| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayde Creek | 3 | Idk | Idk |
|
|
| |
| TFA State | 1 | Sebastian Bourbon | Jacob Koshak |
|
|
| |
| sleep inn | Semis | David Xu | Ben Duong |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Mayde Creek | 3 | Opponent: Idk | Judge: Idk 1AC - space colonization |
| TFA State | 1 | Opponent: Sebastian Bourbon | Judge: Jacob Koshak 1AC - Citizen journalists biopolitics of objectivity |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - contactTournament: sleep inn | Round: Semis | Opponent: David Xu | Judge: Ben Duong I am novice but will try my best to disclose | 3/10/22 |
2 - JF - Innovation DATournament: Mayde Creek | Round: 3 | Opponent: Idk | Judge: Idk InnovationSpace Commercialization drives Tech Innovation in the Status Quo – it provides a unique impetus.Hampson 17 Joshua Hampson 1-25-2017 "The Future of Space Commercialization" https://republicans-science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/documents/TheFutureofSpaceCommercializationFinal.pdf (Security Studies Fellow at the Niskanen Center)Elmer Strong Innovation solves Extinction.Matthews 18 Dylan Matthews 10-26-2018 "How to help people millions of years from now" https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2018/10/26/18023366/far-future-effective-altruism-existential-risk-doing-good (Co-founder of Vox, citing Nick Beckstead @ Rutgers University)Re-cut by Elmer | 3/10/22 |
2 - JF - Private Space goodTournament: Mayde Creek | Round: 3 | Opponent: Idk | Judge: Idk While it may seem that private exploration is bad it's vastly better than public exploration and is able to solve for space colonizationDiakovska and Aliieva 20 ~Halyna Diakovska and Olga Aliieva, Ph.D.s in Philosophy, Associate Professors, Donbass State Pedagogical University, "Consequentialism and Commercial Space Exploration," 2020, Philosophy and Cosmology, Vol. 24, pp. 5-24, https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/24/1, EA~ This exploration spills over into other sectors and solves for many existential threatsGreen 21 ~Brian Patrick Green, director of technology ethics at the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, Santa Clara University, "Space Ethics," 2021, Rowman, pp. 4-5, EA~ Private actors are less radical and actively deter war in spaceCobb 21 ~Wendy N. Whitman Cobb, Associate Professor of Strategy and Security Studies at the School of Advanced Air and Space Studies, "Privatizing Peace: How Commerce Can Reduce Conflict in Space," 2021, Routledge, pp. 68-69, EA~ Commercial mining of asteroids solves a plethora of existential threats from scarcity, climate, terror, war, and disease.Pelton 17—(Director Emeritus of the Space and Advanced Communications Research Institute at George Washington University, PHD in IR from Georgetown).. Pelton, Joseph N. 2017. The New Gold Rush: The Riches of Space Beckon! Springer. Accessed 8/30/19. Resource scarcity coming now and causes extinction—asteroid mining is the only way to solveCrombrugghe 18 – Guerric, Business Development Manager Brussels, Brussels Capital Region, "Asteroid mining as a necessary answer to mineral scarcity", LinkedIn, 1/11/2018, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/asteroid-mining-necessary-answer-mineral-scarcity-de-crombrugghe | 3/10/22 |
3 - MA - T-ObjectivityTournament: TFA State | Round: 1 | Opponent: Sebastian Bourbon | Judge: Jacob Koshak T-Objectivity1NC Shell1~ Interpretation – Objective Journalism is constituted of three things: factual information, impartial and unbiased viewpoints, and emotional detachmentCalcutt and Hammond 11 Andrew Calcutt and Philip Hammond, 11 ~Andrew Calcutt, (Andrew Calcutt is Principal Lecturer in Journalism at the University of East London, where he leads Master courses in journalism and magazines. He is vice-chair of the London East Research Institute and editor of Proof: Reading Journalism and Society (www.proof-reading.org). Previous publications include White Noise: An A–Z of Contradictions in Cyberculture (1999) and Arrested Development: Pop Culture and the Erosion of Adulthood (1998)). Philip Hammond (Philip Hammond is Reader in Media and Communications at London South Bank University. He is the author of Media, War and Postmodernity (2007) and Framing Post-Cold War Conflicts (2007) and is co-editor, with Edward Herman, of Degraded Capability: The Media and the Kosovo Crisis (2000)).~. "Journalism Studies: A Critical Introduction." Routledge and CRC Press, 3-8-2011, Accessed 3-4-2022. https://www.routledge.com/Journalism-Studies-A-Critical-Introduction/Calcutt-Hammond/p/book/9780415554312 duongie Prefer –a~ Context – The resolution isn't about just Research, it's about what a Free Press should do with regards to other reporting which only our Evidence assumes – outweighs – words aren't intrinsically defined but defined with context.Cambridge Dictionary No Date "Free Press" https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/free-press Elmer b~ Intent to Define – 1NC Calcutt and Hammond are making a holistic description about what Objective Journalist Ethics entail, the ~1AC card~ is merely defining a subsection which can't constitute a model of Debate since it arbitrarily defines the limits of the Topic beyond Framers Intent to always favor the Aff.2~ Violation – the Aff only interprets Objectivity as factual reporting which isn't sufficient to constitute Objectivity – ~that's the 1AC Definition and CX proves~.If the 1AR makes a No Link or a Permutation on the CP, it proves the Violation since they don't defend an Objective Free Press as being impartial or emotionally detached, thus not meeting their resolutional burden. At worst, view this as auto-competition for our CP's and links for our DA's.3~ Standards:a~ Neg Ground – Making the Debate Facts Good/Bad is physically impossible to Negate since both Advocacy and Objective Journalists agree Lying is Bad – removing perspective, solution, and point of view Journalism, all of which are factual but disagree w/ the detached and impartial aspects of Objective Journalism destroys all Core Generics.b~ Topic Ed – Topic Lit Controversy isn't Objectivity Good/Bad BUT about distinctions of Impartial Reporting and Point of View – the Topic is about tensions between Advocacy and Objectivity which ISN'T Factual Research Good/Bad – that outweighs since we only debate the Topic for one tournament.4~ Paradigm Issues –a~ Topicality is Drop the Debater – it's a fundamental baseline for debate-ability.b~ Use Competing Interps – 1~ Topicality is a yes/no question, you can't be reasonably topical and 2~ Reasonability invites arbitrary judge intervention and a race to the bottom of questionable argumentation.c~ No RVI's - 1~ Forces the 1NC to go all-in on Theory which kills substance education, 2~ Encourages Baiting since the 1AC will purposely be abusive, and 3~ Illogical – you shouldn't win for not being abusive. | 3/10/22 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
3/10/22 | duongben000@mysbisdorg |
|