Bishops Chandra Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any | Finals | Any | Any |
|
| ||
| Any | Finals | Any | X |
|
| ||
| Any | Quarters | Any |
|
| |||
| Loyola | 2 | Portola AS | Nathan Russell |
|
|
| |
| Loyola | 4 | Marlborough JS | David Dosch |
|
|
| |
| Loyola | 6 | Westwood AD | Joshua StPeter |
|
|
| |
| ValleyMid America Cup | 1 | Sage MP | Maya Xia |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Loyola | 2 | Opponent: Portola AS | Judge: Nathan Russell 1AC - COVID |
| Loyola | 4 | Opponent: Marlborough JS | Judge: David Dosch 1AC - COVID Aff |
| Loyola | 6 | Opponent: Westwood AD | Judge: Joshua StPeter 1AC - Cap aff alt |
| ValleyMid America Cup | 1 | Opponent: Sage MP | Judge: Maya Xia 1AC - Jordan |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - CitesTournament: Any | Round: Quarters | Opponent: Any | Judge: Afropessimism | 9/4/21 |
0 - Contact InformationTournament: Any | Round: Finals | Opponent: Any | Judge: Any My I'm Advay. If you see something missing from this wiki that you've seen me read, it's likely that I just forgot to upload it. You can contact me on Facebook under "Advay Chandra" or at 858-209-3858 | 8/31/21 |
0 - DebateDrillsTournament: Any | Round: Finals | Opponent: Any | Judge: X | 8/31/21 |
1 - T-Black Framework v1Tournament: Loyola | Round: 6 | Opponent: Westwood AD | Judge: Joshua StPeter Next is T – Black Framework:AFFIRMATIVES must demonstrate how they engage efforts to advocate the plan BEYOND hypothetical imaginationShanara Reid-Brinkley 2020, "The Future is Black: Afropessimism, Fugitivity, and Radical Hope in Education", Edited by Carl Grant, Ashley Woodson, Michael Dumas, https://books.google.com/books?id=SMHyDwAAQBAJandpg=PR5andsource=gbs_selected_pagesandcad=2~~#v=onepageandqandf=false//WY They violate1~ Ascetic tourism – reading absent direct efforts to challenge communal violence posits them as tourists to violence. Benefits to scenario planning don't disprove violation.2~ Revitalization of stasis - Our offense isn't just "going beyond scenario planning" BUT specification of such since it revitalizes stasis forces research beyond traditional norms.3~ Effects T – Words holding potential of action proves scenario planning could effect action, which links since it still posits them as tourists over violence, and is infinitely regressive – anything can could effect each other. | 9/25/21 |
Sept-Oct - Cap KTournament: ValleyMid America Cup | Round: 1 | Opponent: Sage MP | Judge: Maya Xia KOur thesis is that the collapse of capitalism is inevitable, it is a question of now or later: you should frame your decision through an anti-capitalist lens by centering the valorization of productivity that aff's logic is founded upon.Kuang 20 ~Da Kuang and Changyi Huang are professors at the Huazhong University of Science and Technology, College of Marxism in Wuhan 430074, China. A Study of Marx's Thought on the Speed of Capital Accumulation, Presented at the 2020 International Conference on Social Science, Economics and Education Research (SSEER 2020), Atlantic Press: Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research Volume 455, 8-22-21, amrita~ The affirmative resets the cycle and rejuvenates short-term capitalist accumulation in two ways.First, is false liberalism. The plan is representative of the idea that capitalism can be saved- eliminating "intellectual property protections" is a scheme that aims to boost falling rates of profit and improve capital accumulation.Gilbert 19 ~Geoff Gilbert is a Professor of Law in the School of Law and Human Rights Centre at the University of Essex. He was Head of Department between 2000-2003 and 2011-13. In 2012, he was appointed a Professorial Visiting Fellow at the University of New South Wales in Sydney. He was Editor-in-Chief of the International Journal of Refugee Law from 2002-15 and is co-Editor-in-Chief as of September 2019; he also sits on the Advisory Board., "Free trade" is today's imperialism by the 1 percent, 1-13-2019,No Publication,https://www.bilaterals.org/?free-trade-is-today-s-imperialism, 8-21-2021 amrita~ Second is WTO legitimacy. The plan is a colonialist revision that re-packages the WTO as a legitimate organization that can overcome its insidious past towards a future of equal free trade—that decks class consciousness.Gilbert 19 ~Geoff Gilbert is a Professor of Law in the School of Law and Human Rights Centre at the University of Essex. He was Head of Department between 2000-2003 and 2011-13. In 2012, he was appointed a Professorial Visiting Fellow at the University of New South Wales in Sydney. He was Editor-in-Chief of the International Journal of Refugee Law from 2002-15 and is co-Editor-in-Chief as of September 2019; he also sits on the Advisory Board., "Free trade" is today's imperialism by the 1 percent, 1-13-2019,No Publication,https://www.bilaterals.org/?free-trade-is-today-s-imperialism, 8-21-2021 amrita~ But capitalism can't be saved. The short-term rejuvenation simply pushes back the long-term inevitable collapse which dooms us to death by climate change—this card preempts all their "cap solves climate change" answers.Foster 18 ~John Bellamy Foster, John Bellamy Foster is a professor of sociology at the University of Oregon and also editor of Monthly Review. He writes about political economy of capitalism and economic crisis, ecology and ecological crisis, and Marxist theory. "Making War on the Planet." Monthly Review. September 1, 2018. https://monthlyreview.org/2018/09/01/making-war-on-the-planet/ recut 8-22-2021 amrita~ Endorse a dictatorship of the proletariat. Global capitalism's inequities can only be fully purged once its intrinsic contradictions expose themselves. A dictatorship is required to solidify our transition to communism and is why you should reject any perm that attempts to preserve the state apparatus.Revolution 73 Proletarian Dictatorship Vs. Bourgeois "Democracy"; Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line; Revolution; May 1973; Edited by Paul Saba; https://www.marxists.org/history/erol/ncm-1/pd-v-bd.htm; CE recut amrita | 9/25/21 |
Sept-Oct - NC Util v1Tournament: Loyola | Round: 4 | Opponent: Marlborough JS | Judge: David Dosch | 9/5/21 |
Sept-Oct - Politics DATournament: Loyola | Round: 2 | Opponent: Portola AS | Judge: Nathan Russell Dems win the Senate now, but it's close—-it determines the Biden presidency.Shane Goldmacher 7/17. Reporter, New York Times, "Democrats See Edge in Early Senate Map as Trump Casts Big Shadow," The New York Times, July 17, 2021, https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/17/us/politics/midterm-elections.html, RJP, DebateDrills. The plan is unpopular—-it's seen as soft on China.Cynthia Hicks 21. Director of Public Affairs at PhRMA focusing on polling and opinion research that supports advocacy communications and strategy. "New polling shows Americans are sounding the alarm on the TRIPS IP waiver," PhRMA, May 14, 2021, https://catalyst.phrma.org/new-polling-shows-americans-are-sounding-the-alarm-on-the-trips-ip-waiver, RJP, DebateDrills China is the key for the midterms—-Senate control hinges on it.Sarah Mucha 21. Politics reporter at Axios, covering the Biden administration and Congress. "Parties pounce on China as midterm issue," Axios, June 23, 2021, https://www.axios.com/democrat-republicans-china-2022-midterms-6c242c54-b51b-444e-b9b2-65ff0afb906a.html, RJP, DebateDrills GOP control of the Senate will be used to usher in a new wave of Trumpism, crushing democracy.Morton Kondracke 21. Retired executive editor of Roll Call, a former "McLaughlin Group" and Fox News commentator and co-author, with Fred Barnes, of Jack Kemp: The Bleeding Heart Conservative Who Changed America. "Why Democrats Must Retain Control of Congress in 2022," RealClearPolitics, August 4, 2021, https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2021/08/04/why_democrats_must_retain_control_of_congress_in_2022_146189.html, RJP, DebateDrills ExtinctionKasparov 17 | 9/4/21 |
Sept-Oct - T-Data ExclusivityTournament: ValleyMid America Cup | Round: 1 | Opponent: Sage MP | Judge: Maya Xia T-Data ExclusivityInterpretation: Intellectual property must create a monopoly market – data exclusivity doesn'tWilkinson 21 (Margaret Ann, Professor of Law at Western University, Canada, Director of the Area of Concentration in Intellectual Property, Information and Technology Law)
Standards:1. Limits – data exclusivity is straight up just not IP. Their interp allows anything tangentially related to patents like employee noncompetes and medical software DRM which explodes the topic.Topicality should be a voting issue evaluated through competing interpretations—reasonability invites arbitrary judge intervention that takes the debate out of the hands of the debaters. Pre-round prep has already been skewed which means the only remedy is to drop the debater. | 9/25/21 |
Sept-Oct - T-MedicinesTournament: Loyola | Round: 4 | Opponent: Marlborough JS | Judge: David Dosch | 9/5/21 |
Sept-Oct - T-TheTournament: ValleyMid America Cup | Round: 1 | Opponent: Sage MP | Judge: Maya Xia T-TheThe word "the" means ALL member nations of the WTO—specifying some is nontopicalUS District Court of Massachusetts '3
Grammar provesSharvy 80 (Richard Sharvy, philosopher) "A More General Theory of Definite Descriptions on JSTOR," The Philosophical Review, Vol. 89, No. 4, Oct. 1980, accessed 9/18/2021, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2184738 EE Member nations of the WTO are the following countries:WTO no date – see the list in the doc https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/org6_e.htm~~#collapseI Violation: they read JordanVote neg:1~ Limits – you can pick anything from Israel to India to North Korea and there's no universal DA since each state has a different political situation – it explodes neg prep and leads to random state of the week affs which makes cutting stable neg links impossible – limits key to reciprocal engagement since they create a caselist for neg prep2~ TVA – read the aff as an advantage to a whole rez aff. We don't prevent new FWs, mechanisms, or advantages. PICs don't solve – it's absurd to say neg potential abuse justifies the aff being flat out not T, which leads to a race towards abuse. | 9/25/21 |
Sept-Oct - T-WTOTournament: Loyola | Round: 2 | Opponent: Portola AS | Judge: Nathan Russell Interp: The aff must defend action by the member nations of the WTOWTO member nations are the following countries:WTO no date – see the list in the doc https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/org6_e.htm~~#collapseI Violation: their aff is the United StatesVote neg for predictable limits – their aff justifies just eviscerating words in the topic which destroys any predictable basis of neg prep. There's no non-arbitrary way to choose which words aren't changeable under their interp which means today they can read X country, tomorrow they can talk about movie copyright law, and next weekend they can reduce military aid or anything else they want. Voter for fairness and education.Topicality should be a voting issue evaluated through competing interpretations—reasonability invites arbitrary judge intervention that takes the debate out of the hands of the debaters. Pre-round prep has already been skewed which means the only remedy is to drop the debater. | 9/4/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
9/4/21 | advaychandra22@bishopscom |
| |
9/5/21 | advaychandra22@bishopscom |
| |
9/25/21 | advaychandra22@bishopscom |
|