| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Howe | 6 | Marlborough LK | Joel Lemuel |
|
|
| |
| Jack Howe | Doubles | Brookfield East DJ | Rao, Abhishek, Towner, Asher, Barquin, Joseph |
|
|
| |
| the olympics | 1 | myself | mental gymnastics |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Jack Howe | 6 | Opponent: Marlborough LK | Judge: Joel Lemuel 1AC - COVID Vaccines |
| Jack Howe | Doubles | Opponent: Brookfield East DJ | Judge: Rao, Abhishek, Towner, Asher, Barquin, Joseph 1AC - Korsgaard |
| the olympics | 1 | Opponent: myself | Judge: mental gymnastics Contact Information |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0--Contact InformationTournament: the olympics | Round: 1 | Opponent: myself | Judge: mental gymnastics Email: hhspolicy@gmail.com I also use Facebook messenger, so you can find me on there. Lmk if you have disclosure preferences/requests. | 9/18/21 |
SO--CP--ProductionTournament: Jack Howe | Round: 6 | Opponent: Marlborough LK | Judge: Joel Lemuel The United States federal government should: - substantially increase production and global distribution of the COVID-19 Vaccine, specifically providing all necessary vaccines to India and South Africa, and - cooperate with allies to achieve increased production and global distribution of the COVID-19 Vaccine. That comparatively solves better – IP rights don’t hinder vaccine cooperation, but manufacturing capacity is the current constraint. | 9/19/21 |
SO--DA--InnovationTournament: Jack Howe | Round: 6 | Opponent: Marlborough LK | Judge: Joel Lemuel Pharma profits are up from COVID vaccines in particular, patent waivers threaten this Strong IP protection spurs innovation by encouraging risk-taking and incentivizing knowledge sharing -- prefer statistical analysis of multiple studies Biopharmaceutical innovation is key to prevent future pandemics and bioterror That causes extinction, which outweighs. | 9/19/21 |
SO--K--Set Col--V2Tournament: Jack Howe | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Brookfield East DJ | Judge: Rao, Abhishek, Towner, Asher, Barquin, Joseph Settler colonialism is a power relation structured around the logic of elimination – the libidinal drive to eliminate the native, evidenced by centuries of smallpox blankets, boarding schools, bounties, pipelines, etc. This fundamental logic consistently articulates itself across time and space, seeking to remove native presence from the land by assimilation and genocide. That removal recasts indigenous land as property, turning natives into ghosts, displaced and severed from their land – this ontological violence is all-encompassing Their philosophy is built on genocide and exploitation of native bodies – metaphysical dualisms justify and inform settler colonialism by creating distinctions between the rational and irrational subject – this justifies colonialism because we will win indigenous people are never seen as rational subjects – they will be unable to answer how their framework binds settlers to treat indigenous people as agents which means you vote negative. Settler colonialism embeds itself in structures of moral philosophy – winning that your ethical theory says racism is bad is insufficient – you need to articulate why it can disassociate itself from the implications of settler colonialism in every aspect of society. The universal human is built around conceptions of western humanity – its structurally inaccessible to the native. Settler subjectivity is inevitably concerned with the construction of a smooth wholeness – a coherent imago, which the settler constructs through disidentification with the violence of their origins. The alternative is reidentification – this is an iterative process that requires the refusal and disruption of settler spaces of coherence – you should refuse the research project of the affirmative as a method of subject formation. The role of the ballot is to adopt an ethic of incommensurability – political movements inevitably invest themselves in structures of settler innocence absent a total ideological commitment to decolonization. | 9/19/21 |
SO--Turn--BatailleTournament: Jack Howe | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Brookfield East DJ | Judge: Rao, Abhishek, Towner, Asher, Barquin, Joseph Our thesis---accumulation of excess energy and the problem of its expenditure makes transgression of law an inevitability of the human experience---traditional moral codes which discourage violence and encourage repression of these violent urges ultimately only result in more harmful violent outbursts. The alternative is a morality of evil that accepts the inevitability of violent outbursts and eschews moral prohibitionism in favor of accepting and encouraging those acts of violence that are least unacceptable---the alternative tactically expends energy to avoid those expenditures which are most harmful. | 9/19/21 |
SO--T--Medicine--V2Tournament: Jack Howe | Round: 6 | Opponent: Marlborough LK | Judge: Joel Lemuel Interpretation: Vaccines are not medicines. Prefer: it Comes from someone who works in the field of vaccines, OWs on real-worldness Violation – they defend IP waivers of vaccines Standards: 1---Limits: explodes the number of affs in the topic that are tangentially related to medicines (ie CRISPR, therapy, vitamins). Makes it impossible to predict the 1ac and decks neg prep, hurts clash 2---Ground: allows them to no link out of drug-specific DAs since they go through a different mechanism | 9/19/21 |
SO--T--PermanentTournament: Jack Howe | Round: 6 | Opponent: Marlborough LK | Judge: Joel Lemuel Interpretation: Reduce means permanent reduction – it’s distinct from “suspend” Violation: Vaccine waivers are temporary Standards: 1---Legal precision: it’s the best precedent within policy, shows how words are interpreted within the law 2---Limits: it doubles the number of affs on the topic since every suspension is of different times, (ex: suspend IP protections for 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, etc.) makes it impossible to predict which turns clash and innovation 3---Ground: decks link ground, all link cards are predicated on permanent changes because authors don’t care about temporary policies 4---Aff shiftiness: no definition of how long suspension will be and how it happens allow affs to skirt out of DAs by changing their suspension periods, makes it impossible to be neg and decks clash D Paradigm Issues – 1 T is DTD – A their abusive advocacy skewed the debate from the start B DTA is incoherent because we indict their advocacy 2 Comes before 1AR theory -- A If we had to be abusive it’s because it was impossible to engage their aff B T outweighs on scope because their abuse affected every speech that came after the 1AC C Topic norms outweigh on urgency – we only have a few months to set them 3 Use competing interps on T – A topicality is a yes/no question, you can’t be reasonably topical B only our interp sets norms -- reasonability is arbitrary and invites judge intervention C reasonability causes a race to the bottom of questionable argumentation | 9/19/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
9/19/21 | lisiyu0831@gmailcom |
| |
9/19/21 | lisiyu0831@gmailcom |
|