Bridgeland Traxler Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | 1 | All | All |
|
| ||
| All | 1 | All | All |
|
| ||
| All | 1 | All | All |
|
| ||
| All | 1 | All | All |
|
| ||
| Grapevine | 1 | Northland Christian CS | Wyatt Hatfield |
|
|
| |
| Grapevine | 4 | Tommy Yu | Jack Quisenberry |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Grapevine | 1 | Opponent: Northland Christian CS | Judge: Wyatt Hatfield 1AC - Retrovirals |
| Grapevine | 4 | Opponent: Tommy Yu | Judge: Jack Quisenberry 1AC - PragTrix |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - Contact InfoTournament: All | Round: 1 | Opponent: All | Judge: All Email: parker_traxler@hotmail.com | 8/3/21 |
0 - DebateDrillsTournament: All | Round: 1 | Opponent: All | Judge: All | 8/3/21 |
0 - NavigationTournament: All | Round: 1 | Opponent: All | Judge: All | 8/3/21 |
0 - Note - Content WarningsTournament: All | Round: 1 | Opponent: All | Judge: All | 8/3/21 |
1 - Interp Must Number All 1AC ArgsTournament: Grapevine | Round: 1 | Opponent: Northland Christian CS | Judge: Wyatt Hatfield | 9/11/21 |
SO - Nebel TTournament: Grapevine | Round: 1 | Opponent: Northland Christian CS | Judge: Wyatt Hatfield Medicines is a generic bare plural It applies to this topic – democracy was the subject of SeptOct that year the same way medicines are the subject of SeptOct because “Member nations ought to eliminate IP for covid – therefore, member nations ought to eliminate IP protections for all” is illogical | 9/11/21 |
SO - SetCol K v10Tournament: Grapevine | Round: 4 | Opponent: Tommy Yu | Judge: Jack Quisenberry Genocidal disposition is not an event but on an ongoing process that functions through a tripartite structure of elimination, replacement, and indoctrination. Debate as a competitive research activity is not isolated from said violence, but works to iteratively indoctrinate settler ideologies which is necessary to maintain the broader process of genocide.Patel 14 ~Lisa (Leigh) Patel (2014), Countering Coloniality in Educational Research: From Ownership to Answerability, Educational Studies, 50:4, 357-377, DOI: 10.1080/00131946.2014.924942, Accesed via Taylor Francis Online~itsnagisa The will to elimination has indoctrinated itself into all settler institutions making genocidal elimination possible. The inevitable 1AR's link turns and permutations will conflate the distinctions between colonization and racialized violence and in such create a quagmire rather than creating a language to fuel liberation programs. This should be starred as a reason why you should at least within debate refuse to invest into a politics of contingencyRifkin 14 ~Mark, 'Settler Common Sense: Queerness and Everyday Colonialism in the American Renaissance,'~itsnagisa The 1AC is a call upon the shadow archive that uses the benign affect of medical access to enact widespread genocidal violence.Pugliese 13 ~Pugliese, Joseph~ "State Violence and the Execution of Law Biopolitical caesurae of torture, black sites, drones" GlassHouse Book, 2013~itsnagisa International law attempts to uphold the ideology of colonial saviorism – it attempts to justify ongoing genocide and serves as a scheme to remake native cultures into a Eurocentric image.Mutua 01 ~Mutua, Makau, Savages, Victims, and Saviors: The Metaphor of Human Rights (2001). Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 201-245, 2001, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1525547~~ DD PT The alternative is total refusal – only in this mode of upheaval are new futurisms possibleGrande 18 – Sandy Grande, Professor of Education and Director of the Center for the Critical Study of Race and Ethnicity at Connecticut University, 2018 ("Refusing the Settler Society of the Spectacle," Handbook of Indigenous Education, Published by Springer, Edited by Elizabeth Ann McKinley and Linda Tuhiwai Smith, ISBN 978-981-10-1839-8, pp. 1-17) FW: Eval the 1AC as a scholarly artifact – the affirmative should have to defend their epistemic orientation prior to evaluating a risk of fiated solvency.a.~ Anti-Naitve Education DA – Fiat is illusory and voting for them doesn't do anything – but voting negative can reshape the scholastic practices within this activity – that outweighs because repeated practices presented in speech activities give way to parasitic spaces only challenging the underlying epistemology that shapes that is able to disrupt those settler psyches and mitigate the violence in an anti-settler activity. That Comes first: 1.~ A 1 chance that debate does shape subject formation outweighs a risk that it doesn't – because its not worth risking genocide. 2.~ Accessibility structures procedural fairness - if we win a link argument it proves why the space that they forward is not only violent but also inaccessible for native folx.B.~ Isopolitics DA – Fiat is a form of colonial roleplaying whereby debaters can play the colonizer pretending to legislate on this land which all necessarily presumes an ethicality behind land ownershop and western law. Negation of this authority destabilizes this organizing logic of settler Political selfhood which is an independent reason you should vote negative. This means that we have impact turned their end point of their education offense because rather the constructing advocates who push towards a decolonial ethics, the skills they create, cultivate settlers who think they are more creative without giving out the land. | 9/11/21 |
SO - TT ROBTournament: Grapevine | Round: 1 | Opponent: Northland Christian CS | Judge: Wyatt Hatfield Now negate – Permissibility and presumption negate – | 9/11/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
9/11/21 | parkertraxler@gmailcom |
|