Tournament: Loyola | Round: 1 | Opponent: OA Independent DM | Judge: Gordon Krauss
Nebel 19 Jake Nebel ~Jake Nebel is an assistant professor of philosophy at the University of Southern California and executive director of Victory Briefs.~ , 8-12-2019, "Genericity on the Standardized Tests Resolution," Briefly, https://www.vbriefly.com/2019/08/12/genericity-on-the-standardized-tests-resolution/ SM
Both distinctions are important. Generic resolutions can’t be affirmed by specifying particular instances.
AND
-value meaning and standard expectations about what LD resolutions tend to mean.
Adverb test – adding "usually" to the res doesn’t substantially change its meaning because a reduction is universal and permanent
T is a constitutive rule of the activity and a basic aff burden – they agreed to debate the topic when they came here
Limits – there are countless affs accounting for thousands of medicines – unlimited topics incentivize obscure affs that negs won’t have prep on – limits are key to reciprocal prep burden – potential abuse doesn’t justify foregoing the topic and 1AR theory checks PICs
FDA 11/18 ~(U.S. Food and Drug Administration, federal agency of the Department of Health and Human Service) "Fact Sheet: FDA at a Glance," 11/18/2020~ JL
There are over 20,000 prescription drug products approved for marketing.
FDA
AND
drug products.
There are about 300 FDA-licensed biologics products.
Competing interps – reasonability invites arbitrary judge intervention and a race to the bottom of questionable argumentation
No RVIs – fairness and education are a priori burdens – and encourages baiting – outweighs because if T is frivolous, they can beat it quickly