Tempe Prep Clark Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASU | 1 | Peninsula AY | Jonah Gentleman |
|
|
| |
| ASU | 4 | Harker KB | Gordon Krauss |
|
|
| |
| ASU | 5 | Peninsula AJ | Molly Miller |
|
|
| |
| ASU | Octas | West HS SLC HZ | panel |
|
|
| |
| Harvard | 2 | George Washington KR | Chetan Hertzig |
|
|
| |
| this one | Finals | you | Bacchus |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| ASU | 1 | Opponent: Peninsula AY | Judge: Jonah Gentleman 1AC - space mining |
| ASU | 4 | Opponent: Harker KB | Judge: Gordon Krauss debris |
| ASU | 5 | Opponent: Peninsula AJ | Judge: Molly Miller util debris Africa mining climate change |
| ASU | Octas | Opponent: West HS SLC HZ | Judge: panel stock Winter and Leighton (climate change colonialism exploitation) |
| Harvard | 2 | Opponent: George Washington KR | Judge: Chetan Hertzig ecosocialism (semi-K) |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - Contact InfoTournament: this one | Round: Finals | Opponent: you | Judge: Bacchus | 12/27/21 |
0 - Disclosure and other stuffTournament: this one | Round: Finals | Opponent: you | Judge: Bacchus That said, I don't know most circuit norms, so either tell me about them and what I can do in the short time before the round or don't run a shell on them because if it can't be met even with my best effort, it's probably a) not abusive (or very minimally so), or b) exclusionary of those outside of the nat circuit. | 12/27/21 |
JanFeb - KantTournament: ASU | Round: Octas | Opponent: West HS SLC HZ | Judge: panel Ethics must begin a priori:~A~ Naturalistic fallacy – experience only tells us what is since we can only perceive what is, and not what ought to be. But it's impossible to derive an ought from descriptive premises, so there needs to be a priori premises to make a legitimate moral theory.~B~ Constitutive Authority – practical reason is the only unescapable authority because to ask for why we should be reasoners concedes its authority since it uses reason – anything else is nonbinding and arbitrary.~C~ Action theory – only evaluating action through reason solves since reason is key to evaluate intent, otherwise we could infinitely divide actions. For example: If I was brewing tea, I could break up that one big action into multiple small actions. Only our intention, to brew tea unifies these actions. If we were never able to unify action, we could never classify certain actions as moral or immoral since those actions would be infinitely divisible.Next, the relevant feature of reason is universality – any non-universalizable norm justifies someone's ability to impede on your ends i.e. if I want to eat ice cream, I must recognize that others may affect my pursuit of that end and demand the value of my end be recognized by others which also means universality acts as a side constraint on all other frameworks. It's impossible to will a violation of freedom since deciding to do so would will incompatible ends since it logically entails willing a violation of your own freedom.Moral law follows – it stems uniquely from reason and not from empiricism. That outweighs – if morality were based on things like desires then it would be imposed on us from the outside and we wouldn't be free.Thus, the standard is consistency with the categorical imperative. Prefer:~1~ Performativity— willing that we should abide by their ethical theory presupposes that we own ourselves in the first place. Thus, it is logically incoherent to justify a standard without first willing that we can pursue ends free from others.~2~ Prefer ideal theory – real world injustices need universal ideal principles to ground them and explain why they are wrong. You can't measure something with a ruler that is constantly changing in length.~3~ Only universalizable reason can effectively explain the perspectives of agents – that's the best method for combatting oppression.Farr 02 Arnold Farr (prof of phil @ UKentucky, focusing on German idealism, philosophy of race, postmodernism, psychoanalysis, and liberation philosophy). "Can a Philosophy of Race Afford to Abandon the Kantian Categorical Imperative?" JOURNAL of SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY, Vol. 33 No. 1, Spring 2002, 17–32. OffenseAcquisition of property can never be unjust – to create rights violations, there must already be an owner of the property being violated, but that presupposes its appropriation by another entity.Feser 1, (Edward Feser, 1-1-2005, accessed on 12-15-2021, Cambridge University Press, "THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN UNJUST INITIAL ACQUISITION | Social Philosophy and Policy | Cambridge Core", Edward C. Feser is an American philosopher. He is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Pasadena City College in Pasadena, California. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/social-philosophy-and-policy/article/abs/there-is-no-such-thing-as-an-unjust-initial-acquisition/5C744D6D5C525E711EC75F75BF7109D1)~~brackets for gen lang~phs st To own yourself and use your own freedom is to be able to interact with external objects. Anything else makes you unable to exercise your own freedom on other things and creates a contradiction.Feser 2, (Edward Feser, 1-1-2005, accessed on 12-15-2021, Cambridge University Press, "THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN UNJUST INITIAL ACQUISITION | Social Philosophy and Policy | Cambridge Core", Edward C. Feser is an American philosopher. He is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Pasadena City College in Pasadena, California. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/social-philosophy-and-policy/article/abs/there-is-no-such-thing-as-an-unjust-initial-acquisition/5C744D6D5C525E711EC75F75BF7109D1)~~brackets for gen lang~phs st | 2/19/22 |
JanFeb - set colTournament: ASU | Round: 1 | Opponent: Peninsula AY | Judge: Jonah Gentleman Our thesis is this – settler colonialism is not an event, but an evolving structure of technologies – a patterning of social relations that renders land and life ripe for biopolitical destruction and ontological genocide. the current political system excludes natives. In the current system, civil rights are not afforded to the indigenous, silencing their voice once again.Paperson 17 (La Paperson, University of Minnesota Press, ""Land. And the University Is Settler Colonial" in "A Third University Is Possible" on Manifold @uminnpress", 2017, https://manifold.umn.edu/read/a-third-university-is-possible/section/561c45d2-9442-42d5-9938-f8c9e2aafcfc~~#ch02) Settler colonialism is an ontological logic of elimination that constantly manifests itself in everyday reiterations of our spatial inhabitance – the world is built on the extermination of indigenous communities which provided the ontological grounding for modern sovereignty and provided the very possibility for engaging in the realm of outer spaceRifkin 14 (Mark Rifkin, Ph.D. University of Pennsylvania-2003, M.A. University of Pennsylvania-1999, B.A. Rutgers University-1996 Dr. Rifkin's research primarily focuses on Native American writing and politics from the eighteenth century onward, exploring the ways that Indigenous peoples have negotiated U.S. racial and imperial formations. His work explores the roles of gender, sexuality, affect, and eroticism in those processes, addressing legal and administrative frameworks, textual representations, and forms of everyday experience. Director of the Women's and Gender Studies Program and Professor of English at the University of North Carolina 'Settler Common Sense: Queerness and Everyday Colonialism in the American Renaissance,' June 2014 pages 7-10) Their "optimism" has become cruel. Their attachment with a better future simply reproduces the Natives psycho-affective attachment to reform—the impact is cruel optimism and colonial violence.Grande 18 (Professor of Education and Director of the Center for the Critical Study of Race and Ethnicity at Connecticut University (Sandy, "Refusing the University", Edited by Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang, Published by Routledge Press) The aff's spectacularized claim of extinction is an act of settler futurity that hides the ongoing violence of settler colonialism. The aff has an investment in the end of the world to create a sense of vulnerability at the expense of decolonization. Settlers fantasize about their own death day and night, looking for an excuse to justify further exploitation of indigenous people. Their narrative of is an act of colonialism and the 1NC is the ACT OF RESISTANCE.Dalley 16 (Hamish Dalley, Ph.D. from the Australian National University in 2013, and is now an Assistant Professor of English at Daemen College, Amherst, New York, where he is responsible for teaching in World and Postcolonial Literatures., (2016): The deaths of settler colonialism: extinction as a metaphor of decolonization in contemporary settler literature, Settler Colonial Studies, DOI: 10.1080/2201473X.2016.1238160) fiat double bind – two possibilities1~ even if the aff is right that all their impacts are going to happen, the ballot doesn't spill up fast enough to actually solve them2~ if not, then fiat isn't real, so you vote neg on presumptionThe alternative is to demand decolonization and abolition. The starting point for our revolution is an act of resistance and abolition. We refuse to sit aside while indigenous populations are subject to horrors that the settler ignores. Indigenous rights must be the foundation of our movement, or colonial violence will continue to be replicated.Tuck and Yang 18 (Eve Tuck Associate Professor of Critical Race and Indigenous Studies at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, and Canada Research Chair of Indigenous Methodologies with Youth and Communities at the University of Toronto, K. Wayne Yang Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Ethnic Studies Department at the University of California at San Diego, 2018, "Introduction: Born Under the Rising Sun of Social Justice," Toward What Justice? Describing Diverse Dreams of Justice in Education, Edited by Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang, Published by Routledge Press, ISBN: 978-1-351-24093-2, pp. 1-18) The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater that endorses the best method of subject formation. Current debate practices normalize settler colonialism by absorbing indigenous thought into white supremacy, perpetuating the ongoing colonial project and ontological exclusion of Indigenous voices. Fiat is illusory – This means the judge should focus solely on how we as debaters are affecting the way in which our subjectivities are formed.Tuck and Gaztambide-Fernandez 13 (Eve Tuck and Rubén A. Gaztambide-Fernandez, "Curriculum, Replacement, and Settler Futurity," Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2013, p. 72-89) Adopt an ethic that is willing to risk total extinction in order to form ethical subjectivities that are oriented towards a world of decolonization. This radical break from our 'business as usual' turns their impact calculus and is the prerequisite for value itself.Pinkard 13 ~2013, Lynice Pinkard, "Revolutionary Suicide: Risking Everything to Transform Society and Live Fully", Tikkun 2013 Volume 28, Number 4: 31-41, http://tikkun.dukejournals.org/content/28/4/31.full~~ | 1/7/22 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
1/7/22 | connyobro@icloudcom |
| |
2/19/22 | connyobro@icloudcom |
| |
2/19/22 | connyobro@icloudcom |
| |
2/19/22 | connyobro@icloudcom |
| |
2/19/22 | connyobro@icloudcom |
|