| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Finals | - | - |
|
| ||
| - | Finals | - | - |
|
| ||
| - | Finals | - | - |
|
| ||
| - | Finals | - | - |
|
| ||
| - | Finals | - | - |
|
| ||
| - | Finals | - | - |
|
| ||
| Loyola | 1 | Silver Creek KZ | Joey Georges |
|
|
| |
| Loyola | 3 | Catonsville AT | Navarrete, Javier |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Loyola | 1 | Opponent: Silver Creek KZ | Judge: Joey Georges 1AC- human rights plan |
| Loyola | 3 | Opponent: Catonsville AT | Judge: Navarrete, Javier 1AC Stock |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - Accessible FormattingTournament: - | Round: Finals | Opponent: - | Judge: - | 9/4/21 |
0 - Contact InfoTournament: - | Round: Finals | Opponent: - | Judge: - | 9/4/21 |
0 - Content WarningsTournament: - | Round: Finals | Opponent: - | Judge: - | 9/4/21 |
0 - DisclosureTournament: - | Round: Finals | Opponent: - | Judge: - | 9/4/21 |
0 - NavigationTournament: - | Round: Finals | Opponent: - | Judge: - | 9/4/21 |
1 - Theory - Implementation BadTournament: Loyola | Round: 1 | Opponent: Silver Creek KZ | Judge: Joey Georges A. Interpretation: The aff may not defend implementation.Ought statements entail an ideal without an action or imperative.Robinson 71 Richard Robinson, "Ought and Ought Not," Philosophy, Vol. 46, No. 177 (Jul., 1971), pp. 193-202 Massa B. Violation: They do.C. Standards:1. Precision –2. Limits and Ground –3. Resolvability –D. Voters:Fairness is a voter –Drop the debater –No RVIs – Use competing interps | 9/14/21 |
2 - K - WomxnTournament: Loyola | Round: 1 | Opponent: Silver Creek KZ | Judge: Joey Georges Their use of the term women instead of womxn reinforces hierarchies.Caira Blignaut, OPINION: Womxn vs Women, March 24, 2018, https://www.matiemedia.org/opinion-womxn-vs-women/ /AHS PB Drop them to deter further sexist rhetoric in the debate space- they could have said womxn instead.The safety of the space is prima facie – we don't know who's winning if people can't engage. Anything that doesn't immediately denounce atrocities excludes people who have and can experience them.Teehan Ryan Teehan ~NSD staffer and competitor from the Delbarton School~ – NSD Update comment on the student protests at the TOC in 2014. Massa | 9/14/21 |
2 - K - DependencyTournament: Loyola | Round: 3 | Opponent: Catonsville AT | Judge: Navarrete, Javier Their discourse of "dependency" stems from repressive rhetoricNANCY FRASER AND LINDA GORDON, American critical theorist, feminist, and the Henry A. and Louise Loeb Professor of Political and Social Science and professor of philosophy at The New School in New York City. AND professor of history and a University Professor of the Humanities at New York University , "Dependency" Demystified: Inscriptions of Power in a Keyword of the Welfare State, published 1994, /AHS PB Drop them to deter oppressive rhetoric in the debate space- they didn't need include discourse of "dependency" to win case – they also could have used terms like "mutually reliant" to imply that all within the case are equals.The safety of the space is prima facie – we don't know who's winning if people can't engage. Anything that doesn't immediately denounce atrocities excludes people who have and can experience them.Teehan Ryan Teehan ~NSD staffer and competitor from the Delbarton School~ – NSD Update comment on the student protests at the TOC in 2014. Massa | 9/15/21 |
2 - NC - SkeppyTournament: Loyola | Round: 1 | Opponent: Silver Creek KZ | Judge: Joey Georges Presumption and permissibility negates -Every reason is equally as violent in its creation.Derrida, Jacques Derrida, "Force of Law: The Mystical Foundation of Authority" Massa But justice, however unpresentable it may be, doesn't wait.· It is that which must not wait. To be direct, simple and brief, let us say this: a just decision is always required immediately, "right away." It cannot furnish itself with infinite information and the unlimited knowledge of conditions, rules or hypothetical imperatives that could justify it. And even if it did have all that at its disposal, even if it did give itself the time, all the time and all the necessary facts about the matter, the moment of decision, as such, always remains a finite moment of urgency and precipitation, since it must not be the consequence or the effect of this theoretical or historical knowledge, of this reflection or this deliberation, since it always marks the interruption of the juridico- or ethico- or politico-cognitive deliberation that precedes it, that must precede it. The instant of decision is a madness, says Kierkegaard. This is particularly true of the instant of the just decision that must rend time and defy dialectics. It is a madness. Even if time and prudence, the patience of knowledge and the mastery of conditions were hypothetically unlimited, the decision would be structurally finite, however late it came, decision of urgency and precipitation, acting in the night of non-knowledge and non-rule Affirming negates.Paraphrasing Mcnamara '06, Paul, 2-7-2006, "Deontic Logic (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)," No Publication, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-deontic/index.html~~#4.3 Massa Premise 1—Premise 2—Thus, premise 3—External world skep is true.Neta, Ram. "External World Skepticism." The Problem of The External World, 2014, philosophy.unc.edu/files/2014/06/The-Problem-of-the-External-World.pdf. Massa | 9/14/21 |
2 - ROB - Truth TestingTournament: Loyola | Round: 1 | Opponent: Silver Creek KZ | Judge: Joey Georges Use a truth testing paradigm a) Logic –– b) Fiat is illusory –– c) ROBs that aren't phrased as binaries maximize leeway for interpretation as to who is winning offense– d) Inclusion –– e) Permissibility trigger –f) Constitutivism –– g) Inescapability – | 9/14/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
9/14/21 | luckychanpark@gmailcom |
|