Scripps Ranch Sridharan Aff
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loyola Invitational | 1 | Vestavia Hills DS | Kurian, Michael |
|
|
| |
| Loyola Invitational | 3 | Peninsula BD | Das, Sreyaash |
|
|
| |
| Loyola Invitational | 6 | San Mateo YR | Hatfield, Wyatt |
|
|
| |
| Loyola Invitational | Triples | Lynbrook SM | Panel |
|
|
| |
| Loyola Invitational | Doubles | Immaculate Heart JL | Panel |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Loyola Invitational | 1 | Opponent: Vestavia Hills DS | Judge: Kurian, Michael 1AC - AFC - Must Have Contact Info - You're Going De-Leuze Kurian votes for Scripps Ranch AS (W) |
| Loyola Invitational | 3 | Opponent: Peninsula BD | Judge: Das, Sreyaash 1AC - You're Going De-leuze - AFC |
| Loyola Invitational | 6 | Opponent: San Mateo YR | Judge: Hatfield, Wyatt 1AC - Be Prepared De-leuze v3 |
| Loyola Invitational | Triples | Opponent: Lynbrook SM | Judge: Panel 1AC - Be Prepared De-leuze v4 Hilligoss votes for Scripps Ranch AS (W) |
| Loyola Invitational | Doubles | Opponent: Immaculate Heart JL | Judge: Panel 1AC - Be Prepared De-leuze v4 |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
SEPTOCT - AC - Be Prepared De-leuze v1Tournament: Loyola Invitational | Round: 1 | Opponent: Vestavia Hills DS | Judge: Kurian, Michael SO21 Deleuze AC1ACShellInterpretation: All debaters must have contact info on the NSDA 21-22 wiki.Violation: You don't even have a wiki – screenshots below:Drop them on 1AC theory – skews put me at an unrecoverable disadvantage from the outset. Use competing interps on 1AC theory – the negative has 7 minutes to answer the shell. No RVIs – you'd read a counter-interp for 7 minutes of the NC and the debate would end right there.AC – You're Going De-LeuzeWe are dynamic – overtime, affective encounters with our surroundings through time shape subjectivity, yet representational thought ascribes to them a limited essence – our model resists the imposition of sameness onto a chaotic world.Deleuze – Deleuze, Gilles. Difference and Repitition. Translated by Paul Patton. 1968 Our instability necessitates power structures of rhizomatic becoming that embrace difference. Dominant economic models repress creative desires and over-code social life – fields that are not intelligible within straited space are excluded as deviant.Rowe 13 – Rowe, J. E. (2013). Understanding economic development as a Deleuzian "plateau." Local Economy, 28(1), 99–113. doi:10.1177/0269094212465580, Agastya Thus, the roll of the ballot is to embrace economic creative difference. Our orientation is key to pedagogy – we need to tip the scales towards a minoritarian repositioning to mobilize moments of relationality and challenge dominant epistemologies.Carlin and Wallin – Carlin, Matthew. Wallin, Jason. "Deleuze and Guattari, Politics and Education." Bloomsbury. 2014. Pg. 119-121 The politics of stable subjectivity coopts all attempts at resistance – it stabilizes complex features into unchanging models which dooms all radical praxis to failure.Rolli – Rolli, Marc. "Immanence and Transcendence" Bulletin de la Sociite Amincaine de Philosophie de Langue Franfais Volume 14, Number 2, Fall 2004 Now affirm – The member nations of the World Trade Organization ought to eliminate intellectual property protections for medicines. I'll clarify specification in CX to avoid frivolous debates.Medical intellectual property protections proliferate the Empire's parasitic control of subjects by restricting affective communication, making revolution impossible.Lemmens – Lemmens, P. (n.d.). The conditions of the Common. A Stieglerian critique ON Hardt AND Negri's thesis on Cognitive capitalism as a prefiguration of communism. The_Conditions_of_the_Common_A_Stieglerian_Critique_on_Hardt_and_Negri_s_Thesis_on_Cognitive_Capitalism_as_a_Prefiguration_of_Communism Restrictions of fluidity idealize life to warrant a cleansing of difference which is the root cause of material violence and collapses to fascism.Evans 10 – Brad Evans, Lecturer in the School of Politics and International Studies at the University of Leeds and Programme Director for International Relations, "Foucault's Legacy: Security, War, and Violence in the 21st Century," Security Dialogue vol.41, no. 4, August 2010, pg. 422-424 Reject focus on utility and death – it creates a survival-at-all-costs mindset in the form of racism, xenophobia, and sexism that makes debate unsafe.Winnubst – Shannon Winnubst, professor of Women's and gender studies at Ohio State University, Queering Freedom, pg. 183 Utilitarianism fails – multiple warrants.Cleveland ~Cleveland, Paul A. "The Failure of Utilitarian Ethics in Political Economy." Independent Institute. https://www.independent.org/publications/article.asp?id=1602. Published 1 September 2002~ AFCInterpretation: The negative must concede the affirmative framework if the standard is promoting economic creative difference.Prefer – 1~ Time skew – Winning the negative framework moots 6 minutes of 1AC offense and forces a 1AR restart against a 7 min 1NC – outweighs on quantifiability and reversibility – I can't get back time lost and it's the only way to measure abuse. 2~ Topic Ed – Every debate would just be a framework debate which crowds out our ability to have core debates about the topic – that outweighs – we only have 2 months to debate the topic 3~ Prep skew – We can't predict every single negative framework before round but they know the aff coming into round which makes pre-tournament prep impossible. Especially true since there are millions of K's and NC's that could negate – that outweighs – A~ Sequencing – It's a perquisite engaging in-round since you need prep to debate B~ Engagement – It ruins the quality and depth of discussions that make debate rounds educational.1AC – Paradigm1~ Yes 1AR theory – anything else means infinite abuse – drop the debater, competing interps, and the highest layer – the 1AR is too short to make up for the time trade-off – no RVIs – 6 min 2NR means they can brute force me every time. | 9/4/21 |
SEPTOCT - AC - Be Prepared De-leuze v2Tournament: Loyola Invitational | Round: 3 | Opponent: Peninsula BD | Judge: Das, Sreyaash SO21 Deleuze ACSPIKES ON THE BOTTOMAC – You're Going De-LeuzeWe are dynamic – overtime, affective encounters with our surroundings through time shape subjectivity, yet representational thought ascribes to them a limited essence – our model resists the imposition of sameness onto a chaotic world.Deleuze – Deleuze, Gilles. Difference and Repitition. Translated by Paul Patton. 1968 Impacts: A~ Stable subjectivity makes critique impossible since it takes empirical features and treats it as a model, which provides no place for contestation and B~ Every negation is just a reconfiguration of a set of relationships of differences. It doesn't in truth deny those relations, it just affirms them in a different way. There is a multiplicity of "yes's" from which we shape a no, which means even if there is no logical conclusion from this, then only affirmation is true.Our instability necessitates power structures of rhizomatic becoming that embrace difference. Dominant economic models repress creative desires and over-code social life – fields that are not intelligible within straited space are excluded as deviant.Rowe 13 – Rowe, J. E. (2013). Understanding economic development as a Deleuzian "plateau." Local Economy, 28(1), 99–113. doi:10.1177/0269094212465580, Agastya And, it is imperative to preserve affective truth – theories cannot rely on an external framework of power structures for validation – other ethics are referential.Joyce 1 – Joyce, R. (2001). The Myth of Morality (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511487101 Thus, the roll of the ballot is to embrace economic creative difference. Our orientation is key to pedagogy – we need to tip the scales towards a minoritarian repositioning to mobilize moments of relationality and challenge dominant epistemologies.Carlin and Wallin – Carlin, Matthew. Wallin, Jason. "Deleuze and Guattari, Politics and Education." Bloomsbury. 2014. Pg. 119-121 The politics of stable subjectivity coopts all attempts at resistance – it stabilizes complex features into unchanging models which dooms all radical praxis to failure.Rolli – Rolli, Marc. "Immanence and Transcendence" Bulletin de la Sociite Amincaine de Philosophie de Langue Franfais Volume 14, Number 2, Fall 2004 There are infinite affective states – the aff is moral in one which is sufficient.Vaidman 2 ~Vaidman, Lev, 3-24-2002, "Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)," No Publication, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-manyworlds/~~ Only affect can bridge the gap between discursive regimes and the material world – it's cruelly optimistic to force chaotic identity into stable structures.Schafer 13 – Schaefer '13. Schaefer, D. "The Promise of Affect: The Politics of the Event in Ahmed's The Promise of Happiness and Berlant's Cruel Optimism." Theory and Event 16.2 2013. Project MUSE Outweighs – A~ Even you win your framework, this outweighs because we can't cohere to that norm and B~ The statement of affirmation is sufficient to affirm. The nature of affect is such that any singularity of expression must be taken as an individual's truth, thus my stance is sufficient to affirm.Now affirm – The member nations of the World Trade Organization ought to eliminate intellectual property protections for medicines. I'll clarify specification in CX to avoid frivolous debates.Medical intellectual property protections proliferate the Empire's parasitic control of subjects by restricting affective communication, making revolution impossible.Lemmens – Lemmens, P. (n.d.). The conditions of the Common. A Stieglerian critique ON Hardt AND Negri's thesis on Cognitive capitalism as a prefiguration of communism. The_Conditions_of_the_Common_A_Stieglerian_Critique_on_Hardt_and_Negri_s_Thesis_on_Cognitive_Capitalism_as_a_Prefiguration_of_Communism Intellectual property regimes biologically regulate affective expression and force the subject into binary, mechanical, categories which staticize creative desires.Lefebvre – Lefebvre, A. (2009). In The image of law: Deleuze, BERGSON, SPINOZA. essay, Stanford University Press. Body extension and the law: Medical devices, intellectual property, prosthetics and marginalisation (again) TRIPS standards fail to protect indigenous knowledge – current patent system is built on Eurocentric values .Garcia 4 – Javier Garcia. "Fighting Biopiracy: The Legislative Protection of Traditional Knowledge". 2004 Restrictions of fluidity idealize life to warrant a cleansing of difference which is the root cause of material violence and collapses to fascism.Evans 10 – Brad Evans, Lecturer in the School of Politics and International Studies at the University of Leeds and Programme Director for International Relations, "Foucault's Legacy: Security, War, and Violence in the 21st Century," Security Dialogue vol.41, no. 4, August 2010, pg. 422-424 Reject focus on utility and death – it creates a survival-at-all-costs mindset in the form of racism, xenophobia, and sexism that makes debate unsafe.Winnubst – Shannon Winnubst, professor of Women's and gender studies at Ohio State University, Queering Freedom, pg. 183 Utilitarianism fails – multiple warrants.Cleveland ~Cleveland, Paul A. "The Failure of Utilitarian Ethics in Political Economy." Independent Institute. https://www.independent.org/publications/article.asp?id=1602. Published 1 September 2002~ AFCInterpretation: The negative must concede the affirmative framework.Prefer – 1~ Time skew – Winning the negative framework moots 6 minutes of 1AC offense and forces a 1AR restart against a 7 min 1NC – outweighs on quantifiability and reversibility – I can't get back time lost and it's the only way to measure abuse. 2~ Topic Ed – Every debate would just be a framework debate which crowds out our ability to have core debates about the topic – that outweighs – we only have 2 months to debate the topic 3~ Prep skew – We can't predict every single negative framework before round but they know the aff coming into round which makes pre-tournament prep impossible. Especially true since there are millions of K's and NC's that could negate – that outweighs – A~ Sequencing – It's a perquisite engaging in-round since you need prep to debate B~ Engagement – It ruins the quality and depth of discussions that make debate rounds educational.Drop them on 1AC theory – skews put me at an unrecoverable disadvantage from the outset. Use competing interps on 1AC theory – the negative has 7 minutes to answer the shell, and you can't reasonably concede my framework. No RVIs – you'd read a counter-interp for 7 minutes of the NC and the debate would end right there.1AC – Paradigm1~ Yes 1AR theory2~ Presumption and Permissibility Affirm – | 9/4/21 |
SEPTOCT - AC - Be Prepared De-leuze v3Tournament: Loyola Invitational | Round: 6 | Opponent: San Mateo YR | Judge: Hatfield, Wyatt SO21 Deleuze ACSPIKES ON THE BOTTOMACWe are dynamic – overtime, affective encounters with our surroundings through time shape subjectivity, yet representational thought ascribes to them a limited essence – our model resists the imposition of sameness onto a chaotic world. Every negation is just a reconfiguration of a set of relationships of differences. It doesn't in truth deny those relations, it just affirms them in a different way.Deleuze – Deleuze, Gilles. Difference and Repitition. Translated by Paul Patton. 1968 Our instability necessitates power structures of rhizomatic becoming that embrace difference. Dominant economic models repress creative desires and over-code social life – fields that are not intelligible within straited space are excluded as deviant.Rowe 13 – Rowe, J. E. (2013). Understanding economic development as a Deleuzian "plateau." Local Economy, 28(1), 99–113. doi:10.1177/0269094212465580, Agastya And, it is imperative to preserve affective truth – theories cannot rely on an external framework of power structures for validation – other ethics are referential.Joyce 1 – Joyce, R. (2001). The Myth of Morality (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511487101 Thus, the standard is to embrace economic creative difference.There are infinite affective states – the aff is moral in one which is sufficient.Vaidman 2 ~Vaidman, Lev, 3-24-2002, "Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)," No Publication, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-manyworlds/~~ Static rules fail since each agent formulates their own interpretation in moments of crisis – we must orient agency towards chaos to break free from indeterminate principles.Smith – Nathan Jun and Daniel W. Smith. "Deleuze and Ethics." Prefer obligatorily – ought entails that obligations are understood through the frame of affective relations.Cappelle – "Should vs Ought to" 2010 Bert Cappelle is a lecturer of English linguistics at the University of Lille https://www.academia.edu/1433058/Should_vs_ought_to Now affirm – The member nations of the World Trade Organization ought to eliminate intellectual property protections for medicines. Resolved is defined as firm in purpose or intent; determined and I'm determined. Affirm means to express agreement and you already know I do. I'll clarify specification in CX to avoid frivolous debates.Medical intellectual property protections proliferate the Empire's parasitic control of subjects by restricting affective communication, making revolution impossible.Lemmens – Lemmens, P. (n.d.). The conditions of the Common. A Stieglerian critique ON Hardt AND Negri's thesis on Cognitive capitalism as a prefiguration of communism. The_Conditions_of_the_Common_A_Stieglerian_Critique_on_Hardt_and_Negri_s_Thesis_on_Cognitive_Capitalism_as_a_Prefiguration_of_Communism 1AC – Paradigm1~ Yes 1AR theory – anything else means infinite abuse – drop the debater, competing interps, and the highest layer – the 1AR is too short to make up for the time trade-off – no RVIs – 6 min 2NR means they can brute force me every time – eval after the 1AR – only way to check back for 7 minute NC dump. No new 2NR weighing or theory – they can up-layer the short 3 minute 2AR with infinite no-risk paradigm issues for 6 minutes.2~ Presumption and Permissibility Affirm – ~A~ We assume statements true until proven false. You'd believe me if I told you that my name was Agastya unless you already had a reason to believe otherwise. The neg may not read meta-theory – I only have time to check abuse 1 time but you can do it in the NC and 2N, up-layering my attempt means we never get to the best norm. This means reject any reason why an aff spike is bad since they claim aff theory is unfair. And, drop them for contesting spikes – skews 1ar time allocation cause I invested time in reading them. ~B~ Affirming is harder – the short 1AR is always at a disadvantage to the 7 minute NC dump – means that if the round's equal I did the better debating.3~ No 2NR "I meet" arguments – A~ Skews theory ground because they're each a NIB for me to winning theory which kills my ability to check abuse. B~ Skews time, they can make three minutes of blippy I meets that I can't cover because the 2AR is too short. No neg arguments – skews me to answer those. Answering this triggers a contradiction since it relies on an analytic argument and those affirm since I spoke first and they were your fault for creating. Also no new 2n arguments, weighing, and paradigm issues. a) overloads the 2AR with a massive clarification burden b) it becomes impossible to check NC abuse if you can dump on reasons the shell doesn't matter in the 2NR – c) neg has access to bidirectional shells which makes neg shells impossible to meet and impact turns your reading of the shells since I'll always lose on an interpretation.4~ The neg may not read nibs or OCIs a) you can up-layer for 7 minutes that I have to answer before I even have access to offense b) inf neg abuse since you would just read 7 mins of auto-negate arguments c) The neg may not read overview answers to aff arguments – they can up-layer all aff arguments for 7 minutes and the 1ar has to shift through it all. I have a computer virus that prevents changing font size and everything's in an overview. d) OCIs are just shorter theory args they can blow up. No neg analytics - I don't have time to cover 100 blippy arguments in the NC since you can read 7 min of analytics and extend any of them to win. No Ks on spikes – moot all the time I spent reading it. This means they must only line by line aff arguments, since otherwise they function as nibs before I access warrants.5~ Can't contest both the fwk and ROB a) forces me to win my fwk is relevant, then win the fwk, then win offense which is a 3-1 skew b) All neg interps are counter interps since the aff takes an implicit stance on every issue which means you need an RVI to become offensive. C) You should accept all aff interps and assume I meet neg theory since the aff speaks in the dark and I have to take a stance on something, you can at least react and adapt.reject all answers to this theory argument – you solve all objections by picking a specific ROB and being the only one that links offense.6~ Reject neg fairness concerns since a) 13-7 time skew and 6-minute collapse gives the negative the strategic advantage and means the AFF must split 1AR time. b) The NC has the ability to uplayer and restart the round and have time to generate offense that matters. c) The AFF will defend NEG preferences on specificity insofar as it doesn't require me to abandon my maxim. Subsequently, you must propose all interps about my advocacy to guarantee better substantive debates. This also means that you should reevaluate the AC under the interpretation. If there is a problem with the paradigmatic issues set, it would justify dropping them rather than the AFF in its entirety since they are logically a prerequisite to the round. d) You have access to more positions due to generic backfiles and bidirectional shells which means neg theory is impossible to avoid. Also, fairness definitionally questions ability to engage in same practice, any abuse is solved for when you affirm next round which is terminal defense to neg shells – only affirming solves because you can construct the aff the way you like while neg is always reactive which means you can't do anything every round d) neg reactivity means you can just perfectly react to any of my advantages and then generate offense – if anything it'll be for 3 mins max which evens out the 1ar and 2n and and no neg analytics. | 9/5/21 |
SEPTOCT - AC - Be Prepared De-leuze v4Tournament: Loyola Invitational | Round: Triples | Opponent: Lynbrook SM | Judge: Panel SO21 Deleuze AC1ACSPIKES ON THE BOTTOMAC – You're Going De-LeuzeWe are dynamic – overtime, affective encounters with our surroundings through time shape subjectivity, yet representational thought ascribes to them a limited essence – our model resists the imposition of sameness onto a chaotic world.Deleuze – Deleuze, Gilles. Difference and Repitition. Translated by Paul Patton. 1968 Our instability necessitates power structures of rhizomatic becoming that embrace difference. Dominant economic models repress creative desires and over-code social life – fields that are not intelligible within straited space are excluded as deviant.Rowe 13 – Rowe, J. E. (2013). Understanding economic development as a Deleuzian "plateau." Local Economy, 28(1), 99–113. doi:10.1177/0269094212465580, Agastya Thus, the roll of the ballot is to embrace economic creative difference. Our orientation is key to pedagogy – we need to tip the scales towards a minoritarian repositioning to mobilize moments of relationality and challenge dominant epistemologies.Carlin and Wallin – Carlin, Matthew. Wallin, Jason. "Deleuze and Guattari, Politics and Education." Bloomsbury. 2014. Pg. 119-121 The politics of stable subjectivity coopts all attempts at resistance – it stabilizes complex features into unchanging models which dooms all radical praxis to failure.Rolli – Rolli, Marc. "Immanence and Transcendence" Bulletin de la Sociite Amincaine de Philosophie de Langue Franfais Volume 14, Number 2, Fall 2004 Static rules fail since each agent formulates their own interpretation in moments of crisis – we must orient agency towards chaos to break free from indeterminate principles.Smith – Nathan Jun and Daniel W. Smith. "Deleuze and Ethics." Now affirm – The member nations of the World Trade Organization ought to reduce intellectual property protections for medicines. CPs and PICs don't negate – they don't disprove the thesis of the AFF which destroys affective revolution. I'll clarify specification in CX to avoid frivolous debates.Medical intellectual property protections proliferate the Empire's parasitic control of subjects by restricting affective communication, making revolution impossible.Lemmens – Lemmens, P. (n.d.). The conditions of the Common. A Stieglerian critique ON Hardt AND Negri's thesis on Cognitive capitalism as a prefiguration of communism. The_Conditions_of_the_Common_A_Stieglerian_Critique_on_Hardt_and_Negri_s_Thesis_on_Cognitive_Capitalism_as_a_Prefiguration_of_Communism Restrictions of fluidity idealize life to warrant a cleansing of difference which is the root cause of material violence and collapses to fascism.Evans 10 – Brad Evans, Lecturer in the School of Politics and International Studies at the University of Leeds and Programme Director for International Relations, "Foucault's Legacy: Security, War, and Violence in the 21st Century," Security Dialogue vol.41, no. 4, August 2010, pg. 422-424 Utilitarianism fails – multiple warrants.Cleveland ~Cleveland, Paul A. "The Failure of Utilitarian Ethics in Political Economy." Independent Institute. https://www.independent.org/publications/article.asp?id=1602. Published 1 September 2002~ AdvantageOnly the plan can solve covid access – inequalities heighten the risk of mutations and uneven development – neg objections miss the boat.Kumar 21 ~Rajeesh; Associate Fellow at the Institute, currently working on a project titled "Emerging Powers and the Future of Global Governance: India and International Institutions." He has PhD in International Organization from Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. Prior to joining MP-IDSA in 2016, he taught at JamiaMilliaIslamia, New Delhi (2010-11and 2015-16) and University of Calicut, Kerala (2007-08). His areas of research interest are International Organizations, India and Multilateralism, Global Governance, and International Humanitarian Law. He is the co-editor of two books;Eurozone Crisis and the Future of Europe: Political Economy of Further Integration and Governance (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014); and Islam, Islamist Movements and Democracy in the Middle East: Challenges, Opportunities and Responses (Delhi: Global Vision Publishing, 2013); "WTO TRIPS Waiver and COVID-19 Vaccine Equity," IDSA Issue Briefs; https://idsa.in/issuebrief/wto-trips-waiver-covid-vaccine-rkumar-120721~~ Justin Yes scale-up for covid.Erfani et al 21 ~Parsa; Lawrence Gostin; Vanessa Kerry; Parsa Erfani is a Fogarty Global Health Scholar at Harvard Medical School and the University of Global Health Equity. Lawrence Gostin is a professor at Georgetown University Law Center, director of the school's O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, and director of the World Health Organization Center on National and Global Health Law. Vanessa Kerry is a critical care physician at Massachusetts General Hospital, director of the Program for Global Public Policy at Harvard Medical School, and CEO of Seed Global Health, a nonprofit that trains health workers in countries with critical shortages; "Beyond a symbolic gesture: What's needed to turn the IP waiver into Covid-19 vaccines," STAT; 5/19/21; https://www.statnews.com/2021/05/19/beyond-a-symbolic-gesture-whats-needed-to-turn-the-ip-waiver-into-covid-19-vaccines/~~ Justin Corona escalates security threats that cause extinction – cooperation thesis is wrong.Recna 21 ~Research Center for Nuclear Weapon Abolition; Nagasaki, Japan; "Pandemic Futures and Nuclear Weapon Risks: The Nagasaki 75th Anniversary pandemic-nuclear nexus scenarios final report," Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament; 5/28/21; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25751654.2021.1890867~~ Justin 1AC – Paradigm1 – Yes 1AR theory – anything else means infinite abuse – drop the debater, competing interps, and the highest layer – the 1AR is too short to make up for the time trade-off – no RVIs – 6 min 2NR means they can brute force me every time. | 9/7/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
9/4/21 | kartik@alumnistanfordedu |
| |
9/4/21 | kartik@alumnistanfordedu |
| |
9/5/21 | kartik@alumnistanfordedu |
| |
9/7/21 | kartik@alumnistanfordedu |
| |
9/7/21 | kartik@alumnistanfordedu |
|