Clements Du Aff
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pwn2Own Invitational | Finals | Turbofan | ZDI |
|
|
| |
| TFA State | 1 | Fanny from Jordan | Jacob Lugo |
|
|
| |
| TFA State | 3 | Seven Lakes Christopher Lee | Joey Georges |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Pwn2Own Invitational | Finals | Opponent: Turbofan | Judge: ZDI Contact info |
| TFA State | 1 | Opponent: Fanny from Jordan | Judge: Jacob Lugo 1AC - Disease and Climate |
| TFA State | 3 | Opponent: Seven Lakes Christopher Lee | Judge: Joey Georges 1AC - Falsity |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
Contact InfoTournament: Pwn2Own Invitational | Round: Finals | Opponent: Turbofan | Judge: ZDI Please reach out if you have any interps or disclosure norms you want me to meet. I'll be happy to comply to a reasonable extent. | 2/23/22 |
MA - FalsityTournament: TFA State | Round: 1 | Opponent: Fanny from Jordan | Judge: Jacob Lugo Inherency (0:20) Objectivity is worsening in the status quo which causes polarization, but its reversible Adv: Climate (1:20) Advantage 1 is climate A climate crisis is happening now, but its not too late to solve Advocacy creates echo chambers which spread climate misinformation across the electorate A misinformed electorate results in policy failure- objectivity is a prerequisite to climate solutions Warming causes extinction Adv: Public Health (1:10) Advantage 2 is public health Vaccination rates low in the status quo Casual link between mainstream media misinformation and vaccine refusal- DTP and MMR Vaccines save hundreds of millions of lives on the low end because of direct prevention and herd immunity means this number is orders of magnitude higher Disease causes extinction Advocacy (1:25) Thus, we affirm that in a democracy a free press ought to prioritize objectivity over advocacy. Negative positions that do not defend advocacy over objectivity affirm. We defend the resolution as a whole and will defend the Watt’s solvency mechanism and enforcement as normal means. An objective press is achieved by a four-tier process- it best solves Put away your circumvention cards- empirically verifiable facts guarantee a basis for objective truth and the method by which we defend objective practices ensure the best outcome Framing (0:50) I value morality The standard is maximizing well-being, specifically act hedonism 1 Pleasure and pain are intrinsic– everything else regresses – robust neuroscience. 2 Extinction first - Extinction is the worst impact under any framing: irreversibility, infinite magnitude, and moral uncertainty Method UV (1:25) Scenario analysis enhance reflexivity, deconstructs cognitive biases and flawed assumptions, and enables the imagination and creation of alternative futures. The role of the judge is to evaluate the post fiat consequences of the affirmative vs negative world Prefer: 1 Intuition: When someone asks you to make a decision you intuitively weigh between the two options; as we are given a rez to debate, we are inclined to compare the world of the aff and neg- outweighs on common usage 2 Accessibility: Traditional and lay debate defaults to comparative world analysis. This ROTB allows for debaters who don’t have access to progressive prep to be able to compete 3 Inclusion: Any type of offense works under comparative world analysis, since framing is undecided and debaters can prioritize different things 4 Real World Education: It requires critical thinking and research to predict and weigh two situations; internal link to education, outweighs every terminal impact on portability Let us weigh case against the kritik 1 Anything else moots 6 min of the 1AC which kills fairness bc time skew 2 Comparison is key to testing the kritik so we know it’s a good idea Theory UV (0:40) 1 I get 1AR theory- key to fairness A Without checks the 1NC can be infinitely abusive | 3/11/22 |
MA - Falsity v2Tournament: TFA State | Round: 3 | Opponent: Seven Lakes Christopher Lee | Judge: Joey Georges Inherency (0:20) Objectivity is worsening in the status quo which causes polarization, but its reversible Adv: Climate (1:20) Advantage 1 is Climate A climate crisis is happening now, but its not too late to solve Advocacy creates echo chambers which spread climate misinformation across the electorate A misinformed electorate results in policy failure- objectivity is a prerequisite to climate solutions Warming causes extinction Adv: Public Health (1:10) Advantage 2 is public health Vaccination rates low in the status quo Casual link between mainstream media misinformation and vaccine refusal- DTP and MMR Vaccines save hundreds of millions of lives on the low end because of direct prevention and herd immunity means this number is orders of magnitude higher Disease causes extinction Advocacy (1:25) Thus, we affirm that in a democracy a free press ought to prioritize objectivity over advocacy. Negative positions that do not defend advocacy over objectivity affirm. We defend the resolution as a whole and will defend the Watt’s solvency mechanism and enforcement as normal means. An objective press is achieved by a four-tier process- it best solves Put away your circumvention cards- empirically verifiable facts guarantee a basis for objective truth and the method by which we defend objective practices ensure the best outcome Framing – short/non-phil 0:40 I value morality The standard is maximizing well-being, specifically act hedonism 1 Pleasure and pain are intrinsic– everything else regresses – robust neuroscience. Theory U/V – short 0:20 1 I get 1AR theory- key to fairness A Without checks the 1NC can be infinitely abusive B Allows for reciprocity since the 1N gets theory Method UV (1:25) Scenario analysis enhance reflexivity, deconstructs cognitive biases and flawed assumptions, and enables the imagination and creation of alternative futures. The role of the judge is to evaluate the post fiat consequences of the affirmative vs negative world Prefer: 1 Intuition: When someone asks you to make a decision you intuitively weigh between the two options; as we are given a rez to debate, we are inclined to compare the world of the aff and neg- outweighs on common usage 2 Inclusion: Any type of offense works under comparative world analysis, since framing is undecided and debaters can prioritize different things 3 Real World Education: It requires critical thinking and research to predict and weigh two situations; internal link to education, outweighs every terminal impact on portability | 3/11/22 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
3/11/22 | antd6@protonmailcom |
| |
3/11/22 | antd6@protonmailcom |
|