Lake Highland Srinivasa Aff
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any | 1 | All | All |
|
| ||
| Harvard | 1 | Westwood AM | Kristen Arnold |
|
|
| |
| Harvard | 3 | West Des Moines Valley JW | Aashril Shazar |
|
|
| |
| Harvard | 5 | Syosset SR | Tom Speaker |
|
|
| |
| Woodward | 1 | Harvard-Westlake Goldman | Colton Gilbert |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Harvard | 1 | Opponent: Westwood AM | Judge: Kristen Arnold 1AC - CHH |
| Harvard | 3 | Opponent: West Des Moines Valley JW | Judge: Aashril Shazar 1AC - CHH |
| Harvard | 5 | Opponent: Syosset SR | Judge: Tom Speaker 1AC - CHH |
| Woodward | 1 | Opponent: Harvard-Westlake Goldman | Judge: Colton Gilbert 1AC - FALC |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - Contact InfoTournament: Any | Round: 1 | Opponent: All | Judge: All | 2/18/22 |
JF22 - AC - CHHTournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Westwood AM | Judge: Kristen Arnold I affirm the resolution resolved: The appropriation of outer space by private entities is unjust.Before I begin with this debate, I offer the following definitionsAppropriation The most commonly accepted definition of outer space is at one hundred kilometers above sea levelCommon Human Heritage The common heritage principle describes property that is jointly owned by all people and not subject to appropriationThus my value is justice. This is bc of term just used in the resoulution and I’ll be using Rawls theory of justice. Robert71 AND by pursuing one's own prudential reasoning under certain procedural bargaining and knowledge constraints." This means that my value criterion has to be one that fully achieves justice. Thus my value criterion is protecting the commons. This brings me to my first contention,Common Human HeritageThe common heritage principle is the most effective model for developing spacePorras 7 AND body quickly, and without putting unnecessary restrictions on a blossoming private sector. The common heritage principle protects and saves future generationsJoyner 86 AND implicit in responsibly supervising the earth's heritage for mankind in the future.35 The common heritage principle rules out private appropriationJoyner 86 AND
Onto my 2nd ContentionDangers associated with private appropriationPrivate appropriation of space causes conflict between countries and puts our already established allies at risk.Finkelstein and Nevitt 18 AND war in outer space is unthinkable, and we cannot let it occur. Conflict in space is a major threat with risks of escalationGrego 15 AND from the earth’s surface than the distance from Boston to Washington, DC. ====Private space appropriation leads to a massive increase in space junk, Holden 18==== AND the commerce department, and not the FAA, begins to make sense. Private appropriation is clearly outlawed under the Outer Space TreatyKerrest 11 AND my judge and opponent are ready, we may go into cross-x I affirm the resolution resolved: The appropriation of outer space by private entities is unjust.Before I begin with this debate, I offer the following definitionsAppropriation The most commonly accepted definition of outer space is at one hundred kilometers above sea levelCommon Human Heritage The common heritage principle describes property that is jointly owned by all people and not subject to appropriationThus my value is justice. This is bc of term just used in the resoulution and I’ll be using Rawls theory of justice. Robert71 AND by pursuing one's own prudential reasoning under certain procedural bargaining and knowledge constraints." This means that my value criterion has to be one that fully achieves justice. Thus my value criterion is protecting the commons. This brings me to my first contention,Common Human HeritageThe common heritage principle is the most effective model for developing spacePorras 7 AND body quickly, and without putting unnecessary restrictions on a blossoming private sector. The common heritage principle protects and saves future generationsJoyner 86 AND implicit in responsibly supervising the earth's heritage for mankind in the future.35 The common heritage principle rules out private appropriationJoyner 86 AND
Onto my 2nd ContentionDangers associated with private appropriationPrivate appropriation of space causes conflict between countries and puts our already established allies at risk.Finkelstein and Nevitt 18 AND war in outer space is unthinkable, and we cannot let it occur. Conflict in space is a major threat with risks of escalationGrego 15 AND from the earth’s surface than the distance from Boston to Washington, DC. ====Private space appropriation leads to a massive increase in space junk, Holden 18==== AND the commerce department, and not the FAA, begins to make sense. Private appropriation is clearly outlawed under the Outer Space TreatyKerrest 11 AND my judge and opponent are ready, we may go into cross-x | 2/18/22 |
JF22 - AC - CHHTournament: Harvard | Round: 3 | Opponent: West Des Moines Valley JW | Judge: Aashril Shazar I affirm the resolution resolved: The appropriation of outer space by private entities is unjust.Before I begin with this debate, I offer the following definitionsAppropriation The most commonly accepted definition of outer space is at one hundred kilometers above sea levelCommon Human Heritage The common heritage principle describes property that is jointly owned by all people and not subject to appropriationThus my value is justice. This is bc of term just used in the resoulution and I’ll be using Rawls theory of justice. Robert71 AND by pursuing one's own prudential reasoning under certain procedural bargaining and knowledge constraints." This means that my value criterion has to be one that fully achieves justice. Thus my value criterion is protecting the commons. This brings me to my first contention,Common Human HeritageThe common heritage principle is the most effective model for developing spacePorras 7 AND body quickly, and without putting unnecessary restrictions on a blossoming private sector. The common heritage principle protects and saves future generationsJoyner 86 AND implicit in responsibly supervising the earth's heritage for mankind in the future.35 The common heritage principle rules out private appropriationJoyner 86 AND
Onto my 2nd ContentionDangers associated with private appropriationPrivate appropriation of space causes conflict between countries and puts our already established allies at risk.Finkelstein and Nevitt 18 AND war in outer space is unthinkable, and we cannot let it occur. Conflict in space is a major threat with risks of escalationGrego 15 AND from the earth’s surface than the distance from Boston to Washington, DC. ====Private space appropriation leads to a massive increase in space junk, Holden 18==== AND the commerce department, and not the FAA, begins to make sense. The Earth is overdue for asteroid strikes and is underprepared – only unified national efforts can solve, which private appropriation makes impossible, Krekonian 18Kerkonian, Aram Daniel. "The Possible Regulation of Certain Space Activities through an International Orgnaization: Tutmonda Spaco Agentejo." ZLW 67 (2018): 279. AND my judge and opponent are ready, we may go into cross-x I affirm the resolution resolved: The appropriation of outer space by private entities is unjust.Before I begin with this debate, I offer the following definitionsAppropriation The most commonly accepted definition of outer space is at one hundred kilometers above sea levelCommon Human Heritage The common heritage principle describes property that is jointly owned by all people and not subject to appropriationThus my value is justice. This is bc of term just used in the resoulution and I’ll be using Rawls theory of justice. Robert71 AND by pursuing one's own prudential reasoning under certain procedural bargaining and knowledge constraints." This means that my value criterion has to be one that fully achieves justice. Thus my value criterion is protecting the commons. This brings me to my first contention,Common Human HeritageThe common heritage principle is the most effective model for developing spacePorras 7 AND body quickly, and without putting unnecessary restrictions on a blossoming private sector. The common heritage principle protects and saves future generationsJoyner 86 AND implicit in responsibly supervising the earth's heritage for mankind in the future.35 The common heritage principle rules out private appropriationJoyner 86 AND
Onto my 2nd ContentionDangers associated with private appropriationPrivate appropriation of space causes conflict between countries and puts our already established allies at risk.Finkelstein and Nevitt 18 AND war in outer space is unthinkable, and we cannot let it occur. Conflict in space is a major threat with risks of escalationGrego 15 AND from the earth’s surface than the distance from Boston to Washington, DC. ====Private space appropriation leads to a massive increase in space junk, Holden 18==== AND the commerce department, and not the FAA, begins to make sense. Private appropriation is clearly outlawed under the Outer Space TreatyKerrest 11 AND my judge and opponent are ready, we may go into cross-x | 2/19/22 |
JF22 - AC - CHHTournament: Harvard | Round: 5 | Opponent: Syosset SR | Judge: Tom Speaker I affirm the resolution resolved: The appropriation of outer space by private entities is unjust.Before I begin with this debate, I offer the following definitionsAppropriation The most commonly accepted definition of outer space is at one hundred kilometers above sea levelCommon Human Heritage The common heritage principle describes property that is jointly owned by all people and not subject to appropriationThus my value is justice. This is bc of term just used in the resolution and I’ll be using Rawls theory of justice. Robert71 AND by pursuing one's own prudential reasoning under certain procedural bargaining and knowledge constraints." This means that my value criterion has to be one that fully achieves justice. Thus my value criterion is protecting the commons. This brings me to my first contention,Common Human HeritageThe common heritage principle is the most effective model for developing spacePorras 7 AND body quickly, and without putting unnecessary restrictions on a blossoming private sector. The common heritage principle protects and saves future generationsJoyner 86 AND implicit in responsibly supervising the earth's heritage for mankind in the future.35 The common heritage principle rules out private appropriationJoyner 86 AND
Onto my 2nd ContentionDangers associated with private appropriationPrivate appropriation of space causes conflict between countries and puts our already established allies at risk.Finkelstein and Nevitt 18 AND war in outer space is unthinkable, and we cannot let it occur. Conflict in space is a major threat with risks of escalationGrego 15 AND from the earth’s surface than the distance from Boston to Washington, DC. ====Private space appropriation leads to a massive increase in space junk, Holden 18==== AND the commerce department, and not the FAA, begins to make sense. The Earth is overdue for asteroid strikes and is underprepared – only unified national efforts can solve, which private appropriation makes impossible, Krekonian 18Kerkonian, Aram Daniel. "The Possible Regulation of Certain Space Activities through an International Orgnaization: Tutmonda Spaco Agentejo." ZLW 67 (2018): 279. AND an organization representing the diverse interests of humanity rather than a single State. I affirm the resolution resolved: The appropriation of outer space by private entities is unjust.Before I begin with this debate, I offer the following definitionsAppropriation The most commonly accepted definition of outer space is at one hundred kilometers above sea levelCommon Human Heritage The common heritage principle describes property that is jointly owned by all people and not subject to appropriationThus my value is justice. This is bc of term just used in the resoulution and I’ll be using Rawls theory of justice. Robert71 AND by pursuing one's own prudential reasoning under certain procedural bargaining and knowledge constraints." This means that my value criterion has to be one that fully achieves justice. Thus my value criterion is protecting the commons. This brings me to my first contention,Common Human HeritageThe common heritage principle is the most effective model for developing spacePorras 7 AND body quickly, and without putting unnecessary restrictions on a blossoming private sector. The common heritage principle protects and saves future generationsJoyner 86 AND implicit in responsibly supervising the earth's heritage for mankind in the future.35 The common heritage principle rules out private appropriationJoyner 86 AND
Onto my 2nd ContentionDangers associated with private appropriationPrivate appropriation of space causes conflict between countries and puts our already established allies at risk.Finkelstein and Nevitt 18 AND war in outer space is unthinkable, and we cannot let it occur. Conflict in space is a major threat with risks of escalationGrego 15 AND from the earth’s surface than the distance from Boston to Washington, DC. ====Private space appropriation leads to a massive increase in space junk, Holden 18==== AND the commerce department, and not the FAA, begins to make sense. Private appropriation is clearly outlawed under the Outer Space TreatyKerrest 11 AND my judge and opponent are ready, we may go into cross-x | 2/19/22 |
JF22 - AC - FALCTournament: Woodward | Round: 1 | Opponent: Harvard-Westlake Goldman | Judge: Colton Gilbert JF21 – AC – Space CommunismPart 1 – The Future of CapitalismAsteroid mining opens up the possibility of a utopian world of luxury in which the logic of scarcity along with capitalist exploitation no longer exists. However, private monopolization of asteroid mining will destroy the dream of space communism, dooming us, BASTANI 1 2019Bastani, A. (2019). Fully automated luxury communism. Verso Books. AND . Finally, and perhaps most sensibly, one could foresee the adoption of Thus, I affirm the resolution, resolved: The appropriation of outer space by private entities is unjust. Private asteroid mining will make outer space the realm of the capitalists and new forms of exploitation, up to extermination. However, Fully Automated Luxury Communism paves the way for an alternate world, turning capitalist abundance on itself and destroying capitalism.With the abundance of outer space and new technologies, it is possible achieve a new communism characterized by international luxury. Only a communist, populous politics that deviates from traditional capitalist usage of technology and resources can solve capitalism while ensuring green living. BASTANI 3,Bastani, A. (2019). Fully automated luxury communism. Verso Books. AND and the state, won’t rest in ensuring FALC never comes to pass. Part 2 – Apocalypse NowCapitalism is a death cult and the apocalypse is already happening. Without an unshakable commitment to the total and complete rejection of the fetishization of capitalist value, we will all die like the dinosaurs, Allinson 21Allinson, J. (2021). The tragedy of the worker: towards the proletarocene. Verso Books. pg 8-17 AND of ‘adaptation’ has become the ideology of capitalism’s triumph over all life. We are on the brink of a post-scarcity world for the rich, where they will no longer need us for their luxuries. If dictated by the capitalist regime through private appropriation, a post-scarcity world would mean the extermination of the working-class, FRASE 2016Frase, P. (2016). Four futures: Life after capitalism. Verso books LHP HL + LHP AB AND ." As a result, the US horse population fell from 21.5 Part 3 – Luxury Populism is the Method (1:17)Anti-capitalism must learn to compete with capitalism in the realm of desire, taking existing capitalist structures like the state and repurposing them to create Marxist possibility. Thus, we must transform our libidinal desires and direction of thought against capitalism – the aff does this through a unified horizon towards FALC – Heron:Heron, Kai. "Journal of the Marxist Literary Group." Mediations, https://mediationsjournal.org/articles/still-a-world. LHP PS AND might outlast neoliberalism by compromising with precisely such social-democratic projects.26 The role of the ballot is fidelity to the truth – unified dedication to a shared horizon is liberatory – the affirmative’s horizon is FALC, Dean 19:Dean, Jodi. Comrade: An essay on political belonging. Verso, 2019. LHP BT + LHP PS AND 68 Comrades demonstrate fidelity through political work; through concerted, disciplined engagement. | 3/19/22 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
2/18/22 | srinivasaso@lhpreporg |
| |
2/19/22 | srinivasaso@lhpreporg |
| |
2/19/22 | srinivasaso@lhpreporg |
|