| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | 1 | All | All |
|
|
| |
| University of Kentucky | 1 | Ridgewood Independent JF | Eva Lamberson |
|
|
| |
| University of Kentucky | 4 | Colonial Forge SR | Jenni Lee Buckner |
|
|
| |
| University of Kentucky | 6 | Woodrow Wilson CO | Jack Merkel |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| All | 1 | Opponent: All | Judge: All Info and Generics |
| University of Kentucky | 1 | Opponent: Ridgewood Independent JF | Judge: Eva Lamberson 1AC - COVID Innovation |
| University of Kentucky | 4 | Opponent: Colonial Forge SR | Judge: Jenni Lee Buckner 1AC - Trad Aff |
| University of Kentucky | 6 | Opponent: Woodrow Wilson CO | Judge: Jack Merkel 1AC - Evergreening |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - AccessibilityTournament: All | Round: 1 | Opponent: All | Judge: All As for my accessibility request, I have ADHD and some associated auditory processing issues that make it tough to keep up with super rapid speech. If you could slow down by 15-20 percent on analytics and anything that isn't in the speech doc that would help me out a lot. I won't run theory on you if you don't, but I will say clear if I'm having trouble understanding or keeping up with you. | 8/7/21 |
0 - Contact InfoTournament: All | Round: 1 | Opponent: All | Judge: All Number: 317-440-1758 | 8/7/21 |
0 - NavigationTournament: All | Round: 1 | Opponent: All | Judge: All | 8/7/21 |
1 - Disclosure InterpsTournament: All | Round: 1 | Opponent: All | Judge: All Interpretation: Debaters must open source all constructive positions with highlighting on the 2021-22 NDCA LD wiki after the round in which they were first read. Interpretation: Debaters must disclose round reports on the 2021-22 NDCA LD wiki for every round they have debated this season. Round reports must disclose which positions (AC, NC, K, T, Theory, etc.) were read/gone for in each speech. Interpretation: Debaters must disclose all constructive positions in cite boxes (you still must open source) on the 2021-22 NDCA LD wiki. To clarify, they can’t say check open source. Interpretation (previously read positions only): The affirmative debater must disclose which affirmative position they will be reading within 10 minutes of pairings being released or the coin flip. This includes advocacy text, framing text, advantages, and which evidence will stay the same. If the debate occurs during flight 2, disclosure should occur at least 30 minutes before the round. Interpretation (new affs only): The affirmative debater must disclose the advocacy text of their constructive if they break new within 10 minutes of pairings being released or the coin flip. If the debate occurs during flight 2, disclosure should occur at least 30 minutes before the round. Interpretation (new affs only): The affirmative debater must disclose the framing text of their constructive if they break new within 10 minutes of pairings being released or the coin flip. If the debate occurs during flight 2, disclosure should occur at least 30 minutes before the round. | 8/7/21 |
SO - 1AC - EvergreeningTournament: University of Kentucky | Round: 6 | Opponent: Woodrow Wilson CO | Judge: Jack Merkel | 9/13/21 |
SO - 1AC - TradTournament: University of Kentucky | Round: 1 | Opponent: Ridgewood Independent JF | Judge: Eva Lamberson 1ACIntroI affirm the resolution, resolved: The member states of the World Trade Organization ought to reduce intellectual property protections for medicines.First, I would like to offer a couple of definitions:The World Trade Organization describes its purpose as AND of a trademark is not required, but registering can offer additional advantages. FrameworkI value morality because the word ought in the resolution implies a moral obligation.Thus, the value criterion must be maximizing well-being for everyone.There are two main reasons for this:No one likes painful or emotionally harmful experiences, so naturally we should try to replace these things with good experiences.Things like death and oppression are intuitively bad, and effect everyone, so we should try to prevent them.In summary, if I can prove to you that reducing IP protections would have a good impact on the world, then you should vote for the affirmative in today’s debate.Contention 1 is Covid 19 Vaccine AccessibilityThere is a significant disparity between rich and poor nations on vaccination accessibility, rollout and rates. IP protections harm the ability to combat this gap in a short timeframe- sharing information is extremely important.Kumar 21 ~Rajeesh; Associate Fellow at the Institute, currently working on a project titled "Emerging Powers and the Future of Global Governance: India and International Institutions." He has PhD in International Organization from Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. Prior to joining MP-IDSA in 2016, he taught at JamiaMilliaIslamia, New Delhi (2010-11and 2015-16) and University of Calicut, Kerala (2007-08). His areas of research interest are International Organizations, India and Multilateralism, Global Governance, and International Humanitarian Law. He is the co-editor of two books;Eurozone Crisis and the Future of Europe: Political Economy of Further Integration and Governance (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014); and Islam, Islamist Movements and Democracy in the Middle East: Challenges, Opportunities and Responses (Delhi: Global Vision Publishing, 2013); "WTO TRIPS Waiver and COVID-19 Vaccine Equity," IDSA Issue Briefs; https://idsa.in/issuebrief/wto-trips-waiver-covid-vaccine-rkumar-120721~~ Justin AND , from trade-offs to pressurising, to make the waiver happen. Intellectual Property is the barrier stalling vaccines from scaling up- only the affirmative can resolve such a problemParsa Erfiani, a Fogarty Global Health Scholar at Harvard Medical School, writes in May 2021 AND to acquire the IP necessary for mRNA technologies— which is currently missing. Equitable vaccine distribution solves COVID- this study takes into account mutations and vaccine nationalism. The affirmative is saving millions of lives.Princeton University writes in August 2021 AND study strongly supports that ethical position showing that stockpiling will undermine global health." The only way to effectively end the pandemic is for everyone to get vaccinated- but Intellectual Property protections harm the ability for developing and low-income countries to get access to such technology. Voting affirmative allows for pharmaceutical companies to share their information and save countless lives from COVID.Contention 2 is InnovationHIV/AIDs prove that an IP waiver is key to creating "global public goods" that create public incentives to innovate.Hassan 21 ~Fatima; South African social justice activist and human rights lawyer. She worked on HIV/AIDS medicine access advocacy and litigation for many years with the AIDS Law Project and for the Treatment Action Campaign, clerked at the Constitutional Court of South Africa, served as special advisor to South Africa’s former minister of health and public enterprises, and is the founder and current head of the Health Justice Initiative based in Cape Town; "Don’t Let Drug Companies Create a System of Vaccine Apartheid," FP; 2/23/21; https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/02/23/dont-let-drug-companies-create-a-system-of-vaccine-apartheid/~~ Justin AND innovation, continuing to benefit only the wealthy and powerful while millions die. Pharmaceutical innovation is key to stop bioterrorism and antimicrobial resistanceCarolina Feijao, a Ph.D in biochemistry from the University of Cambridge, writes in 2020 AND health threats to an even greater extent under improved innova-tion conditions. Bioterror and biotechnology are the largest medical threat—only generating innovative drugs can prevent millions from deathBakerlee 21 Chris Bakerlee is a Ph.D. candidate studying evolutionary genetics at Harvard University and a fellow in the Council on Strategic Risks’s Fellowship for Ending Bioweapons Programs. "Mother Nature is not 'the ultimate bioterrorist' - STAT." STAT, 8 Jan. 2021, www.statnews.com/2021/01/08/mother-nature-is-not-the-ultimate-bioterrorist. ~Quality Control~ AND evolving biological risks, striving toward solutions with open eyes and moral courage. As society becomes more and more complex, the more complex our threats get. Bioterror is accelerating at never seen before rates, and in order to protect innocent lives we need the pharmaceutical industry to innovate. However, the current patent and IP system is profit driven and stops innovation from happening- only voting affirmative can solve. | 9/11/21 |
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
9/11/21 | calebsuhy19@gmailcom |
| |
9/13/21 | calebsuhy19@gmailcom |
| |
9/13/21 | calebsuhy19@gmailcom |
|