Mission San Jose Raju Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | Quads | - | - |
|
| ||
| Yale University Invitational 2021 | 1 | Millburn WW | Fabrice Etienne |
|
|
| |
| Yale University Invitational 2021 | 3 | Claudia Taylor AP | Mariana Colicchio |
|
|
| |
| Yale University Invitational 2021 | 5 | Loveless Academic Magnet Program RR | Luke Gastelu |
|
|
| |
| Yale University Invitational 2021 | Doubles | Milton Academy AT | Gastelu - Dumas - Herrera |
|
|
| |
| Yale University Invitational 2021 | Octas | Princeton CB | Morris - Waldman - Herrera |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Yale University Invitational 2021 | 1 | Opponent: Millburn WW | Judge: Fabrice Etienne 1AC - communities |
| Yale University Invitational 2021 | 3 | Opponent: Claudia Taylor AP | Judge: Mariana Colicchio 1AC - Mollow Non-T |
| Yale University Invitational 2021 | 5 | Opponent: Loveless Academic Magnet Program RR | Judge: Luke Gastelu 1AC - Capitalism TRIPs |
| Yale University Invitational 2021 | Doubles | Opponent: Milton Academy AT | Judge: Gastelu - Dumas - Herrera 1AC - Cap |
| Yale University Invitational 2021 | Octas | Opponent: Princeton CB | Judge: Morris - Waldman - Herrera 1AC - Evergreening |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - GeneralTournament: All | Round: Quads | Opponent: - | Judge: - You can contact me on: I prefer email but if you want to contact me on facebook, please make sure I'm friend requested first or I won't see the message. Please put content warnings for anything graphic Lmk if you need me to meet any disclosure interps - if I don't do cites, os, rr's, or anything of that sorts, it is because they are not working but I will happily send them to you externally | 9/17/21 |
G - Th - Contact InfoTournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: 1 | Opponent: Millburn WW | Judge: Fabrice Etienne | 9/17/21 |
G - Th - Dictionary DefinitionsTournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: 1 | Opponent: Millburn WW | Judge: Fabrice Etienne | 9/17/21 |
G - Th - Fairness SpecTournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: Octas | Opponent: Princeton CB | Judge: Morris - Waldman - Herrera extemped | 9/19/21 |
G - Th - Tournament Name DisclosureTournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: 3 | Opponent: Claudia Taylor AP | Judge: Mariana Colicchio The standard is inclusion - they make debate inaccessible to novices or small schools who compete on the circuit but don’t have access to resources or have knowledge of debate lingo to know the shorthand nicknames for tournaments. Two internal links to accessibility - 1) lets debaters see if you won or lost on tab going for specific strategies or hitting specific strategies, letting debaters adapt around that and b) lets debaters see what speaks judges gave to help them see how good you were at going for x argument. Independently links into reciprocity since if I disclosed one way and you didnt’ you had the advantage in this round. Outweighs - none of their standards matter if debaters can’t access them and means reasonability is uniquely wrong since even a 1 risk of exclusion is bad, you obviously don’t say some level of exclusion is justified | 9/18/21 |
SeptOct - CP - Abolish WTOTournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Milton Academy AT | Judge: Gastelu - Dumas - Herrera CP:
Agreements under the WTO are self serving and inherently neoliberal - doing the plan independently is necessaryFukuda 10 Fukuda, Yasuo. "WTO regime as a new stage of imperialism: Decaying capitalism and its alternative." World Review of Political Economy 1.3 (2010): 485. MSJ SB | 9/19/21 |
SeptOct - CP - Consult WHOTournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: 5 | Opponent: Loveless Academic Magnet Program RR | Judge: Luke Gastelu CP: The member nations of the World Trade Organization ought to enter into a prior and binding consultation with the World Health Organization over waiving the TRIPS agreement.Rimmer 4, Matthew. "The race to patent the SARS virus: the TRIPS agreement and access to essential medicines." Melbourne Journal of International Law 5.2 (2004): 335-374. https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/1681117/Rimmer.pdf (BA (Hons), LLB (Hons) (Australian National University), PhD (New South Wales); Lecturer at ACIPA, the Faculty of Law, The Australian National University)SidK + Elmer WHO says yesSpencer Kimball and Rich Mendez, 7-3-2020, "WHO chief urges world to follow U.S. lead and support waiving Covid vaccine patent protections," CNBC, https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/07/who-chief-urges-world-to-follow-us-waive-covid-vaccine-patent-protections.html SR Consultation displays strong leadership, authority, and cohesion among member states which are key to WHO legitimacyGostin et al 15 (Lawrence O., Linda D. and Timothy J. O’Neill Professor of Global Health Law at Georgetown University, Faculty Director of the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on Public Health Law and Human Rights, JD from Duke University) “The Normative Authority of the World Health Organization,” Georgetown University Law Center, 5/2/2015 JL WHO legitimacy is uniquely necessary to resist pandemics, populism, and conflict through solidarity - flips their accessibility offenseFriedman 17 Eric Friedman March 2017 “New WHO Leader Will Need Human Rights to Counter Nationalistic Populism” https://www.hhrjournal.org/2017/03/new-who-leader-will-need-human-rights-to-counter-populism/ (JD, Project Leader of the Platform for a Framework Convention on Global Health at the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at the Georgetown University Law Center in Washington, DC)Elmer | 9/18/21 |
SeptOct - CP - Consult WIPOTournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: 1 | Opponent: Millburn WW | Judge: Fabrice Etienne CP: The member nations of the World Trade Organization ought to engage in a prior and binding consultation with the World Intellectual Property Organization to reduce intellectual property protections for medicinesJohn Zarocostas, freelance journalist December 2017, "Perspectives on access to medicines and IP rights," No Publication, https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2017/06/article_0002.html SR WIPO says yesJames Pooley, 5-25-2021, "The Big Secret Behind the Proposed TRIPS Waiver," IPWatchdog, https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2021/05/25/big-secret-behind-proposed-trips-waiver/id=133905/ SR | 9/17/21 |
SeptOct - CP - Indigenous MedicinesTournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: 1 | Opponent: Millburn WW | Judge: Fabrice Etienne CP: The member nations of the World Trade Organization ought to reduce intellectual property protections for all medicines except for medicines created by indigenous folks, for which all ownership ought to be transferred to the indigenous communities that originally developed the medicine.Ngoc Tang, 3-24-2020, Finance Major, CSULB 2021, "The Importance of Native American Intellectual Property," California State University, Long Beach, https://www.csulb.edu/college-of-business/legal-resource-center/article/the-importance-of-native-american-intellectual SR *brackets in text* The CP gives indigenous nations resources for self sovereignty and centers discussions around native demands, which better allows for the accessibility of those medicinesSimon Brascoupé and Karin Endemann, Fall 1999, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ABORIGINAL PEOPLE: A WORKING PAPER https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/tk/en/databases/creative_heritage/docs/ip_aboriginal_people.pdf SR | 9/17/21 |
SeptOct - Hijack - ContractsTournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: 1 | Opponent: Millburn WW | Judge: Fabrice Etienne That negates: 1 Aff breaks existing contracts. Weighs under their fw directly since breaking promises violates trust in a communitySauer 21 Hans; Deputy General Counsel and Vice President for Intellectual Property for the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO), a major trade association representing more than 1,000 biotechnology companies from the medical, agricultural, environmental, and industrial sectors. At BIO, he advises the organization’s board of directors, amicus committee, and various staff committees on patent and other intellectual-property-related matters. Before taking his current position at BIO in 2006, he was chief patent counsel for MGI Pharma Inc. in Bloomington, MN, and senior patent counsel for Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc. in Baltimore, MD. Mr. Sauer holds a M.S. degree in biology from the University of Ulm in his native Germany, a Ph.D. in neuroscience from the University of Lund, Sweden, and a J.D. degree from Georgetown University Law Center, where he serves as adjunct professor; “Waiving IP Rights During Times of COVID: A ‘False Good Idea’,” IP Watch Dog; 4/19/21; https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2021/04/19/waiving-ip-rights-during-times-of-covid-a-false-good-idea/id=132399/ Justin 2 Aff forecloses future contractsHilty et al 21 Reto Hilty Director at the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition and a professor at the University of Zurich Pedro Henrique D. Batista Doctoral student and Junior Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Suelen Carls Senior Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Daria Kim Senior Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Matthias Lamping Senior Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Peter R. Slowinski Doctoral student and Junior Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition; “10 Arguments against a Waiver of Intellectual Property Rights,” Oxford Law; 6/29/21; https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2021/06/10-arguments-against-waiver-intellectual-property-rights Justin | 9/17/21 |
SeptOct - NC - LibertarianismTournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: 5 | Opponent: Loveless Academic Magnet Program RR | Judge: Luke Gastelu Objective morality is epistemically inaccessible – The solution is the libertarian utopia – a political philosophy to preserve freedom and people’s conceptions of truth, insofar as it doesn’t violate someone else’s freedom to do the same Thus, the standard is consistency with libertarianism. Prefer additionally - all theories presume the freedom to follow them. I’ll defend a lack of an obligation to the aff. Negate: IP protections define agents as autonomous beings who are able to create their own ideas and boost the free exchange of ideas in the free market by NPEs | 9/18/21 |
SeptOct - T - AspecTournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Milton Academy AT | Judge: Gastelu - Dumas - Herrera
| 9/19/21 |
SeptOct - T - FrameworkTournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: 3 | Opponent: Claudia Taylor AP | Judge: Mariana Colicchio Resolved means a policyWords and Phrases 64 Words and Phrases Permanent Edition. “Resolved”. 1964. Vote neg for limits: their model has no resolutional bound and creates the possibility for literally an infinite number of 1ACs. Not debating the topic allows someone to specialize in one area of the library for 4 years giving them a huge edge over people who switch research focus ever 2 months. Cutting negs to every possible aff wrecks small schools, which has a disparate impact on under-resourced and minority debaters. Counter-interpretations are arbitrary, unpredictable, and don’t solve the world of neg prep because there’s no grounding in the resolution Terminal defense to their model – Drop the debater - severance kills 1NC strat construction—1AR restart favors aff since it’s 7-6 time skew and they get 2 speeches to my one. Competing interps - a) reasonability’s arbitrary and forces judge intervention especially with 2ar recontextualizations to always sound like the more reasonable debater b) norm setting - we find the best possible norms c) reasonability collapses - you use offense/defense paradigm to evaluate brightlines. This means Even if their aff is answerable, the ones they incentivize are not which means you presume the worst possible affs because people inevitably want to be as abusive as possible for the win and they create a model of self care No rvi’s or impact turns - No 1ar theory or independent voters: you get 2ar ethos to blow up a 20 second shell we overcover and responses to my counter interp will be new causing intervention. | 9/18/21 |
SeptOct - T - ReduceTournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: 5 | Opponent: Loveless Academic Magnet Program RR | Judge: Luke Gastelu Prefer - its a legal definition from the Supreme Court which is the only legally applicable and predictable one - new 1ar definitions are unpredictable and late breaking Violation: the aff defends a temporary waiver. Standards: | 9/18/21 |
SeptOct - T - Reduce v2Tournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: Octas | Opponent: Princeton CB | Judge: Morris - Waldman - Herrera Interpretation: The affirmative must only defend a permanent reduction of intellectual property protections for medicinesReynolds 59 – Judge (In the Matter of Doris A. Montesani, Petitioner, v. Arthur Levitt, as Comptroller of the State of New York, et al., Respondents NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department 9 A.D.2d 51; 189 N.Y.S.2d 695; 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7391 August 13, 1959, lexis) Prefer - its a legal definition from the Supreme Court which is the only legally applicable and predictable one - new 1ar definitions are unpredictable and late breaking Violation: One and done does not permanently decrease IP, because one patent term still exists Standards: | 9/19/21 |
SeptOct - Th - Spec IPTournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: 5 | Opponent: Loveless Academic Magnet Program RR | Judge: Luke Gastelu Its a vague and ambiguous term with no meaningRichard M. Stallman, 2018/12/15, Did You Say “Intellectual Property”? It's a Seductive Mirage https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.en.html SR Standards: Cx doesn’t check - a prep skew - we were forced to prep a 1NC that hedges around the potential of you not speccing and had to prep multiple case negs b incentivizes infinite abuse and hope you don’t get called out since its no risk if we ask you and you can strategically not meet then get extra time in cx to prep the shell since we asked c non verifiable since judges don’t flow it d no brightline to what constitutes a check | 9/18/21 |
SeptOct - Th - Spec MedicineTournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Milton Academy AT | Judge: Gastelu - Dumas - Herrera Medicines is a vague and broad term - no normal means Standards:
Cx doesn’t check - a prep skew - we were forced to prep a 1NC that hedges around the potential of you not speccing and had to prep multiple case negs b incentivizes infinite abuse and hope you don’t get called out since its no risk if we ask you and you can strategically not meet then get extra time in cx to prep the shell since we asked c non verifiable since judges don’t flow it d no brightline to what constitutes a check | 9/19/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
9/17/21 | shreyraju@gmailcom |
| |
9/18/21 | shreyraju@gmailcom |
| |
9/18/21 | shreyraju@gmailcom |
| |
9/19/21 | shreyraju@gmailcom |
|