Coppell Mallidi Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 - Important Info | Finals | NA | NA |
|
| ||
| 0 - Important Info | Finals | NA | NA |
|
| ||
| 1 - Grapevine | 2 | Bridgeland PT | Holden Bukowsky |
|
|
| |
| 2 - Greenhill | 2 | Lexington AT | Saianurag Kieklak |
|
|
| |
| 2 - Greenhill | 3 | Denton Guyer SB | Joseph Kieklak |
|
|
| |
| 2 - Greenhill | 6 | Presentation AB | Chris Flowers |
|
|
| |
| 3 - Dulles | 1 | Strake Jesuit JY | Madhura Kelkar |
|
| ||
| 3 - Dulles | 2 | McNeil KJ | Misha Adams |
|
| ||
| 3 - Dulles | 4 | William P Clements KK | Rafael Acosta |
|
| ||
| 4 - JW Patterson | 1 | Ardsley ZS | Amanda Nobra |
|
| ||
| 4 - JW Patterson | 4 | Broken Arrow JM | Wesley Loofbourrow |
|
| ||
| 4 - JW Patterson | 5 | Harvard-Westlake AT | Mohammad Sheikh |
|
| ||
| 5 - Meadows | 2 | Harvard-Westlake JH | Diana Alvarez |
|
| ||
| 5 - Meadows | 4 | Immaculate Heart MF | Jonathan Hsu |
|
| ||
| 5 - Meadows | 6 | West Des Moines Valley MM | Silma Bathily |
|
| ||
| 6 - Glenbrooks | 2 | Immaculate Heart SP | Sam Larson |
|
| ||
| 6 - Glenbrooks | 4 | Brophy CC | Joseph Barquin |
|
| ||
| 6 - Glenbrooks | 5 | Valor Christian LS | Rafael Li |
|
| ||
| 7 - Berkner | 2 | Seven Lakes VS | Sembree Yeary |
|
| ||
| 7 - Berkner | 3 | Greenhill CR | Davion Williams |
|
| ||
| 8 - University of Houston | 1 | Clear Springs WM | Avery Wilson |
|
| ||
| 8 - University of Houston | 4 | Woodlands ST | Demarcus Powell |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| 1 - Grapevine | 2 | Opponent: Bridgeland PT | Judge: Holden Bukowsky 1AC - COVID Waivers |
| 2 - Greenhill | 2 | Opponent: Lexington AT | Judge: Saianurag Kieklak 1AC - Disclosure Trade Secrets |
| 2 - Greenhill | 3 | Opponent: Denton Guyer SB | Judge: Joseph Kieklak 1AC - COVID Waivers |
| 2 - Greenhill | 6 | Opponent: Presentation AB | Judge: Chris Flowers 1AC - COVID Waivers |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - Contact InfoTournament: 0 - Important Info | Round: Finals | Opponent: NA | Judge: NA wiki might be down for me, so please email for docs before you run Disclosure theory on me ):. Pronouns: He/Him | 1/16/22 |
0 - NavigationTournament: 0 - Important Info | Round: Finals | Opponent: NA | Judge: NA | 1/16/22 |
NC - Util V1Tournament: 2 - Greenhill | Round: 6 | Opponent: Presentation AB | Judge: Chris Flowers UtilUtil GoodMy value is Morality because the word "ought" implies Moral Obligation. Prefer:1~ Actor specificity: Governments must aggregate since collective actions necessarily benefit some people while hurting others either due to resource tradeoffs or scope of effect.2~ Util is a lexical pre-requisite to any other framework: Threats to bodily security and life preclude the ability for moral actors to effectively utilize and act upon other moral theories since they are in a constant state of crisis – that inhibits the ideal moral conditions which other theories presuppose.3~ Parameters –A. Reciprocity – non-utilitarian frameworks can't be turned because they're intent based or procedural – only util has equal offense and allows for rigorous testing which O/W's because that the constitutive purpose of debateB. Ground: we both have equal ground under util whereas more ethical fw's flow one way or the otherC. Clash: Util debates have more substantive clash about the topic in all of it's aspects encourages people not to just go all in for fw and win.4~ No act omission distinction – if I watch someone drown and I don't try to save them, that is just as bad as actively drowning them because given that I know this is the consequence, my unwillingness to act promotes the consequence.5~ Their framing collapses to consequentialism - we can only know what is oppressive or not oppressive based on consequentialism. This means Util is the only way to explain degrees of wrongness.Nagel 86 (Thomas ~"The View From Nowhere", 1986~)1 6~ Forecloses future improvement – we can never improve society because our impact is irreversible. We destroy infinite number of lives that could have otherwise existed. Even a small percent probability outweighs any other outcome.7~ Turns suffering – mass death causes maximum suffering because people can't get access to resources and necessities.8~ Pleasure and pain are the starting point for moral reasoning—they're our most baseline desires and we have cognitive bias towards these scenarios.9~ And they will try to attack "low probability" but climate change is huge impact that is getting worse by the day – make them win that our specific scenario is improbable10~ Body count is the most objective way to calculate impacts because comparing suffering is unethical.11~ Extinction Outweighs as reducing existential risk is the most important thing.A2: Structural Violence1) Structural violence excludes a whole bunch of people from its calculus2) Structural violence is subsumed Utilitarianism; in util we care about the pleasure and pain of minorities and account for them - arguments about genocides and ethnic cleansings are examples of util not interpreted correctly3) Structural violence is hard to measure, there's very little brightline | 1/16/22 |
SO - DA - InfrastructureTournament: 2 - Greenhill | Round: 6 | Opponent: Presentation AB | Judge: Chris Flowers DA — InfrastructureInfrastructure will pass – recent progress provesBruns 9/8/21 (Tim Bruns is a reporter for Roadsbridges and is currently in charge of reporting the Infrastructure Bill, "PASSING AN INFRASTRUCTURE PACKAGE IS HIGHLY ANTICIPATED—AND MAY HAPPEN SOON" Roadsbridges, 9/9/21, https://www.roadsbridges.com/passing-infrastructure-package-highly-anticipated-and-may-happen-soon)//TN Aff requires negotiations that destroys PCPooley 5/26 ~James; Former deputy director general of the United Nations' World Intellectual Property Organization and a member of the Center for Intellectual Property Understanding; "Drawn-Out Negotiations Over Covid IP Will Blow Back on Biden," Barron's; 5/26/21; https://www.barrons.com/articles/drawn-out-negotiations-over-covid-ip-will-blow-back-on-biden-51621973675~~//RM Reconciliation Infrastructure's key to agriculture production, connectivity, and global food securityJahn 19 — Chris; contributor and president of The Fertilizer Institute. ("America is in desperate need of infrastructure investment: Senate highway bill a step in the right direction" The Hill. August 7, 2019. https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/politics/456602-america-is-in-desperate-need-of-infrastructure-investment-senate) US ag and food security stabilize the globe — collapse greenlights great power wars, which risks extinction.Castellaw 17—Lieutenant General, former President of the non-profit Crockett Policy Institute (John, "Opinion: Food Security Strategy Is Essential to Our National Security," https://www.agri-pulse.com/articles/9203-opinion-food-security-strategy-is-essential-to-our-national-security, dml) | 1/16/22 |
SO - K -- CapTournament: 1 - Grapevine | Round: 2 | Opponent: Bridgeland PT | Judge: Holden Bukowsky The present division of labor inhibits embodiment of productive forces. This division has increased the hegemonic power of the elite. Intellectual property protection has become a fundamental power structure of modern capitalism.Pagano 14 (Ugo Pagano, Ugo Pagano is an Italian economist and Professor of Economic Policy at the University of Siena where he is also Director of the PhD programme in Economics and President of S. Chiara Graduate School, "A Crisis of Intellectual Monopoly Capitalism", November 2014)RM Waivers perpetuates Capitalism through Vaccine ImperialismVanni 2021, Vanni, Amaka. Dr. Amaka Vanni is a legal scholar and documentary filmmaker based in Lagos, Nigeria. Her work lies at the intersection of international economic law, development, and global governance. Her research and teaching are on topics of intellectual property, international trade, global health, philantrocapitalism, gender, legal theory and history, human right and the impact of colonialism on various aspect of postcolonial societies. She completed an undergraduate degree in International Relations and Politics at Keele University, UK. She holds a Masters in Law degree in International Economic Law and completed a doctorate in same field from the University of Warwick. Her doctoral thesis won the 2018 SIEL–Hart Prize in International Economic Law."On Intellectual Property Rights, Access to Medicines and Vaccine Imperialism." TWAILR, 24 Mar. 2021, twailr.com/on-intellectual-property-rights access-to medicines-and-vaccine-imperialism/. The affirmative's attempt to reform IPR only strengths and produces inequalities present in the status quo. Any reform on IPR fails, capitalist nations maintain their dominance over the market and developing nations.Vanni 2021, Vanni, Amaka. Dr. Amaka Vanni is a legal scholar and documentary filmmaker based in Lagos, Nigeria. Her work lies at the intersection of international economic law, development, and global governance. Her research and teaching are on topics of intellectual property, international trade, global health, philantrocapitalism, gender, legal theory and history, human right and the impact of colonialism on various aspect of postcolonial societies. She completed an undergraduate degree in International Relations and Politics at Keele University, UK. She holds a Masters in Law degree in International Economic Law and completed a doctorate in same field from the University of Warwick. Her doctoral thesis won the 2018 SIEL–Hart Prize in International Economic Law."On Intellectual Property Rights, Access to Medicines and Vaccine Imperialism." TWAILR, 24 Mar. 2021, twailr.com/on-intellectual-property-rights-access-to medicines-and-vaccine-imperialism/. Everyday suffering is dictated by continued structures of power that puts minorities into a continuous cycle of violence. The result is sadistic violence occurring right now— structural violence, climate change, biodiversity loss, genocide, and even economic collapse. This capitalistic crisis is not like others in history—the brink is now.Robinson 16 — William I. Robinson, Professor of Sociology, Global Studies and Latin American Studies at the University of California at Santa Barbara, PhD in Sociology, 2016 ("Sadistic Capitalism: Six Urgent Matters for Humanity in Global Crisis," Truth-Out, April 12th, Available Online at http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/35596-sadistic-capitalism-six-urgent-matters-for-humanity-in-global-crisis)//RM The alternative is an abolitionist praxis of destruction that refuses existing systems of oppression and actively imagines radical new forms of collective power. IPR is a destructive power that sustains the power corporations have over the public.Pagano 14 (Ugo Pagano, Ugo Pagano is an Italian economist and Professor of Economic Policy at the University of Siena where he is also Director of the PhD programme in Economics and President of S. Chiara Graduate School, "A Crisis of Intellectual Monopoly Capitalism", November 2014)RM Pedagogical spaces are the crucial staging ground for keeping socialism on the horizon. Thus, the role of the ballot is to vote for the best methodology to resist capitalism.McLaren '4, Distinguished Fellow – Critical Studies @ Chapman U and UCLA urban schooling prof, and Scatamburlo-D'Annibale, associate professor of Communication – U Windsor, '4 Large-scale threats of future suffering perpetuate capitalist violence and the hegemonic power of the elite, endlessly prolonging suffering. The only response is to interrupt the system, insisting that the urgent bodies across the globe cannot wait.Olson '15 (Elizabeth Olson, prof of geography @ UNC Chapel Hill 'Geography and Ethics I: Waiting and Urgency,' Progress in Human Geography, vol. 39 no. 4, pp. 517-526)RM | 1/16/22 |
SO - T -- NebelTournament: 1 - Grapevine | Round: 2 | Opponent: Bridgeland PT | Judge: Holden Bukowsky Interpretation: Medicines is a generic bare plural. The aff cannot defend a specific subset of medicines and thus affirm the resolution.Jake Nebel, 8-12-2019, "Genericity on the Standardized Tests Resolution," VBriefly, https://www.vbriefly.com/2019/08/12/genericity-on-the-standardized-tests-resolution/ ~Jake Nebel is~ an assistant professor of philosophy at USC. ~He works~ mostly on questions in normative ethics and the theory of value. ear Violation: Medicines is a generic bare plural noun, so it fails the upward entailment test. They defend a subset of medicine.StandardsInfinitely Regressive: There is no threshold for how much the aff can specify. It would kill limits and predictability because there are an infinite number of case combinations available. TVA: Defend the whole resolution and read your plan as an advantage to the affVotersFairness: Fairness is a voter because debate is an activity that results in winners and losers. Equal access to the ballot is key to generate activism and ultimately gain educational benefits exclusive to debate. Fairness controls the I/L to education because if we don’t have equal access, we can’t debate. Paradigm IssuesDrop the Debater: A loss deters future abuse | 1/16/22 |
SO - T -- WaiversTournament: 2 - Greenhill | Round: 6 | Opponent: Presentation AB | Judge: Chris Flowers T—WaiversInterpretation: The affirmative must defend a topical plan text under the resolution.Violation: The India/South Africa plan is extra-T – the TRIPs waiver includes things other than medicines, like manufacturing.5/25 https://www.crowell.com/NewsEvents/AlertsNewsletters/all/Three-Takeaways-From-the-May-21-Revised-TRIPS-Waiver-Proposal StandardsSemantics: The topic is the only reasonable focal point for debate, anything else destroys the possibility of debate. Violating semantics justifies the aff talking about whatever has zero neg prep and destroys predictability. Also, you can't vote for them because the ballot says to vote for the better debater in the context of the resolution. TVA – Defend Whole Rez with the Waivers as an advantageVoters for Fairness and Education Paradigm IssuesDrop the Debater: A loss deters future abuse | 1/16/22 |
SO- K -- Set ColTournament: 1 - Grapevine | Round: 3 | Opponent: Cooper City NR | Judge: Becca Traber Aff relies on European theoretical tradition of abstraction and despiritualization is the foundation of genocidal exploitationMeans 80 (Russell, an American Oglala Lakota activist, the following speech was given by Russell Means in July 1980, before several thousand people who had assembled from all over the world for the Black Hills International Survival Gathering, in the Black Hills of South Dakota. It is Russell Means's most famous speech, 1980 "For America to Live, Europe Must Die") Settlement is not an event, but a structuring ontological logic of elimination constantly manifest in everyday reiteration of the very modes of spatial inhabitance and subjective modes of being – distinct from racial violencesRifkin 14 (Associate Professor of English and WGS @ UNC-Greensboro (Mark, 'Settler Common Sense: Queerness and Everyday Colonialism in the American Renaissance,' pp. 7-10)TN Role of the ballot is to vote for the team that best disrupts settler colonialism – the desirability of the Aff should be judged by its effect on non-European peoples. Capitalism is not the root cause, it's European cultureMeans 80 (Russell, an American Oglala Lakota activist, the following speech was given by Russell Means in July 1980, before several thousand people who had assembled from all over the world for the Black Hills International Survival Gathering, in the Black Hills of South Dakota. It is Russell Means's most famous speech, 1980 "For America to Live, Europe Must Die") | 1/16/22 |
SO- T -- FWTournament: 1 - Grapevine | Round: 3 | Opponent: Cooper City NR | Judge: Becca Traber Interpretation: The affirmative should defend a topical plan text under — Resolved: The member nations of the World Trade Organization ought to reduce intellectual property protections for medicine.Violation: The affirmative changes the entire system in which medicine operatesStandardsPredictable limits—The resolution proposes the question the negative is prepared to answer and creates a bounded list of potential affs. This is also vital to rigorous modes of contestation that allow for skill development by navigating the complex field of public policy within a bounded area. De-limiting the topic decimates dialogue – research asymmetry creates a procedural hierarchy which makes dialogical communication impossible – that shuts out ideological flux and reinstates the logic of mastery. Failing to do so creates a colonization of methods and inadequate debates about methodology.Lewis Gordon 14—professor of philosophy, African and Judiac Studies at the University of Connecticut—2014 ("Disciplinary Decadence and the Decolonization of Knowledge," Africa Development 39.1: 81-92, 88). Fallibility– unlimited topics make assessing the validity of the 1ac's truth claims impossible AND cause concessionary ground which creates incentives for avoidance. Our method of refinement via contestation challenges hegemonic structures which I/L turns their method – it's also key to advocacy skillsReforms are possible and desirable—-tangible change outweighs the risk of cooption and is still a better strategy than the aff Omi 13:Omi, Michael (Berkeley ethnic studies professor). "Resistance is futile?: a response to Feagin and Elias", Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36.6, Taylor and Francis Switch side debate - Nobody really likes the topic, but defending the resolution is good for everyone. Tailoring arguments to the format of switch-side deliberation promotes self-reflexive openness—that's the best way to cause wide-scale opinion shifts over time. Absent normative meta-consensus on procedural terms for debate that guarantee switch-side deliberative testing within mutually-understood constraints, we encourage dogmatism and group polarization, which turn the affTVA – Defend a plan to take down Capitalism through taking down IPR.Reading the affirmative's thesis on the neg solves educational benefits of the aff. The ballot isn't key for the aff, so vote neg if the form of debate is irrelevant.Vote for Procedural Fairness and Education – allowing the aff to arbitrarily manipulate the debate's content with self-serving interpretations creates a moral hazard. Vote neg because debate is a competitive activity which loses meaning without substantive constraints. | 1/16/22 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
1/16/22 | rrm2979@gcoppellisdcom |
| |
1/16/22 | rrm2979@gcoppellisdcom |
| |
1/16/22 | rrm2979@gcoppellisdcom |
| |
1/16/22 | rrm2979@gcoppellisdcom |
|