Canyon Crest Norman Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | 1 | - | - |
|
| ||
| Meadows | 1 | Harvard-Westlake AT | Fagan, Donald |
|
|
| |
| Meadows | 3 | Westwood AK | Haas, Eliza |
|
|
| |
| Meadows | 5 | Harvard-Westlake MT | Montague, Heaven |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Meadows | 1 | Opponent: Harvard-Westlake AT | Judge: Fagan, Donald 1AC - COVID |
| Meadows | 3 | Opponent: Westwood AK | Judge: Haas, Eliza 1AC - Biocolonialism |
| Meadows | 5 | Opponent: Harvard-Westlake MT | Judge: Montague, Heaven 1AC - Biopiracy |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - Contact InformationTournament: - | Round: 1 | Opponent: - | Judge: - | 10/30/21 |
0 - Content WarningTournament: - | Round: 1 | Opponent: - | Judge: - | 10/30/21 |
0 - DiscloserTournament: - | Round: 1 | Opponent: - | Judge: - Interp: Debaters, on their corresponding NDCA LD wiki page, must disclose their contact information. To clarify, this can be an email address, Facebook, number, etc. Interp: For each position broken on the NDCA wiki, debaters must include a corresponding round report that summarizes what positions were read and gone for in each speech. Interp: For all broken positions, debaters must open source disclose all taglines, citations, and evidence read with highlighting on the NDCA LD wiki. | 10/30/21 |
SepOct - CP - Dual-useTournament: Meadows | Round: 1 | Opponent: Harvard-Westlake AT | Judge: Fagan, Donald The counterplan incentivizes development into countermeasures and removes terrorist access to biotechnologies. AND development an attractive investment, and takes advantage of companies' resources and expertise. Vulnerabilities exposed by COVID have invigorated availability and interest in bioterror, but technical challenges remain as barriers to acquisition. AND should be optimized to strengthen preparedness against the full spectrum of biological threats. IP protections are the only limit on proliferating dual-use biotech – losing patents puts financial pressure on companies to outsource RandD, which skyrockets bioterror acquisition. AND actor involvement in dual-use activities has sobering implications for global security. Bioterrorism causes Extinction – overcomes any conventional defense. AND to pull this off. It’s actually surprising that it hasn’t happened yet.” | 10/30/21 |
SepOct - DA - FisheriesTournament: Meadows | Round: 1 | Opponent: Harvard-Westlake AT | Judge: Fagan, Donald AND no marine fisheries left to subsidise — or artisanal fishing communities to support.” IP disputes fragment WTO unity and trade off with subsidies negotiation AND will ultimately harm the legitimacy of the trading system,” the person added. Overfishing collapses biodiversity AND , the extent of this damage has only recently been recognized (15). Continued biodiversity loss causes extinction AND no longer ignore the impact of current unsustainable production models and wasteful lifestyles.” | 10/30/21 |
SepOct - DA - InnovationTournament: Meadows | Round: 3 | Opponent: Westwood AK | Judge: Haas, Eliza AND drugs), and conducting postapproval testing for safety-monitoring or marketing purposes. The aff crushes innovation in the pharma sector---incentivizes them to focus on non-important issues. AND by ponying up cash to vaccinate the entire world. No confiscation necessary. Pharma Innovation prevents Extinction – checks new diseases. AND profit in medicine and especially in the pharmaceutical and medical-device industries. | 10/30/21 |
SepOct - T - MedicineTournament: Meadows | Round: 1 | Opponent: Harvard-Westlake AT | Judge: Fagan, Donald CDC 14 Prefer – Precision -- we cite the CDC and WHO which proves common usage -- they add a whole new caselist based on social medicine which kills predictability -- that's k2 pre-tournament prep and deep clash around the core topic controversy. Reject counter-interps without a positive vision of the topic -- otherwise they can always shift the goalposts No RVIs – a) illogical – you shouldn’t win for being fair – it’s a litmus test for engaging in substance, b) norming – I can’t concede the counterinterp if I realize I’m wrong which forces me to argue for bad norms, c) baiting – incentivizes good debaters to be abusive, bait theory, then collapse to the 1AR RVI, d) topic ed – prevents 1AR blipstorm scripts and allows us to get back to substance after resolving theory Evaluate T before 1AR theory – a) norms – we only have a couple months to set T norms but can set 1AR theory norms anytime, b) magnitude – T affects a larger portion of the debate since the aff advocacy determines every speech after it | 10/30/21 |
SepOct - T - Medicine V2Tournament: Meadows | Round: 3 | Opponent: Westwood AK | Judge: Haas, Eliza AND “colleges and universities” is generic rather than existential in the resolution. It applies to medicines:
3. Violation: the aff only defends medicines that use indigenous knowledge Vote neg: 1 Semantics outweigh: a) T is a constitutive rule of the activity and a basic aff burden – they agreed to debate the topic when they came here b) It’s the only stasis point we know before the round so it controls the internal link to engagement – there’s no way to use ground if debaters aren’t prepared to defend it 2 Limits – there are countless affs accounting for thousands of medicines – unlimited topics incentivize obscure affs that negs won’t have prep on – potential abuse doesn’t justify foregoing the topic compeltely and 1AR theory checks PICs if they are as abusive as you say. There are over 20,000 affs AND drug products. 3 Ground – spec guts core generics like innovation that rely on reducing IP for all medicines because individual medicines don’t affect the pharmaceutical industry broadly – also means there is no universal DA to spec affs 4 TVA solves – read as an advantage to whole rez | 10/30/21 |
SepOct - Theory - DiscloserTournament: Meadows | Round: 3 | Opponent: Westwood AK | Judge: Haas, Eliza Violation—they didn’t, and wouldn’t tell me if teammates have read their aff before. They just told me it was new, when it wasn’t since teammates have read it. See screenshot Vote neg for prep and clash—two internal links—a) neg prep—4 minutes of prep is not enough to put together a coherent 1nc or update generics—30 minutes is necessary to learn a little about the affirmative and piece together what 1nc positions apply and cut and research their applications to the affirmative b) aff quality—plan text disclosure discourages cheap shot affs. If the aff isn’t inherent or easily defeated by 20 minutes of research, it should lose—this will answer the 1ar’s claim about innovation—with 30 minutes of prep, there’s still an incentive to find a new strategic, well justified aff, but no incentive to cut a horrible, incoherent aff that the neg can’t check against the broader literature. | 10/30/21 |
SepOct - Theory - New Affs BadTournament: Meadows | Round: 5 | Opponent: Harvard-Westlake MT | Judge: Montague, Heaven Violation—they didn’t Vote neg for prep and clash—two internal links—a) neg prep—4 minutes of prep is not enough to put together a coherent 1nc or update generics—30 minutes is necessary to learn a little about the affirmative and piece together what 1nc positions apply and cut and research their applications to the affirmative b) aff quality—plan text disclosure discourages cheap shot affs. If the aff isn’t inherent or easily defeated by 20 minutes of research, it should lose—this will answer the 1ar’s claim about innovation—with 30 minutes of prep, there’s still an incentive to find a new strategic, well justified aff, but no incentive to cut a horrible, incoherent aff that the neg can’t check against the broader literature. Fairness and education are voters – debate’s a game that needs rules to evaluate it and education gives us portable skills for life like research and thinking. | 10/31/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
10/30/21 | maxn990@gmailcom |
| |
10/30/21 | maxn990@gmailcom |
| |
10/31/21 | maxn990@gmailcom |
|