1AC - covid 1NC - innovation DA fishing DA consult WHO adv CP case 1AR - all 2NR - Adv CP DA case 2AR -all
Presentation
5
Opponent: Mission San Jose SS | Judge: Michael Harris
1AC - covid 1NC - Innovation Fishing subsidies v2 consult WHO adv cp case 1AR -all consult cp bad cps that compete off of immediacy bad 2NR - Innovation case 2AR - case innovation
1AC - EU trade secrets 1NC - Nebel IPP T- WTO case 1AR - all 2NR - T-WTO 2AR - T-WTO case
Presentation RR
1
Opponent: Sequoia AS | Judge: Nick Fleming
1AC - jordan 1NC - T-WTO nebel IPP cap K case 1AR - all 2NR - T-WTO 2AR -all
Presentation RR
3
Opponent: Sage MP | Judge: Nathan Fleming
1AC - Jordan 1NC - T-WTO T- nebel IPP neolib K case 1AR - all 2NR - K 2AR - case K
Presentation RR
5
Opponent: Harker DV | Judge: Margaret Strong
1AC - Emergency use medicines 1NC - T-Nebel Consult WHO Neolib K case 1AR - all 2NR - case (disease good) 2AR - case
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
Entry
Date
0 - Contact Info
Tournament: - | Round: 1 | Opponent: - | Judge: - Hi! I'm Bea (she/her) Messenger - Beatrice Culligan Email - bculligan2022@ihs.immaculateheart.org Some cites are not working but everything is open sourced!
9/5/21
JANFEB - CP - Debris
Tournament: Harvard Westlake | Round: 3 | Opponent: Harker SY | Judge: Samantha McLoughlin cites not working
1/16/22
JANFEB - DA - ASAT
Tournament: DebateLA Challenge | Round: 2 | Opponent: Sage MP | Judge: panel Cites not working
1/13/22
JANFEB - DA - Broadband
Tournament: DebateLA Challenge | Round: 2 | Opponent: Sage MP | Judge: panel Cites not working
1/13/22
JANFEB - DA - Dip Cap
Tournament: Palm Classic | Round: 2 | Opponent: Harker SB | Judge: Courtney Coffman cites not working
2/12/22
JANFEB - DA - Heg
Tournament: DebateLA Challenge | Round: 4 | Opponent: Harvard Westlake KD | Judge: Panel cites not working
1/14/22
JANFEB - DA - Space Exploration
Tournament: Berkeley | Round: 3 | Opponent: Cogito CL | Judge: Leah Clark-Villanueva cites not working check source
2/20/22
JANFEB - DA - Water Wars
Tournament: Harvard Westlake | Round: 3 | Opponent: Harker SY | Judge: Samantha McLoughlin cites not working
1/16/22
JANFEB - DA - Xi Lashout
Tournament: DebateLA Challenge | Round: 2 | Opponent: Sage MP | Judge: panel Cites not working
1/13/22
JANFEB - PIC - Lockheed Martin ISR
Tournament: Barkley Forum | Round: Triples | Opponent: Orange Lutheran AZ | Judge: Panel Cites not working check osource
1/31/22
JANFEB - PIC - REM
Tournament: Harvard Westlake | Round: 3 | Opponent: Harker SY | Judge: Samantha McLoughlin cites not working
1/16/22
JANFEB - PIC - US
Tournament: DebateLA Challenge | Round: 4 | Opponent: Harvard Westlake KD | Judge: Panel cites not working
1/14/22
JANFEB - T - Appropriation
Tournament: Harvard Westlake | Round: 3 | Opponent: Harker SY | Judge: Samantha McLoughlin cites not working
CP: Member nations of the World Trade Organization should enter into a prior and binding consultation with the World Health Organization over reducing intellectual property protections for medicines. Member nations will support the proposal and adopt the results of consultation.
WHO says yes – it supports increasing the availability of generics and limiting TRIPS
Hoen 03 ~(Ellen T., researcher at the University Medical Centre at the University of Groningen, The Netherlands who has been listed as one of the 50 most influential people in intellectual property by the journal Managing Intellectual Property, PhD from the University of Groningen) "TRIPS, Pharmaceutical Patents and Access to Essential Medicines: Seattle, Doha and Beyond," Chicago Journal of International Law, 2003~ JL However, subsequent resolutions of the World Health Assembly have strengthened the WHO’s mandate in
AND
access to drugs, local manufacturing capacity, and the development of new drugs
Consultation displays strong leadership, authority, and cohesion among member states which are key to WHO legitimacy
Gostin et al 15 ~(Lawrence O., Linda D. and Timothy J. O’Neill Professor of Global Health Law at Georgetown University, Faculty Director of the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on Public Health Law and Human Rights, JD from Duke University) "The Normative Authority of the World Health Organization," Georgetown University Law Center, 5/2/2015~ JL Members want the WHO to exert leadership, harmonize disparate activities, and set priorities
AND
Organization generously, grant it authority and flexibility, and hold it accountable.
WHO is critical to disease prevention – it is the only international institution that can disperse information, standardize global public health, and facilitate public-private cooperation
Murtugudde 20 ~(Raghu, professor of atmospheric and oceanic science at the University of Maryland, PhD in mechanical engineering from Columbia University) "Why We Need the World Health Organization Now More Than Ever," Science, 4/19/2020~ JL WHO continues to play an indispensable role during the current COVID-19 outbreak itself
AND
and trade restrictions. WHO coordinates and helps build capacity to implement IHR.
Extinction – defense is wrong
Piers Millett 17, Consultant for the World Health Organization, PhD in International Relations and Affairs, University of Bradford, Andrew Snyder-Beattie, "Existential Risk and Cost-Effective Biosecurity", Health Security, Vol 15(4), http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1089/hs.2017.0028 Historically, disease events have been responsible for the greatest death tolls on humanity.
AND
, and available vectors, could be modified as well.19-2
WHO diplomacy solves great power conflict
Murphy 20 ~(Chris, U.S. senator from Connecticut serving on the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee) "The Answer is to Empower, Not Attack, the World Health Organization," War on the Rocks, 4/21/2020~ JL The World Health Organization is critical to stopping disease outbreaks and strengthening public health systems
AND
international anti-pandemic infrastructure without the World Health Organization at the center.
case
9/4/21
SEPTOCT - CP - Consult WHO vs Biocolonialism
Tournament: Greenhill Round Robin | Round: 5 | Opponent: Westwood PM | Judge: Wesley Loofbourrow, Chetan Hertzig cites not working
9/18/21
SEPTOCT - CP - Sui Generis
Tournament: Greenhill Round Robin | Round: 2 | Opponent: Harrison AC | Judge: Austin Broussard, Sim Guerrero
1NC – off
CP: Member nations of the World Trade Organization should establish a sui generis right for holders of traditional knowledge.
That solves the aff by preventing biopiracy while ensuring indigenous communities can use IP as an economic bargaining chip
Garcia 07 ~(Javier, attorney at Perkins Coie LLP in Seattle, Washington, J.D. from Gonzaga University School of Law and B.A. from the University of Redlands) "Fighting Biopiracy: The Legislative Protection of Traditional Knowledge," Berkeley La Raza Law Journal," 3/2007~ JL The establishment of a sui generis right for holders of traditional knowledge would provide compensation
AND
foreign entities seeking to extract and exploit traditional knowledge from vulnerable indigenous communities.
It competes – the CP is anti-topical action
IPTF 04 ~(International Intellectual Property Institute, not-for-profit 501 corporation that provides education and training on intellectual property) "Is a Sui Generis System Necessary?" 1/14/2004~ JL WIPO and the WTO are in the process of establishing international rules for the protection
AND
, petroglyphs, art, music, history and other traditional artistic expressions.
9/18/21
SEPTOCT - DA - Fishing Subsides
Tournament: Presentation | Round: 1 | Opponent: Summit MR | Judge: Nick Fleming cites aren't working
10/9/21
SEPTOCT - DA - Fishing Subsides v2
Tournament: Presentation | Round: 5 | Opponent: Mission San Jose SS | Judge: Michael Harris cites aren't working
10/9/21
SEPTOCT - DA - Grid PTX
Tournament: Meadows | Round: 3 | Opponent: Lexington CH | Judge: Asher Towner cites not working - osource
Cancherini et al. 4/30 ~(Laura, Engagement Manager @ McKinsey and Company, Joseph Lydon, Associate Partner @ McKinsey and Company, Jorge Santos Da Silva, Senior Partner at McKinsey and Company, and Alexandra Zemp, Partner at McKinsey and Company), "What’s ahead for biotech: Another wave or low tide?", McKinsey and Company, 4-30-2021, https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/pharmaceuticals-and-medical-products/our-insights/whats-ahead-for-biotech-another-wave-or-low-tide~~ TDI As the pandemic spread across the globe in early 2020, biotech leaders were initially
AND
as multi-omics tailored diets) to a multitude of health applications.
IP protections are key to innovation – recouping startup costs and high risk of failure
Grabowski et al 15 ~(Henry, Professor of Economics, member of the faculty for the Health Sector Management Program, and Director of the Program in Pharmaceuticals and Health Economics at Duke University) "The Roles of Patents and Research And Development Incentives In Biopharmaceutical Innovation," Health Affairs, 2/2015~ JL The essential rationale for patent protection for biopharmaceuticals is that long-term benefits in
AND
protection plays a key role in funding and partnership opportunities for such firms.
IP enables critical information sharing
Simon 6/25 ~(Brenda, professor at California Western School of Law, research interests focus on how technological developments affect intellectual property and information law, former teaching fellow for the Law, Science and Technology LL.M. Program at Stanford Law School, and a research fellow in the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences, JD from UC Berkeley School of Law) "Patents, Information, and Innovation," Brooklyn Law Review, 6/25/2020~ JL Patents play numerous roles in encouraging the exchange of information during the investment-seeking
AND
protection would be available for some medical devices have also raised concerns.229
Biopharmaceutical innovation is key to prevent future pandemics and bioterror.
Marjanovic and Feijao 20 ~(Sonja Marjanovic, Ph.D., Judge Business School, University of Cambridge. Carolina Feijao, Ph.D. in biochemistry, University of Cambridge; M.Sc. in quantitative biology, Imperial College London; B.Sc. in biology, University of Lisbon.) "How to Best Enable Pharma Innovation Beyond the COVID-19 Crisis," RAND Corporation, 05-2020, https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA407-1.html~~ TDI As key actors in the healthcare innovation landscape, pharmaceutical and life sciences companies have
AND
such public health threats to an even greater extent under improved innovation conditions.
9/4/21
SEPTOCT - DA - Innovation vs Biocolonialism
Tournament: Greenhill Round Robin | Round: 5 | Opponent: Westwood PM | Judge: Wesley Loofbourrow, Chetan Hertzig cites not working
9/18/21
SEPTOCT - DA - Innovation vs COVID
Tournament: Presentation | Round: 4 | Opponent: Marlborough LK | Judge: Vishan Chaudhary cites not working
The Aff’s portrayal of a world with reduced IP protections as an "information commons" where medical inequality is solved by deregulation perpetuates the neoliberal myth of a perfect market Kapczynski 14 ~(Amy, a Professor of Law at Yale Law School, Faculty Co-Director of the Global Health Justice Partnership, and Faculty Co-Director of the Collaboration for Research Integrity and Transparency. She is also Faculty Co-Director of the Law and Political Economy Project and cofounder of the Law and Political Economy blog. Her areas of research include information policy, intellectual property law, international law, and global health.) "INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY’S LEVIATHAN" Duke Law, Law and Contemporary problems, 2014. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4710andcontext=lcp~~ BC
Over the last decade or so, a powerful set of critiques has emerged to contest the dominant account just sketched out as well as the contemporary state of IP law.12 These arguments have come from many directions, some even arising from scholars who previously were champions of the dominant account.13 The most prominent and potent line of theoretical critique in the legal literature has come in the guise of arguments for free culture and the "information commons" and has been most influentially articulated by Lawrence Lessig and Yochai Benkler.14 Both have stressed the problems with expansive exclusive rights regimes in information and have also sketched a set of actually existing alternatives to market-based exclusionary forms of information and cultural production. Lessig has written a series of influential books that have made him a "rock
AND
and reduce it to a concrete proposal that could be sold to governments.
Attempts to reform the WTO are neoliberal attempts to sustain the US regime of accumulation – the contradictions of capitalism are why credibility is low, not IP protection
or at least to strongly impede the turn towards an alternative model to neoliberalism
Neoliberal exploitation causes extinction.
Clark 18 (Brett, associate professor of sociology and sustainability studies at the University of Utah; Stefano B. Longo, Assistant Professor specializing in Environmental Sociology at NC State; "Land–Sea Ecological Rifts", Land–Sea Ecological Rifts, https://monthlyreview.org/2018/07/01/land-sea-ecological-rifts/) Covering approximately 70 percent of the Earth’s surface, the World Ocean is "the
AND
the contradictions of capital are central to contemporary land-sea ecological rifts.
The alternative is a global socialist movement that ends globalization
Galant 19 ~(Michael, a coordinator of the Wire Pillar of the Progressive International, former economics and trade fellow at Young Professionals in Foreign Policy, MPP from Harvard University’s Kennedy School and BA in political economy from Brown University) "The Battle of Seattle: 20 years later, it's time for a revival" Open Democracy, 11/30/2019. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/oureconomy/battle-seattle-20-years-later-its-time-revival/~~ BC 20 years ago today, the streets of Seattle became front lines in the global
AND
possible!" It still is – if we’re willing to fight for it.
9/4/21
SEPTOCT - K - Neolib v2
Tournament: Greenhill Round Robin | Round: 2 | Opponent: Harrison AC | Judge: Austin Broussard, Sim Guerrero
1NC – off
The Aff’s portrayal of a world with reduced IP protections as an "information commons" where medical inequality is solved by deregulation perpetuates the neoliberal myth of a perfect market Kapczynski 14 ~(Amy, a Professor of Law at Yale Law School, Faculty Co-Director of the Global Health Justice Partnership, and Faculty Co-Director of the Collaboration for Research Integrity and Transparency. She is also Faculty Co-Director of the Law and Political Economy Project and cofounder of the Law and Political Economy blog. Her areas of research include information policy, intellectual property law, international law, and global health.) "INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY’S LEVIATHAN" Duke Law, Law and Contemporary problems, 2014. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4710andcontext=lcp~~ BC
Over the last decade or so, a powerful set of critiques has emerged to contest the dominant account just sketched out as well as the contemporary state of IP law.12 These arguments have come from many directions, some even arising from scholars who previously were champions of the dominant account.13 The most prominent and potent line of theoretical critique in the legal literature has come in the guise of arguments for free culture and the "information commons" and has been most influentially articulated by Lawrence Lessig and Yochai Benkler.14 Both have stressed the problems with expansive exclusive rights regimes in information and have also sketched a set of actually existing alternatives to market-based exclusionary forms of information and cultural production. Lessig has written a series of influential books that have made him a "rock
AND
and reduce it to a concrete proposal that could be sold to governments.
identity politics is the ideology of the bourgeoisie that is used to justify its own economic and political privilege and contribute to the reproduction of capitalism.
Das 20 ~(Raju, Professor, Department of Geography, York University. He teaches radical political economy, international development, state-society relations, and social struggles. He is on the editorial board of Science and Society (New York) and is also a member of its manuscript collective. He is also a member of the editorial board of Class, Race and Corporate Power, and a member of the editorial advisory board of Dialectical Anthropology.) "Identity Politics: A Marxist View" Class, Race and Corporate Power, 2020~ BC Identity politics and/as bourgeois ideology Identity politics – in terms of its
AND
its own economic and political privilege and contribute to the reproduction of capitalism.
Neoliberal exploitation causes extinction.
Clark 18 (Brett, associate professor of sociology and sustainability studies at the University of Utah; Stefano B. Longo, Assistant Professor specializing in Environmental Sociology at NC State; "Land–Sea Ecological Rifts", Land–Sea Ecological Rifts, https://monthlyreview.org/2018/07/01/land-sea-ecological-rifts/) Covering approximately 70 percent of the Earth’s surface, the World Ocean is "the
AND
the contradictions of capital are central to contemporary land-sea ecological rifts.
The alternative is a global socialist movement that ends globalization
Galant 19 ~(Michael, a coordinator of the Wire Pillar of the Progressive International, former economics and trade fellow at Young Professionals in Foreign Policy, MPP from Harvard University’s Kennedy School and BA in political economy from Brown University) "The Battle of Seattle: 20 years later, it's time for a revival" Open Democracy, 11/30/2019. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/oureconomy/battle-seattle-20-years-later-its-time-revival/~~ BC 20 years ago today, the streets of Seattle became front lines in the global
AND
possible!" It still is – if we’re willing to fight for it.
9/18/21
SEPTOCT - K - Neolib v3
Tournament: Greenhill Round Robin | Round: 4 | Opponent: Harker DS | Judge: Holden Bukowsky, Christopher Randall cites not working check osource
pleasure and pain are intrinsically valuable. People consistently regard pleasure and pain as good reasons for action, despite the fact that pleasure doesn’t seem to be instrumentally valuable for anything.
Moen 16 ~Ole Martin Moen, Research Fellow in Philosophy at University of Oslo "An Argument for Hedonism" Journal of Value Inquiry (Springer), 50 (2) 2016: 267–281~ SJDI Let us start by observing, empirically, that a widely shared judgment about intrinsic
AND
places where we reach the end of the line in matters of value.
Moreover, only pleasure and pain are intrinsically valuable. All other values can be explained with reference to pleasure; Occam’s razor requires us to treat these as instrumentally valuable.
Moen 16 ~Ole Martin Moen, Research Fellow in Philosophy at University of Oslo "An Argument for Hedonism" Journal of Value Inquiry (Springer), 50 (2) 2016: 267–281~ SJDI I think several things should be said in response to Moore’s challenge to hedonists.
AND
why do they tend to point toward pleasure and away from pain?27
Moral uncertainty means preventing extinction should be our highest priority. Bostrom 12 ~Nick Bostrom. Faculty of Philosophy and Oxford Martin School University of Oxford. "Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority." Global Policy (2012)~ These reflections on moral uncertainty suggest an alternative, complementary way of looking at existential risk; they also suggest a new way of thinking about the ideal of sustainability. Let me elaborate.¶ Our present understanding of axiology might well be confused. We may not now know — at least not in concrete detail — what outcomes would count as a big win for humanity; we might not even yet be able to imagine the best ends of our journey. If we are indeed profoundly uncertain about our ultimate aims, then we should recognize that there is a great option value in preserving — and ideally improving — our ability to recognize value and to steer the future accordingly. Ensuring that there will be a future version of humanity with great powers and a propensity to use them wisely is plausibly the best way available to us to increase the probability that the future will contain a lot of value. To do this, we must prevent any existential catastrophe.
No act-omission distinction – choosing to omit is an act – governments actively decide not to act so there is no omission. Also, If we foresee a consequence, then it is intrinsic to our action since we intend it to happen
Universizability requires the equal satisfaction of everyone’s preferences
R. M. Hare ~White's Professor of Moral Philosophy at the University of Oxford from 1966 until 1983. "Universal Prescriptivism." Originally published in Peter Singer, A Companion to Ethics (Blackwell Publishers, 1991)~ AJ A possible move for one who is looking for the necessary constraints on moral thinking is to say that unless I treat the person, in whose place I am imagining myself being, on equal terms with myself, showing him equal concern, I am not really imagining him as being me. This entails treating his preferences as of equal weight with my own present preferences, and thus forming preferences for the hypothetical situation in which I am he, equal in strength to those which he actually has. This is what is involved in following the Golden Rule, doing to others as we wish others to do to us, and loving our neighbours as ourselves. It is also implicit in Bentham's maxim 'Everybody to count for one, nobody for more than one' (cited in Mill, 1861, Ch. 5 s.f.). The Kantian method we have been outlining is consistent with a form of utilitarianism (though not, we must add, exactly Bentham's form, because that is put in terms of pleasure, whereas Kant's theory is put in terms of will). It is wrong to think, as many do, that Kantianism and utilitarianism have to be at odds. To treat a person 'never simply as a means but always at the same time as an end' requires, as Kant himself says on the next page, that 'the ends of a subject who is an end in himself must, if this conception is to have its full effect ~46~ in me, be also, as far as possible, my ends’ (1785, BA 69=430 f.). An end is what is willed for its own sake; so we are, according to Kant, to give equal respect to everybody's wills-for-ends, including our own; and this is what utilitarianism also binds us do. This involves, in a harmless sense, treating the ends of many people as if they were the ends of one person (myself). But this does not involve failing to 'take seriously the distinction between persons' (Rawls, 1971,pp. 27, 187)- a distinction of which Kant and the utilitarians are well aware.
6. Actor specificity –
A~ Aggregation – every policy benefits some and harms others, which also means side constraints freeze action.
B~ No intent-foresight distinction – If we foresee a consequence, then it becomes part of our deliberation which makes it intrinsic to our action since we intend it to happen.
9/4/21
SEPTOCT - PIC - HIV
Tournament: Presentation | Round: 1 | Opponent: Summit MR | Judge: Nick Fleming cites aren't working
10/9/21
SEPTOCT - T - Extra
Tournament: Greenhill | Round: 1 | Opponent: Coppell RM | Judge: David Asafu-Adjaye cites aren't working
9/18/21
SEPTOCT - T - Framework
Tournament: Loyola | Round: 5 | Opponent: Sam Barlow EL | Judge: Sam Larson Cites aren't working check osource - fairness based version
9/18/21
SEPTOCT - T - Framework v2
Tournament: Greenhill Round Robin | Round: 2 | Opponent: Harrison AC | Judge: Austin Broussard, Sim Guerrero cites aren't working - clashed based version
Interpretation: medicines is a generic bare plural. The aff may not defend that member nations of the World Trade Organization reduce intellectual property protections for a subset of medicines.
Nebel 19 Jake Nebel ~Jake Nebel is an assistant professor of philosophy at the University of Southern California and executive director of Victory Briefs.~ , 8-12-2019, "Genericity on the Standardized Tests Resolution," Briefly, https://www.vbriefly.com/2019/08/12/genericity-on-the-standardized-tests-resolution/ SM Both distinctions are important. Generic resolutions can’t be affirmed by specifying particular instances.
AND
-value meaning and standard expectations about what LD resolutions tend to mean.
It applies to medicines:
Upward entailment test – spec fails the upward entailment test because saying that nations ought to reduce IPP for one medicine does not entail that those nations ought to reduce IPP for all medicines
Adverb test – adding "usually" to the res doesn’t substantially change its meaning because a reduction is universal and permanent
Vote neg:
Semantics outweigh:
T is a constitutive rule of the activity and a basic aff burden – they agreed to debate the topic when they came here
Jurisdiction – you can’t vote aff if they haven’t affirmed the resolution
It’s the only stasis point we know before the round so it controls the internal link to engagement – there’s no way to use ground if debaters aren’t prepared to defend it
Limits – there are countless affs accounting for thousands of medicines – unlimited topics incentivize obscure affs that negs won’t have prep on – limits are key to reciprocal prep burden – potential abuse doesn’t justify foregoing the topic and 1AR theory checks PICs
There are over 20,000 affs
FDA 11/18 ~(U.S. Food and Drug Administration, federal agency of the Department of Health and Human Service) "Fact Sheet: FDA at a Glance," 11/18/2020~ JL There are over 20,000 prescription drug products approved for marketing. FDA
AND
drug products. There are about 300 FDA-licensed biologics products.
Ground – spec guts core generics like innovation that rely on reducing IP for all medicines because individual medicines don’t affect the pharmaceutical industry broadly – also means there is no universal DA to spec affs
TVA solves – read as an advantage to whole rez
Paradigm issues:
Drop the debater – their abusive advocacy skewed the debate from the start
Competing interps – reasonability invites arbitrary judge intervention and a race to the bottom of questionable argumentation
Fairness is a voter ¬– necessary to determine the better debater
Education is a voter – why schools fund debate
9/4/21
SEPTOCT - T - Nebel member nations
Tournament: Greenhill Round Robin | Round: 4 | Opponent: Harker DS | Judge: Holden Bukowsky, Christopher Randall cites aren't working check osource
9/18/21
SEPTOCT - T - WTO vs EU
Tournament: Greenhill Round Robin | Round: 4 | Opponent: Harker DS | Judge: Holden Bukowsky, Christopher Randall cites aren't working check osource
9/18/21
SEPTOCT - T - WTO vs EU v2
Tournament: Presentation | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Harker MK | Judge: Samantha McLoughlin, Lukas Krause, Vanessa Nguyen cites not working
10/10/21
SEPTOCT - theory - Comparative Worlds
Tournament: Greenhill | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Plano East NG | Judge: Chris Theis, Tarun Ratnasabapathy, Austin Broussard cites not working