| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contact info | Finals | XX | XX |
|
|
| |
| Falcon | 4 | xx | xx |
|
|
| |
| Harvard | 6 | xx | xx |
|
|
| |
| Harvard | 1 | Plano East VR | Daou, Jack |
|
|
| |
| UPENN | 3 | Harrison TB | Ambrose, Milachi |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Contact info | Finals | Opponent: XX | Judge: XX Na |
| Falcon | 4 | Opponent: xx | Judge: xx 1ac - stock 1nc - K |
| Harvard | 6 | Opponent: xx | Judge: xx 1ac - Mining |
| Harvard | 1 | Opponent: Plano East VR | Judge: Daou, Jack 1ac - Soko NC - T T K |
| UPENN | 3 | Opponent: Harrison TB | Judge: Ambrose, Milachi 1ac - Regs 1nc - k |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
Contact InfoTournament: Contact info | Round: Finals | Opponent: XX | Judge: XX Hmu before round if you have any questions or need to clarify anything (trigger warnings, pronouns, etc) | 2/12/22 |
Harvard R1Tournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Plano East VR | Judge: Daou, Jack Interp – Unjust refers to a negative action – it means contrary. Violation – The Aff is a positive action – it creates a new concept for Space i.e the institution of a ban 1 Predictable Limits – The 1ac explodes negative prep burdens insofar as they can institute literally any action that would decrease the use of private space - 2 Ground – wrecks Neg Generics – we can’t say appropriation good since the 1AC can create new views on Outer Space Property Rights that circumvent our Links 3 TVA – just defend that space appropriation is bad. Drop the Debater – A) it’s the only way to deter abuse B) the entire round is now skewed which means that the aff should be punished . Use Competing Interps – A Reasonability is arbritrary B Reasonability invites arbitrary judge intervention which the neg cant prep out No RVI’s - A Forces the 1NC to go all-in on Theory which kills substance education, B Encourages Baiting since the 1AC will purposely be abusive, and C Illogical – you shouldn’t win for not being abusive. OFF It applies to “entities”– Outweighs their evidence – it tells us what to do with indefinite singulars, whereas theirs assumes indefinite singulars can only mean one thing. Standards: 1 Jurisdiction – that’s an independent voter and outweighs insofar as the judge cant vote aff if they didn’t affirm the resolution 2 Limits and ground – The aff can spec out any one of infinite different potential private entities that can explore space, which is only supercharged by the ability to read combinations of different entities That’s a major skew in the round – the 1ac gets infinite prep to defend their case whereas the NC is reactive, I cant predict all the possible affirmatives, especially when they can be made specifically so that they can avoid different types of generics 3 tva – just read your aff as an advantage under a whole adv, solves all ur offenfse since I can read normal means evidence OFF The neg begins at the question of deviancy Queerness is not a static identity but rather a result of information and norms that circulate to constantly produce new areas of deviance from contingent discursive formations that continually seek to eliminate that which escapes them We are the others that live outside the ethical grammars of society, outside the constraints of what civil society can or wishes to rationalize or understand. No matter how liberal the 1ac may attempt to be, there will always be the production of new lines of deviancy in which beings are subject to violence The modulation and surveillance of affect via the attempt to rationalize and control social forces for the purpose of securitizing the future produces hierarchical binaries that justify violence against deviant bodies and foreclose possibilities for new liberatory becomings Queerness situates itself within the position of death – what we face now is not just the question of constant physical violence, but the constant attempt of queer erasure, the attempt to brutalize and destroy every aspect of the queer body and queer existence The alternative is to embrace the model of the Queer Suicide Bomber - The ultimate figure of anti normativity that disrupts the discursive apparatuses – rather than the assumption of stable identity – the QSB obliterates the conception of the human subject in favor of a full embrace of affect – a move towards assemblage that enables the queer becoming The role of the ballot is vote for the debater who best embraces Illegibility – a rejection of the enforcement of traditional structures of knowledge in favor of new forms of knowledge Case Plan gets circumvented – empirics prove. Circumvention waters down enforcement Adv The construction of a deviant threat is the mechanism by which war is able to occur and anti queer violence is justified Debris collision is so unlikely, we don’t even need to remove debris No escalation from satellite destruction Nuclear winter would only last a year or two due to rainout – no extinction. | 3/31/22 |
Harvard r6Tournament: Harvard | Round: 6 | Opponent: xx | Judge: xx | 3/31/22 |
K - Death DriveTournament: UPENN | Round: 3 | Opponent: Harrison TB | Judge: Ambrose, Milachi The thesis of the negative begins with the question of enjoyment, within the entrance into the symbolic order individuals sacrifice of imaginary wholeness, producing a loss constitutive of their entire subjectivity. It is this experience that marks the beginnings of the death drive, the lost object is the ultimate symbol of enjoyment, and it is within the endless pursuit of the imaginary object A that we lend coherence to our identity – to reproduce the feeling of loss that constitutes their subjectivity, individuals engage in acts of violence self destruction in a masochistic attempt to maintain enjoyment and satisfaction. It is this drive that ensures infinite error replication and serves as a fundamental barrier to any true progress Emancipatory politics centered around opposition are destined to fail as they fail to consider how the very structures they revolt against lend to their coherence – the good ideal society is only defined by the structures that oppose it Within the entrance into the chaotic and self-contradictory symbolic order, the subject sacrifices a sense of wholeness in order to develop its coherency. This loss that constitutes subjectivity shapes the interactions between the other, what arises in these interactions is paranoid scapegoating. In order to stabilize the inherent unstable nature of social interaction, we blame our constitutive loss apon the existence of a singular subject, an overriding authority that organizes the formations of power that exist today – this scapegoating provides the foreground for targeted violence of the other. Emancipatory politics centered around this will never be capable of providing true recourse for subjects – it deprives agency and leads to a never ending conflict between the self and the scapegoated other. Politics of making demands falls into the repetition of enjoyment. Interrogating affective investment in movements is key to articulating political desires. White racial identity structures its coherence through conjuring images of mythic enjoyment experienced by racial minorities; consequently, they become the objects of the surveillance of white racial gaze, objects whose excessive enjoyment must be curtailed, with spectacular violence of necessary. No Link Turns or Perms: The aff is an obsessed attempt to satisfy the big other by remaining interpassive—their determination of how to be the best cog is mere intellectual masturbation locking in domination and violence—they cant say why this is good because it is just their libidinal economy demands this stimulation Their form of politics makes things worse and sustains a bad relationship to the death drive, ensuring the extinction of humanity. An embrace of the death drive entails an outright rejection of the 1acs demands, rather than the attempt to move towards a new future we must center the discussion on the loss that constitutes our subjectivity – only through this rejection and a focus on the impossibility of the lost object can we reposition our enjoyment to serve in ways that provide true possibilities for freedom and recourse The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best engages in psychoanalytic interrogation Reality is only a guise to ensure what we see is what we want to see and is shaped by the pleasure principle – a prior psychoanalytical interrogation is key to understand reality. Case Plan gets circumvented – empirics prove. Circumvention waters down enforcement | 3/31/22 |
K - PuarTournament: Falcon | Round: 4 | Opponent: xx | Judge: xx The role of the ballot is vote for the debater who best embraces Illegibility – a rejection of the enforcement of traditional structures of knowledge in favor of new forms of knowledge The neg begins at the question of deviancy Queerness is not a static identity but rather a result of information and norms that circulate to constantly produce new areas of deviance from contingent discursive formations that continually seek to eliminate that which escapes them No matter how liberal the 1ac may attempt to be, there will always be the production of new lines of deviancy in which beings are subject to violence We are the others that live outside the ethical grammars of society, outside the constraints of what civil society can or wishes to rationalize or understand. The 1ac attempts to impose calculative rationality on ever changing social forces that constantly elude our conceptions of rationality – this imposition for the purpose of calculating risk creates hierarchies of normalization that justify the discipling and elimination of deviant bodies Queerness situates itself within the position of death – what we face now is not just the question of constant physical violence, but the constant attempt of queer erasure, the attempt to brutalize and destroy every aspect of the queer body and queer existence The discursive construction of otherization is the lifeblood on which capitalism thrives on – the systems of exploitation are but a reflection of the inner logics of hierarchy in the sqo Vote negative to affirm the Queer Suicide Bomber. The ultimate figure of anti normativity that disrupts the discursive apparatuses – rather than the assumption of stable identity – the QSB obliterates the conception of the human subject in favor of a full embrace of affect – a move towards assemblage that enables the queer becoming Case No Ozone Impact. No impact – the tipping point is 12 degrees and inevitable human adaption solves. No impact to Acidification – Historic fluctuations were much more, dissolves as bicarbonate, and doesn’t destroy marine life. Not existential – keystone species substitution. | 2/12/22 |
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
3/31/22 | vikzrox@gmailcom |
|