| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contact Info | Finals | Me | You |
|
|
| |
| Sunvite | 2 | Ayman Badawy | Eric He |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Contact Info | Finals | Opponent: Me | Judge: You Check Cites |
| Sunvite | 2 | Opponent: Ayman Badawy | Judge: Eric He 1AC - Cap |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - Contact InfoTournament: Contact Info | Round: Finals | Opponent: Me | Judge: You | 1/8/22 |
0 - Lay DisclosureTournament: Contact Info | Round: Finals | Opponent: Me | Judge: You | 1/8/22 |
0 - NavigationTournament: Contact Info | Round: Finals | Opponent: Me | Judge: You | 1/8/22 |
JanFeb - DA - ClimateTournament: Sunvite | Round: 2 | Opponent: Ayman Badawy | Judge: Eric He AND in the numbers here, so these will need to be better understood. Warming causes extinction and turns every impact – no adaptation and each degree is worse AND This increase will also mean more pandemics, devastating storms, and uncontrollable wildfires | 1/8/22 |
JanFeb - DA - IndiaTournament: Sunvite | Round: 2 | Opponent: Ayman Badawy | Judge: Eric He AND has undertaken promotion, commercialisation and regulatory functions – which is not healthy. Mining is key – ensures India a seat at the table. AND to ensure New Delhi will at least have a seat at the table. Key to soft power AND paves the way for increased economic success in a fast-growing industry. Indo-Pak water conflicts will escalate – India holds vital position to stopping it AND related things … more flooding or there is more encroachment,” he says. India key to leading in peacekeeping and conflict mediation – means we can withstand and prevent every one of the war impacts in the AC. AND through the UN or directly as mandated by the terms of the deal. Also good for climate – means we withstand that as well AND mass-produced cost effective renewable solutions for the rest of the world. | 1/8/22 |
JanFeb - T - FiatTournament: Sunvite | Round: 2 | Opponent: Ayman Badawy | Judge: Eric He Violation: They do. Its in the plan text. Vote neg: 1 Precision – the resolution doesn’t entail an actor nor does it an action – they are definitionally not topical for even a subset of the resolution – vote them down – Key to having a stasis point – topic focus is reasonable – anything else destroys debate because we will be two ships passing in the night 2 Limits – they explode them – super Extra T and justify an infinite possible number of affirmatives and different actors – none of which are part of the res . Multiple Impacts – A Predictability – no actor or action means its impossible to have a way to predict affs on this topic means we cant engage – B Infinite Abuse – they can pick a trivially true aff which means they always win 3 TVA – don’t defend an action and use ideal theory to explain why appropriation is bad - That’s better – it promotes in-depth philosophical clash over law that’s constitutive to LD Interpretation: “appropriation of outer space” by private entities refers to the exercise of exclusive control of space. AND the Bogotá Declaration were trying to accomplish, albeit through different means.219 | 1/8/22 |
JanFeb - T - UnjustTournament: Sunvite | Round: 2 | Opponent: Ayman Badawy | Judge: Eric He Violation – The Aff is a positive action – it adds things as opposed to only taking away things i.e. it introduces a new public trust obligation. Standards – 1 Limits – making the topic bi-directional explodes predictability – it means that Aff’s can both increase non-exist property regimes in space AND decrease appropriation by private actors – makes the topic untenable. 2 Ground – wrecks Neg Generics – we can’t say appropriation good since the 1AC can create new views on Outer Space Property Rights that circumvent our Links since they can say their approach solves. TVA – just defend that space appropriation is bad. T is Drop the Debater – 1 it’s a fundamental baseline for debatability and 2 DTA illogical on T CI – 1 Topicality is a yes/no question, you can’t be reasonably topical and 2 Reasonability invites arbitrary judge intervention and a race to the bottom of questionable argumentation. No RVIs - 1 Forces the 1NC to go all-in on Theory which kills substance education, 2 Encourages Baiting since the 1AC will purposely be abusive, and 3 Illogical – you shouldn’t win for defending the topic | 1/8/22 |
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
1/8/22 | 24aggarwal@daorg |
|