Joshi Plat Bai Aff
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 NSD CAMP TOURNAMENT | 1 | McCAnd Teja Katipalli | Traber, Becca |
|
|
| |
| 2021 NSD CAMP TOURNAMENT | 3 | TraRob Tommy Yu | Sinha, Abhinav |
|
|
| |
| wolo g | Finals | the opps | judge |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 NSD CAMP TOURNAMENT | 1 | Opponent: McCAnd Teja Katipalli | Judge: Traber, Becca 1ac - domination |
| 2021 NSD CAMP TOURNAMENT | 3 | Opponent: TraRob Tommy Yu | Judge: Sinha, Abhinav 1ac - kant climate adv afc |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - Contact InfoTournament: wolo g | Round: Finals | Opponent: the opps | Judge: judge | 7/8/21 |
NSD - 1AC - DominationTournament: 2021 NSD CAMP TOURNAMENT | Round: 1 | Opponent: McCAnd Teja Katipalli | Judge: Traber, Becca 1AC – Domination1AC – FrameworkThe meta ethic is practical reason-~1~ Ethics must be derived a prioriA~ Uncertainty – if we base ethics on a postieri knowledge, our experiences are subjective and unverifiable, but principles created with the bases if a priori in the noumenal world are universally the same with all agents. That outweighs because if ethics are subjective that allows people to justify atrocities by saying they don't experience the sameB~ Is/Ought Gap – experience in the physical world only descriptively tells us what is, not what ought to because we won't know the best course of action, only what we can perceive. Thus it's not possible to create an ought statement through descriptive premises which means there must be a premises created in the noumenal a priori world to make a moral theory so we can see if an action is good in a vacuum and in all situations.~2~ Agents have a constitutive right to freedom –A~ Inescapability – to deny agency is self-contradictory because questioning your agency is exercising that same agency. Thus, exercising free agency – justifying judgements and freely taking actions – is constitutive of subjectivityB~ Principle of Generic Consistency – freedom is constitutive of agency and is necessary good. Denying freedom in general in contradictory since it justifies interference in your ability to take actions and make judgements in the first place.Gewirth '84 ~Alan Gewirth, "The Ontological Basis of Natural Law: A Critique and an Alternative," The American Journal of Jurisprudence, Vol. 29, No. 1 (1984), Pg. 95–121. Gewirth was professor of philosophy at the University of Chicago.~ CHSTM Brackets for gendered language ~Recut Lex JB~ ~3~ Freedom is not just the absence of interference – a slaveowner who does not interfere in the affairs of their slaves has not made them "freer," because they are still subject to domination, a regime of potential arbitrary intervention. Prefer freedom as nondomination – better corrects noninterfering forms of subjugation through institutional restraints.Pettit '96 ~Philip Pettit, "Freedom as Antipower," Ethics, Vol. 106, No. 3 (Apr. 1996), pp. 576-604. Pettit is the Laurance S. Rockefeller University Professor of University Center for Human Values at Princeton University and also Distinguished University Professor of Philosophy at the Australian National University.~ CHSTMJB ~Recut Lex JB~ ~4~ Non-domination requires specific interventions by the state to protect the polity from subjugation – laws do not infringe on freedoms but enable them. Only when interrelations are mutually governed by a system of non-arbitrary communal public rules is it possible for citizens to enjoy independence from arbitrary rule.Pettit '05 ~Philip Pettit, "The Domination Complaint", Nomos, Vol. 46, POLITICAL EXCLUSION AND DOMINATION (2005), pp. 87-117.~ CHSTM ~Recut LEX JB~ Thus, the standard is establishing checks against domination.Prefer additionally –1~ Performativity – debate as an institution is defined not just how we perform as individuals but how we interact as a community, ensuring the community is free of domination by removing subjugating regimes so everyone is equally respected and everyone's voices can be heard is a pre-requisite to being able to debate.2~ Actor-specificity – non-domination is the only notion of freedom that can apply to state actors since individuals always exist in communities and communal governance always involves restrictions3~ Inclusion – analytical philosophy allows for anyone to make responses to it with no carded evidence1AC – AdvocacyThus the advocacy – Resolved: A just government ought to recognize an unconditional right of workers to strike.Findlaw 17 ~Created By Findlaw'S, 5-2-2017, "Labor Strike FAQs," Findlaw, https://www.findlaw.com/employment/wages-and-benefits/labor-strike-faqs.html LEX JB~ I'll defend the actor as an ideal government in relation to nondominating principles as per the resolution's use of just which implies morality. If a government is just then it is one that recognizes workers' strike.The aff fiats recognition which ishttps://www.ldoceonline.com/Government-topic/recognition LEX JB 1AC – Offense~1~ Strikes give the ability to challenge dominating workplaces – it's not a question of whether the workplace is coercive, it's just that workers should have the freedom to strikeGourevitch 16 ~Gourevitch, Alex. "Quitting work but not the job: Liberty and the right to strike." Perspectives on Politics 14.2 (2016): 307. Yoaks + JB~ ~2~ CPs don't solve – strikes are uniquely good to and the best method of resisting domination through collective methods of resistance – anything else gets cooptedGourevitch 18 ~Gourevitch, Alex. "The right to strike: A radical view." American Political Science Review 112.4 (2018): 905-917. Yoaks + JB~ ~3~ Strikes are just an extension of the right to self defense and a core part of human valueWaas 12 ~Professor Dr. Bernd Waas, Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany https://islssl.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Strike-Waas.pdf September 2012~ ~4~ The offense can't be turned – strikes are an omission of actionBenjamin 78 ~Walter Benjamin, On Violence, Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings ~Walter Bendix Schönflies Benjamin was a German Jewish philosopher, cultural critic and essayist~ 1AC – Funderview~1~ 1ar theory since the neg can do infinite bad things and I can't check. It's drop the debater since the 1ar is too short to win both layers. No RVI since they'd dump on it for 6 minutes. CI since reasonability is arbitrary and bites intervention.~2~ Permissibility and presumption substantively affirm: a) Statements are true before false since if I told you my name, you'd believe me b) Epistemics – we wouldn't be able to start a strand of reasoning since we'd have to question that reason. c) If anything is permissible, then definitionally so is the aff since there is nothing that prevents us from doing it d) Vote aff on optimism – act in optimistic ways because that's happy~3~ No omissions: All neg theory violations and kritik links must come from the text of the AC, not the absence of specification a) I have a limited time to speak so it's an infinite aff burden b) Race to bottom – incentivizes people to not engage the aff and make a bunch spec argument to preclude~4~ No neg fiat a) The resolution is a question of ought-reading a more desirable advocacy doesn't prove that the negative is a good idea b) Resolved means firmly determined and I'm firmly determined c) Aff has to indict the squo, but they don't defend that, nullifying any possible reason to do the aff – that's half my speech time and all my offense | 7/8/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
7/8/21 | 23bai@lexingtonmaorg |
| |
7/8/21 | 23bai@lexingtonmaorg |
|