| ... |
... |
@@ -1,99
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-=TOC R2= |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
- |
| 5 |
|
-==NC== |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
- |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-===1=== |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
- |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
-====The meta ethic is to avoid ontological gap between the real and symbolic.==== |
| 14 |
|
- |
| 15 |
|
- |
| 16 |
|
- |
| 17 |
|
-====Answers the K cuz theres its impossible to bridge identity and actions==== |
| 18 |
|
- |
| 19 |
|
- |
| 20 |
|
- |
| 21 |
|
-====Ethics must begin absent signifiers==== |
| 22 |
|
- |
| 23 |
|
- |
| 24 |
|
- |
| 25 |
|
-====1~~ Ideological Paradox – aesthetic abstraction subverts itself through signifiers.==== |
| 26 |
|
-**Kim 1 **(Chang-Hee Kim, The Fantasy of Asian America: Identity, Ideology, and Desire) 2009 //Nato |
| 27 |
|
-The performative transformation of the geisha into Madame Butterfly is made possible by concealing her |
| 28 |
|
- |
| 29 |
|
-AND |
| 30 |
|
- |
| 31 |
|
-up as a pathological symptom of ideological paradox that subverts the very universal itself |
| 32 |
|
- |
| 33 |
|
- |
| 34 |
|
- |
| 35 |
|
-====2~~ Desire Paradox – Fantasy to obtain the symbolic identity fails and leads to destruction. Subjects fundamentally resist and is not concerned what the impacts.==== |
| 36 |
|
-**Kim 2 **(Chang-Hee Kim, The Fantasy of Asian America: Identity, Ideology, and Desire) 2009 //Nato |
| 37 |
|
-Gallimard’s fear of seeing Song naked is attributed to his symptomatic anxiety that he is |
| 38 |
|
- |
| 39 |
|
-AND |
| 40 |
|
- |
| 41 |
|
-want from me or what am I for those others (HRL 49) |
| 42 |
|
- |
| 43 |
|
- |
| 44 |
|
- |
| 45 |
|
-====3~~ Power Paradox – trying to explain and solve for antagonisms fail since it leaves no room for the subject to be unidentifiable which makes it stuck in a cycle of violence.==== |
| 46 |
|
-**Kim 3 **(Chang-Hee Kim, The Fantasy of Asian America: Identity, Ideology, and Desire) 2009 //Nato |
| 47 |
|
-In light of racial identification, the apparitional power of fantasy operates paradoxically with a |
| 48 |
|
- |
| 49 |
|
-AND |
| 50 |
|
- |
| 51 |
|
-fully Orientalism-free East nor the East as an authentic Western knowledge. |
| 52 |
|
- |
| 53 |
|
- |
| 54 |
|
- |
| 55 |
|
-====Thus the standard is embrace Charlie Chan’s subjectless and hauntological position==== |
| 56 |
|
- |
| 57 |
|
- |
| 58 |
|
- |
| 59 |
|
-====1~~ Inclusion – Charlie Chan is key to inspiration to expand values and inclusion which o/w since debate needs to be accessible.==== |
| 60 |
|
-**Kim 6 **(Chang-Hee Kim, The Fantasy of Asian America: Identity, Ideology, and Desire) 2009 //Nato + lydia |
| 61 |
|
-Therefore, what is at stake in a critique of Asian American identity politics is |
| 62 |
|
- |
| 63 |
|
-AND |
| 64 |
|
- |
| 65 |
|
-what my dissertation contributes to the extant scholarship of Asian American literary studies. |
| 66 |
|
- |
| 67 |
|
- |
| 68 |
|
- |
| 69 |
|
-====2~~ Lexicality – Charlie Chan is the center of Asian America which is the world we live in today, everything is defined in relation to it.==== |
| 70 |
|
-**Kim 7 **(Chang-Hee Kim, The Fantasy of Asian America: Identity, Ideology, and Desire) 2009 //Nato + Lydia |
| 71 |
|
-As a paradoxical figure of hauntology, Charlie Chan would never disappear, if not |
| 72 |
|
- |
| 73 |
|
-AND |
| 74 |
|
- |
| 75 |
|
-and permanence in American society transforms him, paradoxically, into an archetype. |
| 76 |
|
- |
| 77 |
|
- |
| 78 |
|
- |
| 79 |
|
-====3~~ Flexibility – Subjectless position deconstructs identity in pursuit of justice.==== |
| 80 |
|
-**Kim 8 **(Chang-Hee Kim, The Fantasy of Asian America: Identity, Ideology, and Desire) 2009 //Nato + lydia |
| 81 |
|
-Evidently, Asian American women scholars have attempted to unravel the dilemma via a paradigm |
| 82 |
|
- |
| 83 |
|
-AND |
| 84 |
|
- |
| 85 |
|
-full citizenship by remaining racialized, marginalized, and ghettoized from the mainstream. |
| 86 |
|
- |
| 87 |
|
- |
| 88 |
|
- |
| 89 |
|
-====Offense==== |
| 90 |
|
- |
| 91 |
|
- |
| 92 |
|
- |
| 93 |
|
-====1~~ Refuses identity distinction between Private entities and states – ~~extempt~~==== |
| 94 |
|
-2~~ resfuses disabled identity |
| 95 |
|
-3~~ coutner method to resolve ur violence |
| 96 |
|
- |
| 97 |
|
- |
| 98 |
|
- |
| 99 |
|
-====Presumption and permissibility negates – a) more often false than true since I can prove something false in infinite ways b) real world policies require positive justification before being adopted – there’s alwahys an institutional DA to going through Congress c) ought^^ ^^ means "moral obligation" so the lack of that obligation means the aff hasn’t fulfilled their burden d) resolved^^ ^^ indicates "firmly determined" which means they proactively did something, to negate that means that they aren’t resolved e) permissibility can’t affirm since then anything would be ok which would justify racism – we should be safe and do nothing. f) to negate^^ ^^ means to deny the truth of which means if the aff is false you vote neg ==== |