1AC Value Common good Criterion structural violence Structural violence = structural violence C1 insulin talks about generic drugs decrease access increase insulin C2 africa africa is not able to receive the medications that they need to survive
1NC
Value Morality Criterion consequentialism I provide the definition for intellectual property with the card of georgetown law I also provide the definition for consequentialism using the card from merriam webster Value 19 C1 counterfeit medications If the reduction of IPP it would mean that more and more companies would make more medications and this means that they would not be the same as the original Kohli 2019 Card Even though their is a watch list this doesn't mean that it would be full proof C2 Alternatives IPP isn't the best proposition to IPP the TRIPS flexibilities would be the best option for this Hoen 18 card IPP is not the way we should go with IP protections because it has too much leeway with countries and companies that produce counterfeit medications There are many different alternatives to this problem
1AR The access to common good stabilizes social well being the reduction of IPP would create poverty Only the affs criterion can solve for this problem
1NR
The negatives criteria is the prerequisite to the affirmatives criteria and value without the negatives criteria and value the affirmatives would never exist in the first place The affirmative even fails to even rebuttal the negative case within their entire speech
2AR
Rebuttals own case
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.