Tournament: woooo | Round: 1 | Opponent: ur mom | Judge: ur mom
any pronouns
phone number: 480-845-7485
discord: karl thee marx#6781
email: leelars25@gmail.com (you'll get to me fastest w/ text or discord lol pls don't email me unless you really have to)
send me any interps or accessibility things you want me to meet before the round please
accessibility stuff:
- slow down a little when there's no doc b/c i have a hand tremor and can't flow as fast
- don't read theory or whatnot if i have to sit during round. i'm disabled n i promise i'm actually in pain and not just lazy
- space out your analyticals! longish tags are fine but if you're a debater who loves huge blocks of text for phil/tricks/fun? separate it and number warrants otherwise it's difficult for me to read them.
heres something that's bad for reference:
3. Reject neg fairness concerns since a) 13-7 time skew and 6-minute collapse gives the negative the strategic advantage and means the AFF must split 1AR time. b) The NC has the ability to uplayer and restart the round and have time to generate offense that matters. c) You have access to more positions due to generic backfiles and bidirectional shells which means neg theory is impossible to avoid. Also, fairness definitionally questions ability to engage in same practice, any abuse is solved for when you affirm next round which is terminal defense to neg shells – only affirming solves because you can construct the aff the way you like while neg is always reactive which means you can’t do anything every round d) neg reactivity means you can just perfectly react to any of my advantages and then generate offense – if anything it’ll be for 3 mins max which evens out the 1ar and 2n.
if you willfully don't do this stuff expect theory in the 1n/1ar lmao