| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkeley | 2 | Archbishop Mitty AA | Kotapati, Saketh |
|
|
| |
| Berkeley | 4 | Monta Vista YS | Canyon, Dylan |
|
|
| |
| Berkeley | 5 | Westlake AC | Dandu, Keshav |
|
|
| |
| Grapevine | 3 | Round Rock SV | Agler |
|
|
| |
| Grapevine | 2 | Dulles NJ | Shaw, Andrew |
|
|
| |
| Grapevine | 5 | Stephen F Austin VG | Ribera, Claudia |
|
|
| |
| UT | 1 | Sebastian Bourbon | Truman Le |
|
|
| |
| XX Contact Info | Finals | xx | xx |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley | 2 | Opponent: Archbishop Mitty AA | Judge: Kotapati, Saketh AC - PTD |
| Berkeley | 4 | Opponent: Monta Vista YS | Judge: Canyon, Dylan AC- whole rez |
| Berkeley | 5 | Opponent: Westlake AC | Judge: Dandu, Keshav AC - SetCol |
| Grapevine | 3 | Opponent: Round Rock SV | Judge: Agler AC- Covid NC- T CP Disad NR- T CP |
| Grapevine | 2 | Opponent: Dulles NJ | Judge: Shaw, Andrew AC- Kant NC-Util Disad Disad NR- Disad |
| Grapevine | 5 | Opponent: Stephen F Austin VG | Judge: Ribera, Claudia AC- Covid NC- T Theory Disad Covax CP |
| UT | 1 | Opponent: Sebastian Bourbon | Judge: Truman Le AC- Bio-politics |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
Contact InfoTournament: XX Contact Info | Round: Finals | Opponent: xx | Judge: xx
| 9/10/21 |
JF - CP - HotlinesTournament: Berkeley | Round: 2 | Opponent: Archbishop Mitty AA | Judge: Kotapati, Saketh Hotlines and dialogue prevent escalation. To maintain the AND and transparency measures. | 2/20/22 |
JF - Disad - China MiningTournament: Berkeley | Round: 4 | Opponent: Monta Vista YS | Judge: Canyon, Dylan Exploration of space-based AND increasing space ambitions. China terrestrial mining slipping. Growing Global Competition AND to nearly 3.4 million. REMs dominance solves the economy. Economic Development and AND foreign currency reserves. Chinese economic decline leads to all-out war – specifically over Taiwan. The biggest national AND and political power. Taiwan goes nuclear. As China’s power AND unfold again today. | 2/20/22 |
JF - Disad - InnovationTournament: Berkeley | Round: 4 | Opponent: Monta Vista YS | Judge: Canyon, Dylan The size of AND wider economic growth. Strong innovation solves extinction. If you care AND becomes plain ol’ do-goodery. Commercial space innovation stops extinction. We find ourselves AND and no defense. | 2/20/22 |
JF - Disad - InternetTournament: Berkeley | Round: 2 | Opponent: Archbishop Mitty AA | Judge: Kotapati, Saketh Hong Kong (CNN) AND disrupting a network.” SpaceX satellites are key to internet access. I don’t have AND Earth than otherwise. Internet access checks multiple existential threats. Many great civilisations AND that saves us. | 2/20/22 |
JF - T - EffectsTournament: Berkeley | Round: 2 | Opponent: Archbishop Mitty AA | Judge: Kotapati, Saketh Standards:
| 2/20/22 |
JF - Util shortTournament: Berkeley | Round: 5 | Opponent: Westlake AC | Judge: Dandu, Keshav Let us start AND ground Pettit’s theory. Thus, The standard is maximizing expected well-being. Extinction comes first under any framework. There appears to AND On What Matters) a. Gateway issue - we need to be alive to assign value and debate competing moral theories- extinction literally ends the debate on “ought”. | 2/20/22 |
T - FWTournament: Berkeley | Round: 5 | Opponent: Westlake AC | Judge: Dandu, Keshav Violation: they don’t. Resolved indicates a policy action. Definition of the AND establish by law”. Vote neg for predictable limits—post-facto topic adjustment structurally favors the aff by manipulating the balance of prep which is anchored around the resolution as a stasis point. Not debating the topic allows someone to specialize in one area of the library for 4 years giving them a huge edge over people who switch research focus ever 2 months, which means their arguments are presumptively false because they haven’t been subject to well-researched scrutiny. I can’t go for any disad, specific CPs, solvency turns, etc in order to answer the aff, you’ll just delink my offense in the 1ar. Kills neg ground since certain principles are good in the abstract; it only makes sense taking everything into context. Ground is key to fairness since equal access to arguments controls equal access to the ballot. Truth testing - you can’t vote on the case outweighs T because lack of preparation prevents rigorous testing of the AC claims. If we win fairness we don’t have to “outweigh” other impacts. Second is switch side and idea-testing --- only a limited topic that leaves a role for the negative allows contestation and second-order testing that overcomes polarization. Switching sides forces them to scrutinize their own beliefs, which is valuable for developing and defending their own convictions more robustly. Poscher 16 Ralf Poscher, Diat the Institute for Staatswissenschaft and Philosophy of Law at the University of Freiburg “Why We Argue About the Law: An Agonistic Account of Legal Disagreement”, Metaphilosophy of Law, Tomasz Gizbert-Studnicki/Adam Dyrda/Pawel Banas (eds.), Hart Publishing. 2016. Hegel’s dialectical thinking AND to be discovered? Third is the small schools disad - under-resourced are most adversely effected by a massive, unpredictable caselist which worsens structural disparities Ballot paradox - either they want the ballot and prove the competition arguments, or they’re only here for the discussion in which case vote neg but recognize the aff’s education is valuable – proves T comes first. TVA - Paradigm –
| 2/20/22 |
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
2/20/22 | Collin_Scampgross@northlandchristianorg |
| |
2/20/22 | Collin_Scampgross@northlandchristianorg |
| |
2/20/22 | Collin_Scampgross@northlandchristianorg |
| |
9/11/21 | Collin_Scampgross@northlandchristianorg |
| |
9/11/21 | Collin_Scampgross@northlandchristianorg |
| |
9/11/21 | Collin_Scampgross@northlandchristianorg |
|