Lexington Kumar Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emory | 1 | Unionville AS | Tyler Wood |
|
|
| |
| Emory | 4 | Harvard Westlake CC | Gordon Krauss |
|
|
| |
| Emory | Triples | Lake Higland AV | Dylan Jones, Stuckert, Jayln |
|
|
| |
| Emory | Doubles | Memorial SC | Grant Brown, Dylan Jones, Henry Eberhart |
|
|
| |
| Emory | 5 | Millburn AX | Kate Totz |
|
|
| |
| Glenbrooks | 2 | Presentation NR | Tajiah |
|
|
| |
| Glenbrooks | 4 | Dulles IC | Javier |
|
|
| |
| Glenbrooks | 6 | harker RM | Andrew Torrez |
|
|
| |
| Glenbrooks | 7 | Immac SS | Shreyaash Das |
|
|
| |
| Glenbrooks | Doubles | Ayala AM | Danielle, Sreyaash, Emmiee |
|
|
| |
| Greenhill | 2 | Bellarmine AK | David Yi |
|
|
| |
| Greenhill | 3 | Westwood ST | JP Stuckert |
|
|
| |
| Greenhill | Doubles | Seqouia AS | Sarena Lu, Gordon Krauss, Ishan Rereddy |
|
|
| |
| Greenhill Fall Classic | 6 | Southlake Carrol EP | Gordon Krauss |
|
|
| |
| Harvard | 1 | Newtown KS | David Herrera |
|
|
| |
| Harvard | 3 | Ridge VS | Josh porter |
|
|
| |
| Harvard | 5 | Scarsdale BS | JP Stuckert |
|
|
| |
| Heart of Texas | 1 | Harvard Westlake CR | Lindsey Williams |
|
|
| |
| Heart of Texas | 3 | Marlborough WR | Ishan Rereddy |
|
|
| |
| Heart of Texas | 5 | Harvard Westlake AL | Jack |
|
|
| |
| Heart of Texas | Octas | Westwood AG | Danielle, David, Herrera |
|
|
| |
| Heart of Texas | Quarters | Harker RM | Sam Larson, Castillo, Skylar |
|
|
| |
| Meadows | 2 | Interlake DB | Jalyn Wu |
|
|
| |
| Meadows | 3 | Southlake Carrol PK | Conal |
|
|
| |
| Meadows | 6 | Ayala AM | Truman Le |
|
|
| |
| TOC | 2 | Immaculate Heart RR | Parker Mitchell |
|
|
| |
| TOC | 2 | Immaculate Heart RR | Parker Mitchell |
|
|
| |
| TOC | 2 | Immaculate Heart RR | Parker Mitchell |
|
|
| |
| TOC | 2 | Immaculate Heart RR | Parker Mitchell |
|
|
| |
| TOC | 2 | Immaculate Heart RR | Parker Mitchell |
|
|
| |
| Valley | 1 | Northern Valley Independent | Scopa |
|
|
| |
| Valley | 3 | Mabel Rieger | Breigh |
|
|
| |
| Valley | 6 | Nathan Gong | Nikita |
|
|
| |
| Valley | Doubles | Saranya Singh | Panel |
|
|
| |
| Valley RR | 2 | American Heritage EM | Gordon, Brixz, Gonzaba |
|
|
| |
| Valley RR | 3 | Mission San Jose SR | Holden, Jared Burke |
|
|
| |
| West Lex Invitational | 9 | Brett Round Reports Fortier | Flighreacts |
|
| ||
| West Lex Invitational | 8 | Arun Kodumuru | Matthew Berhe |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Emory | 1 | Opponent: Unionville AS | Judge: Tyler Wood 1AC - Megaconstellations 1NC - T appropriation Heg DA Starlink Pic case 1AR - All 2NR - Heg DA Case 2AR - Case Heg DA |
| Emory | 4 | Opponent: Harvard Westlake CC | Judge: Gordon Krauss 1AC - Space capitalism bad 1NC - Kant nc Spec Type of appropriation CCP DA Case 1AR - All 2NR - Kant Case 2AR - Kant |
| Emory | Triples | Opponent: Lake Higland AV | Judge: Dylan Jones, Stuckert, Jayln 1AC - Hegel |
| Emory | Doubles | Opponent: Memorial SC | Judge: Grant Brown, Dylan Jones, Henry Eberhart 1AC - Racial Cap |
| Emory | 5 | Opponent: Millburn AX | Judge: Kate Totz 1AC - Set col |
| Glenbrooks | 2 | Opponent: Presentation NR | Judge: Tajiah 1AC - Non T |
| Glenbrooks | 4 | Opponent: Dulles IC | Judge: Javier 1AC - Whole rez (China adv) |
| Glenbrooks | 6 | Opponent: harker RM | Judge: Andrew Torrez 1AC - EU |
| Glenbrooks | 7 | Opponent: Immac SS | Judge: Shreyaash Das 1AC - Brazil |
| Glenbrooks | Doubles | Opponent: Ayala AM | Judge: Danielle, Sreyaash, Emmiee 1AC - Strikes |
| Greenhill | 2 | Opponent: Bellarmine AK | Judge: David Yi 1AC - Piracy K aff |
| Greenhill | 3 | Opponent: Westwood ST | Judge: JP Stuckert 1AC - Stock Innovation |
| Greenhill | Doubles | Opponent: Seqouia AS | Judge: Sarena Lu, Gordon Krauss, Ishan Rereddy 1AC - Jordan |
| Greenhill Fall Classic | 6 | Opponent: Southlake Carrol EP | Judge: Gordon Krauss 1AC - Weed |
| Harvard | 1 | Opponent: Newtown KS | Judge: David Herrera 1AC - Veganism |
| Harvard | 3 | Opponent: Ridge VS | Judge: Josh porter 1AC - Semiocap |
| Harvard | 5 | Opponent: Scarsdale BS | Judge: JP Stuckert 1AC - Kant |
| Heart of Texas | 1 | Opponent: Harvard Westlake CR | Judge: Lindsey Williams 1AC- Covid |
| Heart of Texas | 3 | Opponent: Marlborough WR | Judge: Ishan Rereddy 1AC - Covid |
| Heart of Texas | 5 | Opponent: Harvard Westlake AL | Judge: Jack 1AC - Covid |
| Heart of Texas | Octas | Opponent: Westwood AG | Judge: Danielle, David, Herrera 1AC - Biocolonialism |
| Heart of Texas | Quarters | Opponent: Harker RM | Judge: Sam Larson, Castillo, Skylar 1AC - Covid |
| Meadows | 2 | Opponent: Interlake DB | Judge: Jalyn Wu 1AC - Set col Music |
| Meadows | 3 | Opponent: Southlake Carrol PK | Judge: Conal 1AC - Jordan |
| Meadows | 6 | Opponent: Ayala AM | Judge: Truman Le 1AC - Evergreening |
| TOC | 2 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart RR | Judge: Parker Mitchell 1AC - China |
| TOC | 2 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart RR | Judge: Parker Mitchell 1AC - China |
| TOC | 2 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart RR | Judge: Parker Mitchell 1AC - China |
| TOC | 2 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart RR | Judge: Parker Mitchell 1AC - China |
| TOC | 2 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart RR | Judge: Parker Mitchell 1AC - China |
| Valley | 1 | Opponent: Northern Valley Independent | Judge: Scopa 1AC - Burden Hobbes |
| Valley | 3 | Opponent: Mabel Rieger | Judge: Breigh 1AC - Lay |
| Valley | 6 | Opponent: Nathan Gong | Judge: Nikita 1AC - evergreening |
| Valley | Doubles | Opponent: Saranya Singh | Judge: Panel 1AC - Covid |
| Valley RR | 2 | Opponent: American Heritage EM | Judge: Gordon, Brixz, Gonzaba 1AC - Virtue w adv |
| Valley RR | 3 | Opponent: Mission San Jose SR | Judge: Holden, Jared Burke 1AC - Virtue w util adv |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - Contact InfoTournament: West Lex Invitational | Round: 9 | Opponent: Brett Round Reports Fortier | Judge: Flighreacts I prefer Messenger - Archit Kumar on facebook - Westbrook PFP Email: 22kumar5@lexingtonma.org | 9/15/21 |
0 - Note - Please readTournament: West Lex Invitational | Round: 8 | Opponent: Arun Kodumuru | Judge: Matthew Berhe | 9/15/21 |
1 - T - Extra T BadTournament: Greenhill | Round: 2 | Opponent: Bellarmine AK | Judge: David Yi Violation: They fiat piracy and stealing of IP which is extra topical. If they don’t fiat it they have no spillover claims. Vote neg | 9/18/21 |
1 - Theory - 1AR theory, DTD, no neg rvis, highest layerTournament: Harvard | Round: 5 | Opponent: Scarsdale BS | Judge: JP Stuckert | 2/20/22 |
1 - Theory - Cant say neg interps counterinterps and no rvis on aff theoryTournament: Valley | Round: 1 | Opponent: Northern Valley Independent | Judge: Scopa | 9/25/21 |
1 - Theory - Disclose PlanTournament: Greenhill | Round: 2 | Opponent: Bellarmine AK | Judge: David Yi First is prep and clash—two internal links—a) neg prep—4 minutes of prep is not enough to put together a coherent 1nc or update generics—30 minutes is necessary to learn a little about the affirmative and piece together what 1nc positions apply and cut and research their applications to the affirmative b) aff quality—plan text disclosure discourages cheap shot affs. If the aff isn't inherent or easily defeated by 20 minutes of research, it should lose—this will answer the 1ar's claim about innovation—with 30 minutes of prep, there's still an incentive to find a new strategic, well justified aff, but no incentive to cut a horrible, incoherent aff that the neg can't check against the broader literature. Can’t weigh or c/a the case Violation—they didn't. You can tell its them since their number is disclosed on their wiki. | 9/18/21 |
1 - Theory - Open SourceTournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Newtown KS | Judge: David Herrera | 2/19/22 |
1 - Theory - Spec Standard TextTournament: Heart of Texas | Round: 1 | Opponent: Harvard Westlake CR | Judge: Lindsey Williams 1 Strat Skew – I don't know what matters under your framing – our ideas of what exactly matters may vary – means I can't engage substantively. You just have a bunch of random cards which could be reinterpreted in the 1AR depending on the 1NC CX Checks don’t solve – a) Pre round prep – I have to wait till cx to determine which offs are most strategic rather than being able to do it pre round or pre-tournament which is when the majority of prep happens, b) Verifiability – judges don’t flow cross ex so they might not catch the question or the answer which means that debates become irresolvable. 1AR Spec doesn’t solve – Competing interps | 10/16/21 |
2 - NC - Kantian CountermethodTournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Newtown KS | Judge: David Herrera | 2/19/22 |
2 - NC - UtilTournament: Valley RR | Round: 2 | Opponent: American Heritage EM | Judge: Gordon, Brixz, Gonzaba "While is good AND 2 Util is a lexical pre-requisite to any other framework: Threats to bodily security and life preclude the ability for moral actors to effectively utilize and act upon other moral theories since they are in a constant state of crisis that inhibit the ideal moral conditions which other theories presuppose. That precludes the ability to have agency and have the value conferring status that their framework says is valuable | 9/24/21 |
2 - NC - Util v2Tournament: Emory | Round: 5 | Opponent: Millburn AX | Judge: Kate Totz | 1/30/22 |
4 - NC - KantTournament: Greenhill | Round: 2 | Opponent: Bellarmine AK | Judge: David Yi The existence of extrinsic goodness requires unconditional human worth—that means we must treat others as ends in themselves. The argument shows Practical reason is inescapable - Any moral rule faces the problem of regress – I can keep asking “why should I follow this.” Regress collapses to skep since no one can generate obligations absent grounds for accepting them. Only reason solves since asking “why reason?” requires reason to do in the first place which concedes its authority. 1 Patents protect private companies. That negates – A Promise breaking – states promised legally binding IP protections to companies who might not have otherwise developed medicines – the aff is a unilateral violation of that contract. B That’s a form of restricting the free economic choices of individuals. 2 IP is a reflection of our will and a form of property. It is clear | 9/18/21 |
4 - ND - T - ATournament: Glenbrooks | Round: 6 | Opponent: harker RM | Judge: Andrew Torrez | 11/21/21 |
4 - ND - T- Just GovernmentTournament: Glenbrooks | Round: 4 | Opponent: Dulles IC | Judge: Javier | 11/21/21 |
4 - ND - CCP DATournament: Glenbrooks | Round: 4 | Opponent: Dulles IC | Judge: Javier | 11/21/21 |
4 - ND - CP - Police PicTournament: Glenbrooks | Round: 7 | Opponent: Immac SS | Judge: Shreyaash Das | 11/21/21 |
4 - ND - CP - Racist StrikesTournament: Glenbrooks | Round: 6 | Opponent: harker RM | Judge: Andrew Torrez | 11/21/21 |
4 - ND - Kant NCTournament: Glenbrooks | Round: 6 | Opponent: harker RM | Judge: Andrew Torrez | 11/21/21 |
4 - ND - Military PicTournament: Glenbrooks | Round: 4 | Opponent: Dulles IC | Judge: Javier | 11/21/21 |
4 - ND - T - Just government vs BrazilTournament: Glenbrooks | Round: 7 | Opponent: Immac SS | Judge: Shreyaash Das | 11/21/21 |
4 - SO - Biotech DATournament: Greenhill | Round: 3 | Opponent: Westwood ST | Judge: JP Stuckert AND the U.S. risks these technologies being mastered by Chinese companies. The plan chills American biomed innovation, ceding control to China – also can’t solve future diseasesPaulsen 7/9 ~ERIK PAULSEN: We can save the world with our vaccines — without surrendering our IP to China," Bakersfield Californian, https://www.bakersfield.com/opinion/erik-paulsen-we-can-save-the-world-with-our-vaccines-without-surrendering-our-ip-to/article'b0b87692-df61-11eb-9a13-d7fa02eefaee.html~~//Lex AKu AND the only way to keep China at bay and American innovators at work. Biotech leadership key to future military primacy.Moore 21 ~(Scott Moore is a political scientist and administrator at the University of Pennsylvania and the author of a forthcoming book, "How China Shapes the Future," on China’s role in public goods and emerging technologies.) 8-8-2021, "In Biotech, the Industry of the Future, the U.S. Is Way Ahead of China," Lawfare, https://www.lawfareblog.com/biotech-industry-future-us-way-ahead-china~~//Lex AKu AND dramatically reduce the risk of sophisticated bioweapons development in the decades to come. Heg solves arms races, land grabs, rogue states, and great power war.Brands 18 ~Hal, Henry Kissinger Distinguished Professor at Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced International Studies and a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments." American Grand Strategy in the Age of Trump." Page 129-133~ AND to its military dominance than it has for at least a quarter century. | 9/18/21 |
4 - SO - CP - DistributionTournament: Valley RR | Round: 2 | Opponent: American Heritage EM | Judge: Gordon, Brixz, Gonzaba That comparatively solves better – IP rights don’t hinder vaccine cooperation, but manufacturing capacity is the current constraint. But contrary to | 9/24/21 |
4 - SO - CP - Reduce IP for covidTournament: Valley RR | Round: 3 | Opponent: Mission San Jose SR | Judge: Holden, Jared Burke | 9/24/21 |
4 - SO - DA - Counterfeit DrugsTournament: Valley | Round: 3 | Opponent: Mabel Rieger | Judge: Breigh | 10/16/21 |
4 - SO - DA - Innovation vs BiocolonialismTournament: Heart of Texas | Round: Octas | Opponent: Westwood AG | Judge: Danielle, David, Herrera | 10/18/21 |
4 - SO - Saudi Relations CPTournament: Greenhill Fall Classic | Round: 6 | Opponent: Southlake Carrol EP | Judge: Gordon Krauss | 9/19/21 |
4 - SO - T MedicineTournament: Greenhill | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Seqouia AS | Judge: Sarena Lu, Gordon Krauss, Ishan Rereddy Medicine is treatment for illness or injury Violation – Data exclusivity are not IPP for medicine. Clinical trials are a study for medicine to then get protected, but not medicine themselves | 10/18/21 |
4 - T - Cant spec Member StatesTournament: Greenhill | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Seqouia AS | Judge: Sarena Lu, Gordon Krauss, Ishan Rereddy Violation: They spec EU states 1 WTO decisions taken by consensus – states don’t act on their own. This is the most likely interpretation of the topic – why would the topic arbitrarily say WTO member states instead of just “states” if the WTO had nothing to do with it and wasn’t the agent of the aff. 2 “The” denotes totality Standards Fairness and education are voters – debate’s a game that needs rules to evaluate it and education gives us portable skills for life like research and thinking. | 10/18/21 |
JF - CP - Indigenous AppropriationTournament: Emory | Round: 5 | Opponent: Millburn AX | Judge: Kate Totz | 1/30/22 |
JF - CP - StarlinkTournament: Emory | Round: 1 | Opponent: Unionville AS | Judge: Tyler Wood | 1/29/22 |
JF - DA - CCPTournament: Emory | Round: 4 | Opponent: Harvard Westlake CC | Judge: Gordon Krauss | 1/29/22 |
JF - DA - HegTournament: Emory | Round: 1 | Opponent: Unionville AS | Judge: Tyler Wood | 1/29/22 |
JF - DA - Indigenous BroadbandTournament: Emory | Round: 5 | Opponent: Millburn AX | Judge: Kate Totz | 1/30/22 |
JF - NC - KantTournament: Emory | Round: 1 | Opponent: Unionville AS | Judge: Tyler Wood | 1/29/22 |
JF - T - Defend policyTournament: Emory | Round: 5 | Opponent: Millburn AX | Judge: Kate Totz 1-~--Resolved. 2-~--Unjust. Violation: There’s no plan, they defend the res as a general rule. 1-~--Ground-~--absent meeting precise words in the res, we lose all the pre-round prep we did around the resolution, killing neg ground. 2-~--Vagueness-~--debates inevitably involve the AFF defending something, but only our interp lets them to clearly define that from the start. Their model leads to late-breaking debates that destroy ground, for example we won’t know if asteroid mining or space exploration are offense until the 1AR, which skews neg prep. 3-~--Topic ed-~--specific policies teaches lets us go deep into the topic, uniquely important given the evolving character of space law. outweighs bc we only have 2 month topics, and phil ed is solved by free textbooks. TVA- This aff with a global commons advocacy- allows legit the same aff, and you still center indigenous education CI bc reasonability is arbitrary and invites judge intervention DTD to deter future abuse No RVIs: 1 illogical, you shouldn’t win for being topical, 2 good theory debaters will read abusive positions to bait theory and dump on an RVI | 1/30/22 |
JF - T - Extra T badTournament: Emory | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Memorial SC | Judge: Grant Brown, Dylan Jones, Henry Eberhart I’ll read you a line –“we reject the regime of property as the white science of logistics.” That’s some form of extra topicality since they are saying the reject property as a whole. hold them to everything their evidence says – anything else allows them to read infinite components and shift out of anything they want making it impossible to negate Standards: Procedural Fairness first—a) ballot pic – at the end of the day they care about competition and want their arguments to be flowed which proves they care about competition, if they don’t care about winning then just vote neg. Solves their offense, there is no reason a ballot is key – our interp precludes voting on non-topical affs but not the reading of them b) scope of solvency – one ballot can’t alter subjectivity, but it can rectify skews which means the only impact to a ballot is fairness and resolving skews. Competing interps – a) you either defend the rez or don’t – there’s no in between. No impact turns or rvis - A Perfcon – if T’s bad and you vote for them on that arg, you’re voting on T. B Substance – if T’s bad then we should try debating on substance – impact turns force me to go for T since I need to defend my position. | 1/30/22 |
JF - T - FrameworkTournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Newtown KS | Judge: David Herrera | 2/19/22 |
JF - T - NebelTournament: TOC | Round: 2 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart RR | Judge: Parker Mitchell Entities is a generic bare plural It applies to this topic – a entities is an existential bare plural bc it has no determiner b The sentence “The appropriation of outer space by private entities is unjust” does not imply “the appropriation of outer space by private and public entities is unjust” Fairness and education are voters – debate’s a game that needs rules to evaluate it and education gives us portable skills for life like research and thinking. | 4/23/22 |
JF - T - NebelTournament: TOC | Round: 2 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart RR | Judge: Parker Mitchell Entities is a generic bare plural It applies to this topic – a entities is an existential bare plural bc it has no determiner b The sentence “The appropriation of outer space by private entities is unjust” does not imply “the appropriation of outer space by private and public entities is unjust” Fairness and education are voters – debate’s a game that needs rules to evaluate it and education gives us portable skills for life like research and thinking. | 4/23/22 |
JF - T - NebelTournament: TOC | Round: 2 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart RR | Judge: Parker Mitchell Entities is a generic bare plural It applies to this topic – a entities is an existential bare plural bc it has no determiner b The sentence “The appropriation of outer space by private entities is unjust” does not imply “the appropriation of outer space by private and public entities is unjust” Fairness and education are voters – debate’s a game that needs rules to evaluate it and education gives us portable skills for life like research and thinking. | 4/23/22 |
JF - T - NebelTournament: TOC | Round: 2 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart RR | Judge: Parker Mitchell Entities is a generic bare plural It applies to this topic – a entities is an existential bare plural bc it has no determiner b The sentence “The appropriation of outer space by private entities is unjust” does not imply “the appropriation of outer space by private and public entities is unjust” Fairness and education are voters – debate’s a game that needs rules to evaluate it and education gives us portable skills for life like research and thinking. | 4/23/22 |
JF - T - NebelTournament: TOC | Round: 2 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart RR | Judge: Parker Mitchell Entities is a generic bare plural It applies to this topic – a entities is an existential bare plural bc it has no determiner b The sentence “The appropriation of outer space by private entities is unjust” does not imply “the appropriation of outer space by private and public entities is unjust” Fairness and education are voters – debate’s a game that needs rules to evaluate it and education gives us portable skills for life like research and thinking. | 4/23/22 |
JF - T - NebelTournament: TOC | Round: 2 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart RR | Judge: Parker Mitchell Entities is a generic bare plural It applies to this topic – a entities is an existential bare plural bc it has no determiner b The sentence “The appropriation of outer space by private entities is unjust” does not imply “the appropriation of outer space by private and public entities is unjust” Fairness and education are voters – debate’s a game that needs rules to evaluate it and education gives us portable skills for life like research and thinking. | 4/23/22 |
JF - Theory - Spec AppropriationTournament: Emory | Round: 4 | Opponent: Harvard Westlake CC | Judge: Gordon Krauss | 1/29/22 |
ND - T - FrameworkTournament: Glenbrooks | Round: 2 | Opponent: Presentation NR | Judge: Tajiah Words and Phrases ’64 | 11/20/21 |
ND - T - Spec EnforcementTournament: Glenbrooks | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Ayala AM | Judge: Danielle, Sreyaash, Emmiee Marley S. Weiss Professor of Law, University of Maryland School of Law, 2000, “The Right To Strike In Essential Services Under United States Labor Law”, https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2189andcontext=fac_pubs 2. Strikes, Lockouts, and This acts as a resolvability standard. Debate has to make sense and be comparable for the judge to make a decision which means it's an independent voter and outweighs. 2 Stable advocacy – 1AR clarification delinks neg positions that prove why enforcement in a certain instance is bad by saying it isn't their method of enforcement – wrecks neg ballot access and kills in depth clash – CX doesn't check since it kills 1NC construction pre-round since I don't know advocacy till in round, and judges do not flow cross ex so its not verifiable. Fairness- consittutive of comp activites, args presume DTD – drop the arg doesn’t make sense in the context of the shell, otherwise you can shift into anything. No RVI’s- a) 1AR can go all in on a 30 second shell and put us in a massive disadvantage, b) 1AR has 2 speeches to genearte theory vs our one. | 1/30/22 |
SO - CP - Adv vs EvergreeningTournament: Valley | Round: 6 | Opponent: Nathan Gong | Judge: Nikita | 10/16/21 |
SO - DA - CCPTournament: Heart of Texas | Round: Quarters | Opponent: Harker RM | Judge: Sam Larson, Castillo, Skylar | 10/30/21 |
SO - DA - Innovation EvergreeningTournament: Valley | Round: 6 | Opponent: Nathan Gong | Judge: Nikita | 10/16/21 |
SO - T - Cant spec medicinesTournament: Valley | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Saranya Singh | Judge: Panel | 10/16/21 |
SO - T - EvergreeningTournament: Meadows | Round: 6 | Opponent: Ayala AM | Judge: Truman Le Vote neg: No RVI’s – illogical to win for meeting the burden of being topical, and encourages unfair affs to bait out T arguments and go for the RVI | 10/31/21 |
SO - T - Medicine is notTournament: Meadows | Round: 2 | Opponent: Interlake DB | Judge: Jalyn Wu
2 TVA – Defend reduction of IP for indigenous MEDICINES. Westwood AG, Sage MP affs are examples. | 10/30/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
1/29/22 | 22the3@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
1/29/22 | 22the3@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
1/29/22 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
1/30/22 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
1/30/22 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
11/20/21 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
11/21/21 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
11/21/21 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
11/21/21 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
1/30/22 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
9/18/21 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
9/18/21 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
10/18/21 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
9/19/21 | bretttfortier@gmailcom |
| |
2/19/22 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
2/19/22 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
2/20/22 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
10/16/21 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
10/16/21 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
10/17/21 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
10/18/21 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
10/30/21 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
10/30/21 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
10/31/21 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
4/23/22 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
4/23/22 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
4/23/22 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
4/23/22 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
4/23/22 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
9/25/21 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
10/16/21 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
10/16/21 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
10/16/21 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
9/24/21 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
9/24/21 | 22kumar5@lexingtonmaorg |
|