| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Finals | - | - |
|
| ||
| - | Finals | - | - |
|
| ||
| - | Finals | - | - |
|
| ||
| - | Finals | - | - |
|
| ||
| - | Finals | - | - |
|
| ||
| - | Finals | - | - |
|
| ||
| - | Finals | - | - |
|
| ||
| - | Finals | - | - |
|
| ||
| - | Finals | - | - |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - Accessible FormattingTournament: - | Round: Finals | Opponent: - | Judge: - | 9/3/21 |
0 - Contact InfoTournament: - | Round: Finals | Opponent: - | Judge: - | 9/3/21 |
0 - Content WarningsTournament: - | Round: Finals | Opponent: - | Judge: - | 9/3/21 |
0 - DisclosureTournament: - | Round: Finals | Opponent: - | Judge: - | 9/3/21 |
0 - NavigationTournament: - | Round: Finals | Opponent: - | Judge: - | 9/3/21 |
1 - Spec StatusTournament: Loyola | Round: 2 | Opponent: Southlake Carroll PK | Judge: Sreyaash Das | 9/4/21 |
JANFEB - AC - FreedomTournament: Loyola | Round: 2 | Opponent: Southlake Carroll PK | Judge: Sreyaash Das FramingThe meta-ethic is procedural moral realism.This entails that moral facts stem from procedures while substantive realism holds that moral truths exist independently of that in the empirical world. Prefer procedural realism –Next is regress -That justifies universalizability –Thus, the standard is Consistency with the Categorical Imperative. Prefer:~1~ Performativity –~2~ Humanity –~3~ Ethical frameworks must be theoretically legitimate. All frameworks are functionally topicality interpretations of the word ought so they must theoretically justified. Prefer our standard –~4~ Frameworks all share equal value.~5~The neg may not read consequentialism –OffenseI affirm: Resolved: The member nations of the World Trade Organization ought to reduce intellectual property protections for medicines. Presumption and Permissibility affirms1~ Patents attempt to assert ownership over nature and impede individuals' abilities to pursue their own endsLong 95 ~(Roderick T., professor of philosophy at Auburn University, editor of the Journal of Ayn Rand Studies, director and president of the Molinari Institute and a Senior Fellow at the Center for a Stateless Society) "The Libertarian Case Against Intellectual Property Rights," Free Nation Foundation, 1995~ JL recut Lex VM 2~ IPR is nonuniversalizable and interferes with the freedom of people who need medicineMerges 11 ~(Robert, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati Professor of Law and Technology, University of California, Berkeley, School of Law) "Justifying Intellectual Property," Harvard University Press, 2011~ JL recut Lex VM The neg must concede the aff contention level arguments -Underview~1~ Aff gets 1AR theory otherwise the neg can be infinitely abusive and I can't check back. It's DTD, competing interps, and highest layer bc the 1AR is too short to win both theory and substance. No 2NR theory or paradigm issues cuz they can dump on it for 6 minutes and my 3-minute 2AR is screwed.~2~ Use a truth testing paradigm a) Logic –– b) Fiat is illusory –– c) ROBs that aren't phrased as binaries maximize leeway for interpretation as to who is winning offense– d) Inclusion~3~ Practices are assumed to exist for the purposes of discussion. However, denying the assumptions behind statements just proves them valid. The only time the statement is invalid is when the consequent is false.Stanford https://web.stanford.edu/~~bobonich/dictionary/dictionary.html Abbreviated Dictionary of Philosophical Terminology An introduction to philosophy Stanford University ACCS JM Implications-Reject uncarded responses –~4~ Util justifies death good –~5~ RVI on NC theory –~6~ Reject neg fairness concerns~7~ All neg interps are counter interps | 9/4/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|