Marcus Rogers Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bronx | 1 | Harrison AC | Ribera, Claudia |
|
|
| |
| Bronx | 4 | Lynbrook SY | Bathily, Silma |
|
|
| |
| Grapevine | 3 | Bridgeland PT | Thode, Micah |
|
|
| |
| Grapevine | 1 | Strake jesuit JK | aldridge, allison |
|
|
| |
| Greenhill | 3 | Westlake AC | Vincent, Christopher |
|
|
| |
| any | Finals | You | idk |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Bronx | 1 | Opponent: Harrison AC | Judge: Ribera, Claudia AC - women in debate performance |
| Bronx | 4 | Opponent: Lynbrook SY | Judge: Bathily, Silma AC - queer necropol |
| Grapevine | 3 | Opponent: Bridgeland PT | Judge: Thode, Micah AC - covid |
| Grapevine | 1 | Opponent: Strake jesuit JK | Judge: aldridge, allison AC - pandemics |
| Greenhill | 3 | Opponent: Westlake AC | Judge: Vincent, Christopher AC - vaccine ineqaulity |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
1 - Cap v IdpolTournament: Bronx | Round: 1 | Opponent: Harrison AC | Judge: Ribera, Claudia Identities are commodified by their consumer profile— separating the individual from the market regenerates the autonomous Self, stabilizing the system and precluding radical changeBlühdorn '6—(Ingolfur, associate Professor in Politics / Political Sociology @ the Department of European Studies @ the University of Bath , "Self-Experience in the Theme Park of Radical Action? Social Movements and Political Articulation in the Late-Modern Condition" pg. 34-37) kb Capitalism undergirds multiple forms of violence— class consciousness is necessaryLaBeouf '17—(Workshy, Leninist anti-imperialism @ Guevarista economics, "The Decaying Nature of Capitalism Poses Only Two Possible Futures: Socialism or Barbarism", January 4th, 2017, https://medium.com/@JoinedAtTheArse/the-decaying-nature-of-capitalism-poses-only-two-possible-futures-socialism-or-barbarism-b3a144432320) kb The alternative is socialism from below—recognizing historical materialism and using it as a building block for socialist party politics creates for hope for the proletariat.Selfa '16—(Lance, a frequent contributor to the ISR, and writes a column on U.S. politics in Socialist Worker newspaper, "Socialism in the Air", Summer 2016, Issue ~#101, http://isreview.org/issue/101/socialism-air) kb The ROB is to vote for the debater that best engages in socialist party politics. Only a denucleated modernity provides a new framework for structural change in social movements subsumes their framing because it's a pre-req to solving for issues for identities.Blühdorn '6—(Ingolfur, associate Professor in Politics / Political Sociology @ the Department of European Studies @ the University of Bath , "Self-Experience in the Theme Park of Radical Action? Social Movements and Political Articulation in the Late-Modern Condition" pg. 33) kb | 10/16/21 |
1 - Counter method join Win debateTournament: Bronx | Round: 1 | Opponent: Harrison AC | Judge: Ribera, Claudia Counter method – join. W.in debateLong term solvencyCoalition building | 10/16/21 |
1 - TFWTournament: Bronx | Round: 1 | Opponent: Harrison AC | Judge: Ribera, Claudia Interpretation: The aff may only garner offense from the hypothetical implementation of the resolutionViolation: they don't – CX proves Net benefits –
A) I can't go for any disad, specific CPs, solvency turns B) Limits: their model has no resolutional bound and creates the possibility for literally an infinite number of 1ACs. Not debating the topic allows someone to specialize in one area of the library for 4 years giving them a huge edge over people who switch research focus ever 2 months, which means their arguments are presumptively false because they haven't been subject to well-researched scrutiny. Cutting negs to every possible aff wrecks small schools, which has a disparate impact on under-resourced and minority debaters. Counter-interpretations are arbitrary, unpredictable, and don't solve the world of neg prep because there's no grounding in the resolution.Procedural fairness outweighs –A) The best solutions are formed with critical contestation from multiple sides – it's more likely we make a good liberation strategy if both debaters can engage and test it.B) Inescapable – every argument you make concedes the authority of fairness: i.e. that the judge will evaluate your arguments. Absent some judge-debater reciprocal relationship, they could just hack against or for you. Means that there is always some implicit policing in debate and the impact turns are terminally non-unique. Also proves that if they win fairness doesn't matter you should vote neg on presumption because you have no reason to not just hack for me.C) Tangibility – voting aff has no terminal impact- it doesn't educate anyone or cause us to make some societal shift whereas theory norms are set all the time like nibs and brackets. The judge isn't really voting for anything when they affirm: you can't set a norm with this aff.They don't get to weigh case against TA) Evaluation – even if their arguments seem true, that's only because they already had an advantage – fairness is a meta constraint on your ability to determine who best meets their ROB. If one debater had ten minutes to speak and the other had three there would be incongruence that alters ability to judge the truth value of who wins on the AC so cross-applications don't work. Which means don't weigh the case against T since I couldn't disprove the case isnce it was non-t.TVA – Read an aff that talks about banning IPP and the impacts it has on women in the medical space and their access to medicineCompeting InterpretationsReasonability causes a race to the bottom because debaters keep being barely reasonableDrop the debater:Dropping them and their advocacy are functionally the same.No RVI's1. Real world applicability- proving that you're being fair doesn't mean you get voted up. | 10/16/21 |
1 - lying in disclosureTournament: Grapevine | Round: 3 | Opponent: Bridgeland PT | Judge: Thode, Micah Interp – debaters cannot lie about disclosureVio – they changed their framing cards and method cards disclosure of full case is keyMakes aff a moving target-Cross apply pardigms from votersScreen shot of FW supercharges abuse because they don't admit in CX to change it | 9/11/21 |
ContactTournament: any | Round: Finals | Opponent: You | Judge: idk I'm welcome to meet any disclosure interp or if you have any triggers or other concerns for the round please contact me If you're interested in any positions I run feel free to reach out as well! Phone - 469-516-4040 | 9/10/21 |
SO - Queer pess KTournament: Grapevine | Round: 1 | Opponent: Strake jesuit JK | Judge: aldridge, allison Politics and society centers around the image of the child this is a reinvestment into a reproductive future inaccessible to the queer body. Thus, queer identities are pushed outside of politics into an ontological deviancy in which we always are framed against society and the future they hope to createBaedan 12 "Not for the children" https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/baedan-baedan~~#toc3 Edelman's critique of politics begins with the figure of the Child. All political positions Their rhetoric of access to medicine begs the question of who that medicine is for. Medicine is made for the "typical patient" a hegemonic imagination that excludes queer folk and their health concerns. It doesn't matter if they make medicine less expensive because the medicine wasn't made for us but rather a heteronormative model that continues to otherize queer folk. Turns case because they only exacerbate health disparities through a rouse of solvency around access to medicine as they continue to overlook and ignore the queer patient.Macfife 19 THE NOT-SO-TYPICAL PATIENT: GYNECOLOGICAL TEACHING ASSOCIATES AND THE STRUGGLE TO QUEER MEDICINE A Thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Master of Arts In Sexuality Studies by Bex MacFife San Francisco, California May 2019 In medical education, students encounter lessons that anticipate the patients they should expect to Queer violence is constantly erased. Every moment that passes more lives are being purged from our history by heterosexual rejections of the notion of queer violence. Thus, the role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best combats structures of queer erasureStanley 11 Eric Stanley (assistant professor in the Department of Gender and Sexuality Studies at the University of California, Riverside) "Near Life, Queer Death Overkill and Ontological Capture" Duke University Press Vol 29 No 2 Summer 2011 p. 7 https://queerhistory.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/near-life-queer-death-eric-stanley.pdf DOA: 8.30.17 BAO Where statistics fail, scars rise to tell other histories. From the phenomenological vault The Alt is the Death Drive – Every society produces its own collapse: The death drive is an unintelligible recognition of the inability of society to contain the fluidity of queerness.Baedan 12: In No Future, Edelman appropriates and privileges a particular psychoanalytic concept: the death | 9/18/21 |
SO - T medicinesTournament: Grapevine | Round: 3 | Opponent: Bridgeland PT | Judge: Thode, Micah Interpretation: "medicines" is a generic bare plural. The aff may not defend that member nations of the World Trade Organization ought to reduce intellectual property protections for a medicine or subset of medicines.Leslie and Lerner 16 ~Sarah-Jane Leslie (Ph.D., Princeton, 2007) is the dean of the Graduate School and Class of 1943 Professor of Philosophy. She has previously served as the vice dean for faculty development in the Office of the Dean of the Faculty, director of the Program in Linguistics, and founding director of the Program in Cognitive Science at Princeton University. She is also affiliated faculty in the Department of Psychology, the University Center for Human Values, the Program in Gender and Sexuality Studies, and the Kahneman-Treisman Center for Behavioral Science and Public Policy~, and Adam Lerner, Ph.D, Postgraduate Research Associate in the Department of Philosophy at Princeton University, 4-24-2016, accessed 9-4-2021, "Generic Generalizations (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)," https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/generics/~~ HWIC And it applies to this topic because medicines fail the upward entailment test, because the WTO ought to reduce intellectual property protections for medicines. Is different from the more general statement WTO ought to reduce intellectual property protections for healthcare.And it fails the adverb quantification test because the WTO ought to reduce intellectual property protections for some medicines has little to no impact on the meaning of the sentence thus, medicines are generic and not existentialViolation: They spec Covid waiversStandardsLimits: they explode limits on the topic theirs an infinite number of different medicines as well as versions of those medicines they could spec insulin, but they could also spec fast acting insulin, or intermediate acting insulin or even smaller variations in those variations like pre-mixed fast acting insulin. that explodes neg prep burden, and allows them to pick affs that have 0 neg ground. Links to fairness because allows for unbeatable affs and equal prep-burden is needed to guarantee reciprocal access to the ballotAnd limits o/w any other standard because without adequate limits debate become a race to the bottom as affs find the most obscure medicine with 0 topic ground meaning it's a internal link to clash, ground, topic edu, and any other standard.TVA – just read your aff as an advantage to a full res AC and PICs don't solve – potential neg abuse doesn't justify a norm that literally forces the neg not to engage.Fairness is a voter cross apply from their UVDTD — deters future abuse because they lose the round for itCompeting Interps — Good enough isn't good— reasonability leads to race to the bottom as teams try and be barely reasonableNo RVIs1~ Illogical—they don't get to win for proving they've been fair2~ T is reactionary to them being abusive first so they shouldn't win for meeting their preround burden | 9/11/21 |
SO - T reduceTournament: Grapevine | Round: 1 | Opponent: Strake jesuit JK | Judge: aldridge, allison Interp: the aff must not specify a timeframe in which the aff takes placeReduce means unconditional and permanentReynolds 59 – Judge (In the Matter of Doris A. Montesani, Petitioner, v. Arthur Levitt, as Comptroller of the State of New York, et al., Respondents ~NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL~ Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department 9 A.D.2d 51; 189 N.Y.S.2d 695; 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7391 August 13, 1959, lexis) Violation – they spec pandemicsLimits – explodes limits there is an infinte amount of different timeframes they can spec IE month of august month of September or even individual weeks meaning its infinitely divisible. Timeframe spec is specifically bad becuase they can cut the aff in and out of certain times to prevent specific issues and get out of any DA from the neg. that explodes neg prep burden, and allows them to pick affs that have literally 0 neg ground or no any information on by picking such a abstract timeframe and even different chunks of time. Links to fairness because allows for unbeatable affs and equal prep-burden is needed to guarantee reciprocal access to the ballotAnd limits o/w any other standard because without adequate limits debate become a race to the bottom as affs find the most obscure timeframe with 0 topic ground meaning it's a internal link to clash, ground, topic edu, and any other standard.TVA – just read your aff as an advantage to a full res AC and PICs don't solve – potential neg abuse doesn't justify a norm that literally forces the neg not to engage. | 9/18/21 |
SO - Weheliye KTournament: Greenhill | Round: 3 | Opponent: Westlake AC | Judge: Vincent, Christopher We do not exist as sovereign subjects but rather a multiplicity of relations to others. We are constantly being affected on by other subjects and beings around us that have far more power on ourselves then we do. This means any ethical theory must start from a standpoint of the instability of subjectivityHardt 14 "The Power to be Affected" The system of legal personhood and the state has failed. It forces minority groups to compete for recognition under the state and requires them to explain their oppression to the oppressor. This recreates categories based off the western man as people are judged in opposition to what is the ideal legal person thus, the ROTB is to vote for the debater that best deconstructs the western manWeheliye 14, Alexander G. Habeas Viscus: Racializing Assemblages, Biopolitics, and Black Feminist Theories of the Human. Duke University Press, 2014. Intellectual property law no matter if its for medicine or culture is rooted in determining one's legal right to property and by extension their legal personhood. Either marginalized groups ask for intellectual protections and have their culture commodified or they reduce protections and have their culture stolen no matter what the legal system of intellectual property rights is bankrupt and engaging in reform will only reinforce the rest of the system.Sunder 04 "property in personhood" MADHAVI SUNDER, august 2004, School of law university of California Their focus Inclusion and equality will inevitably fail as it only reinvests into a system of subjugation. To fight for inclusion for one group not only affirms the rights of the state to determine inclusion but also inevitably excludes other oppressed groups, - Turns caseWeheliye 14, Alexander G. Habeas Viscus: Racializing Assemblages, Biopolitics, and Black Feminist Theories of the Human. Duke University Press, 2014. This creates liminal spaces through the color line in which people are not quite human but instead exist in degrees of difference from the dominate ideal person and therefore are offered rights based on their closeness to the "ideal western man".Wynter ~Sylvia; 2003; "Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human, After Man, Its Overrepresentation—An Argument," CR: The New Centennial Review, Volume 3, Number 3,257-337~ The Argument proposes that the new master code of the bourgeoisie and of its The alternative is to engage in Habeus Viscus to see suffering not as the body but as the flesh, instead of focusing on legal recognition for the oppressed we engage in an affective relation with the suffering voices around us to imagine a future that can not yet be described through the liberal state.Weheliye 14, Alexander G. Habeas Viscus: Racializing Assemblages, Biopolitics, and Black Feminist Theories of the Human. Duke University Press, 2014. | 9/18/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
10/16/21 | rogersj13@golisdnet |
| |
9/11/21 | rogersj13@golisdnet |
| |
9/18/21 | rogersj13@golisdnet |
| |
9/18/21 | rogersj13@golisdnet |
|