Traber Robinson McLoughlin Verma Aff
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSD Camp Tournament | 1 | RatCha VJ | Samantha McLoughlin |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| NSD Camp Tournament | 1 | Opponent: RatCha VJ | Judge: Samantha McLoughlin 1AC - Non-Domination |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - ContactTournament: all | Round: 1 | Opponent: all | Judge: anyone | 7/8/21 |
NSD21 - AC - Civic RepublicanismTournament: NSD Camp Tournament | Round: 1 | Opponent: RatCha VJ | Judge: Samantha McLoughlin 1acFrameworkFreedom is a primary ethical good –1~ In setting an end, every agent must recognize freedom as a necessary good, Gewirth 84 bracketed for grammar and gendered language~Alan Gewirth, () "The Ontological Basis of Natural Law: A Critique and an Alternative" American Journal Of Jurisprudence: Vol. 29: Iss. 1 Article 5, 1984, https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ajj/vol29/iss1/5/, DOA:9-10-2018 WWBW Recut LHP AV~ AND consistency with the material consideration of the generic features and rights of action. 2~ The exercise of practical rationality requires that one regards practical rationality as intrinsically good – that justifies a right to freedom.Wood 07 ~Allen W. Wood, (Stanford University, California) "Kantian Ethics" Cambridge University Press, 2007, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/kantian-ethics/769B8CD9FCC74DB6870189AE1645FAC8, DOA:8-12-2020 WWBW~ AND is an end in itself whether the person is morally good or bad. There are two models of freedom—the non-interference model and the non-domination model. The non-interference model holds that a person’s freedom is violated if they are actually interfered with, while the non-domination model holds that a person’s freedom is violated if someone has the capacity to arbitrarily interfere in their life. Only the non-domination model can ground legitimate state interference and cohere with intuitions about freedom. Pettit 12:Philip Pettit, "Legitimacy and Justice in Republican Perspective" Current Legal Problems, 2012 RE Recut LHP AV AND , I turn to a consideration of this challenge in the final section. Thus, the standard is consistency with freedom as non-domination, defined as establishing institutional constraints that eliminate the capacity for arbitrary interference.Impact calc – power can be exercised non-arbitrarily insofar as those interfered with have control over domination, Pettit 2:Pettit P. Freedom in the market. Politics, Philosophy and Economics. 2006;5(2):131-149. doi:10.1177/1470594X06064218 LHP AV Accessed 7/4/21 AND , but under the republican approach it will not take such freedom away. Prefer –1~ Discourse – Any genuine discourse requires non-domination and concedes its authority. Pettit 3 bracketed for glang:PETTIT, PHILIP. "THE DOMINATION COMPLAINT." Nomos, vol. 46, 2005, pp. 87–117. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/24220143. Accessed 19 Aug. 2020. AND that person a real voice or give him or her a genuine hearing. 2~ Oppression – Domination as a condition takes away a person’s status as human – categorical dehumanization is created by communal recognition of domination. Pettit 4:PETTIT, PHILIP. "THE DOMINATION COMPLAINT." Nomos, vol. 46, 2005, pp. 87–117. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/24220143. Accessed 19 Aug. 2020. AND that cower at their masters' feet or snuggle that up their mistress’s skirt. 3~ Sociality – Agents are constructed by recognition through the other. However, that leaves agents vulnerable to denial by the not-I. This commits agents to mutual recognition. Wood:Allen W. Wood, "Fichte's Philosophy of Right and Ethics," forthcoming in Günter Zöller (ed). The Cambridge Companion to Fichte. New York: Cambridge University Press. AND the starting point of the external sphere recognized by others must be its body ContentionAbsent a right to strike, workers are dominated –1~ Structural Domination – a labor market structurally requires exploitation and domination – workers need an alternative, Gourevitch 16:Gourevitch, A.. "Quitting Work but Not the Job: Liberty and the Right to Strike." Perspectives on Politics 14 (2016): 307 - 323. LHP AV Accessed 7/4/21 AND refuse to believe that they can overcome their exploitation through purely individual efforts. 2~ Workplace Domination – authority within the workplace arbitrarily resides in the hands of employers, which alienates and dominates workers, Gourevitch 2:Gourevitch, A.. "Quitting Work but Not the Job: Liberty and the Right to Strike." Perspectives on Politics 14 (2016): 307 - 323. LHP AV Accessed 7/4/21 AND labor legislation) or that she owes obligations of deference to the employer. Thus, the plan: A just government ought to recognize an unconditional right of workers to strike. Gourevitch 3:Gourevitch, A.. "Quitting Work but Not the Job: Liberty and the Right to Strike." Perspectives on Politics 14 (2016): 307 - 323. LHP AV Accessed 7/4/21 AND jobs from which they have withdrawn performance belong to them, they maintain. The plan solves –1~ Power – it reverses power relationships and challenges the structure of economic control itself – that alleviates domination, Gourevitch 4:Gourevitch, A.. "Quitting Work but Not the Job: Liberty and the Right to Strike." Perspectives on Politics 14 (2016): 307 - 323. LHP AV Accessed 7/4/21 AND is why they may not take jobs that striking workers refuse to perform. 2~ Decommodification – strikes challenge the notion of labor as a mere commodity – that empowers workers and resists arbitrary managerial authority, Gourevitch 5:Gourevitch, A.. "Quitting Work but Not the Job: Liberty and the Right to Strike." Perspectives on Politics 14 (2016): 307 - 323. LHP AV Accessed 7/4/21 AND Burns 2011, 47-55; Atleson 1983, 67-96). Theory1ar theory –A~ the aff gets it – otherwise the neg can engage in infinite abuse, making debate impossibleB~ drop the debater because the 1ar is too short to win theory and substanceC~ no RVIs – the 2nr has enough time and the 2ar needs strategic flexibilityROBThe role of the ballot is to evaluate the truth or falsity of the resolution through a normatively justified framework via fair, safe, and educational arguments. Prefer it –1~ Reciprocity – normative frameworks provide a reciprocal burden of justifying an obligation with the ability to turn them – other frameworks are arbitrarily impact exclusive and don’t articulate a 1-1 burden2~ Philosophy – only our role of the ballot incentivizes nuanced discussions over the interactions of different ethical theories. That comes first – A~ constitutivism – LD debate is a values debate which means the intrinsic purpose of the activity is philosophical discussion B~ hijacks any voter – the question of why those are good relies on philosophical justification, ie constitutivism or something.MethodThe aff aligns itself with historical labor movements that challenged industrial capitalism and wage-slavery – that opens up the potentiality for cooperative control over the means of production, Gourevitch 6:Gourevitch, Alex. "Labor Republicanism and the Transformation of Work." Political Theory, vol. 41, no. 4, 2013, pp. 591–617. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/23484596. Accessed 6 July 2021. LHP AV AND conceptual possibilities for thinking about work and economy that these labor republicans inspire. Any resistance to systemic injustice must be based on a comprehensive normative theory which determines what the best response to specific injustices are – 4 warrants – Laurence,Laurence, Ben. "The Priority of Ideal Theory." PDF File. LHPYA AND about practical reasoning, which all depend on ideal theory for their systematic character | 7/8/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
7/8/21 | avermamagic@gmailcom |
|