| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UT | 1 | Opp | Judge |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
Demo AffTournament: UT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Opp | Judge: Judge First, discussions of justice and theories of just societies in the modern era concern themselves with the notion of equality within the social sphere May, Todd (2009). Democracy is Where We Make It: The Relevance of Jacques Rancière. _Symposium_ 13 (1): Pp 4 May, Todd (2009). Democracy is Where We Make It: The Relevance of Jacques Rancière. _Symposium_ 13 (1): P 4 The only way to avoid this pitfall is through a presupposition of equality in our politics, this creates the conditions true equality to be created. The form that this equal system takes is through a politics of antagonism towards the political, this presupposes equality and allows subjects to claim their own agency and dialogically engage amongst themselves and other subjects. Thus the standard is promoting forms of democratic agonism, this entails that we preserve the conditions of democratic dialogue and disagreement through an epistemology that starts at equality My thesis is that a right to strike would promote dialogical equality and agonism Contention 1: Democracy A right to strike would inherently preserve the ability for workers to engage in democratic dialogue in the workplace Contention 2- Agonism | 12/4/21 |
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|