| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loyola | 1 | St croix prep ad | Michael kurian |
|
|
| |
| Loyola | 4 | west ranch SV | Claudia Ribera |
|
|
| |
| Loyola | 6 | prospect st | sreyaash das |
|
|
| |
| its your birthday | Quads | me | also me |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Loyola | 1 | Opponent: St croix prep ad | Judge: Michael kurian 1ac- whole res |
| Loyola | 4 | Opponent: west ranch SV | Judge: Claudia Ribera 1ac- whole res |
| Loyola | 6 | Opponent: prospect st | Judge: sreyaash das 1ac- virtue ethics |
| its your birthday | Quads | Opponent: me | Judge: also me theres nothing here |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 t-reduceTournament: Loyola | Round: 1 | Opponent: St croix prep ad | Judge: Michael kurian Reduce requires quantitative decreasePassarello 13 – J.D. Candidate, Duke University School of Law, 2013. (Nicholas, NOTE: THE ITEM VETO AND THE THREAT OF APPROPRIATIONS BUNDLING IN ALASKA, 30 Alaska L. Rev. 125, Lexis)BB AND the amount of an appropriations item, not the descriptive language accompanying it. | 9/21/21 |
0- aspecTournament: Loyola | Round: 6 | Opponent: prospect st | Judge: sreyaash das Concede no rvis, neg theory first because aff gets infinite time to prep case and allows for abuse, no rvis at all, concede no rvis on. Neg theoryA. Violation – The Affirmative fails to specify an agent of action. AND to shift out of 1NC arguments by allowing 2AC clarification about the agent. Drop the debater to deter future abuse | 9/21/21 |
0-nebelTournament: jack howe | Round: 2 | Opponent: fairmont prep sv | Judge: william race Interpretation: "member nations and medicines " are generic bare plurals. The aff may not defend that member nations of the World Trade Organization ought to reduce intellectual property protections for a medicine or country.Nebel 19. ~Jake Nebel is an assistant professor of philosophy at the University of Southern California and executive director of Victory Briefs. He writes a lot of this stuff lol – duh.~ "Genericity on the Standardized Tests Resolution." Vbriefly. August 12, 2019. https://www.vbriefly.com/2019/08/12/genericity-on-the-standardized-tests-resolution/?fbclid=IwAR0hUkKdDzHWrNeqEVI7m59pwsnmqLl490n4uRLQTe7bWmWDO'avWCNzi14 AND linguistic intuition, which is the primary source of data for linguistic theorizing. Violation: They spec covid vaccines and the USStandards:~1~ precision – the counter-interp justifies them arbitrarily doing away with random words in the resolution which decks negative ground and prep because the aff isn’t bounded by the resolution. Independent voter for jurisdiction – the judge doesn’t have the jurisdiction to vote aff if there wasn’t a legitimate aff.~2~ Limits and ground – their model allows affs to defend anything from Covid vaccines to HIV drugs to Insulin— there's no universal DA since each has different functions and political implications — that explodes neg prep and leads to random medicine of the week affs which makes cutting stable neg links impossible — limits key to reciprocal engagement since they create a caselist for neg prep and it takes out ground like DAs to certain medicines which are some of the few neg generics when affs spec medicines.~3~ TVA solves – you could’ve read your plan as an advantage under a whole res advocacy.Fairness – debate is a competitive activity that requires fairness for objective evaluation. Outweighs because it’s the only intrinsic part of debate – all other rules can be debated over but rely on some conception of fairness to be justified.Drop the debater – a~ deter future abuse and b~ set better norms for debate.Competing interps – ~a~ reasonability is arbitrary and encourages judge intervention since there’s no clear norm, ~b~ it creates a race to the top where we create the best possible norms for debate.No RVIs – a~ illogical, you don’t win for proving that you meet the burden of being fair, logic outweighs since it’s a prerequisite for evaluating any other argument, b~ RVIs incentivize baiting theory and prepping it out which leads to abuse | 9/21/21 |
00-contact infoTournament: its your birthday | Round: Quads | Opponent: me | Judge: also me i will tell you if i am not disclosing a position, but just ask me about what it is, i just won't give you the case (it actually depends lol but most likely if i refuse to disclose its not a cap k) (she/her) | 9/10/21 |
00-navigationTournament: its your birthday | Round: Quads | Opponent: me | Judge: also me I'm not competing second semester so there won't be janfeb or marapr | 9/10/21 |
3-capTournament: Loyola | Round: 4 | Opponent: west ranch SV | Judge: Claudia Ribera AND /or adjudicate outcomes" (Avant et al. 2010, 2). Capitalism alienates people not only from themselves but from society as a whole and only relating them through exchange- Volition is an intrinsic feature of humans, alienation from oneself and others undermines the capacity for one to connect with their volition hence, undermining their humanity and ability to connect with others-turns case because their subjugation of more people into workers is antithetical to that of any ethics.Marcuse 64(Herbert Marcuse was a was a German-American philosopher, sociologist, and political theorist, associated with the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. "Reason and Revolution. Part II, The Rise of Social Theory." 1964 MN IM) AND between persons ~sachliche Verhältnisse von Personen~ and social relations between things. The alternative is to use a historical materialist lens in the debate space to create solidarity of the working class to forefront a socialist transformation from below against the capitalist stratificationSelfa ‘16—(Lance, a frequent contributor to the ISR, and writes a column on U.S. politics in Socialist Worker newspaper, "Socialism in the Air", Summer 2016, Issue ~#101, http://isreview.org/issue/101/socialism-air) AND and conscious, force will be a key task in years to come. | 9/21/21 |
3-cap v2Tournament: Loyola | Round: 6 | Opponent: prospect st | Judge: sreyaash das Links don’t need to state explicit lines of the aff, we are able to prove you are creating these impacts, then we win. Because death is objectively bad. Cap turns their evidence, because cap creates greed. Cant perm a performance, at best they get post fiat offense, links das to the permAny ethical system created from within capitalism will be co-opted by it - their appeal to "ethics" is a distraction from class struggleRed Critique 5 (Winter/Spring, "Left Populisms", http://www.redcritique.org/WinterSpring2005/leftpopulisms.htm) AND , with no choice but to consent to the dictates of capital accumulation. Capitalism alienates people not only from themselves but from society as a whole and only relating them through exchange- Volition is an intrinsic feature of humans, alienation from oneself and others undermines the capacity for one to connect with their volition hence, undermining their humanity and ability to connect with others-turns case because their subjugation of more people into workers is antithetical to that of any ethics.Marcuse 64(Herbert Marcuse was a was a German-American philosopher, sociologist, and political theorist, associated with the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. "Reason and Revolution. Part II, The Rise of Social Theory." 1964 MN IM) AND between persons ~sachliche Verhältnisse von Personen~ and social relations between things. The alternative is to use a historical materialist lens in the debate space to create solidarity of the working class to forefront a socialist transformation from below against the capitalist stratificationSelfa ‘16—(Lance, a frequent contributor to the ISR, and writes a column on U.S. politics in Socialist Worker newspaper, "Socialism in the Air", Summer 2016, Issue ~#101, http://isreview.org/issue/101/socialism-air) AND and conscious, force will be a key task in years to come. The Role of the ballot is to vote for the debater that best methodologically and performatively deconstructs the capitalist mode of production.Reasons to prefer:Alienation- capitalism alienates people from each other by relating them through exchange, and separating them from their desires, this renders people as expendable, and means that as long as capitalism exists under any ethical framework everything will be permissible, makes my framing a prerequisite to accessing theirs.Epistemological- capitalist logic is engrained in our psyche meaning that it controls what we perceive as true, this means that we must deconstruct it before able to make normative decisions because it underpins all that, makes my framing a prerequisite before accessing theirs. | 9/21/21 |
3-fem irTournament: Loyola | Round: 1 | Opponent: St croix prep ad | Judge: Michael kurian The aff’s rhetoric of saving the rest of the world, is inherently consolidate the power in the white, hypermasculine world, which re-entrenches the world into the patriarchy.Agathangelou, A., M., professor of international relations and women, Ming, L.,H., scholar for world theorism and political theorist, (sept, 2004), "Power, Borders, Security, Wealth: Lessons of Violence and Desire from September 11", international studies quarterly, vol 48, no. 3, pp. 517-538 AND such that one comes to mean the other, regardless of the outcome. The reducing of patents is an instance of hyperfeminity, where the reduction of patents is seen as other countries leeching off of creators of medicines, which reenforces the view of hegemonic and hypermasculinity in IR. No perms, they are trying to please everyone else marginally to maintain their powerThe affs rhetoric of removing the system that allows for an opportunity for women to enter the scientific field and leave the overarching systems intact, which allows for cooption by the patriarchy of feminist ideals. It also gets rid of a basis where we are able to incorporate a patent system that allows for the insertion of femininity into inventions. The role of the ballot is the debater who best methodologically deconstructs the patriarchy in round.Burk, D., L., professor of intellectual property and law, (2011), do patents have genders?, journal of gender, social policy and the law, https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1526andcontext=jgspl AND still have it on hand to guide us when a cure becomes available. Feminist resistance to masculine IR is essential for sustained peace – without the alternative, the patriarchal drive for war ensures a spiraling continuum of armed conflictCockburn 10, Cynthia Department of Sociology, The City University London, UK b Centre for the Study of Women and AND identity – as men – explicitly resisting the exploitation of masculinity for war. The alternative is to reject the masculine IR logic of the affirmative in favor of a feminist perspective. Rejection of a framework that normalizes masculine warfare is critical to adopt epistemologies centered on a feminist ethic of peaceCohn and Ruddick 3 (Carol, Researcher and Teacher at Harvard Medical Signs, and Sara, author, A Feminist Ethical Perspective on Weapons of Mass Destruction, http://www.genderandsecurity.umb.edu/cohnruddick.pdf) PJ AND need to both think inside their frame, and about the frame itself. | 9/21/21 |
3-repsTournament: Loyola | Round: 4 | Opponent: west ranch SV | Judge: Claudia Ribera Gut check- this rhetoric is incredibly sinophobic and excludes debaters like me from the debate spaceViet Thanh Nguyen, J. W. (2021, March 20). Perspective | bipartisan political rhetoric about Asia leads to anti-Asian violence here. Retrieved July 27, 2021, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/atlanta-shooting-political-rhetoric-violence/2021/03/19/f882f8e8-88b9-11eb-8a8b-5cf82c3dffe4'story.html AND an analyst at the National Weather Service. The charges were later dropped. | 9/21/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
9/21/21 | ylei157@millardpsorg |
| |
9/21/21 | ylei157@millardpsorg |
| |
9/21/21 | ylei157@millardpsorg |
|