Bridgeland Traxler Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | 1 | All | All |
|
| ||
| All | 1 | All | All |
|
| ||
| All | 1 | All | All |
|
| ||
| All | 1 | All | All |
|
| ||
| All | 1 | All | All |
|
| ||
| Apple Valley | 1 | Walt Whitman EY | Braedon Kirkpatrick |
|
|
| |
| Apple Valley | 3 | Dulles TY | Jeff Swift |
|
|
| |
| Grapevine | 1 | Northland Christian CS | Wyatt Hatfield |
|
|
| |
| Grapevine | 4 | Tommy Yu | Jack Quisenberry |
|
|
| |
| Memorial | 2 | Jordan VS | Dunno |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Valley | 1 | Opponent: Walt Whitman EY | Judge: Braedon Kirkpatrick 1AC - Butler |
| Apple Valley | 3 | Opponent: Dulles TY | Judge: Jeff Swift 1AC - China |
| Grapevine | 1 | Opponent: Northland Christian CS | Judge: Wyatt Hatfield 1AC - Retrovirals |
| Grapevine | 4 | Opponent: Tommy Yu | Judge: Jack Quisenberry 1AC - PragTrix |
| Memorial | 2 | Opponent: Jordan VS | Judge: Dunno 1AC - Covid |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - Contact InfoTournament: All | Round: 1 | Opponent: All | Judge: All Email: parker_traxler@hotmail.com | 11/5/21 |
0 - DebateDrillsTournament: All | Round: 1 | Opponent: All | Judge: All | 8/3/21 |
0 - NavigationTournament: All | Round: 1 | Opponent: All | Judge: All | 8/3/21 |
0 - New Affs BadTournament: Apple Valley | Round: 1 | Opponent: Walt Whitman EY | Judge: Braedon Kirkpatrick | 11/5/21 |
0 - Note - Content WarningsTournament: All | Round: 1 | Opponent: All | Judge: All | 8/3/21 |
0 - SkepTournament: Apple Valley | Round: 1 | Opponent: Walt Whitman EY | Judge: Braedon Kirkpatrick To negate means to contradict. To contradict means to speak or declare against. Debate itself requires consistency with non-contradiction and proactive justification, any doubt of proof flows neg.Luca ~Luca, Andrei. "LogicWarrior Demand Reason." LogicWarrior, 9 Oct. 2017, www.logicwarrior.net/tag/law-of-non-contradiction/~ Skepticism is true and negates –1~ Moral skep – justices requires us to act immediately since waiting in the face of injustice is itself an injustice. However, we need to be fully informed to avoid formulating a rule incorrectly and unjustly, so obligations are internally contradictory.Derrida ~Derrida, J. "The Force of Law: The 'Mystical Foundation of Authority.'" In And any account of morality is regressive since it predicates on universal rule on the existence of another moral rule. Since every human chain of reasoning must be finite according to our finite nature, such a reasoning process must terminate in a rule for which no reason can be given.2~ External world skep – no amount of subjective experience can ever prove objective knowledge.Searle ~John Rogers Searle, "Mind, Language, And Society: Philosophy In The Real World.", https://novacat.nova.edu:446/record=b1236325~~S13~~ That negates since providing an obligation requires that A. the one assigning the obligation has some externally reliable source of authority and B. it assumes we know the facts about a situation and can make a case for an obligation which is impossible.3~ All statements and moral theories are regulated by the falsifiability theory of meaning which prioritizes falsity over positive observation. This renders future knowledge in a state of indeterminacy and holds negative observations sufficient to disprove a theorem.Nickles ~Thomas."Falsifiability."NewDictionaryoftheHistoryofIdeas.2005. , https://elearning.shisu.edu.cn/pluginfile.php/35320/mod_resource/content/1/Falsifiability2028Introduction29.pdf~~ 4~ Uncertain truth statements are illogical.Unger 75 ~Unger, Peter (1975): Ignorance (Oxford: Oxford University Press)~ /AHS PB 5~ Induction – either it's the case we can predict the outcome of a situation, or we cannot. We cannot, insofar as no situation is ever replicated exactly, and even if it can, there's no guarantee the outcome will be the same. If we can predict situations, that means everyone can which means we will always predict each other, making a paradox of action insofar as we always attempt to predict the outcomes of each other's actions, and will cancel out the obligations. | 11/5/21 |
1 - Interp Must Number All 1AC ArgsTournament: Grapevine | Round: 1 | Opponent: Northland Christian CS | Judge: Wyatt Hatfield | 9/11/21 |
ND - Academy KTournament: Apple Valley | Round: 3 | Opponent: Dulles TY | Judge: Jeff Swift The endless appeals to objectivity and evidence near and dear to the status quo have lost all weight in the world of alternative facts and fake news – attempts to decipher the world through transparent metaphysics prove to not only be futile but also infinitely destructive as the quest to know everything merely reveals all that we can never know – meaning is contrary to its own intent; all information inevitably crumbles into the void of illusion.Shapiro 17 ~Alan N, Professor in Transdisciplinary design at Folkwang, 1/5, "Baudrillard and Trump: Simulation and Object-Orientation, Not True and False," http://www.alan-shapiro.com/baudrillard-and-trump-simulation-and-object-orientation-not-true-and-false-by-alan-n-shapiro/~~ Participation based political opposition legitimates cybernetic structures of control that undergird communication – the activist stance merely legitimates the reactionary one, like debates between MSNBC and Fox News.Anarchist News 10 ~"The University, Social Death, and the Inside Joke," http://anarchistnews.org/content/university-social-death-and-inside-joke~~ This system causes global implosive violence as a method for creating meaning for its own existence by destroying all mysterity in the world and rendering it intelligible.Artrip and Debrix 14 ~Artrip, Ryan Edward and François Debrix. "The Digital Fog of War: Baudrillard and the Violence of Representation." (2014)~ The political has lost the will for positive action. A society that maintains capitalist production is contingent upon subjects that are forced to labor under hyperreality – so we let the system collapse in on itself. All that is left in the power of the masses is negation – our alternative is the strategy of the masses.Baudrillard 93 (Jean, The Transparency of Evil: Essays on Extreme Phenomena, 1993) | 11/6/21 |
SO - Kant NCTournament: Memorial | Round: 2 | Opponent: Jordan VS | Judge: Dunno Ethics must begin a priori –A~ Is-ought gap – empiricism can only observe what is since that's the only thing in our perception, not what ought to be, but it's impossible to derive an ought from descriptive premises which requires a priori premises to form morality.B~ Empirical uncertainty– evil demon could deceive us, dreaming, simulation, and inability to know other's experiences makes empiricism an unreliable basis for universal ethics. Outweighs since it would be escapable since people could say they don't experience the same.C~ Infallibility – practical reason is the only unescapable authority because to ask why we should be reasoners is to concede authority to reason since the question itself uses reason – anything else is nonbinding and arbitrary.Reason requires that maxims we act upon must be universalizable – A. Any reasoner would know that two plus two equals four because there is no a priori distinction between agents so norms must be universally valid. B. Any non-universalizable norm justifies someone's ability to impede on your ends – it's impossible to will a violation of freedom since deciding to do so would will incompatible ends since it logically entails justifying willing a violation of your own freedom.Individuals must be considered to have a right to property, otherwise it's impossible to consider them as volitional.Kant 1797 - Immanuel. Kant: The Metaphysics of Morals (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy) 2nd Edition. by Immanuel Kant (Author, philosopher), Mary J. Gregor (Editor), Roger J. Sullivan (Introduction). Cambridge University Press 1996. 1797 Governments have a burden of being minimally interventionist on liberties so to not infringe upon self-ownership.Feser 8/21 ~Feser, Edward. "Robert Nozick (1938—2002)." https://iep.utm.edu/nozick/. Web. August 21, 2021.~ Thus, the standard is consistency with respecting a system of outer freedom. Prefer additionally –1~ Self-ownership is a prerequisite to any form of just government existing in the first place.Feser 8/21 ~Feser, Edward. "Robert Nozick (1938—2002)." https://iep.utm.edu/nozick/. Web. August 21, 2021.~ 2~ Innate rights necessitates the ability to own objects external to yourselfRipstein 9 Ripstein, Arthur. Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 2009. Print. Now negate –~1~ Reducing IP is a form of free riding that fails the universality test, but also uses the creators of the medicine as means to an end.Dyke 18 ~Raymond Van Dyke, 7-17-2018, "The Categorical Imperative for Innovation and Patenting," IPWatchdog, https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2018/07/17/categorical-imperative-innovation-patenting/id=99178/~~ DD PT ~2~ Restrictions of intellectual property rights are violations of liberty.Pozzo 06 ~Pozzo, Riccardo (2006), "Immanuel Kant on intellectual property", https://www.scielo.br/j/trans/a/rLfb3yPN3p4KPsYpxp8LQCp/?format=pdfandlang=en~~ DD PT | 10/8/21 |
SO - Nebel TTournament: Grapevine | Round: 1 | Opponent: Northland Christian CS | Judge: Wyatt Hatfield Medicines is a generic bare plural It applies to this topic – democracy was the subject of SeptOct that year the same way medicines are the subject of SeptOct because “Member nations ought to eliminate IP for covid – therefore, member nations ought to eliminate IP protections for all” is illogical | 9/11/21 |
SO - SetCol K v1Tournament: Grapevine | Round: 4 | Opponent: Tommy Yu | Judge: Jack Quisenberry Genocidal disposition is not an event but on an ongoing process that functions through a tripartite structure of elimination, replacement, and indoctrination. Debate as a competitive research activity is not isolated from said violence, but works to iteratively indoctrinate settler ideologies which is necessary to maintain the broader process of genocide.Patel 14 ~Lisa (Leigh) Patel (2014), Countering Coloniality in Educational Research: From Ownership to Answerability, Educational Studies, 50:4, 357-377, DOI: 10.1080/00131946.2014.924942, Accesed via Taylor Francis Online~itsnagisa The will to elimination has indoctrinated itself into all settler institutions making genocidal elimination possible. The inevitable 1AR's link turns and permutations will conflate the distinctions between colonization and racialized violence and in such create a quagmire rather than creating a language to fuel liberation programs. This should be starred as a reason why you should at least within debate refuse to invest into a politics of contingencyRifkin 14 ~Mark, 'Settler Common Sense: Queerness and Everyday Colonialism in the American Renaissance,'~itsnagisa The 1AC is a call upon the shadow archive that uses the benign affect of medical access to enact widespread genocidal violence.Pugliese 13 ~Pugliese, Joseph~ "State Violence and the Execution of Law Biopolitical caesurae of torture, black sites, drones" GlassHouse Book, 2013~itsnagisa International law attempts to uphold the ideology of colonial saviorism – it attempts to justify ongoing genocide and serves as a scheme to remake native cultures into a Eurocentric image.Mutua 01 ~Mutua, Makau, Savages, Victims, and Saviors: The Metaphor of Human Rights (2001). Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 201-245, 2001, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1525547~~ DD PT The alternative is total refusal – only in this mode of upheaval are new futurisms possibleGrande 18 – Sandy Grande, Professor of Education and Director of the Center for the Critical Study of Race and Ethnicity at Connecticut University, 2018 ("Refusing the Settler Society of the Spectacle," Handbook of Indigenous Education, Published by Springer, Edited by Elizabeth Ann McKinley and Linda Tuhiwai Smith, ISBN 978-981-10-1839-8, pp. 1-17) FW: Eval the 1AC as a scholarly artifact – the affirmative should have to defend their epistemic orientation prior to evaluating a risk of fiated solvency.a.~ Anti-Naitve Education DA – Fiat is illusory and voting for them doesn't do anything – but voting negative can reshape the scholastic practices within this activity – that outweighs because repeated practices presented in speech activities give way to parasitic spaces only challenging the underlying epistemology that shapes that is able to disrupt those settler psyches and mitigate the violence in an anti-settler activity. That Comes first: 1.~ A 1 chance that debate does shape subject formation outweighs a risk that it doesn't – because its not worth risking genocide. 2.~ Accessibility structures procedural fairness - if we win a link argument it proves why the space that they forward is not only violent but also inaccessible for native folx.B.~ Isopolitics DA – Fiat is a form of colonial roleplaying whereby debaters can play the colonizer pretending to legislate on this land which all necessarily presumes an ethicality behind land ownershop and western law. Negation of this authority destabilizes this organizing logic of settler Political selfhood which is an independent reason you should vote negative. This means that we have impact turned their end point of their education offense because rather the constructing advocates who push towards a decolonial ethics, the skills they create, cultivate settlers who think they are more creative without giving out the land. | 9/11/21 |
SO - TT ROBTournament: Grapevine | Round: 1 | Opponent: Northland Christian CS | Judge: Wyatt Hatfield Now negate – Permissibility and presumption negate – | 9/11/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
11/5/21 | parkertraxler@gmailcom |
| |
11/6/21 | parkertraxler@gmailcom |
| |
9/11/21 | parkertraxler@gmailcom |
| |
9/11/21 | parkertraxler@gmailcom |
| |
10/8/21 | parkertraxler@gmailcom |
|