Tempe Prep Clark Aff
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASU | 2 | Hamilton MR | James Chen |
|
|
| |
| this one | Finals | you | Bacchus |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| ASU | 2 | Opponent: Hamilton MR | Judge: James Chen AC - CHP |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - Contact InfoTournament: this one | Round: Finals | Opponent: you | Judge: Bacchus | 12/27/21 |
0 - Disclosure and other stuffTournament: this one | Round: Finals | Opponent: you | Judge: Bacchus That said, I don't know most circuit norms, so either tell me about them and what I can do in the short time before the round or don't run a shell on them because if it can't be met even with my best effort, it's probably a) not abusive (or very minimally so), or b) exclusionary of those outside of the nat circuit. | 12/27/21 |
JanFeb - CHPTournament: ASU | Round: 2 | Opponent: Hamilton MR | Judge: James Chen FramingI affirm the resolution: the appropriation of outer space by private entities is unjust.My value is justice and my criterion is consistency with the common heritage principle of mankind (CHP for short) – Prefer:1~ Justice and Morality are not the same – the resolution specifies that we debate the implications of private entities appropriating outer space on justice, and not on morality.Bierson 21 (Marshall Bierson, pursuing a PhD in philosophy at Florida State University, 2021, accessed on 12-26-2021, Victory Briefs, January/February 2022 LD Brief, pdf) 2~ Even if the neg proves that the resolution is morally bad, but doesn't tie anything back to justice, you affirm on presumption because I debated the resolution as the writers intended3~ CHP is a method of distributive justiceNoyes 11 John E. Noyes (the Roger J. Traynor Professor of Law, California Western School of Law). "The Common Heritage of Mankind: Past, Present, and Future." 40 Denv. J. Int'l L. and Pol'y 447 (2011). JDN. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1156andcontext=djilp 4~ The existence of humanity is social – this justifies an obligation to preserve interpersonal relationships as they are core to our being.Bickhard 01 (Mark Bickhard, Professor of Cognitive Robotics and the Philosophy of Knowledge, at Lehigh University — interests are in theoretical philosophy and theoretical psychology, 12-9-2001, accessed on 1-7-2022, Lehigh, "The Social Ontology of Persons", https://www.lehigh.edu/~~mhb0/SocOntPersons.pdf) 5~ CHP provides a legal guarantee of joint property – comes prior to all other frameworks as it's a pre-requisite to the survival of quality human relationships, which was just shown to be key to our ontological purpose as a species.Arnold 1 Rudolph Preston Arnold (President, International Law Society). "The Common Heritage of Mankind as a Legal Concept." 9 Int'l L. 153 (1975). JDN. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/intlyr9anddiv=15andid=andpage= Offense1~ CHP rules out private appropriation – there is no legal means to acquire space because it doesn't have a governing body that exercises jurisdiction over it.Joyner 1 Christopher C. Joyner (Professor of Government and Foreign Service at Georgetown University). Legal Implications of the Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 35(01), 190–199. 1986. JDN. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-and-comparative-law-quarterly/article/abs/legal-implications-of-the-concept-of-the-common-heritage-of-mankind/27C87188CE97BA536F9FE5DD8E048C78
2~ This is uniquely different from private property on Earth, where governments have the authority to grant property rights to private individuals and entities. Don't buy the argument that "OST is a sovereign governance body over space" because it simply isn't true. The reality is that the OST emphasizes outer space as a public area not able to be owned by any sovereign state or private entity, meaning privatization of outer space runs counter to international law.van Eijk 20 ~(Cristian, finishing an accelerated BA in Law at the University of Cambridge. He holds a BA cum laude in International Justice and an LLM in Public International Law from Leiden University, and has previously worked at the T.M.C. Asser Institute and the International Commission on Missing Persons.) "Sorry, Elon: Mars is not a legal vacuum – and it's not yours, either," 5/11/20, Völkerrechtsblog, https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/sorry-elon-mars-is-not-a-legal-vacuum-and-its-not-yours-either~~ 3~ CHP protects future generationsJoyner 2 Christopher C. Joyner (Professor of Government and Foreign Service at Georgetown University). Legal Implications of the Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 35(01), 190–199. 1986. JDN. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-and-comparative-law-quarterly/article/abs/legal-implications-of-the-concept-of-the-common-heritage-of-mankind/27C87188CE97BA536F9FE5DD8E048C78 Further SpecificationCHP extends to all of outer spaceOduntan 1 Gbenga Oduntan (Lecturer in Law, Canterbury Christ Church University College, England; Legal Adviser to the Nigerian Government and Member, United Nations Nigerian/Cameroon Mixed Sub-Commission on the Demarcation of the Boundary between Nigeria and Cameroon) Imagine There Are No Possessions: Legal and Moral Basis Of The Common Heritage Principle In Space Law. Manchester Journal of International Economic Law, 2 (1). pp. 30-59. ISSN 1742-3945. 2005. JDN. https://kar.kent.ac.uk/1767/1/Imagine2520There2520are2520No2520Possessions.pdf It's impossible to rationally distinguish parts of space in relation to appropriationOduntan 2 Gbenga Oduntan (Lecturer in Law, Canterbury Christ Church University College, England; Legal Adviser to the Nigerian Government and Member, United Nations Nigerian/Cameroon Mixed Sub-Commission on the Demarcation of the Boundary between Nigeria and Cameroon) Imagine There Are No Possessions: Legal and Moral Basis Of The Common Heritage Principle In Space Law. Manchester Journal of International Economic Law, 2 (1). pp. 30-59. ISSN 1742-3945. 2005. JDN. https://kar.kent.ac.uk/1767/1/Imagine2520There2520are2520No2520Possessions.pdf CHP describes space as collectively owned by all of humanityArnold 2 Rudolph Preston Arnold (President, International Law Society). "The Common Heritage of Mankind as a Legal Concept." 9 Int'l L. 153 (1975). JDN. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/intlyr9anddiv=15andid=andpage= | 1/7/22 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|