Chattahoochee KaidarHeafetz Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard | 1 | Clements MM | Jada Bourne |
|
|
| |
| Harvard | 3 | Byram Hills AK | Lukas Krouse |
|
|
| |
| Harvard | 6 | Lexington AT | Srey Das |
|
|
| |
| Things being broken | Finals | God | Help |
|
| ||
| UNLV | 1 | Peninsula Kris Deng | Diana Alvarez |
|
|
| |
| UNLV | 3 | Marlborough MS | Nikhil Navare |
|
|
| |
| UNLV | 6 | Harker RT | Jackson Hanna |
|
|
| |
| UNLV | Doubles | Mission San Jose SR | Panel |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Harvard | 1 | Opponent: Clements MM | Judge: Jada Bourne 1AC- Wynter |
| Harvard | 3 | Opponent: Byram Hills AK | Judge: Lukas Krouse 1AC - Kant |
| Harvard | 6 | Opponent: Lexington AT | Judge: Srey Das 1AC- Megaconstellations |
| UNLV | 1 | Opponent: Peninsula Kris Deng | Judge: Diana Alvarez 1AC- Asteroid mining |
| UNLV | 3 | Opponent: Marlborough MS | Judge: Nikhil Navare 1NC- Space race DA Disclosure Extra T MTCR CP Case |
| UNLV | 6 | Opponent: Harker RT | Judge: Jackson Hanna 1NC- Russia appeasement MTCR Extra T case |
| UNLV | Doubles | Opponent: Mission San Jose SR | Judge: Panel 1NC - Bunkers CP Util K Teaching moment Procedural spark |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
Broken thingsTournament: Things being broken | Round: Finals | Opponent: God | Judge: Help | 2/6/22 |
Bunkers CPTournament: UNLV | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Mission San Jose SR | Judge: Panel The United States federal government should construct isolated, continuously manned, self-sufficient underground and underwater refuges that can support at least 100 people.Solves extinction from nuclear warKarim Jebari 15. Royal Institute of Technology, KTH, Teknikringen. 06/2015. "Existential Risks: Exploring a Robust Risk Reduction Strategy." Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 541–554. | 2/7/22 |
Disclosure Theory R3 UNLVTournament: UNLV | Round: 3 | Opponent: Marlborough MS | Judge: Nikhil Navare Interps—- teams must disclose their aff 30 minutes before the round | 2/6/22 |
Disclosure theory r1 HarvardTournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Clements MM | Judge: Jada Bourne Interp—- Affirmative disclosure must be reciprocal with negative disclosureViolation—- the aff refused to disclose after asking us first—-1~ Email—- we were asked what the negative strategies have been including round reports before—- we disclosed fairly and they should too—-2~ Wiki—- affirmative teams should disclose the 1AC that was read every round—- they never didStandards—- | 2/18/22 |
Extra TTournament: UNLV | Round: 3 | Opponent: Marlborough MS | Judge: Nikhil Navare Interpretation – The affirmative can only garner offense from "the appropriation of outer space by private entities being unjust". To clarify, they can't garner offense off of methods to solve private entities appropriating outer space such as treaties or actor action.Violation – They have extra offense from adopting a binding international agreement, and establishing outer space as a global common subject to regulatory deliming and liabilityStandards:1~ Limits – Only our interp accurately sets the upper limit to the topic. The CI will let the aff garner offense from any possible way to reduce property rights/private appropriation, which can range from treaties like OST, PTD, Common Heritage or state/actor action, which there are hundreds of. 0 chance the neg can prep for all possible offense relating to space possible and forces random LARP generics, turns edu by spreading us thin2~ Neg-flex – Forces the negative to allows fall back onto generics that can never have the potential to engage with affirmative on a content level. Aff gets 2 months to pigeonhole and prep out every neg arg3~ Education – 2-month time limit on the topic means every round is valuable. Specific education about the direct question the resolution asks is the only take away we get from this event. Precision in what they aff can read forces concise topic research in a limited area that allows us to deeply explore every area of the topic.Paradigms -Extra T is drop the debater – We indict your ability to read and garner offense from the affirmative in the first place.Competing interps over reasonability – Reasonability is always arbitrary and innvites judge interventionNo RVIs on Extra T –1~ Extra T is a gateway issue – Affirmative is always proactive while the neg is reactive. we always have to hyper tailor T args to the affirmative while the aff can just prep out the few2~ Illogical – You don't get to win for following the rules3~ Deterrence – deters debaters from calling out untopical affs, otherwise unfair affs always winoutweighs 1AR theory, it's a forced reaction to untopical affs | 2/6/22 |
Fwk - Harvard R1Tournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Clements MM | Judge: Jada Bourne Interpretation: Affirmatives should affirm whether or not a hypothetical action should be taken to resolve the resolution of "resolved: the appropriation of space by private entities is unjust" | 2/18/22 |
JF- BatailleTournament: UNLV | Round: 1 | Opponent: Peninsula Kris Deng | Judge: Diana Alvarez There was only ever one debate to be had, that of being versus becoming. This card is extremely complicated and if you even try to answer it you're gonna lose.Bataille 1985 Georges. "The labyrinth." trans. Allan Stoekl, Visions of Excess, ed. Allan Stoekl (Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1985) 5 (1985). The Labyrinth (1930). Michigan km 3, recut by fhs-cm JMK Damien-AD We are becoming the High Unpredictables of the Church of the SubGenius who absolutely refuse to take ourselves seriously! In laughter we find ourselves and Others by breaking from western conceptions of desire – we are not everything, we will eventually disappear and we know absolutely nothing – but we're okay with that! Are you?Bordun 13 (Troy M. Bordun, PhD in Philosophy and Cultural Studies, Western University, "Georges Bataille, Philosopher of Laughter," https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000andcontext=mllgradconference, pages 2-8, accessed 10/29/20, emma millar) | 2/5/22 |
JF- Extra TTournament: UNLV | Round: 1 | Opponent: Peninsula Kris Deng | Judge: Diana Alvarez Interpretation – The aff must only garner offense from private entities appropriating outer space, to clarify, the aff may not gain offense off of Asteroids, Planets, or other celestial bodiesViolation -1~ Semantics – Outer Space doesn't include Earth or celestial bodies, just space | 2/5/22 |
JF- MisdisclosureTournament: UNLV | Round: 1 | Opponent: Peninsula Kris Deng | Judge: Diana Alvarez Midisclosure is a voting issue—- check the 1AC sent in the chat it's not the one read in the 1AC—- makes 1NC strategy impossible because this aff wasn't disclosed on the wiki or in round—- it's a voter for clash and fairness and you can cross apply the no new 1AR theory from the T flow | 2/5/22 |
JF- OST CPTournament: UNLV | Round: 1 | Opponent: Peninsula Kris Deng | Judge: Diana Alvarez TEXT: The Outer Space Treaty ought to be amended to establish an international legal trust system governing outer space that does not ban the appropriation of space resources by private entities, but gives property rights. The Legal trust would include private property rights and would ensure the sustainable development as well as the equitable distribution of space resources.Finoa '20 – Ivan Finoa ~Department of Law, University of Turin~, "An international legal trust system to deal with the new space era," 71st International Astronautical Congress (IAC) – The CyberSpace Edition, (12-14 October 2020). https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/66728932/_IAC_20_E7.VP.8.x58518_An_international_legal_trust_system_to_deal_with_the_new_space_era_BY_IVAN_FINO-with-cover-page-v2.pdf?Expires=1642044926andSignature=asvt6StaK5n9UnpXuJIlo4ziI839WzFYjDZy37bm70ObGy3vFJyHwWNGxhn2beze4QzYDPPX0pVEXAwYvDaINVNxN01Ify8YwG5loNRddlat-grf3iawic7KvwqPowxFe2GuemVvbB-KW8ZVBxigwS-gelSKIVy4KYR9UgiDrM6e6deEBnUTcULSwmsH-JdHNg13ytZ3vNVMMlxZW2MPOCRuB2WlOHdCLoC86VqafSoMwuec-d~~Aisbgyt5F2vO-GjvI60bR7h2MSp0iT6P7apIDUUpHUsDGbvcdxp22HSxXdlvr7lSqtLnL5rKxujGDYq~~R9B~~WuGiorVL2hn74UQ__andKey-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZACT | 2/5/22 |
JF- Russia DATournament: UNLV | Round: 1 | Opponent: Peninsula Kris Deng | Judge: Diana Alvarez We stopped appeasing Russia – they'll pocket concessions from coop and increase aggression – tensions aren't the result of understandings but hardened differencesHaddad and Polakova 18 ~Benjamin Haddad Director, Future Europe Initiative - Atlantic Council. Alina Polyakova Director, Project on Global Democracy and Emerging Technology Fellow - Foreign Policy, Center on the United States and Europe. Don't rehabilitate Obama on Russia. March 5, 2018. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/03/05/dont-rehabilitate-obama-on-russia/~~ Appeasing Russia shreds the NPT and causes nuke prolif – extinctionUmland 17 ~Andreas Umland is a German political scientist, historian and Russian interpreter, specializing in contemporary Russian and Ukrainian history. He is a Member of the Institute for Central and East European Studies at the Catholic University, and a senior research fellow at the Institute for Euro-Atlantic Cooperation in Kyiv. The Price of Appeasing Russian Adventurism. January 16, 2017. https://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/67692~~ | 2/5/22 |
Kant NegatesTournament: Harvard | Round: 3 | Opponent: Byram Hills AK | Judge: Lukas Krouse Private sector doing space nowDiakovska 20 ~Halyna Diakovska and Olga Aliieva, Ph.D.s in Philosophy, Associate Professors, Donbass State Pedagogical University, "Consequentialism and Commercial Space Exploration," 2020, Philosophy and Cosmology, Vol. 24, pp. 5-24, https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/24/1, EA~ But appropriation is key to transform short-term goals into settlement.Jonckheere 18 ~Evarist Jonckheere, Master of Laws, Ghent University, "The Privatization of Outer Space and the Consequences for Space Law," 2018, Master's Thesis, https://libstore.ugent.be/fulltxt/RUG01/002/479/330/RUG01-002479330_2018_0001_AC.pdf, EA~ That prevents other-wise inevitable extinction – independently creates massive tech spillover, global coop, and new resources.Green 21 ~Brian Patrick Green, director of technology ethics at the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, Santa Clara University, "Space Ethics," 2021, Rowman, pp. 4-5, EA~ Immeasurable expected value also outweighs.Baum 16 – Executive Director of the Global Catastrophic Risk Institute ~Seth D. Baum, "The Ethics of Outer Space: A Consequentialist Perspective," 2016, Springer, pp. 115-116, EA~ | 2/20/22 |
No aff utilTournament: Harvard | Round: 3 | Opponent: Byram Hills AK | Judge: Lukas Krouse Interpretation: debaters must refrain from the usage of fiatThe usage of fiat is uniquely bad and a voting issue:A~ Presumption – the affirmative doesn't do anything; they just suggest actions from an external actor, meaning they resolve none of their impacts, meaning you vote neg on presumptionB~ Strat Skew – fiat allows affirmatives to spike out of answers under the guise of "we can fiat past this" – decks neg solvency deficits and ground which is more often than not already unfairly skewed because of an aff-biased resolution | 2/20/22 |
Rural Revolution KTournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Clements MM | Judge: Jada Bourne The process of assimilation into European frames of resistance is an ongoing process in which the "intellectual European" understands their inecessity and instead attempts to immortalize themselves through systems of existing power by framing resistance as possible within current models of understanding resistance and others | 2/18/22 |
Space Race DATournament: UNLV | Round: 3 | Opponent: Marlborough MS | Judge: Nikhil Navare US wins space race now due to private competition – it's key to space dominance and militarization is good – the plan nukes the US's silver bullet against Chinese aggressionWeichert 21 – former Congressional staff member who holds a Master of Arts in Statecraft and National Security Affairs from the Institute of World Politics in Washington, D.C. He is the founder of The Weichert Report: An Online Journal of Geopolitics ~Brandon, "The Future of Space Exploration Depends on the Private Sector," 7/5/2021, https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/07/the-future-of-space-exploration-depends-on-the-private-sector/~~#slide-1~~ And, space dominance key to global peace – nuclear and conventional deterrence is collapsing, which will provoke civilization-ending revisionist aggression from Russia and ChinaDr. Robert Zubrin 19, Masters in Aeronautics and Astronautics and Ph.D. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Washington, President of Pioneer Energy, Founder and President of the Mars Society, Senior Fellow with the Center for Security Policy, The Case for Space: How the Revolution in Spaceflight Opens Up a Future of Limitless Possibility, p. Google Books Space dominance solves hegemony – deterrence strategies, even rudimentary ones, are perceived as weakness and causes aggressionWeichert 17 (Brandon J. Weichert. Brandon J. Weichert is a former Congressional staff member who holds a Master of Arts in Statecraft and National Security Affairs from the Institute of World Politics in Washington, D.C. He is the founder of The Weichert Report: An Online Journal of Geopolitics, "The High Ground: The Case for U.S. Space Dominance," Orbis, Vol 61, Issue 2, 2017, pp 227 – 237, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030438717300108) US hegemony prevents great-power conflicts that escalates to nuclear warBrands and Edel 19 (Hal Brands and Charles Edel. Hal Brands is the Henry Kissinger Distinguished Professor of Global Affairs in the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies and a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. Charles Edel is a senior fellow at the United States Studies Centre at the University of Sydney and previously served on the U.S. Secretary of State's policy planning staff, "Rediscovering Tragedy. In The Lessons of Tragedy: Statecraft and World Order; Chapter 6: The Darkening Horizon," Yale University Press, pp 128-131 http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvbnm3r9.11) | 2/6/22 |
Teaching MomentsTournament: UNLV | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Mission San Jose SR | Judge: Panel Give disabled debaters a win—it serves as a teaching moment.Mitchell, et. al, 16 ~David Mitchell, Sharon Snyder, and Linda Ware—all of their credentials are in German so I can't read them, 2016, Das Geschlecht der Inklusion, "Curricular Cripistemologies: The Crip/Queer Art of Failure," https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/j.ctvm201kv.5.pdf?ab_segments=0252Fbasic_search_gsv2252Ftestandrefreqid=excelsior3A9788d2c46ec4cbff30928c80efeade1a, accessed 3-7-2021~JMK | 2/7/22 |
Util KTournament: UNLV | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Mission San Jose SR | Judge: Panel | 2/7/22 |
ValenciaTournament: Harvard | Round: 3 | Opponent: Byram Hills AK | Judge: Lukas Krouse There's a top level double-bind – either a) they were ignorant of Kant's racial implications and so they'll concede that you should reject their framework or b) they weren't which is obviously bad.The ROB is to evaluate competing ethical positions and the ROJ is to be an intellectual.1. Predictability—resolved implies firm decisions so it's the only resolutional burden and comes first2. Fiat can't overcome inherency and our rhetoric is the only thing that leaves the room because the policies we learn about become outdated by the time we can do anything about them.3. Precedes arguments about topic education—we've impact turned their conception of the topic if we've proven their orientation wrong.4. They chose their assumptions—they should be prepared to defend them and it means no limits explosion nor arbitrariness because it's reciprocal—- we're a critique of ideal theory | 2/20/22 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
2/18/22 | esh5atl@gmailcom |
| |
2/20/22 | esh5atl@gmailcom |
| |
2/6/22 | esh5atl@gmailcom |
| |
2/5/22 | esh5atl@gmailcom |
| |
2/6/22 | esh5atl@gmailcom |
| |
2/7/22 | esh5atl@gmailcom |
| |
2/7/22 | esh5atl@gmailcom |
|