| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loyola | 4 | west ranch SV | Claudia Ribera |
|
|
| |
| Loyola | 1 | St croix prep ad | Michael kurian |
|
|
| |
| Loyola | 6 | prospect st | sreyaash das |
|
|
| |
| its your birthday | Quads | me | also me |
|
|
| |
| jack howe | 3 | dougherty valley tm | christopher perez |
|
|
| |
| jack howe | 6 | mount vernon tk | diana alverez |
|
|
| |
| jack howe | 2 | fairmont prep sv | william race |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Loyola | 4 | Opponent: west ranch SV | Judge: Claudia Ribera 1ac- whole res |
| Loyola | 1 | Opponent: St croix prep ad | Judge: Michael kurian 1ac- whole res |
| Loyola | 6 | Opponent: prospect st | Judge: sreyaash das 1ac- virtue ethics |
| its your birthday | Quads | Opponent: me | Judge: also me theres nothing here |
| jack howe | 3 | Opponent: dougherty valley tm | Judge: christopher perez 1ac- evergreening |
| jack howe | 6 | Opponent: mount vernon tk | Judge: diana alverez ac- covid apartheid |
| jack howe | 2 | Opponent: fairmont prep sv | Judge: william race 1ac- us waive covid meds |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0-contact infoTournament: its your birthday | Round: Quads | Opponent: me | Judge: also me i will tell you if i am not disclosing a position, but just ask me about what it is, i just won't give you the case (it actually depends lol but most likely if i refuse to disclose its not a cap k) (she/her) | 9/21/21 |
0-t elimTournament: jack howe | Round: 6 | Opponent: mount vernon tk | Judge: diana alverez Eliminating is distinctive from reduce, which the affirmative advocates for(WIKIDIFF) 2021, reduce and eliminate, what is the difference https://wikidiff.com/reduce/eliminate AND eliminate is to completely destroy (something) so that it no longer exists They advocate to eliminate ''''' from the IPP regulationStandards1~} Limits- their interpretation allows for the aff to spec specific countries and subsets under the genre of medicine2~} Ground- they steal core neg ground, there is a difference between elmination and reduce, which leads to elim cps and das3~} topic education- when the affirmative skirts the resolution, there’s no real topic education on the affirmative or the negative which removes the use of debate as a model for policy making, which is an internal link to educationVoterFairness, internal link to education, as if rounds were not fair, then debaters would not want to continue debating, which leads to no education gainedDrop the debater to deter future abuse.Severance is an independent voter, if they skirt out of their aff, vote neg on presumptionNo RVIs – a~ illogical, you don’t win for proving that you meet the burden of being fair, logic outweighs since it’s a prerequisite for evaluating any other argument, b~ RVIs incentivize baiting theory and prepping it out which leads to maximally abusive practices | 9/21/21 |
00- aspecTournament: Loyola | Round: 6 | Opponent: prospect st | Judge: sreyaash das Concede no rvis, neg theory first because aff gets infinite time to prep case and allows for abuse, no rvis at all, concede no rvis on. Neg theoryA. Violation – The Affirmative fails to specify an agent of action. AND to shift out of 1NC arguments by allowing 2AC clarification about the agent. Drop the debater to deter future abuse | 9/21/21 |
00-navigationTournament: its your birthday | Round: Quads | Opponent: me | Judge: also me I'm not competing second semester so there won't be janfeb or marapr | 9/21/21 |
00-t reduceTournament: Loyola | Round: 1 | Opponent: St croix prep ad | Judge: Michael kurian Reduce requires quantitative decreasePassarello 13 – J.D. Candidate, Duke University School of Law, 2013. (Nicholas, NOTE: THE ITEM VETO AND THE THREAT OF APPROPRIATIONS BUNDLING IN ALASKA, 30 Alaska L. Rev. 125, Lexis)BB AND the amount of an appropriations item, not the descriptive language accompanying it. | 9/21/21 |
3-capTournament: Loyola | Round: 4 | Opponent: west ranch SV | Judge: Claudia Ribera AND /or adjudicate outcomes" (Avant et al. 2010, 2). Capitalism alienates people not only from themselves but from society as a whole and only relating them through exchange- Volition is an intrinsic feature of humans, alienation from oneself and others undermines the capacity for one to connect with their volition hence, undermining their humanity and ability to connect with others-turns case because their subjugation of more people into workers is antithetical to that of any ethics.Marcuse 64(Herbert Marcuse was a was a German-American philosopher, sociologist, and political theorist, associated with the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. "Reason and Revolution. Part II, The Rise of Social Theory." 1964 MN IM) AND between persons ~sachliche Verhältnisse von Personen~ and social relations between things. The alternative is to use a historical materialist lens in the debate space to create solidarity of the working class to forefront a socialist transformation from below against the capitalist stratificationSelfa ‘16—(Lance, a frequent contributor to the ISR, and writes a column on U.S. politics in Socialist Worker newspaper, "Socialism in the Air", Summer 2016, Issue ~#101, http://isreview.org/issue/101/socialism-air) AND and conscious, force will be a key task in years to come. | 9/21/21 |
3-cap v2Tournament: Loyola | Round: 6 | Opponent: prospect st | Judge: sreyaash das Links don’t need to state explicit lines of the aff, we are able to prove you are creating these impacts, then we win. Because death is objectively bad. Cap turns their evidence, because cap creates greed. Cant perm a performance, at best they get post fiat offense, links das to the permAny ethical system created from within capitalism will be co-opted by it - their appeal to "ethics" is a distraction from class struggleRed Critique 5 (Winter/Spring, "Left Populisms", http://www.redcritique.org/WinterSpring2005/leftpopulisms.htm) AND , with no choice but to consent to the dictates of capital accumulation. Capitalism alienates people not only from themselves but from society as a whole and only relating them through exchange- Volition is an intrinsic feature of humans, alienation from oneself and others undermines the capacity for one to connect with their volition hence, undermining their humanity and ability to connect with others-turns case because their subjugation of more people into workers is antithetical to that of any ethics.Marcuse 64(Herbert Marcuse was a was a German-American philosopher, sociologist, and political theorist, associated with the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. "Reason and Revolution. Part II, The Rise of Social Theory." 1964 MN IM) AND between persons ~sachliche Verhältnisse von Personen~ and social relations between things. The alternative is to use a historical materialist lens in the debate space to create solidarity of the working class to forefront a socialist transformation from below against the capitalist stratificationSelfa ‘16—(Lance, a frequent contributor to the ISR, and writes a column on U.S. politics in Socialist Worker newspaper, "Socialism in the Air", Summer 2016, Issue ~#101, http://isreview.org/issue/101/socialism-air) AND and conscious, force will be a key task in years to come. The Role of the ballot is to vote for the debater that best methodologically and performatively deconstructs the capitalist mode of production.Reasons to prefer:Alienation- capitalism alienates people from each other by relating them through exchange, and separating them from their desires, this renders people as expendable, and means that as long as capitalism exists under any ethical framework everything will be permissible, makes my framing a prerequisite to accessing theirs.Epistemological- capitalist logic is engrained in our psyche meaning that it controls what we perceive as true, this means that we must deconstruct it before able to make normative decisions because it underpins all that, makes my framing a prerequisite before accessing theirs. | 9/21/21 |
3-cap v3Tournament: jack howe | Round: 3 | Opponent: dougherty valley tm | Judge: christopher perez The WTO is the primary mechanism imperialist western nations use to force neoliberalism on developing nations; the link is the 1AC advocacy for the WTO to set the rules and resolve disputesFukuda 10 AND the rules of trade, specifically through cozy relationships with the US government. ~Bello~ First, the WTO props up U.S. neoliberal heg – reform is the wrong approach – every empiric flows neg.Bello: Bello, Walden ~Filipino academic, environmentalist, and social worker who served as a member of the House of Representatives of the Philippines~ "Why Reform of the WTO is the Wrong Agenda" Focus on Trade, No. 43, December 1999, https://www.tni.org/my/node/6851 AND these are Jurassic institutions in an age of participatory political and economic democracy. ~Reform~ AND the aff is only committed to temporary and exceptional reforms like short-term waivers – that puts power in the WTO’s hands to decide when a pandemic is "over" or which types of patents to pursue.No perms- by affirming that the WTO should be making decisions and the patents protecting these should exist, further affirms the institution of capitalism.Capitalism alienates people not only from themselves but from society as a whole and only relating them through exchange- Volition is an intrinsic feature of humans, alienation from oneself and others undermines the capacity for one to connect with their volition hence, undermining their humanity and ability to connect with others-turns case because their subjugation of more people into workers is antithetical to that of any ethics.Marcuse 64(Herbert Marcuse was a was a German-American philosopher, sociologist, and political theorist, associated with the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. "Reason and Revolution. Part II, The Rise of Social Theory." 1964 MN IM) AND between persons ~sachliche Verhältnisse von Personen~ and social relations between things. The alternative is to use a historical materialist lens in the debate space to create solidarity of the working class to forefront a socialist transformation from below against the capitalist stratificationSelfa ‘16—(Lance, a frequent contributor to the ISR, and writes a column on U.S. politics in Socialist Worker newspaper, "Socialism in the Air", Summer 2016, Issue ~#101, http://isreview.org/issue/101/socialism-air) AND and conscious, force will be a key task in years to come. The Role of the ballot is to vote for the debater that best methodologically and performatively deconstructs the capitalist mode of production.Reasons to prefer:Alienation- capitalism alienates people from each other by relating them through exchange, and separating them from their desires, this renders people as expendable, and means that as long as capitalism exists under any ethical framework everything will be permissible, makes my framing a prerequisite to accessing theirs.Epistemological- capitalist logic is engrained in our psyche meaning that it controls what we perceive as true, this means that we must deconstruct it before able to make normative decisions because it underpins all that, makes my framing a prerequisite before accessing theirs.The aff isn’t able to solve for their impacts of hot spots and amrs wont be solved because the society continues to consume and wont be able to coalesce to be able to act to defeat things like poverty etc | 9/21/21 |
3-fem irTournament: Loyola | Round: 1 | Opponent: St croix prep ad | Judge: Michael kurian The aff’s rhetoric of saving the rest of the world, is inherently consolidate the power in the white, hypermasculine world, which re-entrenches the world into the patriarchy.Agathangelou, A., M., professor of international relations and women, Ming, L.,H., scholar for world theorism and political theorist, (sept, 2004), "Power, Borders, Security, Wealth: Lessons of Violence and Desire from September 11", international studies quarterly, vol 48, no. 3, pp. 517-538 AND such that one comes to mean the other, regardless of the outcome. The reducing of patents is an instance of hyperfeminity, where the reduction of patents is seen as other countries leeching off of creators of medicines, which reenforces the view of hegemonic and hypermasculinity in IR. No perms, they are trying to please everyone else marginally to maintain their powerThe affs rhetoric of removing the system that allows for an opportunity for women to enter the scientific field and leave the overarching systems intact, which allows for cooption by the patriarchy of feminist ideals. It also gets rid of a basis where we are able to incorporate a patent system that allows for the insertion of femininity into inventions. The role of the ballot is the debater who best methodologically deconstructs the patriarchy in round.Burk, D., L., professor of intellectual property and law, (2011), do patents have genders?, journal of gender, social policy and the law, https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1526andcontext=jgspl AND still have it on hand to guide us when a cure becomes available. Feminist resistance to masculine IR is essential for sustained peace – without the alternative, the patriarchal drive for war ensures a spiraling continuum of armed conflictCockburn 10, Cynthia Department of Sociology, The City University London, UK b Centre for the Study of Women and AND identity – as men – explicitly resisting the exploitation of masculinity for war. The alternative is to reject the masculine IR logic of the affirmative in favor of a feminist perspective. Rejection of a framework that normalizes masculine warfare is critical to adopt epistemologies centered on a feminist ethic of peaceCohn and Ruddick 3 (Carol, Researcher and Teacher at Harvard Medical Signs, and Sara, author, A Feminist Ethical Perspective on Weapons of Mass Destruction, http://www.genderandsecurity.umb.edu/cohnruddick.pdf) PJ AND need to both think inside their frame, and about the frame itself. | 9/21/21 |
3-repsTournament: Loyola | Round: 4 | Opponent: west ranch SV | Judge: Claudia Ribera Gut check- this rhetoric is incredibly sinophobic and excludes debaters like me from the debate spaceViet Thanh Nguyen, J. W. (2021, March 20). Perspective | bipartisan political rhetoric about Asia leads to anti-Asian violence here. Retrieved July 27, 2021, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/atlanta-shooting-political-rhetoric-violence/2021/03/19/f882f8e8-88b9-11eb-8a8b-5cf82c3dffe4'story.html AND an analyst at the National Weather Service. The charges were later dropped. | 9/21/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
9/21/21 | ylei157@millardpsorg |
| |
9/21/21 | ylei157@millardpsorg |
| |
9/21/21 | ylei157@millardpsorg |
| |
9/21/21 | ylei157@millardpsorg |
| |
9/21/21 | ylei157@millardpsorg |
| |
9/21/21 | ylei157@millardpsorg |
|