Tournament: life | Round: Finals | Opponent: cishets | Judge: mary nardini
As I sit here in this Starbucks taking advantage of my employee discount that I won't have for long, I've recognized some things that I should probably be clear about.
I'll disclose as much as I'm comfortable with. That will include policy, philosophy, and generally less personal queer K materials. I want to provide a good debate, but I'm also uncomfortable with my more personal arguments being open to the circuit under my school. Don't use disclosure as a way of gatekeeping me from pursuing arguments that allow me to explore my identity and we shouldn't have a problem. That being said, if my case is something that I don't feel comfortable putting on the wiki, CONTACT ME BEFORE ROUND. I'll disclose the full doc 30 minutes before.
I may recut, rework, and reuse people's queer cases on the wiki if I really like it and I feel a passion for the arguments behind it. Your cases might be used! For debaters that are openly not queer, I'll tell you that I plan on recutting it and using it and if that's a problem I'll not do it. For debaters that are wonderful queer voices on the circuit like Cobin, I'll ask permission to do it and I'll also be jealous of you b/c you're cool. For debaters that are openly anti queer, fuck you. Don't run queer kritiks. I'll tell you that I'm going to adapt your case but it's not a conversation. Consider it payback asshole.