College Park Sharma Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cougar Classic | 2 | Cooper City NR | Demarcus Powell |
|
|
| |
| Longhorn Classic | 1 | Langham SB | Sriman Gaddam |
|
|
| |
| Strake | 1 | Academy of Christian Studies JM | James Stuckert |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Cougar Classic | 2 | Opponent: Cooper City NR | Judge: Demarcus Powell 1AC- reqium |
| Longhorn Classic | 1 | Opponent: Langham SB | Judge: Sriman Gaddam 1AC-Structural Violence |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
JF-1NC- Cap GoodTournament: Cougar Classic | Round: 2 | Opponent: Cooper City NR | Judge: Demarcus Powell Cap GoodCapitalism is inevitable. Economic theory means it's bound to stay – empirics prove Only cap can solve warmingFedrizzi 15: Rick Fedrizzi (CEO and founding chair of US Green Building Council). "Capitalism is the solution to climate change." CNBC. November 30th, 2015. https://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/30/capitalism-is-the-solution-to-climate-change-commentary.html Studies prove markets and income are key to the environment – It's more likely to create a mindset shift than other systemsTaylor 3: Director of Natural Resource Studies 0at Cato Institute, Jerry Taylor, "Happy Earth Day? Thank Capitalism," New York Sun, April 2 20032, http://www.cato.org/dailys/04-23-03-2.html Free markets solve poverty – global trends go negMacKenzie '14: (The Data Is Clear: Free Markets Reduce Poverty. June 16, 2014. D.W. MacKenzie, Assistant Professor of Economics At Carroll College) | 1/15/22 |
JF-1NC- TTournament: Cougar Classic | Round: 2 | Opponent: Cooper City NR | Judge: Demarcus Powell 1Interp: The affirmative may only garner offense from the hypothetical implementation that the appropriation of outer space by private entities is unjust and may not garner offense external to that.Resolved indicates a policy action.Parcher 1. ~Jeff. 2/26/01. "Re: Jeff P—Is the resolution a question?" https://web.archive.org/web/20050122044927/http://www.ndtceda.com/archives/200102/0790.html~~ Justin The appropriation of outer space is permanent control.TIMOTHY JUSTIN TRAPP, JD Candidate @ UIUC Law, '13, TAKING UP SPACE BY ANY OTHER MEANS: COMING TO TERMS WITH THE NONAPPROPRIATION ARTICLE OF THE OUTER SPACE TREATY UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW ~Vol. 2013 No. 4~ Violation: They don't: At best they're extra topical which is a voter for exploding limits and inflating aff solvency or effects topical which is worse, since any small aff can spill up to the resolution.Vote neg for competitive equity and clash: changing the topic favors the aff because it destroys the only stasis point and makes prep impossible because any ground is self-serving, concessionary, and from distorted literature bases. Their model allows someone to specialize for 4 years giving them an edge over people who switch every 2 months. Filter this through debate's nature of being a game where both teams want to win, which becomes meaningless without constraints.Topicality must be a voting issue evaluated through competing interps– the role of the ballot is to vote for whoever does the better debating over the resolutional question. Any 1AR role for debate must explain why we switch sides and why there has to be a winner and a loser – switching sides within the competitive yet limited bounds of the topic performs the labor of the negative which avoids group polarization and untested advocacyRalf Poscher 16, director of the Institute for Staatswissenschaft and Philosophy of Law, Professor of Public Law and Legal Philosophy, "Why We Argue About the Law: An Agonistic Account of Legal Disagreement," in Metaphilosophy of Law, ed. Gizbert-Studnicki, Dyrda, Banas, 2/19/16, SSRNRecut Aanya Impacts:1~ Procedural fairness outweighs—a) intrinsicness—debate is a game and equity is necessary to sustain the activity b) probability—debate can't alter subjectivity, but it can rectify skews c) metaconstraint—all your arguments concede fairness since you assume they will be evaluated fairly d) application—your model only indicts how fairness has been applied not that it's intrinsically bad—their model would justify exclusion.2~ Switch Side Debate—they can read it as a K against affirmatives—forces debaters to consider issues from multiple perspectives. Non-topical affs allow individuals to establish their own metrics for what they want to debate leading to dogmatism.3~ TVA – defend an affirmative that defends the topic – their whole aff is about how private entities exploration of space is bad\ Drop the debater – Changing your advocacy kills NC strat because the 1ac advocacy is the only stasis point for NC offense, anything else moots all clash and fairness. No cross apps from the aff since framework proves that that layer was skewed to begin with so we can't actually test the truth of cross applications to the affirmative.New 2nr answers to AC preempts because they are hidden, and implications are unknown until the 1ar.No impact turns or rvis - A~ Perfcon – if T's bad and you vote for them on that arg, you're voting on T. B~ Substance – if T's bad then we should try debating on substance – impact turns force me to go for T since I need to defend my position | 1/15/22 |
ND- DA- economyTournament: Longhorn Classic | Round: 1 | Opponent: Langham SB | Judge: Sriman Gaddam | 12/4/21 |
ND- DA- healthcareTournament: Longhorn Classic | Round: 1 | Opponent: Langham SB | Judge: Sriman Gaddam | 12/4/21 |
ND-DA- UnemploymentTournament: Longhorn Classic | Round: 1 | Opponent: Langham SB | Judge: Sriman Gaddam | 12/4/21 |
ND-DA- ViolenceTournament: Longhorn Classic | Round: 1 | Opponent: Langham SB | Judge: Sriman Gaddam | 12/4/21 |
ND-DA-BackfireTournament: Longhorn Classic | Round: 1 | Opponent: Langham SB | Judge: Sriman Gaddam | 12/4/21 |
ND-FW-maxwellbeingTournament: Longhorn Classic | Round: 1 | Opponent: Langham SB | Judge: Sriman Gaddam
| 12/4/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
12/4/21 | trisha_sharma@outlookcom |
| |
12/18/21 | trisha_sharma@outlookcom |
|