Little Rock Central Jones Aff
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Black and Gold Classic | Finals | Little Rock MG | Gilbert, Valdez, Kieklak |
|
| ||
| JW Patterson Invitational | 2 | Harvard Westlake MT | John Sims |
|
| ||
| Little Rock Classic | 1 | Cabot SC | Aryan Gaddi |
|
| ||
| The Glenbrooks | 1 | Hector G Godinez Fundamental KN | Albert Cardenas |
|
| ||
| UK Season Opener | 1 | Woodrow Wilson DT | Ki Radcliffe |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - Contact InfoTournament: Black and Gold Classic | Round: Finals | Opponent: Little Rock MG | Judge: Gilbert, Valdez, Kieklak | 10/9/21 |
Civil Disobedience - Hood Feminism v1Tournament: Little Rock Classic | Round: 1 | Opponent: Cabot SC | Judge: Aryan Gaddi Girls in the hood must learn to present only the … Their disposability extends to debate tournaments; high school LD uniquely excludes students of color. “Neutrality in arguments” ensures black debaters hate speech similar to what’s spoken at Klan rallies except it’s the halls and zoom rooms of debate tournaments. Smith, 13 At every tournament you attend this year look around the cafeteria and take … Black Women are captive, suspended within the captivity that no amount of liberal discourse on bodies or subjective choice can free us from. Focusing on the unprotected and violated flesh of the Black Femme is the only starting point for politics. Debates about civil disobedience are useless without providing an analytic to understand black female suffering; that makes the aff a precondition for devising political strategies. Malaklou, 18 If the inclusivity of liberal humanism-cum-… Vote affirmative to endorse epistemic disobedience in debate; this requires unlearning preconceived notions of the IP protections but also normative interps of debate. Amsler and Facer 17 In the theories and practices made public by these projects, we find neither a desire to colonize the future through its algorithmic induction nor a resignation to abandoning it to power or chance, but pedagogies, curricula and modes of governance which are designed to enlarge spaces of possibility to participate in autonomous and common forms of life. Here there … Debate is a deliberative democracy that is tribal in nature; teams on the left, defend the oppressed and teams on the right want to debate “policy” or LARP. Only by refusing whiteness and forcing conversations about antiblackness IN DEBATE can we confront the racism that is rampant both sin the activity and America. Taylor, 19 Matthew Taylor is the chief executive of the Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce (RSA) in Britain, and the former head of the Number 10 Policy Unit under Prime Minister Tony Blair., The Economist, “How to fix democracy Citizen deliberation is the gateway to a better politics,” 11 March 2019, https://www.economist.com/open-future/2019/03/11/citizen-deliberation-is-the-gateway-to-a-better-politics Cgilbert This is the second in a series of opinion pieces on how to fix … | 9/29/21 |
SeptOct - Pathologized DisobedienceTournament: UK Season Opener | Round: 1 | Opponent: Woodrow Wilson DT | Judge: Ki Radcliffe Two French doctors appeared on television … This disposability extends to debate tournaments; high school LD uniquely excludes students of color. “Neutrality in arguments” ensures black debaters hate speech similar to what’s spoken at Klan rallies except it’s the halls and zoom rooms of debate tournaments. Smith, 13 At every tournament you attend this year look around the cafeteria and take … Black death is the premium that ensures white humanity—putting faith in institutional reformism is a dream narrative that legitimizes broader health crises for black people—state sanctioned violence is a constant threat to the existence of blackness Again, when NourbeSe Philip asks in the Notanda to Zong! “What is the word … Vote affirmative to endorse epistemic disobedience in debate; this requires unlearning preconceived notions of the IP protections but also normative interps of debate. In the theories and practices made public by these projects, we find … Debate is a deliberative democracy that is tribal in nature; teams on the left, defend the oppressed and teams on the right want to debate “policy” or LARP. Only by refusing whiteness and forcing conversations about antiblackness IN DEBATE can we confront the racism that is rampant both sin the activity and America. Taylor, 19 Matthew Taylor is the chief executive of the Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce (RSA) in Britain, and the former head of the Number 10 Policy Unit under Prime Minister Tony Blair., The Economist, “How to fix democracy Citizen deliberation is the gateway to a better politics,” 11 March 2019, https://www.economist.com/open-future/2019/03/11/citizen-deliberation-is-the-gateway-to-a-better-politics Cgilbert This is the second in a series of opinion pieces on how to fix … | 9/11/21 |
SeptOct - Pathologized Disobedience v2Tournament: JW Patterson Invitational | Round: 2 | Opponent: Harvard Westlake MT | Judge: John Sims Centering debates about IP reductions for medicine without interrogating the pathologization that makes Black flesh disposable in medical experimentation, the global police state, and health discussion writ large. IP protections are directly attributable to the racial status quo. Patz, 21 Two French doctors appeared on television … Where have all the Black judges gone? Why aren’t they judging deep outrounds of big tournaments? Why is it SO much harder for Black students to justify why their “style” of argumentation is valid and should be accepted practice in the community? This disposability extends to debate tournaments; high school LD uniquely excludes students of color. “Neutrality in arguments” ensures black debaters hate speech similar to what’s spoken at Klan rallies except it’s the halls and zoom rooms of debate tournaments. Smith, 13 At every tournament you attend this year look around the cafeteria and take … It’s not just “out of round” it’s also in rounds. Anti-blackness is a lit base that has been in debate for 12-15 years now. There should be more engagement with affs than procedurals. Instead, all of our rounds are framework debates. Black death exists all around us in debate culture. Black coaches are few and far between, often times tokenized locally. Black students are told if you “just did ” or “just made that ONE argument” they would have won. People love hearing Black scholarship but hate voting for Black people reading it. Black death is the premium that ensures white humanity—putting faith in institutional reformism is a dream narrative that legitimizes broader health crises for black people—state sanctioned violence is a constant threat to the existence of blackness Again, when NourbeSe Philip asks in the Notanda to Zong! “What is the word … WTO, IP protections, and current debate topics have NO explanatory power for Black people. We love debate, the research, the skills, but we hate how it treats us. We come here for refuge from our daily lives for a moment of escape. We love the activity; instead of leaving we offer another method. Vote affirmative to endorse epistemic disobedience in debate; this requires unlearning preconceived notions of the IP protections but also normative interps of debate. In the theories and practices made public by these projects, we find … Psychological violence is inevitable in debate for Black folks; it’s only a question of WHAT do we do in the face of it? Since we won’t leave debate we will work IN debate. Debate has become too insular and full of itself; only concerned with white sensibilities while protecting power and privilege in the community. Judges, and debaters alike, must change their relationship to arguments and their opponents; focusing on normative interps crowds out discussions about privilege and power. Students should be allowed to kritik debate because the things we discuss inherently AFFECT debate; disregard “dropped arguments” if we win our top-level framing. Smith, 14 Despite popular opinion, I think you should be rooted in the topic … | 10/9/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|