| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duke Invitational | 3 | Durham ZG | Survance, Anthony |
|
|
| |
| all | Finals | all | all |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Duke Invitational | 3 | Opponent: Durham ZG | Judge: Survance, Anthony email me |
| all | Finals | Opponent: all | Judge: all all |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - Note for DukeTournament: all | Round: Finals | Opponent: all | Judge: all | 10/3/21 |
1 - Theory - Cant Defend General PrincipleTournament: Duke Invitational | Round: 3 | Opponent: Durham ZG | Judge: Survance, Anthony Interpretation: The affirmative must not defend general principle.Violation: They do – that was on the contention.Standards:1 – Topic Education – moots topic ed because it allows debaters to recycle generic arguments.2 – Reciprocal burdens – proving a deductive argument is false only requires you win defense against one premise and proving an inductive argument is false is more difficult because of status quo bias. Our model solves because it eschews the idea that either side unilaterally carries the burden of proof, and requires both debaters to give an account of why their world is more desirable not principle.3 – Ground: It gives them the ability to shift out of all CPs by saying they don't disprove the general principle of the AFF which is bad – Good policymaking requires making comparisons between similar courses of action – saying that CPs are bad doesn't answer this because we should have to opportunity to argue that in round. CPs teach us to find the best policy possible – debate should teach us to be better decisionmakers because it's the only transferable skill to the rest of our lives, also controls the I/L to ground because they get infinite advocacies but I only get one. | 10/3/21 |
2 - K - PsychoanalysisTournament: Duke Invitational | Round: 3 | Opponent: Durham ZG | Judge: Survance, Anthony To be is to signify – the failure of linguistic signifiers to describe the Real produces repetitive drives to fill the resulting lack that is the root cause of violence and destroys politics, ethics, and the value to life. Thus, the roll of the ballot is to analyze the libidinal investments of the 1AC's politics and presentation.Ruti 14 ~Mari, English, Toronto, Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society (2014) 19, 297–314~ The aff is radical conformism—they participate in the late-capitalist project of hyper enjoyment replicating the pathological narcissism created from the demands of late capitalism. This ensures a self-destructive anxiety which prevents any dialectical addressing – turns case.Donahue 2 ~Brian Donahue, assistant professor of English at Gonzaga University. He has a Ph.D. from Purdue University, Gonzaga University, 2002 ~"Marxism, Postmodernism, Zizek", http://pmc.iath.virginia.edu/issue.102/12.2donahue.html, 2-19-2019~ The aff's international approach to the patent system is the essence of the capitalist empire. It seeks to deprive local power while bolstering the influence of the global market over them, securing its position of dominance in the world. Knezevic 07,Intellectual Property or Intellectual Poverty? Between Colonialism and Empire in the Context of AIDS and Public Health Crises Their deployment of debate is a cynical project which denies their own perverse investment in the university through an identification with their relationship to other people's relationship to the academy. This allows them to be perversely invested in the continuation of debate and the university because it allows for them to moralize about other people's investment.McGowan '4 (Todd, Assoc. Prof. of Philosophy @ Vermont U., The End of Dissatisfaction: Jacques Lacan and the Emerging Society of Enjoyment, pp. 17-18) Vote negative to embrace the lack – this entails accepting that the gap between the Symbolic and the Real is a precondition of existence and breaks down the subject's compulsive fantasy world.Ruti ~Winnicott with Lacan: Living Creatively in a Postmodern Worldby Mari Ruti, pages 356-360~ | 10/3/21 |
SO - T - BodyTournament: Duke Invitational | Round: 3 | Opponent: Durham ZG | Judge: Survance, Anthony Interp: the aff must defend the plan in addition to a method to operationalize the plan in the 1AC in the real world that is tied to the body and voice of the speaker –the 1AC prove there's no I-meet.Instead, they've mirrored the political stasis that halts the notion of real change that makes debate practical.Vote negative to promote knowledge production – their model of debate is a disembodied performance that detaches the self from the material – this proliferates the domination of hegemonic power structures. Knowledge production is a voting issue – it's the only terminal impact to debating, since our performance can change the lives of those outside the community.Campbell 97 – Fiona, members.tripod.com/FionaCampbell/speech_acts_on_problematising_empowerment.htm, 12-04-07 | 10/3/21 |
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
10/3/21 | 23bai@lexingtonmaorg |
|