| Holy Cross | 2 | Opponent: JPG JF | Judge: Chloe Brown 1ac- a waiver would solve extinction threats 1nc- spreading is inherently bad for debate because it decreases education and is ableist 2nr- Priority is too unfair tactics that hurt debate 2ar- Debate is accessible and fair |
| Holy Cross | 4 | Opponent: Strake Jesuit DO | Judge: Devin Jiang 1ac- a waiver is the right thing to do since IP protections steal indigenous peoples medicines and would increase vaccine availability 1nc- IP protections are rights and are key to innovation 2nr- rights come before cost-benefit analysis 2ar- IP protections infringe on the right of indegineous people |
| Holy Cross | 5 | Opponent: Isidore Newman SW | Judge: Sydney Nelson 1ac- a waiver would save lives 1nc- spreading is bad for the debate because it is not educational and ableist 2nr- the priority is to reject unfair inaccessible debate tactics 2ar-debate is already fair and equal |
| Isidore Newman School Invitational | 3 | Opponent: Lovejoy JV | Judge: Chen, Victor 1ac- allow every worker to strike 1nc- 3 conditions needed on the right to strike 2ac- we meet neg because we define unconditional as anyone can strike 1nr- they do not meet there are other forms of conditions 1ar- right to strike to everyone solves best |
| Isidore Newman School Invitational | 1 | Opponent: Little Rock Central XJ | Judge: Garrison, Stephanie 1ac- K aff reject resolution because it is racist 1nc- aff is a reason to vote neg necessary conditions 2ac- Unfair to make the aff run a racist case due to psychological effects 1nr- only reasons to vote neg 1ar- k outweighs |
| Isidore Newman School invitational | 6 | Opponent: Durham SA | Judge: Li, Qing 1ac- allow every worker to strike to increase quality of life 1nc- 3 conditions needed on the right to strike 2ac- unconditional key to helping workers 1nr- workers can be helped with these conditions that most people agree on 1ar- unconditional tight to strike for everyone solves best |
| LA Districts | 1 | Opponent: Isidore Newman JL | Judge: Kevin Xu 1ac- democracyutil value and objective journalism saves democracy and solves climate change 1nc- moralityutil value and objective journalism lacks morality while advocacy journalism solves morality and climate change 1nr- Advocacy journalism is based on fact unlike propaganda democracy is useless without morality 2ar- democracy is doomed if there is advocacy journalism |
| LA Districts | 3 | Opponent: Isidore Newman AB | Judge: Kristina Plunkett 1ac-democracy value Objective journalism is key to solving climate change and protecting democracy 1nc- moralityutil value objective journalism lacks morality advocacy journalism solves better 1nr- advocacy journalism is based on truth unlike propaganda objectivity is immoral morality is what matters for a good society 2ar- advocacy journalism enables lies |
| LHSSL State | 1 | Opponent: Parkway EW | Judge: Jharick Shields 1ac- objective journalism is preferable 1nc- objective journalism is immoral 1nr- objective journalism hurts minority groups 2ar- objective journalism is the only moral solution |
| LHSSL State | 3 | Opponent: Holy Cross ND | Judge: Bennett Dombcik 1ac- objective journalism is key to saving democracy 1nc- objective journalism is immoral 1nr- objective journalism hurts minority groups 2ar- objective journalism is the only moral solution that helps minorities |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.