American Heritage Broward Wong Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any | 1 | Any | Any |
|
|
| |
| Mid America CupValley | 2 | Scarsdale DH | Hertzig, Chetan |
|
|
| |
| Mid America CupValley | 4 | Harker MK | Holden Bukowsky |
|
|
| |
| Mid America CupValley | 6 | Scarsdale JT | Delon Fuller |
|
|
| |
| Tradition | 3 | Lake Highland Prep HL | Mirani, Dhruvi |
|
|
| |
| Tradition | 2 | Lake Highland Prep KS | Prince, Glenn |
|
|
| |
| Woodward | 2 | Immaculate Heart Fleming | Rosas, Yardley |
|
|
| |
| Woodward | 4 | Little Rock Central Chakraborty | Pittman, Phoenix |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Any | 1 | Opponent: Any | Judge: Any Ignore |
| Mid America CupValley | 2 | Opponent: Scarsdale DH | Judge: Hertzig, Chetan AC - Kant NC - Kant K Offense Turns 2N - K 2AR - Case |
| Mid America CupValley | 4 | Opponent: Harker MK | Judge: Holden Bukowsky AC - Whistleblowers Adv Uniformity Adv NC - Scandals K Colonialism K Case 2N - Scandals K 2AR - Scandals K |
| Mid America CupValley | 6 | Opponent: Scarsdale JT | Judge: Delon Fuller AC - Kant Shell Offense NC - Kant K Shell Offense Case 2N - Kant K Shell 2AR - Shell Kant K |
| Tradition | 3 | Opponent: Lake Highland Prep HL | Judge: Mirani, Dhruvi AC - Non Domination AC |
| Tradition | 2 | Opponent: Lake Highland Prep KS | Judge: Prince, Glenn AC - pettit |
| Woodward | 2 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart Fleming | Judge: Rosas, Yardley ac - china ac |
| Woodward | 4 | Opponent: Little Rock Central Chakraborty | Judge: Pittman, Phoenix ac - racial cap |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - contactTournament: Any | Round: 1 | Opponent: Any | Judge: Any Pronouns: she/her If there's anything I don't meet just message me before round so we can have a substantive debate. | 9/24/21 |
g -- k -- kantTournament: Mid America CupValley | Round: 2 | Opponent: Scarsdale DH | Judge: Hertzig, Chetan Kant is bad1. Inclusion – It's bad for inclusion:A) it's ableist.Ryan 11, Intro to ethics @ Birmingham University Phil 140; "Cognitive Disability, Misfortune, and Justice"; Jan 17; http://parenethical.com/phil140win11/2011/01/17/group-3-cognitive-disability-misfortune-and-justice-deontology-ryan/ B) It's homophobic. This isn't an ad hominem but the logical conclusion of his philosophy. Being gay is a contradiction in conception, since if everyone had homosexual intercourse, their would be no reproduction. Kant believes this is sex without function, requires sacrificing rational agency for the subordinate end of pleasure.Alan Soble, American philosopher and author of several books on the philosophy of sex. He taught at the University of New Orleans from 1986 to 2006. He is currently Adjunct Professor of philosophy at Drexel University in Philadelphia, Kant and Sexual Perversion, The Monist 86:1 (Jan. 2003), pp. 55-89, https://philpapers.org/archive/SOBKAS /AHS PB C) Kantianism is anti-Black racism – not his personal views, but his transcendental philosophy depends on the character and capacity individuals have for moral reasoning. Black people may have value, but they lack moral worth and the character necessary for rational moral thought in Kant's critical philosophy. Kantianism denies Black, Brown, and Indigenous humanity for white superiority. Eze 97,Eze—1997 (Emmanuel, Professor of Philosophy @DePaul University, "The Color of Reason" in PostColonial African Philosophy: A Critical Reader ~Cambridge: Blackwell Publishing, 1997~, 103-131 Accessibility 1stAccessibility comes first –1. It's a pre-requisite – in order for us to debate a) we have to feel safe and not exclude anyone from the discussion through justifying things like their death or triggering them and b) driving people out of the space prevents any debate from happening in the future which means all other benefits can only be achieved by first maintaining the accessibility of the space.2. Proximity – The judge's most proximal obligation as an educator is to ensure the safety and accessibility of the debate space which outweighs on intrinsicness to the nature of the role of the judge.3. Dropping out – People don't drop out of debate because it's unfair or uneducational but they do drop out when the space becomes too violent or inaccessible – empirically proven by an increase in Non-T affs and participation despite people considering them to be unfair.They read morally repugnant arguments. The judge has a proximal obligation to ensure inaccessible practices don't proliferate. Accessibility is a voting issue since all aff arguments presuppose that people feel safe in this space to respond to them. | 9/25/21 |
g -- nd -- utilTournament: Tradition | Round: 2 | Opponent: Lake Highland Prep KS | Judge: Prince, Glenn The standard is maximizing expected well-being. – we will spec – Hedonistic act UtilitarianismPrefer:1~ Actor specificity:A~ Governments must aggregate since every policy benefit some and harms others, which also means side constraints freeze action.B~ States lack wills or intentions since policies are collective actions. Actor-specificity comes first since different agents have different ethical standings. Link turns calc indites because the alt would be no action.2~ Lexical Prerequisite – suffering creates lifelong conditions and threats on life that preclude the ability of actors being able to engage in other ethical evaluations since they are in a constant state of crisis.3~ TJF – Ethical frameworks must be theoretically legitimate. All frameworks are functionally topicality interpretations of the word ought so they must theoretically justified. Prefer our standard – a~ Ground: Both debaters are guaranteed access to ground – Aff gets plans and advantages, while Neg gets disads and counterplans. Additionally, anything can function as an impact as long as an external benefit is articulated, so all your offense applies. b~ Weighing ground: consequences lets us weigh the probability a scenario, its risk, scope, severity, etc. and we can even weigh between these standards. We can still run side constraints but they are compared to other impacts while other frameworks prevent weighing by making them absolute. Ow on resolvability because if there is framing mechanism that we don't know what offense matters. That's an independent voter: because the judge literally cannot make a decision.4~ Extinction outweighs –a~ Moral Uncertainty and Magnitude –Pummer 15 ~Theron, Junior Research Fellow in Philosophy at St. Anne's College, University of Oxford. "Moral Agreement on Saving the World" Practical Ethics, University of Oxford. May 18, 2015~ AT b~ Forecloses future improvement – we can never improve society because our impact is irreversiblec~ Turns suffering – mass death causes suffering because people can't get access to resources and basic necessitiesd~ Moral obligation – allowing people to die is unethical and should be prevented because it creates ethics towards other peoplee~ Objectivity – body count is the most objective way to calculate impacts because comparing suffering is unethical | 11/14/21 |
jf -- cp -- plagiarismTournament: Woodward | Round: 4 | Opponent: Little Rock Central Chakraborty | Judge: Pittman, Phoenix | 3/19/22 |
jf -- cp -- wolfTournament: Woodward | Round: 2 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart Fleming | Judge: Rosas, Yardley | 3/19/22 |
jf -- k -- academyTournament: Woodward | Round: 4 | Opponent: Little Rock Central Chakraborty | Judge: Pittman, Phoenix | 3/19/22 |
jf -- k -- orientalismTournament: Woodward | Round: 2 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart Fleming | Judge: Rosas, Yardley | 3/19/22 |
nd -- cp -- pandemicTournament: Tradition | Round: 2 | Opponent: Lake Highland Prep KS | Judge: Prince, Glenn Public health emergency CPCP Text: Just governments ought to recognize the right of workers to strike except for healthcare workers during a public health emergency. Pandemics cause extinctionMillet and Snyder-Beattie 17 Piers Millett and Andrew Snyder-Beattie, Health Security Volume 15, Number 4, 2017, https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1089/hs.2017.0028 | 11/14/21 |
nd -- da -- defense baseTournament: Tradition | Round: 2 | Opponent: Lake Highland Prep KS | Judge: Prince, Glenn Defense Industrial BaseUS Defense companies are increasing investment in innovation now but now is not the time to lower.Global data 10/7.Author at Army Technology published on 7 October 2020 ~https://www.army-technology.com/comment/us-dod-ai/~~ ahs emi Unionization and improved bargaining power destroys tech innovationBradley et al. 15 (Daniel* Incheol Kim, Xuan Tian*, last revisited August 24th 2015 *professor of the Muma College of Business Finance Department and holds the Lykes Chair in Finance and Sustainability at the University of South Florida, University of Texas - Rio Grande Valley - College of Business and Entrepreneurship, *Tsinghua University - PBC School of Finance, "Do Unions Affect Innovation?," https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2232351) RTF / recut swickle A strong defense base supports nuclear deterrenceHeritage 18 - The Heritage Foundation, Oct 4, 2018 "U.S. Nuclear Weapons Capability" ~https://www.heritage.org/military-strength/assessment-us-military-power/us-nuclear-weapons-capability~~ Accessed 3/15/19 SAO Internal Link: Russia and China are existential threats to the U.SHelprin 15 - MARK HELPRIN, National Review, June 11, 2015 "Indefensible Defense"~https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/06/indefensible-defense/~~ Accessed 3/15/19 SAO Nuke war causes mass extinction.Ward 18 - Alex Ward, Vox, updated December 26th, 2018 "This is exactly how a nuclear war would kill you" ~https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2018/10/19/17873822/nuclear-war-weapons-bombs-how-kill~~ Accessed 2/26/19 SAO | 11/14/21 |
nd -- lay ncTournament: Tradition | Round: 3 | Opponent: Lake Highland Prep HL | Judge: Mirani, Dhruvi FwkI negate the resolution resolved: a just government ought to recognize an unconditional right of workers to strike.Because the resolution questions what we ought do, I value morality.My value criterion is utilitarianism, which is to maximize expected well-being for the most amount of people.Prefer my framework.~1~ Moral choices may only be decided by which results in the net-most good.~2~ Real World: Governments predict success of policies by analyzing benefits and harms for all their constituents. Our fwk teaches students the best skills for the real world.This means you should vote negation if I prove a just government not recognizing an unconditional right of workers to strike maximizes pleasure and minimizes pain.Merriam Webster defines just as acting or being in conformity with what is morally upright or good: RIGHTEOUS.That means there would be no need for strikes if the government was just in the first place. Based on this, you can negate immediately.Overview~1~ A just government would hold companies accountable, not the workers themselves. That means there are no-instances where a just government has to allow strikes because a just government would not allow conditions that generate strikes to exist in the first place. This argument is simple – A just government wouldn't leave it up to workers to fight for themselves.~2~ Recognition alone can't solve. They haven't isolated a specific policy that ensures workers are able to strike. Just because a government doesn't intervene to prevent strikes doesn't mean they take proactive actions to prevent workers from being punished by companies for striking.~C~ We don't have to win that strikes are good or bad, we just have to win that there are some conditions to which strikes should not happen. All of the aff examples are conditional examples where certain circumstances lead to the necessity of strikes. That does not prove that strikes are unconditionally good.Police StrikesThe risk of a large-scale police strike is increasing by the minute, as officer prejudice and murder occurs daily disincentivizing police work. Wyllie 21.Doug Wyllie, March 2, 2021, "Cause and Effect: Why Attacks on Officers Appear to Be Increasing", ~https://www.policemag.com/596997/cause-and-effect-why-attacks-on-officers-appear-to-be-increasing~~ ahs ja Recut AHSJW Accessed 10/28/21 Empirically proven – police strikes cause civil unrest, murder, and economic downfall. A purge! Al Jazeera 17.Al Jazeera, 8 Feb 2017, "Brazil state faces deadly chaos amid police strike", ~https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/2/8/brazil-state-faces-deadly-chaos-amid-police-strike~~ ahs ja Recut AHSJW Accessed 10/28/21 Nurse StrikesHospital strikes lower the quality of health care by increasing mortality and readmission.Gruber and Kleiner 10 – Jonathan Gruber Samuel and A. Kleiner March 2010 "DO STRIKES KILL? EVIDENCE FROM NEW YORK STATE" ~https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w15855/w15855.pdf~~ AHSJW Accessed 10/28/21 ====Hospitals are overrun with COVID patients and understaffed. Strikes will increase mortality readmission to already overrun hospitals and prevent the ability to solve COVID.==== Economic DeclineViolent worker strikes cause economic declines in developing countries like South Africa.Tenza 20 - Mlungisi Tenza 2020 "The effects of violent strikes on the economy of a developing country: a case of South Africa" ~http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttextandpid=S1682-58532020000300004~~ AHSJW Accessed 10/28/21 Economic decline causes war – overwhelms interconnected systems and causes cascading failure.Pamlin and Armstrong 15 ~Dennis Pamlin, Executive Project Manager, Global Challenges Foundation, Stuart Armstrong, James Martin Research Fellow, Future of Humanity Institute. February 2015. "Global Challenges: 12 Risks that Threaten Human Civilization." http://www.astro.sunysb.edu/fwalter/HON301/12-Risks-with-infinite-impact-full-report-1.pdf~~ Recut AHSJW Accessed 10/28/21 NonviolenceLabor/worker strikes are violent.Nonviolent alternatives like rent, debt, shopping, and hunger strikes solve the aff.Sun 21 - Rivera Sun February 3, 2021 "These six global struggles show the power of nonviolence in action" ~https://wagingnonviolence.org/cnv/2021/02/six-global-struggles-show-power-nonviolence-in-action/~~ AHSJW Accessed 10/28/21 | 11/13/21 |
so -- kant turnsTournament: Mid America CupValley | Round: 2 | Opponent: Scarsdale DH | Judge: Hertzig, Chetan Now my offense~1~ Not having IP protections violates the categorical principle.Van Dyke 18 - "The Categorical Imperative for Innovation and Patenting" on july 17, 2018 By Raymond Van Dyke has been an intellectual and technology attorney and consultant for over 25 years, specializing in IP procurement, prosecution, IP portfolio building and management, licensing, legislative advocacy and expert witnessing. He is licensed to practice law in Washington, DC, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Texas, and the Patent and Trademark Office of the United States. He is also admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States, the Court of Appeals for the Federal, Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth Circuits, as well as the Federal Court of Claims and the Court of International Trade. For more information or to contact see his profile at Van Dyke Law. ~https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2018/07/17/categorical-imperative-innovation-patenting/id=99178/~~ ahs emi ~2~ Property is an extension of free will so it must be protected.Marks 19 - "Patent Law's Latent Schism" by Matthew G. Sipe* Frank H. Marks Visiting Associate Professor, George Washington University Law School; J.D., Yale Law School; B.A., University of Virginia. ~https://www.law.uh.edu/wipip2019/full-draft/MSipe_draft.pdf~~ ahs emi ~3~ IP is a procedural prerequisite to property rights since before one can make something their property, they must first be able to conceive of owning the property. This makes reducing IP rights equivalent to theft since taking away the products of one's mind inherently also interferes with their ability to own physical products.~4~ When one labors to create a product, using the product without their consent uses them as a mere means to an end since you're using their labor for your own benefit – any piece of IP, especially medicines, requires labor to produce making it property.~5~ Taking away intellectual property is a contradiction in conception, since if every agent was able to take the intellectual property then a~ it would no longer be property and thus would not exist making the initial act incoherent and b~ no one would make IP since there's no incentive to so there'd be no IP to steal.We have to evaluate freedom in the context of how agents interact with others.Jaeggi 2, Jaeggi, Rahel. "Alienation." Columbia University Press, cup.columbia.edu/book/alienation/Scopa. The positions of both authors can be reduced to the following common denominator: roles are less alienating than constitutive for the development of persons and personality. They are constitutive in the sense that they are directly bound up with a person's development and, so, "productive." At first glance this position might seem to come down on one side of the two alternatives—an unconditional affirmation of roles—but after giving a brief account of the position, I will make use of it to move beyond the two alternatives. Once the "productivity thesis" has been articulated, it will be possible to distinguish between alienating and non-alienating aspects of role behavior. THE HUMAN BEING AS DOPPELGÄNGER Roles are productive. In and through them we first become ourselves. This is the essence of Helmuth Plessner's conception of the positive significance of roles (which he developed as a direct response to critiques of them as alienating). "The human being is always himself only in 'doubling' in relation to a role figure he can experience. Also, all that he sees as comprising his authenticity is but the role he plays before himself and others.22 Roles on this view are not only necessary in order to make social interaction possible, whether this be a "being together" of individuals or a benign "passing each other by;" interaction mediated by roles is also constitutive of an individual's relation to herself. Under this conception of relational ethics, intellectual property must be used in a way that reflects the framers intent bc property is a self-expression of the subject.Justin Hughes 98, "The Philosophy of Intellectual Property," 77 Georgetown L.J. 287, 330-350 (1988) ~https://cyber.harvard.edu/IPCoop/88hugh2.html~~ AHSMAK recut emi Accessed 8/10/21 | 9/25/21 |
so -- scandals kTournament: Mid America CupValley | Round: 4 | Opponent: Harker MK | Judge: Holden Bukowsky Scandals KLink 1: Whistleblowing serves a regulatory function by drawing lines of appropriate conduct that end up strengthening the institutions we blow whistles against. Turns the whole case.Johnson 17 - Jamie M. Johnson University of Sheffield, European Journal of International Relations 2017 "Beyond a politics of recrimination: Scandal, ethics and the rehabilitation of violence" ~https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732620/pdf/10.1177_1354066116669569.pdf~~ Accessed 8/10/18 SAO Link 2: Scandals and leaks are used by power holders to cover up larger atrocitiesHearns 11 - Jesse Owen Hearns-Branaman, The University of Leeds Institute of Communications Studies, August 2011 "The Fourth Estate in the USA and UK" ~http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/2283/1/J_O_Hearns-Branaman_-_The_Fourth_Estate_in_the_USA_and_UK_-_.pdf~~ Accessed 8/15/18 SAO Link 3: Images of suffering fuel violenceAlford 20 - Aaron J. Alford, Medium, January 13th, 2020 "Disaster Pornography and the American Media" ~https://medium.com/@aaronjalford1/disaster-pornography-and-the-american-media-f01ee1cb4512~~ Accessed 1/30/20 SAO The alternative is to become the catalyst for symbolic disaster. Let companies hide everything from people and collapse the European Union. Voting for the worst idea creates a pure, non-referential connection.Hoofd 17 - Ingrid Hoofd, Utrecht University, 2017 "Higher Education and Technological Acceleration" ~https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/978-1-137-51409-7~~ Accessed 8/24/19 SAO The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater with the best strategy to rupture the contemporary war-machine. No Perms or Skep Triggers, my alternative breaks free from the trap of leftist cynicism while avoiding the socio-political cooption intrinsic to any permutation. Prefer my ROB because they could have read one in the 1AC but chose not to.Johnson 2 - Jamie M. Johnson University of Sheffield, European Journal of International Relations 2017 "Beyond a politics of recrimination: Scandal, ethics and the rehabilitation of violence" ~https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732620/pdf/10.1177_1354066116669569.pdf~~ Accessed 8/10/18 SAO
Prefer~1~ Revolutionary Skills: The debate should be evaluated through the flow but every argument must reject the fiction that debate should be a site for continuously bolstering the reserve labor force of corporate society by enforcing a presumption of neutrality and academic militarismHoofd 07 - Ingrid M. Hoofd, National University of Singapore, December 2007 "The Neoliberal Consolidation of Play and Speed: Ethical Issues in Serious Gaming" in "CRITICAL LITERACY: Theories and Practices Volume 1: 2, ," p. 6-14, 2007- http://www.criticalliteracyjournal.org/cljournalissue2volume1.pdf~~ KZaidi recut ahs emi ~2~ Liberation – Political reversal is a successful strategy for emancipationHolliday-Karre 11 - Erin Amann Holliday-Karre, Dissertation to receive a PhD in Philosophy from Loyola University Chicago, 2011"The Seduction of Feminist Theory" ~https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/168/~~ Accessed 1/29/20 SAO On caseNo Impact: Existing drugs, genetic variation, physical proximity, and human rationality prevent disease extinctionAdalja 16 - Amesh Adalja is an infectious-disease physician at the University of Pittsburgh, The Atlantic, June 17th, 2016 "Why Hasn't Disease Wiped out the Human Race?" ~https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2016/06/infectious-diseases-extinction/487514/~~ Accessed 9/13/21 SAO On the Framework: Util only matters under Truth testing because its an interpretation of ought. Since you didn't read truth testing it just doesn't matter. And1. Roleplaying leads to an addiction to self-projection onto the political sphere which is violent. That's Alford2. Policy-making is an attempt at ethical cleansing – debaters attempt to rationalize the violence that exists outside the space and cleanse themselves of their ethical responsibility for real action action with the simulacrum of the ballot. This is why debaters fight over concept of "justice" in the space and act as though they've actually stopped healthcare violence. This distancing of ourselves from reality is what perpetuates material violence as we feel good about ourselves and rationalize doing nothing. That's Johnson 173. Policy analysis seduces debaters into an affective attachment to material violence through the reliance on it for the next W. Every new advantage you cut gives you an adrenaline rush as you fantasize about your 1ar weighing arguments, which materializes itself in enjoyment of pain and suffering. This spectacularization of violence in the space also commodifies the material suffering of REAL PEOPLE for them to be consumed the game, just as their violence is consumed by the code. That's Alford 204. Policymakers don't care about us. They only listen to lobbyistsColonialismLink 1: The 1ACs use of extinction rhetoric as a justification for combating diseases legitimizes repression and genocide.Savage 7 - Rowan Savage, Journal of Historical Sociology, September 25th 2007 ""Disease Incarnate": Biopolitical Discourse and Genocidal Dehumanisation in the Age of Modernity" ~https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6443.2007.00315.x~~ Accessed 9/14/21 SAO Link 2: Using extinction as a motivation for action obfuscates colonialism and papers over structural violence (All Countries)Mitchell 17 - Audra Mitchell, Worldly, September 27, 2017"Decolonizing against extinction part II: Extinction is not a metaphor – it is literally genocide" ~https://worldlyir.wordpress.com/category/colonisation-and-settler-colonialism/~~ Accessed 10/19/18 SAO Refuse the Aff - Frameworks of refusal expose the complicity of debate in colonial knowledge production.Tuck and Yang 13 – Eve Tuck and Wayne Yang, Dec 19, 2013 "R-WORDS: REFUSING RESEARCH" ~http://townsendgroups.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/tuckandyangrwords_refusingresearch.pdf~~ Accessed 10/19/18 SAO | 9/26/21 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
9/25/21 | pl230142@ahschoolcom |
| |
9/26/21 | pl230142@ahschoolcom |
| |
9/26/21 | pl230142@ahschoolcom |
| |
11/13/21 | pl230142@ahschoolcom |
| |
11/14/21 | pl230142@ahschoolcom |
| |
3/19/22 | pl230142@ahschoolcom |
| |
3/19/22 | pl230142@ahschoolcom |
|