Stuyvesant Chin Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scarsdale | 1 | NDSJ AG | Derek Ying |
|
|
| |
| Yale | 2 | Lexington FM | Devin Jiang |
|
|
| |
| Yale | 4 | Walt Whitman EY | Annie Wang |
|
|
| |
| Yale | 6 | Bronx Science NK | Stuyvesant LC |
|
|
| |
| Yale | Triples | Dulles TY | Lila Lavender, Annie Wang, Ben Waldman |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Scarsdale | 1 | Opponent: NDSJ AG | Judge: Derek Ying AC - US Agri Plan |
| Yale | 2 | Opponent: Lexington FM | Judge: Devin Jiang AC - Kant |
| Yale | 4 | Opponent: Walt Whitman EY | Judge: Annie Wang AC - Kant theory UV |
| Yale | 6 | Opponent: Bronx Science NK | Judge: Stuyvesant LC AC - Contracts AC |
| Yale | Triples | Opponent: Dulles TY | Judge: Lila Lavender, Annie Wang, Ben Waldman AC - prag advantage |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - DebateDrillsTournament: na | Round: 1 | Opponent: na | Judge: na | 9/19/21 |
0 - NavigationTournament: na | Round: 1 | Opponent: na | Judge: na | 9/19/21 |
1 - Broken InterpsTournament: na | Round: 1 | Opponent: na | Judge: na | 9/19/21 |
1 - Util v1Tournament: Yale | Round: 6 | Opponent: Bronx Science NK | Judge: Stuyvesant LC The standard is maximizing expected well being.Pleasure and pain are intrinsically valuable. People consistently regard pleasure and pain as good reasons for action, despite the fact that pleasure doesn’t seem to be instrumentally valuable for anything.Moen 16 ~Ole Martin Moen, Research Fellow in Philosophy at University of Oslo "An Argument for Hedonism" Journal of Value Inquiry (Springer), 50 (2) 2016: 267–281~ SJDI AND places where we reach the end of the line in matters of value. Thus the standard is maximizing expected well-being. Prefer additionally:1~ Only consequentialism explains degrees of wrongness—if I break a promise to meet up for lunch, that is not as bad as breaking a promise to take a dying person to the hospital. Only the consequences of breaking the promise explain why the second one is much worse than the first. Intuitions outweigh—they’re the foundational basis for any argument and theories that contradict our intuitions are most likely false even if we can’t deductively determine why2~ Reductionism – empirics prove.Parfit 84 ~Derek Parfit, cool hair. "Reasons and Persons" 1984. Brackets for gender~ AND , and can receive two different answers written by this person’s two hands. Use epistemic modesty for evaluating the framework debate: that means compare the probability of the framework times the magnitude of the impact under a framework. Prefer:A~ Substantively true since it maximizes the probability of achieving net most moral value—beating a framework acts as mitigation to their impacts but the strength of that mitigation is contingent.B~ Clash— we don’t know if our frameworks are true, but we can debate the topical question. That incentivizes debating both layers instead of solely focusing on framework. | 9/19/21 |
ND - Hobbes NCTournament: Scarsdale | Round: 1 | Opponent: NDSJ AG | Judge: Derek Ying FramingEthical projects starting from a derivation of truth always fail. 2 warrants:1~ There are no overarching moral doctrines to guide morality – only those we impose in the state of nature.Parrish 1 1. Rick Parrish 2. 2004 3. The Johns Hopkins University Press 4. Derrida's Economy of Violence in Hobbes' Social Contract 5. 1/5/16 6. Pg 4-7. 7. Rick Parrish teaches at Loyola University New Orleans. His current research is focused on the play of violence and respect within justice. He can be reached at parrish@loyno.edu http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0andtype=summaryandurl=/journals/theory'and'event/v007/7.4parrish.html AND things by humans in acts of creation rather than discovered as extrinsic facts." 2~ It is impossible to compare between normative claims since those claims start from functionally different claims, making it impossible to rationally debate between frameworks.Joyce Joyce, Richard. Myth of Morality. Port Chester, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2002. p 45-47. AND count as evidence that would sway the debate one way or the other. ~3~ Linguistics – Truth is constructed by language, which is completely arbitrary. Nothing tells me that a chair is a chair; I only assign it that name arbitrarily because I want to. Meaning can’t be contained within language if we make it up ourselves, and truth doesn’t exist absent language.The conclusion is adherence to the sovereign: since the sovereign's role is to provide a common meaning to notions like morality, the question of morality is the SAME question as the nature of the sovereign.Parrish 2 1. Rick Parrish 2. 2004 3. The Johns Hopkins University Press 4. Derrida's Economy of Violence in Hobbes' Social Contract 5. 1/5/16 6. Pg 4-7. 7. Rick Parrish teaches at Loyola University New Orleans. His current research is focused on the play of violence and respect within justice. He can be reached at parrish@loyno.edu http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0andtype=summaryandurl=/journals/theory'and'event/v007/7.4parrish.html AND all directions" and fall inevitably into the violence of the natural condition. Thus, the standard is consistency with the will of the sovereign.Prefer:The sovereign always exists. All persons want to become meaning creators and eventually a sovereign will be formed.Parrish 3 ~Derrida`s Economy of Violence in Hobbes` Social Contract, Richard Parrish~ AND comparison with others"46 or human nature as a creator of meaning. Moral Discourse: outside of the state there is no authority to ensure that individuals will follow the same moral language. The state clarifies this by being an ultimate arbiter.Infinite Regress: other moral theories inevitably fail as individuals question why we follow them; individuals consent to the state by virtue of engaging in it, therefore we escape this regress.Constitutivism: hypothetically other moral theories may matter but obligations differ based on the nature of agency as different agents have different obligations. Therefore the state has unique obligations that might be inconsistent with morality in general.TJFsResolvability: util debates end up being a mess of weighing and impact calculation, using Hobbes is resolvable because it’s just a question of what the sovereign believes. Independently indicts util, we can’t act on util if every action requires endless weighing.Political education: politicians have to understand the social contract in order to know what powers they do / do not have, debating Hobbes helps us learn about that.Offense1~ Government strikes decrease the power of the state, meaning the unconditional right to strike would further decrease power. This would lead to the state of nature.2~ The aff obligates governments to act – incoherent because it calls on a power higher than the sovereign to make the sovereign act. Only the state has the authority to create moral obligations.3~ Restrictions — the resolution places an obligation on the sovereign, but that’s impossible because the sovereign creates morality. | 11/13/21 |
SO - Cap KTournament: Yale | Round: 4 | Opponent: Walt Whitman EY | Judge: Annie Wang Marxist critique must center around the act of production which lies at the core of the capitalist project. It is only by re-politicizing it that we can resist its further normalization and lay bare the logic of capitalism.Weeks 11 Weeks, Kathi, The Problem with Work: Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork Politics, and Postwork Imaginaries. Duke University Press, Durham (2011); DOI: https://doi-org.ezproxy2.williams.edu/10.1215/9780822394723; CE AND privatize, individualize, ontologize, and also, thereby, depoliticize it. The affirmative invests within capitalism in two way. First, is false liberalism. The plan is representative of the idea that capitalism can be saved- eliminating "intellectual property protections" is a scheme that aims to increase market competition for the purpose of profit.Gilbert 19 ~Geoff Gilbert is a Professor of Law in the School of Law and Human Rights Centre at the University of Essex. He was Head of Department between 2000-2003 and 2011-13. In 2012, he was appointed a Professorial Visiting Fellow at the University of New South Wales in Sydney. He was Editor-in-Chief of the International Journal of Refugee Law from 2002-15 and is co-Editor-in-Chief as of September 2019; he also sits on the Advisory Board., "Free trade" is today’s imperialism by the 1 percent, 1-13-2019,No Publication,https://www.bilaterals.org/?free-trade-is-today-s-imperialism, 8-21-2021 amrita~ AND control a disproportionate amount of the most profitable industries in the global economy. Capitalism will, without a doubt, cause us to die by climate change—this card preempts all their "cap solves climate change" answers.Foster 18 ~John Bellamy Foster, John Bellamy Foster is a professor of sociology at the University of Oregon and also editor of Monthly Review. He writes about political economy of capitalism and economic crisis, ecology and ecological crisis, and Marxist theory. "Making War on the Planet." Monthly Review. September 1, 2018. https://monthlyreview.org/2018/09/01/making-war-on-the-planet/ recut 8-22-2021 amrita~ AND beings as both natural and social beings: what is now called ecosocialism. Endorse a dictatorship of the proletariat. Global capitalism’s inequities can only be fully purged once its intrinsic contradictions expose themselves and allow for the collapse of the bourgeoisie state. A dictatorship is required to solidify our transition to communism and is why you should reject any perm that attempts to preserve the state apparatus.Revolution 73 Proletarian Dictatorship Vs. Bourgeois "Democracy"; Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line; Revolution; May 1973; Edited by Paul Saba; https://www.marxists.org/history/erol/ncm-1/pd-v-bd.htm; CE AND is a million times more democratic than even the most democratic capitalist state. | 9/19/21 |
SO - EconTournament: Yale | Round: 6 | Opponent: Bronx Science NK | Judge: Stuyvesant LC Biotech is resilient and fundamentals are strong – but this trend relies on innovation and investmentCancherini et al 21 — Laura Cancherini is a consultant in McKinsey’s Brussels office; Joseph Lydon is an associate partner in the Zurich office, where Jorge Santos da Silva is a senior partner and Alexandra Zemp is a partner, McKinsey, What’s ahead for biotech: Another wave or low tide?, April 30, 2021, https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/pharmaceuticals-and-medical-products/our-insights/whats-ahead-for-biotech-another-wave-or-low-tide WJ AND andA, the prospects for further financing and deal making look promising. Pharma collapses without strong IP protectionsBuckland 17 - Danny Buckland (award-winning journalist who writes about health, general features and news, shortlisted for the prestigious Mind Media Awards for his work covering mental health issues), April 26, 2017, "Patents are lifeblood of pharmas", https://www.raconteur.net/legal/intellectual-property/patents-are-lifeblood-of-pharmas/ WJ AND and innovation. Quite frankly, it would all collapse without good IP." Bipoharma collapse causes economic meltdown – it’s far worse than previous recessionsHowrigon 17 — Ron Howrigon "(President and Founder of Fulcrum Strategies. He earned a Bachelor's degree in Business Administration from Western Michigan University and a Master's in Economics from North Carolina State University, focusing in the area of Health Economics) http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2017/01/health-care-crash-u-s-economy.html, January 19 2017, WJ AND resulting fallout could be could be much worse than even the housing crisis. | 9/19/21 |
SO - WTO CPTournament: Yale | Round: 2 | Opponent: Lexington FM | Judge: Devin Jiang 2 – CPThe World Trade Organization ought to be abolished.The following 164 countries listed in the speech doc ought to independently ~PLAN~Afghanistan Albania Angola Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Bahrain, Kingdom of Bangladesh Barbados Belgium Belize Benin Bolivia, Plurinational State of Botswana Brazil Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Côte d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Estonia Eswatini European Union (formerly EC) Fiji Finland France Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong, China Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea, Republic of Kuwait, the State of Kyrgyz Republic Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lesotho Liberia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao, China Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Moldova, Republic of Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North Macedonia Norway Oman Pakistan Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Qatar Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovak Republic Slovenia Solomon Islands South Africa Spain Sri Lanka Suriname Sweden Switzerland Chinese Taipei Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Togo Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe AND leading institutions, the World Trade Organization. Solves the case—-abolition allows free trade and permits nations govern without the pitfalls of the WTOJosh Hawley 20. Senator from Missouri, JD @ Yale, "The W.T.O. Should Be Abolished," New York Times, May 5, 2020, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/05/opinion/hawley-abolish-wto-china.html, RJP, DebateDrills AND a new network of trusted friends and partners to resist Chinese economic imperialism. Counterplan competes —-1~ Normal means—-it’s a TRIPs waiver, which doesn’t make sense if TRIPs and the WTO doesn’t existJames Bacchus 20. Member of the Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies, the Distinguished University Professor of Global Affairs and director of the Center for Global Economic and Environmental Opportunity at the University of Central Florida. He was a founding judge and was twice the chairman—the chief judge—of the highest court of world trade, the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization in Geneva, Switzerland. "An Unnecessary Proposal: A WTO Waiver of Intellectual Property Rights for COVID-19 Vaccines," CATO, December 16, 2020, https://www.cato.org/free-trade-bulletin/unnecessary-proposal-wto-waiver-intellectual-property-rights-covid-19-vaccines, RJP, DebateDrills AND the WTO needs is another debate over perceived trade obstacles to public health. 2~ "Member" is defined as part of a group—-the counterplan abolishes the broader groupMerriam Webster n.d. "Member," https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/member, RJP, DebateDrills
3~ "Member of" means "to be contained in" "to be included in" and "be part of" —- none of those are possible if the broader group is gone. | 9/17/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
11/13/21 | lchin30@stuyedu |
| |
9/17/21 | lchin30@stuyedu |
| |
9/19/21 | lchin30@stuyedu |
| |
9/19/21 | lchin30@stuyedu |
| |
9/19/21 | lchin30@stuyedu |
|