Plano East Namdhari Neg
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Loyola | 1 | Opponent: McNeil AG | Judge: Ahuja 1AC - Biopiracy |
| x | 1 | Opponent: x | Judge: x contact |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
00 -- ContactTournament: x | Round: 1 | Opponent: x | Judge: x jaynamdhari1@gmail.com 4697839452 FB messenger, email, and then text. | 9/4/21 |
SO -- CP -- Consult WHOTournament: Loyola | Round: 1 | Opponent: McNeil AG | Judge: Ahuja 1NC – OFF (2:10)Counterplan Text: Member states of the World Trade Organization ought to consult the World Health Organization on whether or not to reduce intellectual property protections on medicines to the point that discoverable biological elements are not patentable outside of their country of origin. The World Health Organization ought to publicly declare that their decision will represent their future decisions on all intellectual property protections on medicines.The Plan’s unilateral action by the WTO on medical IP undermines WHO legitimacy – forcing a perception of WHO action against Patents is key to re-assert it – they say yes.Rimmer 4, Matthew. "The race to patent the SARS virus: the TRIPS agreement and access to essential medicines." Melbourne Journal of International Law 5.2 (2004): 335-374. WHO Cred key to Global Right to Health – medicine access is critical.Note the Bottom Paragraph is at the bottom of the PDF – I put a paragraph break to indicate it as such – no words are missing. Right to Health solves Nationalist Populism.Friedman 17 Eric Friedman March 2017 "New WHO Leader Will Need Human Rights to Counter Nationalistic Populism" https://www.hhrjournal.org/2017/03/new-who-leader-will-need-human-rights-to-counter-populism/ (JD, Project Leader of the Platform for a Framework Convention on Global Health at the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at the Georgetown University Law Center in Washington, DC)Elmer Populism is an existential threat.de Waal 16 Alex de Waal 12-5-2016 "Garrison America and the Threat of Global War" http://bostonreview.net/war-security-politics-global-justice/alex-de-waal-garrison-america-and-threat-global-war (Executive Director of the World Peace Foundation at the Fletcher School at Tufts University)Elmer | 9/4/21 |
SO -- CP -- Organic MaterialsTournament: Loyola | Round: 1 | Opponent: McNeil AG | Judge: Ahuja 1NC – OFFCounterplan Text: The member nations of the World Trade Organization will reduce intellectual property protections on organic materials. | 9/4/21 |
SO -- DA -- InfraPoliticsTournament: Loyola | Round: 1 | Opponent: McNeil AG | Judge: Ahuja 1NC – OFFBiden’s infrastructure bill will pass through reconciliation but absolute Dem Unity is key.Turns Structural Violence Pharma backlashes to the Plan – they’re aggressive lobbyists and will do anything to preserve patent rights.Turns Case – Waters down the Plan due to lobbying They choose Infrastructure as backlash – they bill costs Pharma millions – lobbyists can derail the Agenda.Brennan 8-2 Zachary Brennan 8-2-2021 "How the biopharma industry is helping to pay for the bipartisan infrastructure bill" https://endpts.com/how-the-biopharma-industry-is-helping-to-pay-for-the-bipartisan-infrastructure-bill/ (Senior Editor at Endpoint News)Elmer Democrat Senators in Big Pharma’s pocket derails the Plan.Sirota 8-23 David Sirota 8-23-2021 "Dem Obstructionists Are Bankrolled By Pharma And Oil" https://www.dailyposter.com/dem-obstructionists-are-bankrolled-by-pharma-and-oil/ (an American journalist, columnist at The Guardian, and editor for Jacobin. He is also a political commentator and radio host based in Denver. He is a nationally syndicated newspaper columnist, political spokesperson, and blogger)Elmer Infrastructure reform solves Existential Climate Change – it results in spill-over.USA Today 7-20 7-20-2021 "Climate change is at 'code red' status for the planet, and inaction is no longer an option" https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/todaysdebate/2021/07/20/climate-change-biden-infrastructure-bill-good-start/7877118002/ Elmer Warming causes extinction in mere decades – scientific consensus proves.Schultz 16 (Robert Schultz ~Retired Professor and Chair of Computer Information Systems at Woodbury University~ "Modern Technology and Human Extinction," http://proceedings.informingscience.org/InSITE2016/InSITE16p131-145Schultz2307.pdf) RW | 9/4/21 |
T - Spec ReductionsTournament: Loyola | Round: 1 | Opponent: McNeil AG | Judge: Ahuja 1NC — OFFInterpretation: The affirmative must specify which intellectual property rights they reduce and to what degree they reduce them.There’s no normal means.Chopra 18, Samir. "The Idea of Intellectual Property Is Nonsensical and Pernicious: Aeon Essays." Aeon, Aeon Magazine, 12 Nov. 2018, aeon.co/essays/the-idea-of-intellectual-property-is-nonsensical-and-pernicious. Samir Choprais professor of philosophy at Brooklyn College of the City University of New York. He is the author of several books, including A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents (2011), co-authored with Laurence White.sid Reduce requires quantification.Passarello 13 – J.D. Candidate, Duke University School of Law, 2013. (Nicholas, NOTE: THE ITEM VETO AND THE THREAT OF APPROPRIATIONS BUNDLING IN ALASKA, 30 Alaska L. Rev. 125, Lexis)BB Violation: they don’tStandardsa~ Shiftiness – vague plan wording wrecks Neg Ground since it’s impossible to know which DAs link or which CPs are competitive since different IP’s have different implications – absent 1AC specification, the 1AR can squirrel out of links by saying they don’t effect a certain protection or they don’t reduce IP enough to trigger the link.b~ Topic Education – nuanced debates about IP requires specification since each form of IPR has specific issues related to it so generalization disincentivizes in-depth research. Topic Education is a voter since we only debate the topic for two months.Fairness is a voter since it’s debate is a game so it’s a jurisdictional question and sequencing to evaluating any other argument in the debate.Reductions Spec isn’t regressive – it’s a core discussion central to the literature, we’ve read a card proving predictability, and is a floor for topic debates.CX doesn’t check - 1~ Skews pre-round prep – key to in-depth clash, 2~ Judges don’t flow CX which makes it unverifiableUse DTD since a~ can’t drop an absence of something and it can’t rectify the skew since this skewed the entire 1nc b~ it’s a necessary floor for debate-ability since the damage is irreparable.Use competing interps – Reasonability is arbitrary and causes a race to the bottom of questionable argumentation.No 1AR RVI’s – 1~ Forces the 1NC to go all-in on Theory which kills substance education, 2~ Encourages Baiting since the 1AC will purposely be abusive, and 3~ Illogical – you shouldn’t win for not being abusive.1NC Theory outweighs on scope cause 1AC abuse effects every speech – we had to be abusive since the 1AC was abusive first. | 9/4/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
9/4/21 | jaynamdhari1@gmailcom |
|