leadership Academy, "Longing for Theory: Performance Debate in Action", http://media.proquest.com/media/pq/classic/doc/2719387941/fmt/ai/rep/NPDF?'s=QsK9GR2Bx6bq2BwLv2BLzDyWm2BcJH83D, RH) Edited for gendered language AND pretend to do something. (Kenneth, interview, p. 19) | 9/19/21 |
SeptOct - Climate Change DATournament: Yale | Round: 2 | Opponent: Colonial Forge SR | Judge: Smith, Aeryn Climate Patents and Innovation high now and solving Warming but patent waivers set a dangerous precedent for appropriations - the mere threat is sufficient is enough to kill investment.Brand 5-26, Melissa. "Trips Ip Waiver Could Establish Dangerous Precedent for Climate Change and Other Biotech Sectors." IPWatchdog.com | Patents and Patent Law, 26 May 2021, www.ipwatchdog.com/2021/05/26/trips-ip-waiver-establish-dangerous-precedent-climate-change-biotech-sectors/id=133964/. sid AND is unlikely they will continue to invest at the current and required levels. Climate change destroys the world.Specktor 19 ~Brandon writes about the science of everyday life for Live Science, and previously for Reader's Digest magazine, where he served as an editor for five years~ 6-4-2019, "Human Civilization Will Crumble by 2050 If We Don't Stop Climate Change Now, New Paper Claims," livescience, https://www.livescience.com/65633-climate-change-dooms-humans-by-2050.html Justin AND and perhaps "the end of human global civilization as we know it." | 9/25/21 |
SeptOct - Modi DATournament: Yale | Round: 2 | Opponent: Colonial Forge SR | Judge: Smith, Aeryn India’s COVID crisis has killed Modi’s appetite for international adventurism, but increasing vaccine production reverses the trend.Singh ’21 (Sushant; senior fellow with the Centre for Policy Research in India; 5-3-2021; "The End of Modi’s Global Dreams"; Foreign Policy; https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/05/03/india-vishwaguru-modi-second-wave-soft-power-self-sufficiency/; Accessed: 8-27-2021) AND proposition for India—and hands Pakistan an unexpected advantage in the talks. ====Revitalized risk-taking risks Indo-Pak confrontations – those go nuclear.==== AND life and marine plankton, with the spillover effect of decimating fishing yields. | 9/25/21 |
SeptOct - Nebel TTournament: Holy Cross | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kenston EJ | Judge: Navarrete, Javier Interpretation: "medicines" is a generic bare plural. The aff may not defend that member nations of the World Trade Organization ought to reduce intellectual property protections for a medicine or subset of medicines.Nebel 19. ~Jake Nebel is an assistant professor of philosophy at the University of Southern California and executive director of Victory Briefs. He writes a lot of this stuff lol – duh.~ "Genericity on the Standardized Tests Resolution." Vbriefly. August 12, 2019. https://www.vbriefly.com/2019/08/12/genericity-on-the-standardized-tests-resolution/?fbclid=IwAR0hUkKdDzHWrNeqEVI7m59pwsnmqLl490n4uRLQTe7bWmWDO'avWCNzi14 TG AND "colleges and universities" is generic rather than existential in the resolution. Violation: patent renewal and extension on existing drugs, drugs in developing countries, and drugs to treat epidemic or pandemic statusStandards:~1~ precision – the counter-interp justifies them arbitrarily doing away with random words in the resolution which decks negative ground and preparation because the aff is no longer bounded by the resolution. Independent voter for jurisdiction – the judge doesn’t have the jurisdiction to vote aff if there wasn’t a legitimate aff.~2~ Limits and ground – their model allows affs to defend anything from Covid vaccines, HIV drugs, Insulin, antiobiotics, CRISPR, cancer, cannabis— there's no universal DA since each has different functions and political implications — that explodes neg prep and leads to random medicine of the week affs which makes cutting stable neg links impossible — limits key to reciprocal engagement since they create a caselist for neg prep and it takes out ground like DAs to certain medicines which are some of the few neg generics when affs spec medicines.~3~ TVA solves – you could’ve read your plan as an advantage under a whole res advocacy. Potential abuse doesn’t justify in round abuse, and having no prep leads to cheaty word PICs and Process Cps which are net worseFairness – debate is a competitive activity that requires fairness for objective evaluation. Outweighs because it’s the only intrinsic part of debate – all other rules can be debated over but rely on some conception of fairness to be justified.Drop the debater because their advocacy is their argumentCompeting interpretations because reasonability A. encourages judge intervention and B. justifies a race to the bottom. C. reasonability collapses to C/Is since we debate about which interp is most reasonable. D. it’s more educational to have clashing interps. E. There’s no brightlineNo RVI – A) They’ve obviously frontlined our interp B) Deters us from checking abuse C) Logically incoherent – it’s your burdenD) And to avoid epistemological flight from their reps if they go for an rvi you grant me K comes before T so they can’t use it to sever out of their settler advocacy, they should have to justify their scholarship E) this also justifies 1AR shells aren’t Drop the debater.Competing interpretations because reasonability A. encourages judge intervention and B. justifies a race to the bottom. C. reasonability collapses to C/Is since we debate about which interp is most reasonable. D. it’s more educational to have clashing interps. E. There’s no brightlineNo RVI – A) They’ve obviously frontlined our interp B) Deters us from checking abuse C) Logically incoherent – it’s your burden | 9/25/21 |
SeptOct - Set Col K V1Tournament: Yale | Round: 2 | Opponent: Colonial Forge SR | Judge: Smith, Aeryn | 9/25/21 |
SeptOct - Set Col K V2Tournament: Yale | Round: 5 | Opponent: Olympia BO | Judge: Fees, Bennett | 9/19/21 |
SeptOct - Set Col K V3Tournament: Holy Cross | Round: 5 | Opponent: Strake Jesuit JK | Judge: | 9/25/21 |
SeptOct - T-PluralTournament: Yale | Round: 5 | Opponent: Olympia BO | Judge: Fees, Bennett interp - iprInterp – The affirmative must defend member nations reduce more than one Intellectual Property Protections for medicineWordHippo, no date "What does protections mean?," https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-meaning-of-the-word/protections.html Violation n standards====Plural’s more than one==== Vio: only reduce only 1 protection of ip, the one and doneVote neg for limits – aff can pick anything from hundreds of ipp protections and there’s no universal DA since each X has different parameters– it explodes neg prep and leads to random state of the week affs which makes cutting stable neg links impossible – limits key to reciprocal engagement since they create a imbalanced caselist for neg prep – kills small school and new debaters access to debate because prep disparities lock us out of roundsAnd it’s not what they do it’s what they justify, if they win that their aff is good, it justifies any aff that’s consistent with only some words of the resolution turns CI offense.TVA Read the aff defending more then one ipp protectionTVA: Read the aff defending the whole resolution.Vote on accessibility it acts as a prior question to having a debate space and thus debate rounds in the first place.Drop the debater because per advocacy is per argumentCompeting interpretations because reasonability A. encourages judge intervention and B. justifies a race to the bottom. C. reasonability collapses to C/Is since we debate about which interp is most reasonable. D. it’s more educational to have clashing interps. E. There’s no brightlineNo RVI – A) They’ve obviously frontlined our interp B) Deters us from checking abuse C) Logically incoherent – it’s your burdenD) And to avoid epistemological flight from their reps if they go for an rvi you grant me K comes before T so they can’t use it to sever out of their futurist advocacy, they should have to justify their scholarship E) this also justifies 1AR shells aren’t Drop the debater.1. 1AR theory isn’t drop the debater no RVIS otherwise the interp could be negative debater must concede the round, which kills debate. 2. they shouldn’t get drop the debater shells without nc initating theory because it kills substance debate | 9/19/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
11/17/21 | regina_blenda@sthevillageschoolcom |
| |
11/17/21 | regina_blenda@sthevillageschoolcom |
| |
11/17/21 | regina_blenda@sthevillageschoolcom |
| |
11/17/21 | regina_blenda@sthevillageschoolcom |
| |
1/28/22 | regina_blenda@sthevillageschoolcom |
| |
9/24/21 | regina_blenda@sthevillageschoolcom |
| |
9/25/21 | regina_blenda@sthevillageschoolcom |
| |
9/25/21 | regina_blenda@sthevillageschoolcom |
| |
9/19/21 | regina_blenda@sthevillageschoolcom |
| |
1/8/22 | regina_blenda@sthevillageschoolcom |
| |
1/8/22 | regina_blenda@sthevillageschoolcom |
| |
1/10/22 | regina_blenda@sthevillageschoolcom |
| |
1/22/22 | regina_blenda@sthevillageschoolcom |
| |
1/28/22 | regina_blenda@sthevillageschoolcom |
| |
1/28/22 | regina_blenda@sthevillageschoolcom |
| |
9/19/21 | regina_blenda@sthevillageschoolcom |
| |
9/19/21 | regina_blenda@sthevillageschoolcom |
| |
9/19/21 | regina_blenda@sthevillageschoolcom |
| |
9/25/21 | regina_blenda@sthevillageschoolcom |
|