Lexington Bai Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grapevine Classic | 2 | Southlake Carroll AS | Salazar, Davd |
|
|
| |
| Grapevine Classic | 3 | Elkins RS | Sun, Favian |
|
|
| |
| baby | Finals | the oppositions | ysn flo |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Grapevine Classic | 2 | Opponent: Southlake Carroll AS | Judge: Salazar, Davd 1ac - weed |
| Grapevine Classic | 3 | Opponent: Elkins RS | Judge: Sun, Favian 1ac - biopiracy medical access |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - Contact InfoTournament: baby | Round: Finals | Opponent: the oppositions | Judge: ysn flo | 7/7/21 |
0 - NavigationTournament: baby | Round: Finals | Opponent: the oppositions | Judge: ysn flo | 9/11/21 |
1 - Round ReportsTournament: Grapevine Classic | Round: 2 | Opponent: Southlake Carroll AS | Judge: Salazar, Davd Interp: Debaters must disclose round reports on the 2021-2022 NDCA LD wiki for every round they have debated this season. Round reports disclose which positions (AC, NC, K, T, Theory, etc.) were read/gone for in every speech.Violation: screenshot in the doc – they have noneStandards:1~ Level Playing Field – big schools can go around and collect flows but independents are left in the dark so round reports are key for them to prep- they give you an idea of overall what layers debaters like going for so you can best prepare your strategy against them. Accessibility first and independent voter – it's an impact multiplier.2~ Strategy Education – round reports help novices understand the context in which positions are read by good debaters and help with brainstorming potential 1NCs vs affs – helps compensate for kids who can't afford coaches to prep out affs.3~ Pre-round prep –1ARs gives especially give an idea of what type of debater someone is – they could go for 1AR theory every round– otherwise I enter every round unknowing whereas you have an idea of what you want to go for from the start – key to good clash4~ Data collection – round reports are key to statistical analysis of LD debateZhang 1/22 Peter Zhang, 1-22-2021, "Disclosure in Numbers by Peter Zhang," Briefly, https://www.vbriefly.com/2021/01/22/disclosure-in-numbers-by-peter-zhang/?fbclid=IwAR0q5uCO74vLhYipH8QEO0PrLhY7CiIOwlEJUWEmnIVdqCmlM-jC4A-8rk0 LEX JB Data collection outweighs on norming – a) allows us to be accurate with our findings to see which norms are good and which norms are aren't b) data collection allows us to see if norming is working – means it comes lexically prior to any shells read in this round~1~ DTD on disclosure – a) disclosure cannot be drop the argument because it would just drop you because you're the norm b) deterrence, also dropping them is key now because it's the beginning of the season which is key to norms creation~2~ Reject all responses to disclosure – they disclose open source which concedes the validity of disclosure being good – anything else is a doubleturn~3~ No RVI on disclosure – a) prevents people from checking back for bad disclosure – means we never get better wikis because they're afraid to lose off the RVI b) they know that people will read disclosure on them so they prep a counterinterp just to win off the RVI – leads to infinitely abusive norms~4~ CI – 1~ reasonability is arbitrary – impossible to know what is reasonable until you establish a brightline 2~ bites judge intervention cuz they have to gut check what they think is good 3~ reasonability collapses cuz u use offense defense to evaluate offense under the BL 4~ norms – you can sidestep norms by selectively choosing a different brightline you meet every round.~5~ Disclosure outweighs – it's key to assessing the honesty of the form of your argumentation and how you presented arguments which means it precludes 1AC claims.~6~ Fairness is a voter because debate is a game governed by rules and you can't tell who actually won if the layer was skewed. | 9/11/21 |
SO - DA - ILawTournament: Grapevine Classic | Round: 2 | Opponent: Southlake Carroll AS | Judge: Salazar, Davd The WTO has been seen as ineffective but has the opportunity to bounce back with strong international buy inNgozi Okonjo-Iweala, 20, Reviving the WTO, https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/reviving-the-wto/, Brookings, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala is a nonresident distinguished fellow with the Africa Growth Initiative in the Global Economy and Development program at Brookings. She is an economist and international development expert with over 30 years of experience. Intellectual property rights cannot be discriminated on the basis of field, or place of inventionWTO https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips_04c_e.htm, Article 27.1, Section 5 on patents, World trade Organization, WTO, Part II — Standards concerning the availability, scope and use of Intellectual Property Rights The WTO's appellate body no longer exists to mediate disputes, without immediate buy in by states, and no mechanism to make disobedient states obey, the system collapsesHorton, 08/3, Lessons from Trump's assault on the World Trade Organization, https://www.chathamhouse.org/2021/08/lessons-trumps-assault-world-trade-organization, Chatham House – International Affairs Think Tank, Communications Manager; Project Lead, Common Futures Conversations A major country operating outside WTO consensus wrecks global trade normsBacchus 20 ~James Bacchus, member of the Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies, the Distinguished University Professor of Global Affairs and director of the Center for Global Economic and Environmental Opportunity at the University of Central Florida, 12-16-2020, "An Unnecessary Proposal: A WTO Waiver of Intellectual Property Rights for COVID-19 Vaccines," Cato Institute, https://www.cato.org/free-trade-bulletin/unnecessary-proposal-wto-waiver-intellectual-property-rights-covid-19-vaccines~~/Kankee Collapse of the WTO triggers an inevitable global warRaymond J. Waldmann, Corporate Counsel and Secretary for AuBeta Networks Inc and former vice president of international relations and as director of government affairs for The Boeing Company and assistant U.S. Secretary of Commerce for international economic policy (1981-83) and chair of the Seattle Host Committees for the 1999 WTO Ministerial Meeting, "WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION IMPORTANT TO CITIZENS OF CITY AND STATE, Seattle-Post Intelligencer, 5/11/99, WTO cred solves wars that go nuclear.Hamann 09 ~Georgia; 2009; J.D. Candidate, Vanderbilt University Law School; "Replacing Slingshots with Swords: Implications of the Antigua-Gambling 22.6 Panel Report for Developing Countries and the World Trading System," VANDERBILT JOURNAL OF TRANSNATIONAL LAW, http://www.jogoremoto.pt/docs/extra/duqJ53.pdf~~ Justin | 9/11/21 |
SO - PIC - WeedTournament: Grapevine Classic | Round: 2 | Opponent: Southlake Carroll AS | Judge: Salazar, Davd The member nations of the World Trade Organization should reduce intellectual property protections for medicines except for marijuana.It competes! – Marijuana is medicine and has multiple medical usesGrinspoon 20 ~Peter Grinspoon, 4-10-2020, "Medical marijuana," Harvard Health, https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/medical-marijuana-2018011513085 JB~ Weed booming now.Agustin et al. 20 ~Alejandro Agustin, Jorge Alvarado, Gerardo Cardenas, Talia Towe, Breonna Vann, December 7, 2020, "The Economic Rise of Marijuana", https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/4c839fb0499a453d88be4ab862a96f37 JB~ IP is the driving factor for innovation, participation, and operation of the weed industry.Sander 16 ~Jason Sander. "Patenting Cannabis Strains – Good or Bad?" June 8, 2016, Jason is a versatile writer and marketer with twelve years of experience serving clients. He couples this expertise with a passion for cannabis businesses and the science of medical marijuana, https://www.marijuanatimes.org/patenting-cannabis-strains-good-or-bad JB~ Otherwise that's extinction – weed industry collapses 1AC evidenceThese cards also answer the affirmative and link turn it. | 9/11/21 |
SO - T - TemporaryTournament: Grapevine Classic | Round: 2 | Opponent: Southlake Carroll AS | Judge: Salazar, Davd Interpretation: Reductions are permanentReynolds 59. Judge (In the Matter of Doris A. Montesani, Petitioner, v. Arthur Levitt, as Comptroller of the State of New York, et al., Respondents ~NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL~ Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department 9 A.D.2d 51; 189 N.Y.S.2d 695; 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7391 August 13, 1959) Violation: the COVID enforcement cards talk about a temporary waiveringVote negative for textuality – the actors in the resolution are members of the WTO and evidence from court operates within the WTO's jurisdiction.~1~ Predictability – the resolution is the stasis point for contestation, anything else would be unpredictable and an unfair prep burden for the negative. Their counterinterp will justify jettisoning any possible aspect of the topic which explodes predictable limits for prep~2~ Topic education – only our interpretation allows for the most nuanced clash pertaining to what parameters in which the actors in the resolution act. Anything else doesn't actually talk about the topic because it's not what the actors are allowed to fiat. | 9/11/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
9/11/21 | 23bai@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
9/11/21 | 23bai@lexingtonmaorg |
|