Bergen County Kim Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loyola | 1 | Brookfield East DJ | Sinha, Abhinav |
|
|
| |
| Loyola | 4 | Solebury LM | Georges, Joseph |
|
|
| |
| Loyola | 6 | Tays KM | Clough, Zac |
|
|
| |
| Loyola | Triples | Academy Of Classical Christian Studies JM | panel |
|
|
| |
| Loyola | Doubles | Strake Jesuit JX | panel |
|
|
| |
| any | Finals | any | any |
|
| ||
| any | Finals | any | any |
|
| ||
| any | Finals | any | any |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Loyola | 1 | Opponent: Brookfield East DJ | Judge: Sinha, Abhinav 1ac - whole rez kant |
| Loyola | 4 | Opponent: Solebury LM | Judge: Georges, Joseph 1ac - libertarianism |
| Loyola | 6 | Opponent: Tays KM | Judge: Clough, Zac 1ac - covid whole rez |
| Loyola | Triples | Opponent: Academy Of Classical Christian Studies JM | Judge: panel 1ac - kant |
| Loyola | Doubles | Opponent: Strake Jesuit JX | Judge: panel 1ac - korsgaard |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
Tournament: | Round: | Opponent: | Judge: | 9/6/21 |
0 - ContactTournament: any | Round: Finals | Opponent: any | Judge: any I prefer email, but facebook works too. | 9/4/21 |
0 - DebateDrillsTournament: any | Round: Finals | Opponent: any | Judge: any | 8/25/21 |
0 - Wiki GlitchesTournament: any | Round: Finals | Opponent: any | Judge: any if not, please contact me for disclosure | 9/5/21 |
1 - neg interps are counterinterps, no rvisTournament: Loyola | Round: 1 | Opponent: Brookfield East DJ | Judge: Sinha, Abhinav | 9/4/21 |
1 - new affs badTournament: Loyola | Round: 4 | Opponent: Solebury LM | Judge: Georges, Joseph Fairness matters – debate is a competitive activity, the better debater should win Drop the debater Competing interps – reasonability is vague and arbitrary No rvis | 9/5/21 |
2 - utilitarianismTournament: Loyola | Round: 1 | Opponent: Brookfield East DJ | Judge: Sinha, Abhinav 1 Actor specificity: A Governments must aggregate since every policy benefits some and harms others, which also means side constraints freeze action. B States lack wills or intentions since policies are collective actions. Actor-specificity comes first since different agents have different ethical standings. Takes out util calc indicts since they’re empirically denied and link turns them because the alt would be no action. 2 Util is a lexical pre-requisite to any other framework – Threats to bodily security and life preclude the ability for moral actors to effectively utilize and act upon other moral theories since they are in a constant state of crisis that inhibit the ideal moral conditions which other theories presuppose – so, util comes first and my offense outweighs theirs under their own framework. 3 Weighability – only consequentialism explains degrees of wrongness—if I break a promise to meet up for lunch, that is not as bad as breaking a promise to take a dying person to the hospital. Only the consequences of breaking the promise explain why the second one is much worse than the first. Intuitions outweigh—they’re the foundational basis for any argument and theories that contradict our intuitions are most likely false even if we can’t deduce why. 4 No act-omission distinction—governments are responsible for everything in the public sphere so inaction is implicit authorization of action: they have to yes/no bills, which means everything collapse to aggregation. 5 No intent-foresight distinction – If we’re knowledgeable about the consequence of an action then we calculate that into our intention because we could always decide not to act. Thus means based theories devolve to util. 6 Epistemic modesty - Substantively true since it maximizes the probability of achieving net most moral value—beating a framework acts as mitigation to their impacts but the strength of that mitigation is contingent. 7 Extinction outweighs under any framework | 9/4/21 |
so - econ daTournament: Loyola | Round: 1 | Opponent: Brookfield East DJ | Judge: Sinha, Abhinav Biotech is resilient and fundamentals are strong – but this trend relies on innovation and investment Pharma collapses without strong IP protections Biopharmaceutical research is the bedrock of our economy – even minor reductions in income result in mass unemployment and butterfly effects Bipoharma collapse causes economic meltdown – it’s far worse than previous recessions Extinction | 9/4/21 |
so - midterms daTournament: Loyola | Round: 6 | Opponent: Tays KM | Judge: Clough, Zac The plan is unpopular-~--it’s seen as soft on China. China is the key for the midterms-~--Senate control hinges on it. GOP control of the Senate will be used to usher in a new wave of Trumpism, crushing democracy. Extinction | 9/5/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
9/4/21 | akimender@gmailcom |
| |
9/5/21 | akimender@gmailcom |
| |
9/5/21 | akimender@gmailcom |
| |
9/6/21 | akimender@gmailcom |
|