Lexington Roy Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barkley Forum | 1 | Village RB | Rice, Hanna |
|
|
| |
| Barkley Forum | 3 | Durham BG | Woods, Tyler |
|
|
| |
| Barkley Forum for High Schools | 5 | NorChr LB | Dumas, Cyprian |
|
|
| |
| FLORIDA BLUE KEY SPEECH AND DEBATE TOURNAMENT | 1 | Trinity Prep MZ | Mohan, Eshwar |
|
|
| |
| FLORIDA BLUE KEY SPEECH AND DEBATE TOURNAMENT | 3 | Scarsdale OL | Navarrete, Javier |
|
|
| |
| FLORIDA BLUE KEY SPEECH AND DEBATE TOURNAMENT | 5 | nope | nope |
|
|
| |
| Grapevine Classic | 5 | Kenston EJ | Holden Bukowsky |
|
|
| |
| Grapevine Classic | 1 | Isidore Newman EE | Agler, Chansey |
|
|
| |
| Grapevine Classic | 3 | San Mateo AS | Georges, Joseph |
|
|
| |
| New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament | 1 | Brookfield East DJ | Etienne, Fabrice |
|
|
| |
| New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament | 6 | Montville NP | Gupta, Aashka |
|
|
| |
| New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament | 3 | Lake Highland Prep PS | Joe, Sesh |
|
|
| |
| Palm Classic | 2 | Notre Dame San Jose AG | Johnwell, Josh |
|
|
| |
| Peninsula Invitational | 1 | Harvard-Westlake LD | Alan, Naomi |
|
|
| |
| Peninsula Invitational | 4 | Immaculate Heart MF | JACOB NAILS |
|
|
| |
| Peninsula Invitational | 6 | Immaculate Heart MF | Nails, Jacob |
|
|
| |
| THE NEWARK INVITATIONAL 2022 | 2 | Harrison AC | Wyche, Chaz |
|
|
| |
| THE NEWARK INVITATIONAL 2022 | 3 | Peninsula BD | Etienne, Fabrice |
|
|
| |
| Virtual Scarsdale Invitational Scarvite | 3 | Stuyve HJ | Cruz, Mariel |
|
|
| |
| Virtual Scarsdale Invitational Scarvite | 6 | NorChr LB | Augustin, Shamika |
|
|
| |
| Virtual Scarsdale Invitational Scarvite | 2 | NEWSCI SO | Vega, Miana |
|
|
| |
| Yale University Invitational 2021 | 2 | Pennsbury GB | Ogundare, Temitope |
|
|
| |
| Yale University Invitational 2021 | 4 | Edgemont Junior-Senior AJ | Aldridge, Allison |
|
|
| |
| Yale University Invitational 2021 | 6 | Mission San Jose SR | Datti, Abhilash |
|
|
| |
| any | 2 | any | any |
|
| ||
| any | 5 | any | any |
|
| ||
| any | 4 | any | any |
|
| ||
| any | 1 | any | any |
|
| ||
| any | 3 | any | any |
|
| ||
| lex | 1 | a | p |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Barkley Forum | 1 | Opponent: Village RB | Judge: Rice, Hanna 1ac- Setcol |
| Barkley Forum | 3 | Opponent: Durham BG | Judge: Woods, Tyler 1ac- Util |
| Barkley Forum for High Schools | 5 | Opponent: NorChr LB | Judge: Dumas, Cyprian 1ac- China |
| FLORIDA BLUE KEY SPEECH AND DEBATE TOURNAMENT | 1 | Opponent: Trinity Prep MZ | Judge: Mohan, Eshwar 1ac- SV |
| FLORIDA BLUE KEY SPEECH AND DEBATE TOURNAMENT | 3 | Opponent: Scarsdale OL | Judge: Navarrete, Javier 1ac- Kant |
| FLORIDA BLUE KEY SPEECH AND DEBATE TOURNAMENT | 5 | Opponent: nope | Judge: nope Forfiet |
| Grapevine Classic | 5 | Opponent: Kenston EJ | Judge: Holden Bukowsky 1ac- Negative Util |
| Grapevine Classic | 1 | Opponent: Isidore Newman EE | Judge: Agler, Chansey 1ac- Hauntology topical |
| Grapevine Classic | 3 | Opponent: San Mateo AS | Judge: Georges, Joseph 1ac- Delueze |
| New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament | 1 | Opponent: Brookfield East DJ | Judge: Etienne, Fabrice 1ac- Util |
| New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament | 6 | Opponent: Montville NP | Judge: Gupta, Aashka 1ac- doesn't disclose so I won't |
| New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament | 3 | Opponent: Lake Highland Prep PS | Judge: Joe, Sesh 1ac- Util Data |
| Palm Classic | 2 | Opponent: Notre Dame San Jose AG | Judge: Johnwell, Josh 1ac- China |
| Peninsula Invitational | 1 | Opponent: Harvard-Westlake LD | Judge: Alan, Naomi cap |
| Peninsula Invitational | 4 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart MF | Judge: JACOB NAILS 1ac- space tourism |
| Peninsula Invitational | 6 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart MF | Judge: Nails, Jacob 1ac- China |
| THE NEWARK INVITATIONAL 2022 | 2 | Opponent: Harrison AC | Judge: Wyche, Chaz 1ac- Afro-orentalism |
| THE NEWARK INVITATIONAL 2022 | 3 | Opponent: Peninsula BD | Judge: Etienne, Fabrice 1ac- Stock |
| Virtual Scarsdale Invitational Scarvite | 3 | Opponent: Stuyve HJ | Judge: Cruz, Mariel 1ac- United states stuff |
| Virtual Scarsdale Invitational Scarvite | 6 | Opponent: NorChr LB | Judge: Augustin, Shamika 1ac- US |
| Virtual Scarsdale Invitational Scarvite | 2 | Opponent: NEWSCI SO | Judge: Vega, Miana 1ac- SV |
| Yale University Invitational 2021 | 2 | Opponent: Pennsbury GB | Judge: Ogundare, Temitope 1ac- Util covid |
| Yale University Invitational 2021 | 4 | Opponent: Edgemont Junior-Senior AJ | Judge: Aldridge, Allison 1ac- SV |
| Yale University Invitational 2021 | 6 | Opponent: Mission San Jose SR | Judge: Datti, Abhilash 1ac- Virtue Ethics |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - Th -AS- Accessible FormattingTournament: any | Round: 1 | Opponent: any | Judge: any *T A Interpretation: Debaters must disclose their aff case in an accessible format as of the first document they sent. ( for example even if you read a new aff that still doesn't mean you don't open source disclose) HOW TO 1 Open the document you wish to make accessible 6 Open Advanced Find and Replace (if unsure how to do this for your version of Word look it up) 13 Select all of the text you just pasted and use the "Condense" Verbatim tool *T To clarify they should have sent their speech doc with a version of the document with ‘cut’ cards and a version formatted as demonstrated below and on my wiki. By sending both styles of formatting it allows for better access while being able to check for evidence ethics violations if needed. | 9/18/21 |
0 - Th -AS- SpreadingTournament: any | Round: 2 | Opponent: any | Judge: any *T B violation: I put on my wiki that I would like for my rounds to have speeches that are spreading as going over 250 wpm | 7/7/21 |
0-Contact infoTournament: any | Round: 3 | Opponent: any | Judge: any email- a1lexdebateteam@gmail.com About me: | 1/3/22 |
0-NavigationTournament: any | Round: 5 | Opponent: any | Judge: any | 7/7/21 |
1- Accessible FormattingTournament: New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament | Round: 1 | Opponent: Brookfield East DJ | Judge: Etienne, Fabrice *T B Violation: While they did disclose the aff he told me to look on the wiki which is cut in inaccessible manner *T To clarify they should have sent their speech doc with a version of the document with ‘cut’ cards and a version formatted as demonstrated below and on my wiki. By sending both styles of formatting it allows for better access while being able to check for evidence ethics violations if needed. And, simply disclosing the document absent accessible formatting beforehand isn’t enough, if opponents want engagement they must take steps to make their arguments accessible. Dolmage 17 And, this shell is a game over issue. Don’t let them stand up in the next speech and apologize for not knowing they were being ableist. This is a strategy used to distance themselves from the ableism they committed and exonerates them from responsibility. Individuals must actively resist ableism otherwise they are complicit in disguising it. Dolmage 2 *T And, Accessibility is key to fairness and education because debate is never fair or educational for those who can’t access the round. D. Voters: Drop the Debater.
Competing Interpretations: Aff can’t leverage case- | 10/16/21 |
1- Evidence ethicsTournament: Grapevine Classic | Round: 3 | Opponent: San Mateo AS | Judge: Georges, Joseph | 10/16/21 |
1- Mollow vs setcolTournament: Barkley Forum | Round: 1 | Opponent: Village RB | Judge: Rice, Hanna Ligustic Fluncey of the recreates ableism The alternative is to analyze the disability drive — it comes to terms with the existence of the drive and shatters the fantasy of the ego. Anything else only displaces the lack onto other oppressed groups. The ROTB is to question ideological optimism in the classroom. Disability is the master trope for all forms of oppression on the basis of inferiority – involuntary aesthetics disqualify humans based on their ability. | 1/28/22 |
1- Must put the correct year for the evidence they readTournament: New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament | Round: 3 | Opponent: Lake Highland Prep PS | Judge: Joe, Sesh Sarah S. Amsler 7-28-2008, "Pedagogy against “dis-utopia”: from conscientization to the education of desire," Emerald Group Publishing Limited, https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1016/S0278-1204(08)00010-8/full/html | 11/9/21 |
1- Round ReportsTournament: Grapevine Classic | Round: 5 | Opponent: Kenston EJ | Judge: Holden Bukowsky what you want to go for from the start. | 9/16/21 |
1-New affs badTournament: FLORIDA BLUE KEY SPEECH AND DEBATE TOURNAMENT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Trinity Prep MZ | Judge: Mohan, Eshwar *T 1. Accessibility:
people correcting other, other people’s grammar, And not accommodating for the obsession can make it impossible to focus which makes it key to accessibility ADAA 10 bright and motivated,to their obsessions *T Accessibility is key to fairness and education without accessibility debates not fair or educational for those who are excluded. And the interpretation is key, disclosing on a per round basis places the burden of access on the disabled. Kroeger 10 And, this shell is a game over issue. Don’t let them stand up in the next speech and apologize for not knowing they were being ableist. This is a strategy used to distance themselves from the ableism they committed and exonerates them from responsibility. Individuals must actively resist ableism otherwise they are complicit in disguising it. Dolmage 2 *T 3. Evidence Ethics: open source disclosure is the only way to verify you haven’t miscut evidence. In round is too late because *T key to education two reasons *T key to Fairness two reasons *T Evidence ethics are an independent reason to vote them down because it encourages cheating. *T 4. Depth of clash: open source disclosure allows for nuanced warrant level debate. 2 Justifications *T Controls the internal link to critical thinking absent warrant level debate we would just be making claims. *T D. Voters: | 10/30/21 |
1-SpreadingTournament: Barkley Forum | Round: 3 | Opponent: Durham BG | Judge: Woods, Tyler *T B violation: I put on my wiki that I would like for my rounds to have speeches that are spreading as going under 250 wpm | 1/29/22 |
1-acessiable formating v2Tournament: Peninsula Invitational | Round: 4 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart MF | Judge: JACOB NAILS *T And, Accessibility is key to fairness and education because debate is never fair or educational for those who can’t access the round. D. Voters: Drop the Debater. Competing Interpretations: Aff can’t leverage case- | 1/23/22 |
2- Curry RepsTournament: Virtual Scarsdale Invitational Scarvite | Round: 2 | Opponent: NEWSCI SO | Judge: Vega, Miana While hooks admits who are deemed patriarchs. AND Says Black Trans folx are too small of a category to analyze the intersections between transness and violence And Elitist – AND Silences Black Women That’s a reason to DTD:
| 1/3/22 |
2- Kant KTournament: FLORIDA BLUE KEY SPEECH AND DEBATE TOURNAMENT | Round: 3 | Opponent: Scarsdale OL | Judge: Navarrete, Javier This is a reason to drop them – it kills accessibility to disabled people. Their Reps was also ableist which means they can’t cross apply the theory to defend itself because it’s whats indicted. Reps first – | 10/30/21 |
2-PresumptionTournament: Peninsula Invitational | Round: 6 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart MF | Judge: Nails, Jacob | 1/28/22 |
2-curricular cripistemologyTournament: New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament | Round: 6 | Opponent: Montville NP | Judge: Gupta, Aashka And The aff advocates for curricular cripistemologies to break down inclusionism. This involves the development of teaching pedagogies that deviate from core teachings by foregrounding cripcontent as fortunate failure. This pedagogical incoherence offers options for constructing alternative ethical frameworks for living outside of the goals of inclusionism by creating useable crip maps that are otherwise absent from normative teaching approaches Mitchell and Snyder 2 Ableism is seeded, engagement in life Disability is the master trope of human disqualification that structures oppression Legal solutions fail – legal structures are predicated on the negative ontology of disability And Curricular Cripistemologies is a materialist nonnormative positivism that recognizes disability as a viable alternative to normalcy. Instead of accommodating disability to be normal we must attend to ways that disability disrupts normalcy through its messy realities. We must view disability as alternative source of value*A Mitchell and Snyder 4*C nonnormative positivism pursue, in systems of privilege social phenomenon demands, who take these tests | 11/9/21 |
3- Death GoodTournament: THE NEWARK INVITATIONAL 2022 | Round: 3 | Opponent: Peninsula BD | Judge: Etienne, Fabrice | 1/22/22 |
3- DeterminismTournament: THE NEWARK INVITATIONAL 2022 | Round: 3 | Opponent: Peninsula BD | Judge: Etienne, Fabrice | 1/22/22 |
3- Determinism V2Tournament: Peninsula Invitational | Round: 6 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart MF | Judge: Nails, Jacob | 1/28/22 |
3- ROB- DisabilityTournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: 2 | Opponent: Pennsbury GB | Judge: Ogundare, Temitope Ableism is seeded, engagement in life Presumption and Permissibility Negate. Aff has an obligation to prove that the world is good for disabled individuals. The disadvantage is disabled exhaustion where we are constantly told the aff is good for disabled individuals be in reality it doesn’t do anything. Now Negate
| 9/18/21 |
3- SInger is ableistTournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: 2 | Opponent: Pennsbury GB | Judge: Ogundare, Temitope Vote them down for safety – their model of debate excludes certain bodies by describing them as nonhuman debate should be a safe space for everyone and safety is an impact multipler. If you aren’t in the activity you can’t access the benefits of debate in the first place. | 9/18/21 |
3- Util AbleistTournament: New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament | Round: 1 | Opponent: Brookfield East DJ | Judge: Etienne, Fabrice Ableism is seeded at, engagement in life Util dehumanizes disability and the curing of secondary pity to increase the disabled’s “welfare” | 10/16/21 |
3-ROB Truth testingTournament: Peninsula Invitational | Round: 6 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart MF | Judge: Nails, Jacob | 1/28/22 |
5- Abed CPTournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: 2 | Opponent: Pennsbury GB | Judge: Ogundare, Temitope The Neg advocates for the use of speculative fiction allowing for the use these narrative to re-imagine things we thought we knew | 9/18/21 |
5- Nukes CPTournament: Grapevine Classic | Round: 5 | Opponent: Kenston EJ | Judge: Holden Bukowsky Nuke war causes extinction – 3,000 scientists agree – ignore pseudoscientific ‘nuke war good’ | 9/16/21 |
6- Blue Key round 5Tournament: FLORIDA BLUE KEY SPEECH AND DEBATE TOURNAMENT | Round: 5 | Opponent: nope | Judge: nope | 11/9/21 |
6- Newark round 3Tournament: THE NEWARK INVITATIONAL 2022 | Round: 3 | Opponent: Peninsula BD | Judge: Etienne, Fabrice | 1/22/22 |
JF- Black Disabled CyborgTournament: THE NEWARK INVITATIONAL 2022 | Round: 2 | Opponent: Harrison AC | Judge: Wyche, Chaz Society views those who don’t fit perfect mold as lesser human being. Thus the only way to truly understand Societal Oppression is through Disability. Disabled black individuals are not represented in discussion of antiblack violence The aff’s distinction between humans and technology is a form of otherization—mechanic can not be separated from machine this re-affirms humanism The alternative is to Crip the Black cyborg through space travel Our theory of the cyborg avoids fatalistic presentations of black disability inherent in liberal ideology Redefine the cyborg as a relational tool that lets us see the world in a different way - Assumptions will pervade and control the direction of scientific creations – its not about creating a perfect human its about addressing the experiences against disabled folx Communicative spaces are structured to exclude disabled bodies- speech has come to constitute the boundary of Humanism, to which disability forms the constitutive negative as a disruption of such networks. Thus the rob is to disrupt communicative humanism. | 1/8/22 |
JF- Disabled KantTournament: Peninsula Invitational | Round: 4 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart MF | Judge: JACOB NAILS we should think of her autonomy 1 A model of freedom mandates a market-oriented approach to space—that negates | 1/23/22 |
JF- Disabled communismTournament: Peninsula Invitational | Round: 1 | Opponent: Harvard-Westlake LD | Judge: Alan, Naomi Their unitary critiques of capitalism fail to account for interwoven nature of ableism in the political economy – that serves to reproduce capitalist and ableist violence The ROB is to vote for the debater who best challenges ableism is seeded at, engagement in life The alternative is to frame our anti-capitalist organizing around the principle of non-productivity. By centering non-productive bodies, we breakdown the notion of valorizing labor and thus centering the able-bodied experience. Our alt is deconstructive methods that challenges the dominant norms of productivity the aff reaffies and produces a collective of disabled people who resist the discarding of their value The aff on it’s own fails, their sole focus on material oppression ignores the psychological and social violence disabled people face in the social which implicates their process of political organizing – proves disabled people always get blamed for fracturing the movement British disability studies,removal of barriers. | 1/22/22 |
JF- Mollow vs ChinaTournament: Barkley Forum for High Schools | Round: 5 | Opponent: NorChr LB | Judge: Dumas, Cyprian Nationalist strategies of hegemony and economics are prefigured by ableist epistemological reduction of the rest of the world. The alternative is to analyze the disability drive — it comes to terms with the existence of the drive and shatters the fantasy of the ego. Anything else only displaces the lack onto other oppressed groups. The ROTB is to question ideological optimism in the classroom. | 2/12/22 |
JF- Xi disadTournament: Peninsula Invitational | Round: 6 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart MF | Judge: Nails, Jacob The plan forces China to respond since they can’t pursue resources – that form of militarization creates arms control and escalation crises Turns aff war impacts and hyper-escalate their conflict scenarios since other states have incentives to match China | 1/28/22 |
ND- Case vs KantTournament: FLORIDA BLUE KEY SPEECH AND DEBATE TOURNAMENT | Round: 3 | Opponent: Scarsdale OL | Judge: Navarrete, Javier Presumption Negates: | 10/30/21 |
ND- Mollow vs USTournament: Virtual Scarsdale Invitational Scarvite | Round: 6 | Opponent: NorChr LB | Judge: Augustin, Shamika The affs call for a better democracy is nothing but a call for visibility. Democracy operates through recognition of socially tolerable identities which always excludes disabled folk who are mutually exclusive from democratic notions of civilization. Visibility through democratic identity construction is a stamp of approval that is never afforded to us because we will never “fit in.” The starting point of the 1AC is epistemically flawed and an independent link – fiat is illusory and anything that doesn’t begin from the question of disability allows for ableism to infiltrate modes of thought which means we’re an epistemic prerequisite. Thus, the role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best methodologically challenges ableism. Ableism is seeded, people held together Vote negative to endorse an unwavering pessimism and radical failure – we reject the political and notions of futurism in exchange for an affirmation of disability’s abjection as something beautiful. disability free from, and beautiful No perms: (a) view it as artificially distinct since it’s key to fully flesh out the individual intricacies of both methods and create more concrete proposals (b) justifies infinite aff conditionality – allowings permutations allows infinite new 1AR advocacies which skews 1 mins of the 1NC and destroys neg ground (c) hold the 1AC method by itself since anything else endorses bad scholarship since it justifies severence – justifying both in the aff solves. OV | 1/3/22 |
ND- Mollow vs democracyTournament: Virtual Scarsdale Invitational Scarvite | Round: 3 | Opponent: Stuyve HJ | Judge: Cruz, Mariel The affs call for a better democracy is nothing but a call for visibility. Democracy operates through recognition of socially tolerable identities which always excludes disabled folk who are mutually exclusive from democratic notions of civilization. Visibility through democratic identity construction is a stamp of approval that is never afforded to us because we will never “fit in.” The starting point of the 1AC is epistemically flawed and an independent link – fiat is illusory and anything that doesn’t begin from the question of disability allows for ableism to infiltrate modes of thought which means we’re an epistemic prerequisite. Thus, the role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best methodologically challenges ableism. Ableism is seeded, people held together Vote negative to endorse an unwavering pessimism and radical failure – we reject the political and notions of futurism in exchange for an affirmation of disability’s abjection as something beautiful. disability free from, and beautiful No perms: (a) view it as artificially distinct since it’s key to fully flesh out the individual intricacies of both methods and create more concrete proposals (b) justifies infinite aff conditionality – allowings permutations allows infinite new 1AR advocacies which skews 1 mins of the 1NC and destroys neg ground (c) hold the 1AC method by itself since anything else endorses bad scholarship since it justifies severence – justifying both in the aff solves. OV | 11/14/21 |
ND- WehelyieTournament: Virtual Scarsdale Invitational Scarvite | Round: 2 | Opponent: NEWSCI SO | Judge: Vega, Miana Pleading for recognition from the state to make any kid of meaningful change is are in vain – the state uses recognition to claim to free the oppressed Additionally turns case – state recognition of personhood allows cooperation’s that the aff is trying to strike against to enjoy life and protection under US law. Weheliye 14 Deviancy from the western pure subject is the justification for violence – forms of violence are historically intertwined. The alternative is habeas viscus – a re-orientation of our resistance that breaks free from trying to free the body within the law. Weheliye 1 The ROB is to vote for the debater that best exposes the fold – exposing these breaks in knowledge production is a pre-requisite to deconstructing violence because these discussions are always just erased | 1/3/22 |
SO - K - Cripess vs DeluezeTournament: Grapevine Classic | Round: 3 | Opponent: San Mateo AS | Judge: Georges, Joseph The 1ACs belief of a better future is tied to rehabilitation where the signifier of the Child is placed forward which deems the disabled child a threat to society and is thus eradicated. The only ethical alternative is to affirm crippessimism – only a refusal of the world can disrupt the current notion of optimism. Thus, the role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best disrupts notions of progress within civil society. If we win the starting point is ableist they cannot weigh the consequence of it. Framework Wall 6 Affect theory re-centers an ablebodyminded subject – policing of normative affect is rooted in medicalization of disability. 7 There are two outcomes of an affective encounter between subjects 1 the successful sensory motor relationship – affect is internalized to produce action, or 2 The Sensory-Motor Break – affect is too intense for the subject to produce action, incapacitating them. Case | 10/16/21 |
SO - K - CriptopiaTournament: Grapevine Classic | Round: 1 | Opponent: Isidore Newman EE | Judge: Agler, Chansey The aff’s expansion of the medical complex is not an expansion of care, but rather, an expansion of an industry that labors to eradicate all diseases, which results in lethal eradication of difference, conceptualizing of bodies into medical objects, and accepts death if a cure is possible. Historical analysis fails and doesn’t account for the factors that shape disability Metaphors of haunting facilitate ableist narratives-~--they distract our attention away from the historical reality of institutions that prioritized violence against disabled bodies *T And The role of the ballot is to challenge ableism. Assumptions of ableism are inherent in systems of knowledge production thus ableism is an a priori question *A Campbell 13*C The alternative methodology is to imagine CripTopia, a disability utopia, to uncover the lived experiences of disabled bodies. To clarify the advocacy calls for us to imagine CripTopia in this round. Campbell 12 Difference can be a vexed, subjectification of disability. disability subjectivities create, visions of utopia imagining accessible futures, the constituencies involved. | 9/16/21 |
SO - K - MadnessTournament: Grapevine Classic | Round: 5 | Opponent: Kenston EJ | Judge: Holden Bukowsky Internalized oppression is, in their demise *T And The role of the ballot is to challenge ableism. Assumptions of ableism are inherent in systems of knowledge production thus ableism is an a priori question *A Campbell 13*C Thus, vote neg to delve into madness – refuse rationalist frames of enlightened humanism in favor of recognizing disability as the ground state of life. | 9/16/21 |
SO - K - Mollow vs Data exclusivityTournament: New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament | Round: 3 | Opponent: Lake Highland Prep PS | Judge: Joe, Sesh The affirmative’s politics are tied to a rehabilitative futurism where the signifier of the fantasmatic child is placed forward to eradicate and cure disability – this deems the disabled child a threat and excludes disability from the political. They don’t get to weigh case – if we win their starting point is violent, they don’t get to weigh their end point since we indict the process of how they got there. The aff’s expansion of the medical complex is not an expansion of care, but rather, an expansion of an industry that labors to eradicate all diseases, which results in lethal eradication of difference, conceptualizing of bodies into medical objects, and accepts death if a cure is possible. The affirmative’s orientation towards the desire for insulin reveals their underlying status as a quest to eliminate disability. The starting point of the 1AC is epistemically flawed and an independent link – fiat is illusory and anything that doesn’t begin from the question of disability allows for ableism to infiltrate modes of thought which means we’re an epistemic prerequisite. Thus, the role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best methodologically challenges ableism. Ableism is seeded, people held together Vote negative to endorse an unwavering pessimism and radical failure – we reject the political and notions of futurism in exchange for an affirmation of disability’s abjection as something beautiful. disability free from, as miserable and beautiful No perms: (a) view it as artificially distinct since it’s key to fully flesh out the individual intricacies of both methods and create more concrete proposals (b) justifies infinite aff conditionality – allowings permutations allows infinite new 1AR advocacies which skews 1 mins of the 1NC and destroys neg ground (c) hold the 1AC method by itself since anything else endorses bad scholarship since it justifies severence – justifying both in the aff solves. | 11/9/21 |
SO - K- Cripess v2Tournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: 4 | Opponent: Edgemont Junior-Senior AJ | Judge: Aldridge, Allison The aff’s expansion of the medical complex is not an expansion of care, but rather, an expansion of an industry that labors to eradicate all diseases, which results in lethal eradication of difference, conceptualizing of bodies into medical objects, and accepts death if a cure is possible. Opioid industry and it’s relationship to curing is inherently tied together causes psychological violence’s the “devastating” effects, like moral failure The starting point of the 1AC is epistemically flawed and an independent link – fiat is illusory and anything that doesn’t begin from the question of disability allows for ableism to infiltrate modes of thought which means we’re an epistemic prerequisite. Thus, the role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best methodologically challenges ableism. Ableism is seeded, people held together Vote negative to endorse an unwavering pessimism and radical failure – we reject the political and notions of futurism in exchange for an affirmation of disability’s abjection as something beautiful. disability free from, miserable and beautiful No perms: (a) view it as artificially distinct since it’s key to fully flesh out the individual intricacies of both methods and create more concrete proposals (b) justifies infinite aff conditionality – allowings permutations allows infinite new 1AR advocacies which skews 1 mins of the 1NC and destroys neg ground (c) hold the 1AC method by itself since anything else endorses bad scholarship since it justifies severence – justifying both in the aff solves. case 1 subpoint and extinction – this is totally irrelevant because we read a fiat K which means you can’t weigh hypotheticals BUT even if you intervene and let them. | 9/18/21 |
SO- FW- Disabled KantismTournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: 2 | Opponent: Pennsbury GB | Judge: Ogundare, Temitope we should think, virtue of her autonomy The aff violates the categorical imperative and is non-universalizable- governments have a binding obligation to protect creations Util dehumanizes disability and the curing of secondary pity to increase the disabled’s “welfare” | 9/18/21 |
SO-K- Crippess vs Virtue EthicsTournament: Yale University Invitational 2021 | Round: 6 | Opponent: Mission San Jose SR | Judge: Datti, Abhilash Their theorization of community idealizes the capacity for constant self-management, which causes the exclusion and scapegoating of disabled people. The affirmative’s politics are tied to a rehabilitative futurism where the signifier of the fantasmatic child is placed forward to eradicate and cure disability – this deems the disabled child a threat and excludes disability from the political. They don’t get to weigh case – if we win their starting point is violent, they don’t get to weigh their end point since we indict the process of how they got there. The aff’s expansion of the medical complex is not an expansion of care, but rather, an expansion of an industry that labors to eradicate all diseases, which results in lethal eradication of difference, conceptualizing of bodies into medical objects, and accepts death if a cure is possible. The starting point of the 1AC is epistemically flawed and an independent link – fiat is illusory and anything that doesn’t begin from the question of disability allows for ableism to infiltrate modes of thought which means we’re an epistemic prerequisite. Thus, the role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best methodologically challenges ableism. Ableism is seeded, people held together Vote negative to endorse an unwavering pessimism and radical failure – we reject the political and notions of futurism in exchange for an affirmation of disability’s abjection as something beautiful. disability free from, miserable and beautiful No perms: (a) view it as artificially distinct since it’s key to fully flesh out the individual intricacies of both methods and create more concrete proposals (b) justifies infinite aff conditionality – allowings permutations allows infinite new 1AR advocacies which skews 1 mins of the 1NC and destroys neg ground (c) hold the 1AC method by itself since anything else endorses bad scholarship since it justifies severence – justifying both in the aff solves. | 10/15/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
1/28/22 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
| |
1/29/22 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
| |
2/12/22 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
| |
10/30/21 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
| |
10/30/21 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
| |
9/16/21 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
| |
9/16/21 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
| |
10/16/21 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
| |
10/16/21 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
| |
11/9/21 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
| |
11/9/21 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
| |
1/22/22 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
| |
1/23/22 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
| |
1/28/22 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
| |
1/8/22 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
| |
11/14/21 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
| |
1/3/22 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
| |
1/3/22 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
| |
9/18/21 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
| |
9/18/21 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
| |
10/15/21 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
| |
9/18/21 | aavedonroy@gmailcom |
|